English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50799184      Online Users : 470
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124438


    Title: 少年修復式司法的批判性考察——從少年的最佳利益到利益衡平？
    A Critical Analysis of Restorative Youth Justice: From Juvenile`s Best Interests to Balanced Restorative Approach
    Authors: 謝如媛
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 少年;修復式司法;被害人參與;被害陳述;少年的最佳利益; 健全成長;責任;悔悟;社會融入;再統合
    Juvenile;Youth Offender;Youth Act;Restorative Justice;Victim Involvement;Victim Impact Statements;Best Interests;Youth Development;Responsibility;Accountability;Remorse;Social Inclusion;Reintegrate
    Date: 2018-03
    Issue Date: 2019-07-24 16:02:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 修復式司法運用於少年事件已成為刑事政策上重要議題。然而，在嚴罰化及被害人地位提升的趨勢底下，修復式司法若著重在各方利益（加害人、被害人、社區）的衡平，可能與促進少年健全成長的目的相違背。片面強調少年認錯道歉的重要性、並要求負起修復的責任，可能使得少年非行的社會經濟脈絡被忽視、掩蓋，以「究責」為目的的作法也會減損少年司法的福利色彩，並影響少年最佳利益的考量。本文從少年認錯的心理過程、少年司法應如何看待少年面對被害（人）的態度、以究責為目的並將非行責任個人化的問題點、少年的社會融合等觀點進行分析、檢討與建議，以期修復式司法在少年事件的運用能夠更謹慎而完善。
    The recent Restorative Youth Justice has become one of the most important topics of criminal policies. The Balanced Restorative Justice emphasizes that community, victim, and offender should receive balanced attention. And all three should gain tangible benefits from their interactions with the juvenile justice system. However, in the prevailing penal climate and movements of victim’s rights, the principles of restorative justice may be narrowly interpreted to give undue weight to the responsibilisation of youth offenders. The end result is that the socio-economic causes of juvenile delinquency will be obscured. This article aims to offer a critical analysis of restorative youth justice while also elaborate on the process of youth offender’s remorse, the expectation of remorse in youth court, the negative effects of giving undue weight to the responsibilisation of youth offenders, and reintegration in restorative justice theory and practices, hoping that the idea of restorative justice will be better secured.
    Relation: 法學評論, 152, 125-186
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/ 10.3966/102398202018030152003
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202018030152003
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    62.pdf2508KbAdobe PDF2260View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback