English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50941737      Online Users : 942
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/124676
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124676


    Title: 租稅規避對高階管理者異動之影響
    The Impact of Tax Avoidance on Top Management Turnover
    Authors: 簡士鈞
    Chien, Shih-Chun
    Contributors: 郭弘卿
    簡士鈞
    Chien, Shih-Chun
    Keywords: 租稅規避
    高階管理者異動
    Tax avoidance
    top management turnover
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-08-07 15:56:10 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以2011至2016年間台灣上市櫃公司為研究對象,並以帳面有效稅率、現金有效稅率、財稅差異衡量租稅規避程度,探討租稅規避程度與高階管理者異動之關聯性。本文分別以羅吉特機率模型測試租稅規避程度對董事長與總經理異動的影響;以t檢定與MWW檢定檢驗董事長與總經理異動後對租稅規避程度的影響。實證結果顯示租稅規避程度較同業為高與董事長發生受迫性異動呈正相關,表示董事會對於董事長進行租稅規避所產生的聲譽損失、股價下跌等衍生成本,以及可能伴隨租稅規避發生的管理者操縱損益、內部控制效果下降、管理者自利行為等較為關心;而高階管理者發生異動後,租稅規避程度有反轉之現象,表示繼任者為滿足董事會的要求而改變企業的租稅策略,符合常識理論。
    This study examines the relationship between corporate tax avoidance and top management turnover. I use the public company data dated 2010 to 2016 in Taiwan and measure the degree of tax avoidance by effective tax rates, cash effective tax rates, and book-tax difference. I established Logit model to investigate the relationship between corporate tax avoidance and chairman or CEO turnover. I also established t-test and MWW to investigate the change of corporate tax avoidance after the chairman or CEO turnover. The results show that chairman of the board is more likely to turnover when firm engage in higher tax avoidance, which indicate the board are more concern about non-tax cost such as reputation and potential price drop, and other complications such as earnings manipulation, loss in internal control, and management rent diversion. Also, degree of tax avoidance will turnover after the change of the top management, which indicate that successor of the top management will follow the request of the board and change the corporate tax strategy.
    Reference: 吳嘉勳,2013,租稅法,臺北市:華泰文化。
    吳德豐,2014,企業跨國稅務風險管理─以臺灣上市櫃公司為例,國立臺灣大學臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班未出版碩士論文。
    吳德豐與謝淑美,2014,國際租稅要義與釋例:跨國投資經商 全球稅務治理,財團法人資誠教育基金會。
    李佳玲、葉穎蓉與何晉滄,2005,績效、公司治理與高階管理者離職關係之實證研究,中山管理評論,第13卷第1期:75-106。
    李馨蘋與劉清明,2007,從公司治理與企業績效之觀點看高階主管異動之因素,真理財經學報,第16期:1-21。
    林有志、邱炳雲與高茂峰,2008,更換經理人對公司經營績效之影響,會計與公司治理,第5卷第2期:1-27。
    林穎芬、祝道松與洪晨桓,2006,經濟附加價值與總經理更替之探討,當代會計,第7卷第1期:103-134。
    張力、林翠蓉、侯啟娉與馬文利,2010,所有權型態、經理人行為與總經理異動關係之實證研究,台灣管理學刊,第10卷第2期:149-169。
    郭佩文,2003,高階管理者更迭與公司績效、公司特性、與管理者特性關係之研究–以台灣上市公司為例–,朝陽科技大學財務金融系未出版碩士論文。
    陳明進與蔡麗雯,2006,財稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究,管理學報,第23卷第6期:739-763。
    陳彥霓,2003,經理人異動對公司策略及績效影響之資訊意涵,國立政治大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    陳慧玲,2004,經理人異動與董事會特性關聯性之研究,國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    楊朝旭與蔡柳卿,2003,總經理更換與相對績效評估,人力資源管理學報第3卷第1期:63-80。
    葛克昌,1977,租稅規避之研究,臺大法學論叢,第6卷第2期:167-187。
    遲銘俊,2004,董事會組成與股權結構對高階主管更迭、公司價值與績效之關聯性-以台灣上市(櫃)金融業及電子業為例,國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    Armstrong, C. S., J. L. Blouin, A. D. Jagolinzer, and D. F. Larcker. 2015. Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 60 (1):1-17.
    Armstrong, C. S., J. L. Blouin, and D. F. Larcker. 2012. The incentives for tax planning. Journal of Accounting and Economics 53 (1-2):391-411.
    Badertscher, B. A., S. P. Katz, and S. O. Rego. 2013. The separation of ownership and control and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 56 (2-3):228-250.
    Barford, V., and G. Holt. 2013. Google, Amazon, Starbucks: The rise of `tax shaming`. BBC News Magazine, May 21. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-20560359. Accessed: June 16, 2019.
    Beatty, R. P., and E. J. Zajac. 1987. CEO change and firm performance in large corporations: Succession effects and manager effects. Strategic Management Journal 8 (4):305-317.
    Chen, K. P., and C. Y. C. Chu. 2005. Internal control versus external manipulation: A model of corporate income tax evasion. Rand Journal of Economics 36 (1):151-164.
    Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin. 2010. Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics 95 (1):41-61.
    Christensen, D. M., D. S. Dhaliwal, S. Boivie, and S. D. Graffin. 2015. Top management conservatism and corporate risk strategies: Evidence from managers` personal political orientation and corporate tax avoidance. Strategic Management Journal 36 (12):1918-1938.
    Chyz, J., F. B. Gaertner, A. Kausar, and L. Watson. 2019. Overconfidence and corporate tax policy. Review of Accounting Studies Forthcoming. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2408236. Accessed: June 16, 2019.
    Chyz, J. A. 2013. Personally tax aggressive executives and corporate tax sheltering. Journal of Accounting and Economics 56 (2-3):311-328.
    Chyz, J. A., and F. B. Gaertner. 2018. Can paying "too much" or "too little" tax contribute to forced CEO turnover? Accounting Review 93 (1):103-130.
    Coughlan, A. T., and R. M. Schmidt. 1985. Executive-compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical-investigation. Journal of Accounting & Economics 7 (1-3):43-66.
    Crocker, K. J., and J. Slemrod. 2005. Corporate tax evasion with agency costs. Journal of Public Economics 89 (9-10):1593-1610.
    Dahya, J., J. J. McConnell, and N. G. Travlos. 2002. The Cadbury Committee, corporate performance, and top management turnover. Journal of Finance 57 (1):461-483.
    Davidson III, W. N., D. L. Worrell, and L. Cheng. 1990. Key executive succession and stockholder wealth: The influence of successorys origin, position, and age. Journal of Management 16 (3):647-664.
    Denis, D. J., and D. K. Denis. 1995. Performance changes following top management dismissals. The Journal of Finance 50 (4):1029-1057.
    Denis, D. J., D. K. Denis, and A. Sarin. 1997. Ownership structure and top executive turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 45 (2):193-221.
    Desai, M. A., and D. Dharmapala. 2006. Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics 79 (1):145-179.
    ———. 2009a. Earnings management, corporate tax shelters, and book-tax alignment. National Tax Journal 62 (1):169-186.
    ———. 2009b. Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (3):537-546.
    Desai, M. A., A. Dyck, and L. Zingales. 2007. Theft and taxes. Journal of Financial Economics 84 (3):591-623.
    Dyreng, S. D., M. Hanlon, and E. L. Maydew. 2008. Long-run corporate tax avoidance. Accounting Review 83 (1):61-82.
    ———. 2010. The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. Accounting Review 85 (4):1163-1189.
    Eitzen, D. S., and N. R. Yetman. 1972. Managerial change, longevity, and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1):110-116.
    Frank, M. M., L. J. Lynch, and S. O. Rego. 2009. Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. Accounting Review 84 (2):467-496.
    Friedman, S. D., and H. Singh. 1989. CEO succession and stockholder reaction: The influence of organizational context and event content. Academy of Management Journal 32 (4):718-744.
    Graham, J. R., M. Hanlon, T. Shevlin, and N. Shroff. 2013. Incentives for tax planning and avoidance: Evidence from the field. The Accounting Review 89 (3):991-1023.
    Graham, J. R., and A. L. Tucker. 2006. Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics 81 (3):563-594.
    Grusky, O. 1963. Managerial succession and organizational-effectiveness. American Journal of Sociology 69 (1):21-31.
    Gupta, S., and K. Newberry. 1997. Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16 (1):1-34.
    Hanlon, M., and S. Heitzman. 2010. A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3):127-178.
    Hanlon, M., and J. Slemrod. 2009. What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics 93 (1-2):126-141.
    Harrison, J. R., D. L. Torres, and S. Kukalis. 1988. The changing of the guard: Turnover and structural-change in the top-management positions. Administrative Science Quarterly 33 (2):211-232.
    Huson, M. R., P. H. Malatesta, and R. Parrino. 2004. Managerial succession and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 74 (2):237-275.
    Huson, M. R., R. Parrino, and L. T. Starks. 2001. Internal monitoring mechanisms and CEO turnover: A long-term perspective. Journal of Finance 56 (6):2265-2297.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4):305-360.
    Kang, J. K., and A. Shivdasani. 1995. Firm performance, corporate governance, and top executive turnover in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics 38 (1):29-58.
    Kaplan, S. N. 1994. Top executive rewards and firm performance: A comparison of Japan and the United States. Journal of Political Economy 102 (3):510-546.
    Lausten, M. 2002. CEO turnover, firm performance and corporate governance: Empirical evidence on Danish firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization 20 (3):391-414.
    Law, K. K. F., and L. F. Mills. 2017. Military experience and corporate tax avoidance. Review of Accounting Studies 22 (1):141-184.
    Mills, L. F. 1998. Book-tax differences and internal revenue service adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (2):343-356.
    Murphy, K. J., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1993. Financial performance surrounding CEO turnover. Journal of Accounting & Economics 16 (1-3):273-315.
    Neal, C. S. 2015. Why Dennis Kozlowski`s case matters to all of us. Fox News, May 7. Available at: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/why-dennis-kozlowskis-case-matters-to-all-of-us. Accessed: June 16, 2019.
    Phillips, J. D. 2003. Corporate tax-planning effectiveness: The role of compensation-based incentives. Accounting Review 78 (3):847-874.
    Porcano, T. 1986. Corporate tax rates: Progressive, proportional, or regressive. Journal of the American Taxation Association 7 (2):17-31.
    Rego, S. O. 2003. Tax-avoidance activities of US multinational corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (4):805-833.
    Robinson, J. R., S. A. Sikes, and C. D. Weaver. 2010. Performance measurement of corporate tax departments. Accounting Review 85 (3):1035-1064.
    Slemrod, J. 2004. The economics of corporate tax selfishness. National Tax Journal 57 (4):877-899.
    Stickney, C. P., and V. E. Mcgee. 1982. Effective corporate-tax rates: The effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1 (2):125-152.
    Suchard, J.-A., M. Singh, and R. Barr. 2001. The market effects of CEO turnover in Australian firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 9 (1):1-27.
    Warner, J. B., R. L. Watts, and K. H. Wruck. 1988. Stock-prices and top management changes. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (1-2):461-492.
    Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (1-2):431-460.
    Wilson, R. J. 2009. An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. Accounting Review 84 (3):969-999.
    Zimmerman, J. L. 1983. Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5 (2):119-149.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    106353026
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1063530261
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900456
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    026101.pdf885KbAdobe PDF2116View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback