English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51579310      Online Users : 862
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124274


    Title: 情婦敘家常——PTT第三者板論述分析
    Mistresses’ Chitchat about Marriage: A Discourse Analysis on PTT Third-Person Forum
    Authors: 林薇晨
    Lin, Wei-Chen
    Contributors: 方念萱
    Fang, Nien-Hsuan
    林薇晨
    Lin, Wei-Chen
    Keywords: 情婦
    污名
    婚外情
    婚家常規
    通姦除罪化
    論述分析
    Mistress
    Stigma
    Infidelity
    Marriage norms
    Decriminalization of adultery
    Discourse analysis
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-07-01 11:14:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   基於通姦除罪化尚未完成的台灣社會情境,筆者試圖透過情婦的自述探究情婦、婚家、婚外情三者之間的關係。筆者針對PTT第三者板的情婦文章進行論述分析,並且整理出情婦的八種論述方式,其中包括三種關於情婦污名的論述:「你說……」論述、「責問」論述、「貶妻」論述,三種關於情婦實踐的論述:「指南」論述、「老掉牙」論述、「認錯」論述,以及兩種關於情婦如何看待婚家常規的論述:「認輸」論述、「共生」論述。根據這八種情婦論述方式,筆者歸納出四點:(一)情婦時時針對自己的悖德身分進行合理化與去污名化,即使在匿名網路空間依舊如此;(二)情婦習於內化已婚情人的男性視角,導致情婦實踐成為情感勞動與陰柔美德的結合;(三)情婦善於強調浪漫愛與婚家常規的連結,暗暗呼應社會大眾對於傳統親密關係的想像;(四)情婦經常開啟情婦文章與情婦文章之間的互文性,從而建構出情婦群體的支持網絡與社會認同。
      Based on the social context in Taiwan that the decriminalization of adultery is still unfulfilled, this thesis attempts to explore the relationship among mistress, marriage and extramarital affair through the mistresses’ self-reports. A discourse analysis on the articles written by mistresses in PTT Third-Person Forum is conducted, and eight patterns of the mistresses’ discourses are sorted out, including three patterns about the stigma on mistresses: “You Said…” Discourse, “Retorting” Discourse and “Wife-Degrading” Discourse, three patterns about the everyday practices of doing mistress: “Guiding” Discourse, “Cliché” Discourse and “Apologizing” Discourse, and two patterns about how mistresses perceive the marriage norms: “Surrendering” Discourse and “Coexistence” Discourse. According to these discourses, four points are summed up: (1) mistresses rationalize and destigmatize their immoral identities from time to time, even in the anonymous online space; (2) mistresses accustom themselves to internalize the male viewpoints of their married lovers, making their everyday practices a combination of emotional labor and feminine virtue; (3) mistresses prefer to emphasize the connection between romantic love and marriage norms, implicitly echoing the public imagination for conventional intimacy; (4) mistresses often unfold the intertextuality among the mistresses’ articles, thus constructing the support network for and the social identity of the mistress group.
    Reference: 1.《鏡週刊》社會組(2017.05.02)。〈【女作家之死】師生畸戀 林奕含父母為護女不提告〉,《鏡週刊》。上網日期:2018年4月14日,取自https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20170502soc008/
    2.內政部戶政司(2018)。【結婚對數、結婚率、離婚對數、離婚率】。未出版之統計數據。上網日期:2018年4月14日,取自https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15409&CtNode=3622&mp=4
    3.王志弘、許妍飛譯(2006)。《社會認同》。台北:巨流。(原書Jenkins, R. [1996]. Social Identity)
    4.王灝中(2013.10.23)。〈【想像不家庭】專題導言:毀廢再申論〉,苦勞網。上網日期:2018年4月28日,取自:http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/75991
    5.何定照、高瑟濡譯(2007)。《液態之愛:論人際紐帶的脆弱》。台北:商周。(原書Bauman, Z. [2003]. Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds)
    6.何維涓(2018.01.24)。〈鍵盤記者小心!PTT大神團隊打造台版AI記者,一天自動寫出500篇熱門鄉民新聞〉,《iThome》。上網日期:2018年10月31日,取自https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/120896
    7.吳惠林(2012)。〈我國離婚率發展之趨勢、影響及因應作法之研究〉。台北:內政部。
    8.谷風出版社編輯部譯(1989)。《家庭、私有制和國家的起源》。台北:谷風。(原書Engels, F. [1884]. Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigenthums und des Staats: im Anschlub an Lewis H. Morgan`s Forschungen)
    9.周素鳳譯(2001)。《親密關係的轉變:現代社會的性、愛、慾》。台北:巨流。(原書Giddens, A. [1992]. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies)
    10.林奕含(2015)。〈進學解〉。上網日期:2017年5月3日,取自https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20160411065134/http://yihan28tw.pixnet.net:80/blog/post/42558737
    11.林奕含(2017)。《房思琪的初戀樂園》。台北:游擊文化。
    12.邱瑞鑾譯(2015)。《第二性》。台北:貓頭鷹。(原書Beauvoir, S. D. [1949]. Le Deuxieme Sexe)
    13.洪保鎮譯(2018)。《第三者的誕生:出軌行為的再思》。台北:時報。(原書Perel, E. [2017]. The State of Affairs: Rethinking Infidelity)
    14.奚修君譯(2001)。《情婦:有關「她」的神話、歷史與詮釋》。台北:藍鯨。(原書Griffin, V. [1999]. The Mistress: Histories, Myths and Interpretations of the ‘Other Woman’)
    15.徐江敏、李姚軍譯(1992)。《日常生活中的自我表演》。台北:桂冠。(原書Goffman, E. [1956]. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life)
    16.徐錦昌(2006)。《通姦除罪化——案例研究與實證分析》。台北:五南圖書。
    17.栗筱雯譯(2007)。《婚外情的公式》。台北:大塊文化。(原書Moore, J. H. [2004]. Infidelity: Exploding the Myths)
    18.陳昭如(2010)。〈婚姻作為法律上的異性戀父權與特權〉,《女學學誌:婦女與性別研究》,27:113-199。
    19.曾凡慈譯(2010)。《污名:受損身分的管理筆記》。台北:群學。(原書Goffman, E. [1963]. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity)
    20.黃上銓(2016)。〈為什麼都有FB跟LINE了,還有人在用PTT?〉,黃厚銘(編)《婉君妳好嗎?給覺醒鄉民的PTT進化史》,頁53-74。台北:群學。
    21.黃欣柏、張文川(2017.05.19)。〈通姦除罪化 司改分組會議通過〉,《自由時報》。上網日期:2018年4月14日,取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1103532
    22.黃欣儀譯(2003)。《情與慾》。台北:匡邦文化。(原書Mary, M. [2001]. 5 Lugen, die liebe betreffend)
    23.黃厚銘(2016)。〈捕獲婉君〉,黃厚銘(編)《婉君妳好嗎?給覺醒鄉民的PTT進化史》,頁310-333。台北:群學。
    24.黃彥誠、吳柏勳、林柏均、林柏齡(2017.11.29)。〈不老的電子布告欄!PTT故障全台鄉民騷動〉,《小世界》。上網日期:2018年10月31日,取自http://shuj.shu.edu.tw/blog/2017/11/29/%E4%B8%8D%E8%80%81%E7%9A%84%E9%9B%BB%E5%AD%90%E5%B8%83%E5%91%8A%E6%AC%84%EF%BC%81-ptt%E6%95%85%E9%9A%9C%E5%85%A8%E5%8F%B0%E9%84%89%E6%B0%91%E9%A8%B7%E5%8B%95/
    25.廖彥博譯(2015)。《情婦史(上卷):從聖經、中國後宮、歐洲皇室,到殖民者情婦的故事》。台北:時報。(原書Abbott, E. [2003]. Mistresses: A History of the Other Woman)
    26.廖彥博譯(2015)。《情婦史(下卷):從納粹德國、革命中的古巴,到六〇年代情婦的故事》。台北:時報。(原書Abbott, E. [2003]. Mistresses: A History of the Other Woman)
    27.趙旭東、方文譯(2005)。《現代性與自我認同:晚期現代的自我與社會》。台北:左岸文化。(原書Giddens, A. [1991]. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age)
    28.劉志原(2017.05.18)。〈【司改放送頭】通過林奕含條款 通姦除罪化〉,《鏡週刊》。上網日期:2018年4月14日,取自https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20170518inv003/
    29.羅愛萍、王蜂譯(2018)。《夾縫中的女人》。台北:寶瓶文化。(原書Richardson, L. W. [1985]. The New Other Woman: Contemporary Single Women in Affairs with Married Men)
    30.Amato, P. R., & Previti, D. (2003). People`s Reasons for Divorcing: Gender, Social Class, the Life Course, and Adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24(5), 602-626.
    31.Atwood, J. D., & Seifer, M. (1997). Extramarital Affairs and Constructed Meanings: A Social Constructionist Therapeutic Approach. American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 55-75.
    32.Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of Conjugal Dissolution: A Cross-cultural Study. Current Anthropology, 30(5): 654-676.
    33.Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in Committed Relationships I: A Methodological Review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(2), 183-216.
    34.Burns, A. (1999). IV. Power between Women: The Constructed Otherness of ‘Other Women’. Feminism & Psychology, 9(4), 410-413.
    35.Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Valentine, B. (2013). A Critical Examination of Popular Assumptions About the Benefits and Outcomes of Monogamous Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 124-141.
    36.DePompo, P., & Butsuhara, M. (2016). The “Other” Side of Infidelity: The Experience of the “Other” Partner, Anxious Love, and Implications for Practitioners. Psychological Thought, 9(1), 41-57.
    37.Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    38.Gee, J. P. (2014). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge.
    39.James, W., & Kedgley, S. J. (1973). The Mistress. London: Abelard-Schuman.
    40.Jeanfreau, M. M., Jurich, A. P., & Mong, M. D. (2014). An Examination of Potential Attractions of Women`s Marital Infidelity. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 42(1), 14-28.
    41.Orth, P. (1972). An Enviable Position: The American Mistress from Slightly Kept to Practically Married. New York: David McKay.
    42.Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation Study of Sex, Culture, and Strategies of Human Mating. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 28, 247-275.
    43.Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak?. In Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L. (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271-313). Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
    44.Utley, E. A. (2016). Rethinking the Other Woman: Exploring Power in Intimate Heterosexual Triangular Relationships. Women`s Studies in Communication, 39(2), 177-192.
    45.Whisman, M. A., Dixon, A. E., & Johnson, B. (1997). Therapists’ Perspectives of Couple Problems and Treatment Issues in Couple Therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 361-366.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    105464015
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1054640151
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.014.2019.F05
    Appears in Collections:[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    015101.pdf2688KbAdobe PDF21026View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback