政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124211
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113321/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51110763      線上人數 : 915
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124211


    題名: 教學支出對大學校院畢業生就業與薪資之影響:以獎勵大學教學卓越計畫為例
    The effect of instructional expenditure on college graduates’ employment and earnings: Evidence from the Plan to Encourage Teaching Excellence in Universities
    作者: 蔡咏諭
    Tsai, Yung-Yu
    貢獻者: 朱斌妤
    楊子霆

    Chu, Pin-Yu
    Yang, Tzu-Ting

    蔡咏諭
    Tsai, Yung-Yu
    關鍵詞: 高等教育
    教學支出
    畢業生薪資
    教學卓越計畫
    Higher education
    Instructional expenditure
    Graduates’ earnings
    Teaching Excellence Project
    日期: 2019
    上傳時間: 2019-07-01 11:02:37 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 高等教育經費占我國政府支出,瞭解此一花費是否能有助於大學校院畢業生之就業與薪資實乃重要課題。本論文利用教學卓越計畫作為一自然實驗,建構教學支出之外生工具變數。本論文藉由串連大學校院之財報數據以及稅務行政資料,檢驗教學支出對大學校院畢業生之就業與薪資之影響。
    研究結果發現,教學支出對畢業生就業市場表現之影響微乎其微。教育經費的投入,對畢業生的薪資與就業均不產生影響。教育資源的效果僅體現在幫助畢業生脫離低薪與貧窮的處境。整體而言,每增加10萬元的教學支出,畢業生平均每月薪資超過中位數的可能性,將提高2.83個百分點。對於來自經濟弱勢家庭的學生而言,每增加10萬元的教學支出,畢業生年總薪資超過中位數的可能性,將提高3.62個百分點。教學資源對對經濟弱勢學生的效果,是對來自相對富裕家庭學生的5.25倍。本論文的發現點出教育資源的投入或許無法廣泛地對所有學生產生正面助益,但卻能夠幫助社會中最底層的族群。
    Given the considerable amount of money spent on higher education, understanding the effects of educational investment on graduates’ future achievement is important. This thesis uses the Teaching Excellence Project as a natural experiment to generate an exogenous variation in instructional expenditure. By linking the data on higher education institutions’ expenditure as well as taxation administrative records of individual income, this thesis investigates the effects of instructional expenditure on college graduates’ employment and earnings.
    The result suggests that the effect of instructional expenditure on students’ labor market outcomes is weak. No evidence supports the expenditure effect on graduates’ earnings and employment. The educational resources effect only appears in helping individuals get rid of low income. For all graduates, increasing per-graduate instructional expenditure by 100 thousand leads to 2.83 percentage points increases in the probability of reaching the median of monthly earnings. For graduates from economically disadvantaged families, increasing per-graduate instructional expenditure by 100 thousand leads to 3.62 percentage points increases in the probability of reaching the median of annual earnings. The magnitude of effect size for disadvantaged students is 5.25 times greater than rich students. These findings imply that educational investment in higher education does not have extensively effect on all students but does benefit the underprivileged in society.
    參考文獻: Arcalean, C., & Schiopu, I. (2010). Public versus private investment and growth in a hierarchical education system. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(4), 604-622.
    Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9-49.
    Behrman, J. R., Rosenzweig, M. R., & Taubman, P. (1996). College choice and wages: Estimates using data on female twins. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 672-685.
    Bennell, P. (1998). Rates of return to education in Asia: A review of the evidence. Education Economics, 6(2), 107-120.
    Betts, J. R. (1995). Does school quality matter? Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(2), 231-250.
    Bloom, D. E., Hartley, M., & Rosovsky, H. (2007). Beyond private gain: The public benefits of higher education. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 293-308). Dordrecht: Springer.
    Bowen, H. (2018). Investment in learning: The individual and social value of American higher education. London: Routledge.
    Bowles, S. (1970). Towards an educational production function (Report No. OEC 1-7-000451-2651). Washington, D.C.: US Office of Education
    Brand, J. E., & Xie, Y. (2010). Who benefits most from college? Evidence for negative selection in heterogeneous economic returns to higher education. American Sociological Review, 75(2), 273-302.
    Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1992). Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 1-40.
    Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1996). Labor market effects of school quality: Theory and evidence. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 97-140). Washington, D.C: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1998). School resources and student outcomes. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 559(1), 39-53.
    Card, D., & Payne, A. A. (2002). School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 49-82.
    Chang, Y.-C., & Lin, T.-H. (2015). How does the expansion of higher education reproduce class inequality? The case of Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 85-128.
    Charkins, R., O`Toole, D. M., & Wetzel, J. N. (1985). Linking teacher and student learning styles with student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Economic Education, 16(2), 111-120.
    Chen, H.-h., & Zhang, G.-M. (2016). A review of the Plan to Encourage Teaching Excellence in Universities (Report No. 105-Edu-Inv-0024). Taipei: The Control Yuan.
    Cheng, Y.-F., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2017). Decision tree for investigating the factors affecting graduate salaries. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(2), 125-151.
    Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014a). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593-2632.
    Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014b). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633-2679.
    Chi, C.-H. (2008). A study on current status and influential factors of implementing the university teaching excellence program. (Unpublished master`s dissertation), National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Connolly, L. S. (1997). Does external funding of academic research crowd out institutional support? Journal of Public Economics, 64(3), 389-406.
    Dadgar, M., & Trimble, M. J. (2015). Labor market returns to sub-baccalaureate credentials: How much does a community college degree or certificate pay? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 399-418.
    Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, online publication. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
    Dee, T. S. (2005). Expense preference and student achievement in school districts. Eastern Economic Journal, 31(1), 23-44.
    Devadoss, S., & Foltz, J. (1996). Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendance and performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(3), 499-507.
    DGBAS. (2018). Financial statement of central government, FY2017. Taipei: Directorate General of Budget Accounting and Statistics.
    Eide, E. R., & Showalter, M. H. (2005). Does improving school quality reduce the probability of unemployment? Contemporary Economic Policy, 23(4), 578-584.
    Goodspeed, T. J. (1998). The relationship between state income taxes and local property taxes: Education finance in New Jersey. National Tax Journal, 51(2), 219-238.
    Grogger, J. (1996). School expenditures and post-schooling earnings: Evidence from high school and beyond. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 628-637.
    Grubb, W. N. (1993). The long-run effects of proprietary schools on wages and earnings: Implications for federal policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(1), 17-33.
    Hægeland, T., Raaum, O., & Salvanes, K. G. (2012). Pennies from heaven? Using exogenous tax variation to identify effects of school resources on pupil achievement. Economics of Education Review, 31(5), 601-614.
    Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. Journal of Human Resources, 14(3), 351-388.
    Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24(3), 1141-1177.
    Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45-62.
    Hanushek, E. A. (1996). School resources and student performance. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 43-73). Washington, D.C: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141-164.
    Hanushek, E. A. (2002). The long run importance of school quality (Report No. w9071). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input‐based schooling policies. The Economic Journal, 113(485), F64-F98.
    Hanushek, E. A. (2008). Education production functions. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics online (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Hanushek, E. A., & Luque, J. A. (2003). Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics of Education Review, 22(5), 481-502.
    Hedges, L., Laine, R., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Docs money matter? A meta analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student achievement. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5-14.
    Hines, J. R., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). The flypaper effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 217-226.
    Hsu, H.-C., & Chan, Y.-H. (2014). Reflections on academic capitalism under Taiwan’s “Aim for the Top University Project”. Educational Policy Forum, 17(3), 95-116.
    Hyman, J. (2017). Does money matter in the long run? Effects of school spending on educational attainment. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(4), 256-280.
    Jackson, C. K., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2015). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157-218.
    Jacques, C., & Brorsen, B. W. (2002). Relationship between types of school district expenditures and student performance. Applied Economics Letters, 9(15), 997-1002.
    James, E., Alsalam, N., Conaty, J. C., & To, D.-L. (1989). College quality and future earnings: Where should you send your child to college? American Economic Review, 79(2), 247-252.
    Ke, Y.-R. (2010). Implementing problems and improving strategies of the University Teaching Excellence Program in Taiwan. E-Journal of Education of Ming-Chuan University, 2, 109-122.
    Krueger, A. B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 497-532.
    Lafortune, J., Rothstein, J., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2018). School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), 1-26.
    Levačić, R., & Vignoles, A. (2002). Researching the links between school resources and student outcomes in the UK: A review of issues and evidence. Education Economics, 10(3), 313-331.
    Liu, H.-Y. (2016). Resource distribution of higher education in the age of globalization. In H. E. Press (Ed.), Global education (pp. 33-54). Taipei: Higher Education Press.
    Lo, W. Y. W. (2014). Taiwan’s higher education system in context. In W. Y. W. Lo (Ed.), University rankings: Implications for higher education in Taiwan (pp. 15-39). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
    Mankiw, N. G. (2014). Production and growth. In N. G. Mankiw (Ed.), Principles of macroeconomics (6th ed., pp. 531-554). New Delhi: Cengage Learning.
    McMahon, W. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Mincer, J. (1975). Education, experience, and the distribution of earnings and employment: An overview. In F. T. Juster (Ed.), Education, income, and human behavior (pp. 71-94). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    MOE. (2005a). The list of schools receieved subsidy. Plan to Encourage Teaching Excellence in Universities. Retrieved from http://www.cttlrc.fcu.edu.tw/edu/program_school_lesA.aspx?yms=94
    MOE. (2005b). Plan to develop first-class universities and top-level research centers. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
    MOE. (2006a). The manual of 2006 plan to encourage teaching excellence in universities. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
    MOE. (2006b). Plan to Encourage Teaching Excellence in Universities. Profile on education. Retrieved from https://english.moe.gov.tw/cp-32-14675-9B62E-1.html
    MOE. (2006c). Plan to Develop First-class Universities and Top-level Research Centers. Profile on education. Retrieved from https://english.moe.gov.tw/cp-32-14633-57823-1.html
    MOE. (2008). The second phase of plan to encourage teaching excellence in universities. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
    MOE. (2009). The manual of 2009 plan to encourage teaching excellence in universities. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
    MOE. (2018a). The survey report of the destination of graduates from senior secondary schools of school year 2016. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
    MOE. (2018b). Education statistics. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
    MOE. (2018c). Financial statement of the ministry of education, FY2017. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
    MOE. (2018d). Education in Taiwan. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
    MOE. (2018e). Higher Education Sprout Project: Sustained progress and rise of universities in Taiwan. Retrieved from https://english.moe.gov.tw/cp-48-17299-E6CF9-1.html
    Mok, K. H. (2015). Higher education transformations for global competitiveness: Policy responses, social consequences and impact on the academic profession in Asia. Higher Education Policy, 28(1), 1-15.
    Neely, S. R., & Diebold, J. (2016). Public expenditures and the production of education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(88), online publication. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2441
    OECD. (2017). Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    Okpala, C. O., Okpala, A. O., & Smith, F. E. (2001). Parental involvement, instructional expenditures, family socioeconomic attributes, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(2), 110-115.
    Picus, L. O. (2000). Student-level finance data: Wave of the future? The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 74(2), 75-80.
    Psacharopoulos, G. (1985). Returns to education: A further international update and implications. Journal of Human Resources, 20(4), 583-604.
    Tilak, J. B. (1989). Rates of return to education and income distribution. De Economist, 137(4), 454-465.
    Verstegen, D. A., & King, R. A. (1998). The relationship between school spending and student achievement: A review and analysis of 35 years of production function research. Journal of Education Finance, 24(2), 243-262.
    Wang, B.-J., Chou, C.-I., & Wang, H.-H. (2011). The evaluation of program for the Promoting Teaching Excellence Universities (Report No. RDEC-RES-099-023). Taipei: Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, Executive Yuan.
    Wang, R.-J. (2003). From elitism to mass higher education in Taiwan: The problems faced. Higher Education, 46(3), 261-287.
    Webbink, D. (2005). Causal effects in education. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(4), 535-560.
    Worthington, A. C., & Dollery, B. E. (1999). Fiscal illusion and the Australian local government grants process: How sticky is the flypaper effect? Public Choice, 99(1-2), 1-13.
    Wößmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(2), 117-170.
    Wu, S.-Y. (2010). A study of the University Teaching Excellence Program and teaching quality. (Unpublished master`s dissertation), National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Yang, C.-C., & Huang, Y.-C. (2012). Promoting teaching excellence of universities in Taiwan: Policy analysis with a special reference to educational equality. International Education Studies, 5(5), 129-140.
    Yeh, C.-C. (2009). The evaluation of the University Teaching Excellence Project - An analysis in the perspectives between teachers and students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), National Chi-Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    公共行政學系
    106256028
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106256028
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900156
    顯示於類別:[公共行政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    602801.pdf1796KbAdobe PDF268檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋