政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124879

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124879

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50832514 線上人數 : 782

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/124879

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124879

題名:	以德行法理學的視角論買賣契約法之誠信原則 A Virtue Jurisprudence Approach toward the Good Faith of Purchasing Contract Law
作者:	蔡立亭 Tsai, Li-Ting
貢獻者:	陳起行許政賢蔡立亭 Tsai, Li-Ting
關鍵詞:	誠信原則買賣契約德行法理學正義契約正義契約自由定型化契約公平平等 Good faith (Bona fide) Purchasing contract Virtue jurisprudence Justice Justice of contract Freedom of contract Standard form contract Fair Equality
日期:	2019
摘要:	自G. E. M. Anscombe省思康德道德義務論與道德效益論對倫理學的影響，試圖檢視古希臘倫理學對當代哲學的啟發，此倫理學理上之翻轉，亦推動法理學思考法律與道德在義務論與效益論之外的其他可能性。Lawrence B. Solum教授以德行法理學標示溯源自古希臘哲學，以人為本的理論基礎。德行法理學嘗試藉由對古希臘哲學的梳理，提煉人、法律、道德間的相互關係。在國外對德行法理學的研究仍處於初始的階段，文獻或為對裁判者德行的探討，或為對憲法理論、國家公權力介入行為的論述，以公法為重。本文認為，德行法理學需面對的挑戰來自三個方向：一為對既有義務論與效益論的檢討；二為德行法理學理論之建構，即使係回溯自古希臘哲學，相距幾千年的思想何以適用於現代？以古希臘哲學建構而成的德行法理學，與古希臘哲學間的差異性何在？三為德行法理學在司法實務中的實踐，其對法律中的道德又將如何詮釋。德行法理學的理論仍有待建構，此三個問題亦為本論文思考的內涵。在臺灣對法理學的研究以德沃金與哈特的理論與辯論為主，德行法理學仍屬於新興的領域。而德行法理學的發端為對既有理論的批判，因此本論文首先檢視康德義務論與效益論的侷限，並導引至古希臘哲學對法律、正義等的思考；進而論述法律與道德間之關聯性，藉由德沃金與哈特對原則和規則的闡述，使其與德行法理學有所對話。另，本文認為德行法理學所言之「德」，來自於生活中之實踐，此社會中的共識形塑法律內在的核心價值。臺灣民法第148條第2項即以權利義務之行使應本於誠實信用之方法，「誠實信用」或稱「誠信原則」為民法中之帝王條款，兼具有道德與法律的雙重特質。本論文以買賣契約為觀察的主體，誠實信用為交易時應秉持的德行。誠信原則的內涵，在交易當事人間之互動，以及法院的裁判中，其具體內涵不斷的補充、詮釋、再創造。在一般的商務契約，法院對當事人間交易的介入，立於被動的狀態；惟在定型化契約，契約條款既由一方當事人預先擬定，雙方或有立於不平等地位之虞，基於公平與誠信，立法者制定消費者保護法以規範之，法院對誠信原則之解釋，或亦有所不同。 Since G. E. M. Anscombe thought about how the moral deontological theory of Immanuel Kant and the moral utilitarianism have influenced Ethics, trying to find the possibility of ancient Greek philosophy to inspire contemporary philosophy. It is the overturn of Ethic theory, and is also the promotion for jurisprudence to think the other possibility except deontological theory and utilitarianism. Professor Lawrence B. Solum labeled virtue jurisprudence which was tracing back to ancient Greek philosophy, and was basing on human. The study of virtue jurisprudence was trying to find the interrelation between human, law and virtue by arranging ancient Greek philosophy. In foreign, the study of virtue jurisprudence still in preliminary, the papers might study about the virtue of judicator, and might reaserch the constitutional theory, national power, focusing on public law. I think there are three challenges in virtue jurisprudence: the first one is the criticism about deontological theory and utilitarianism; the second one is about structuring the theory of virtue jurisprudence, even though tracing back to ancient Greek philosophy, which in thousand years apart how to fit contemporary? Virtue jurisprudence was built on ancient Greek philosophy, and what is the difference between them? Thirdly, when virtue jurisprudence practice in judiciary, how it interpret morality in law. The theory of virtue jurisprudence still need to be built, and the three questions would be deliberated in my thesis. In Taiwan, the study of jurisprudence focuses on the theories and debates between Ronald Dworkin and H. L. A. Hart, virtue jurisprudence is still a new area. Virtue jurisprudence begins with critique of the original theories, hence, I will examine the limitation of Kant’s deontological theory and utilitarianism in my thesis at first, and will lead to the deliberation of law, justice and so on in ancient Greek philosophy; moreover, I will discuss the relation between law and moral. By expounding principles and rules of Ronald Dworkin and H. L. A. Hart, they will have a conversation with virtue jurisprudence. Furthermore, I think the word “virtue” in virtue jurisprudence comes from the practice of life, the social consensus built the core value of law. In Taiwan Civil Law §148II is that performing right and duty should base on honesty and credit methods, “honesty and credit” or “good faith principle” is the emperor clause in civil law, the double characteristic of moral and law in it. My thesis focuses on purchasing contract, honesty and credit will be the virtue in transaction. The content of good faith is continuing supplement, annotation, and recreation in the interaction between contract parties and in the judicial judgement. In normal commercial contract, the court interposes the parties’ transaction passive state; however, in standard form contract, the contract terms were draw up by one party in advance, both sides might in inequality, basing on fair and good faith, the legislator made Consumer protection law to rule it, and the court interpreted good faith might be different.
描述:	博士國立政治大學法律學系 102651505
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102651505
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[法律學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

沒有與此文件相關的檔案.

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋