政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124233
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造访人次 : 51295155      在线人数 : 863
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/124233


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124233


    题名: 學業與職業取向的印尼語言課程設計與改善:在台灣的行動研究
    Improving the Instructional Design of an Indonesian Language Course for Academic and Occupational Purposes in Taiwan Through Action Research
    作者: 譚稱玲
    Lanasari
    贡献者: 邱美秀
    Chiu, Mei-Shiu
    譚稱玲
    Lanasari
    关键词: 印尼語
    行動研究
    課程設計
    教學科技
    Indonesian language
    Action research
    Instructional design
    Educational technology
    日期: 2019
    上传时间: 2019-07-01 11:07:18 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究採行動研究以探討在台灣學業與職業取向的印尼語言
    課程設計。透過調查學生在學習印尼語的歷程中,同時收集質性
    與量化的學業與職業取向印尼語言課程的資料。質性資料主要來
    自課堂觀察、學生回饋與深度訪談。而量化資料主要來自學生學
    習成績(例如:課堂活動、作業、測驗、期中考試、期末考試以
    及TIBA 的模擬考試)。此外,研究者透過當地印尼人對學生溝
    通技巧的評估,進行三角測量技術以降低誤差。本研究對象包括
    兩個班級,共有七名學生。第一班有三名學生(106 班)於2018
    年1 月至6 月進行課程 ; 第二班有四名學生(107 班)於2018
    年7 月至12 月進行課程。本研究結果如下:教師身兼研究者可
    以更深入地了解學生,並通過行動研究了解學生需求,進而有效
    地解決並改進問題、關於教學設計的改進包括:(1)創造更多
    與印尼人進行對話練習的機會(2)創建具有不同難度級別作業
    讓學生練習(3)製造線上印尼語對照中文字典。以及,學生們
    在學業成績皆有進步。
    This proposed study takes an action research approach to explore and examine the instructional design of an Indonesian language course for academic and occupational purposes in Taiwan, and then outline the modified/improved
    instructional design of Indonesian language courses in the future according to the action research results in this study. In addition, this study also intends to investigate the students` academic achievement in Indonesian language learning. This study collected data, both quantitative and qualitative data, from Indonesian language classes for academic and occupational purposes taught by the teacher-researcher. The qualitative data was obtained from class observation, students` feedback, an in-depth interview with students. Meanwhile, the quantitative data was derived from students` academic performances (e.g., in-class activities,
    assignments, quizzes, mid-term exam, final exam, and the MOCK test of TIBA). In addition, the teacher-researcher obtained data from several Indonesian people who acted as evaluators of students` communication skills. This study utilized the triangulation technique to minimize bias. Furthermore, this study also applied technology integration in the classroom to support teachers and students. The
    sample included two classes consist of a total of seven students. The first class of three students (Class 106) was carried out in January – June 2018, while the second
    class of four students (Class 107) was conducted in July – December 2018. First, the finding of this study was that the teacher-researcher could understand students more in-depth and identify their needs through action research that led to more effective problem-solving and improvements. Second, the major improvements from Class 106 to Class 107 and from Class 107 to a future class in the instructional
    design included: (1) more conversation practices with native speakers, (2) creation of optional specific assignment with different difficulty levels, (3) creation of an online Indonesian - Chinese dictionary. Third, students revealed their improvement in academic performances.
    參考文獻: Allwright, D. & Bailey, K.M. (1991). Focus on classrooms. An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Republik Indonesia. (2012, June 25). Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA). Retrieved from http://badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/lamanbahasa/info_bipa
    Borgia, Eileen T, Schuler, Dorothy. (2003). Action Research in Early Childhood Education. ERIC Digest [ED401047].
    Bums, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Chun, D. M., & Brandl, K. K. (1992). Beyond form‐based drill and practice: Meaning‐enhancing CALL on the Macintosh. Foreign Language Annals, 25(3), 255–267.
    Dick, W. (1996). The Dick and Carey model: Will it survive the decade? Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55-63.
    Galavis, B. (1998). Computers and the EFL class: Their advantages and a possible outcome, the autonomous learner. English Teaching Forum, 36(4), 27–28.
    Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
    Glanz, G. (2003). Action Research: An educational leader’s guide to school improvement. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
    Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2-11.
    Higgins, C. (1993). Computer-assisted language learning: Current programs and projects. ERIC Digest [ED355835].
    Houghton, C., Casey, D., Shaw, D., and Murphy, K. (2013). Rigour in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Researcher, 20(4), 12-17.
    Jee, M., & Park, M. (2009). Livemocha as an online language-learning community. CALICO Journal, 26(2), 448-456. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/calicojournal.26.2.448
    Johnson, R.T., & Johnson, D.W. (1986). Action research: Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Journal of Science and Children, 24(2), 31-32.
    Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Republik Indonesia. (2018, July 24). Badan Bahasa petakan 652 bahasa daerah di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2018/07/badan-bahasa-petakan-652-bahasa-daerah-di-indonesia
    Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner. Geelong, Victoria.: Deakin University Press.
    Kusmiatun, A., Suyitno, I., Widodo, H.S., & Basuki, I.A. (2017). Identifying features of Indonesian for speakers of other languages (Bipa) learning for academic purposes. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 3(4), 197-207.
    Lai, C. C., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2006). The advantages and disadvantages of computer technology in second language acquisition. National Journal for Publishing and Mentoring Doctoral Student Research, 3(1).
    Lembaga Bahasa Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia (n.d.). Indonesian proficiency tests (Tes Bahasa Indonesia sebagai Bahasa Asing/TIBA). Retreived from http://lbifib.ui.ac.id/beta/archives/category/bipa/indonesian-proficiency-test
    Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990–2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250–273.
    Mann, S. (2005). The language teacher’s development. Language Teaching, 38(3), 103–118.
    Mills, N. (2011). Situated learning through social networking communities: The development of joint enterprise, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 345-368.
    O`Donoghue, T., & Punch, K. (2003). Qualitative educational research in action. London, UK: Routledge.
    O`Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Ovando, C., Collier, V., & Combs, M. (2003). Bilingual and ESL classrooms: Teaching multicultural contexts (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
    Office of Trade Negotiations, Executive Yuan. (2016, September 5). "New Southbound Policy" Guidelines and Action Plan. Retrieved from https://www.ey.gov.tw/otnen/64C34DCA8893B06/9c560855-1ecd-4f58-9c3f-c065d9e58f89
    Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Ed.) (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London, UK: Sage Publications.
    Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.) (1999). Instructional-design theories and models, Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
    Riasati, M. J., Allahyar, N., & Tan, K.E. (2012). Technology in language education: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 25–30.
    Richey, R. C., Silber, K., & Ely, D. (2008). Reflections on the 2008 AECT definitions of the field. TechTrends, 52(1), 24–25.
    Rowland, G. (2008). Design and research: Partners for educational innovation. Educational Technology, 48(6), 3–9.
    Saddhono, K. (2016). Teaching Indonesian as foreign language in Indonesia: Impact of professional managerial on process and student outcomes. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 14, 263-266.
    Shyamlee, S. D., & Phil, M. (2012). Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis. International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture, 33, 150-159.
    Smith, L. C. (2005). The impact of action research on teacher collaboration and professional growth. In D. J. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education international perspectives (pp. 199-215). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Suparsa, I. N., Mantra, I. B. N., & Widiastuti, I. A. M. S. (2017). Developing learning methods of Indonesian as a foreign language. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 51-57.
    Totten, S. (1991). Cooperative Learning: A Guide to Research. Sills, T., Digby, A. & Ross, P. (Eds.), New York; USA, Garland Publishing.
    Vesselinov, R. & J. Grego, 2012, Duolingo Effectiveness Study, http://static.duolingo.com/s3/DuolingoReport_Final.pdf
    Walker, L. (2015). The impact of using Memrise on student perceptions of learning Latin vocabulary and on long-term memory of words. Journal of Classics Teaching, 16(32), 14-20.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育學系
    106152012
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106152012
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900010
    显示于类别:[教育學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    201201.pdf18623KbAdobe PDF2281检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈