政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124111
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51326788      Online Users : 931
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124111


    Title: 審計委員會網絡對違規行為的影響
    The Association Between Audit Committee Network and Fraud
    Authors: 駱瑤
    Luo, Yao
    Contributors: 金成隆
    Chin, Chen-Lung
    駱瑤
    Luo, Yao
    Keywords: 審計委員會網絡
    違規行為
    程度中心性
    接近中心性
    Audit committee network
    Fraud
    Degree centrality
    Closeness centrality
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-07-01 10:41:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文旨在探討審計委員會網絡的中心性是否與發生違規行為的可能性及頻率相關。本文選取2006年至2017年上海證券交易所與深圳證券交易的非ST上市公司的違規樣本及配對樣本3329個作為研究樣本，採用Binary logistic regression（二元邏吉斯回歸）、poisson regression（普瓦松回歸），研究上市公司在審計委員會網絡的中心性對違規行為的影響。研究發現：審計委員會網絡的程度中心性（degree centrality）對違規行為的抑制有著負向的影響，審計委員會網絡的程度中心性（degree centrality）對違規次數的減少亦有著負向的影響。在進一步分析中，本文測試了審計委員會網絡的接近中心性（closeness centrality）對違規行為的影響，得出了與程度中心性（degree centrality）相一致的結果。並且在刪除金融業、刪除金融海嘯年度、刪除資料不全年度之後，回歸結果仍然一致。此外，本文還發現程度中心性（degree centrality）對違規行為的負向影響在非四大審計之樣本中顯著，在四大審計之樣本中不顯著。
    The aim of this thesis is to investigate whether audit committee network is associated with fraud likelihood and frequency of its clients. There are two opposite perspectives about this argument. Using a sample of public companies in China during 2006-2017, my primary results can be summarized as follows. First, I find that audit committee network, as measured by its close centrality, is positively associated with client’s fraud likelihood, suggesting the negative perspective of audit committee network. Second, I also find that fraud frequency is also positively related to audit committee’ centrality. Further analyses indicate that when I use degree centrality as alternative proxy for audit committee network, the main results remain qualitatively the same; the results are driven mainly by non-big firms rather than big firms. My findings are robust after exclusion of financial industry and deleting 2008 year (financial crisis).
    Reference: 王躍堂與塗建明，2006，上市公司審計委員會治理有效性的實證研究——來自滬深兩市的經驗證據，管理世界，第11期;135-143。
    王麗，2007，中國上市公司資訊披露違規行為處罰效果研究，西南財經大學會計系碩士論文。
    田高良、李留闖與齊保壘，2011， 連鎖董事、財務績效和公司價值，管理科學， 第3期: 13-24。
    左雪蓮、郝雲宏與王淑賢，2018，董事網絡中心度對大股東掏空的影響:抑制還是加劇? 財經論叢，第11期：85-92。
    朱春豔與伍利娜， 2009， 上市公司違規問題的審計後果研究———基於證券監管部門處罰公告的分析，審計研究 ，第4期 : 42－51。
    朱雅琴與姚海鑫，2011，獨立董事、審計委員會與資訊透明度—來自深圳證券交易所A股上市公司的經驗證據，東北大學學報，第3期：37-42。
    任兵，2005，連鎖董事的企業間網絡與公司治理，首都經濟貿易大學學報，第1期：38-42。
    任兵，區玉輝與彭維剛，2007，連鎖董事與公司績效：針對中國的研究，南開管理評論，第1期：8-15
    余玉苗與呂凡，2010，財務舞弊風險的識別——基於財務指標增量資訊的研究，經濟評論，第4期：124-130。
    吳國萍，2008，上市公司資訊披露違規問題研究，吉林大學企業管理系博士論文。
    周峻山，2006，對上市公司大股東違規行為的分析及對策思考，社會科學戰線，第4期：301-302。
    馬金城與王磊，2009，系族控制人掏空與支持上市公司的博弈——基於複星系的案例研究，第122期：150-163。
    陳關亭，2007，我國上市公司財務報告舞弊因素的實證分析，審計研究，第5期：91- 96。
    陳國欣，呂占甲與何峰，2007，財務報告舞弊識別的實證研究——基於中國上市公司的經驗數，審計研究，第3期：88－93。
    陳工孟與高寧，2005， 我國證券監管有效性的實證研究，管理世界，第7期: 40-47。
    孫敬水與周永強，2008，我國上市公司董事會特徵與資訊披露違規—基於 2004—2006 年資料實證分，工業技術經濟，第1期：138-142。
    曹倫與陳維政，2008，獨立董事履職影響影視與上市公司違規行為的關係實證研究，軟科學，第11期：127-132。
    楊忠蓮與徐政旦，2004，我國公司成立審計委員會動機的實證研究，審計研究，第1期：19-24。
    楊柏，2006，上市公司資訊披露違規動因剖析及啟示，經濟問題探索，第10期：131-136。
    鄧可斌與周小丹，2012，獨立董事與公司違規：合謀還是抑制，山西財經大學學報，第11期：84-94。
    趙昕，許傑與丁黎黎，2018，董事網絡、獨立董事治理與上市公司過度投資行為研究，審計與經濟研究，第1期：69-79。
    潘皓青，2018，董事長權力會影響上市公司資訊披露品質嗎？——基於 2014—2017 年上半年證監會處罰的統計，商業會計，第14期：41-43。
    劉秋明，2002，我國上市公司內部控制資訊披露的問題及改進，證券市場導報，第6期：38-43。
    謝永珍，2006，中國上市公司審計委員會治理效率的實證研究，南開管理評論，第1期：66-73。
    Ahmed, A. S., M. Anally, S. Rasmussen, and C. D. Weaver. 2010. How costly is the sarbanes oxley act ? Evidence on the effects of the act on corporate profitability”. Journal of Corporate Finance (16): 352-369.
    Albrecht W.S., G. W. Wernz, and T. L. Williams. 1995. Fraud: Bringing light to the dark side of business. New York Irwin Inc.
    Bedard, J., S. M. Chtonron, and L. Courteau. 2004. The effect of audit committee expertise, independence , and activity on aggressive earnings management, Auditing : A Journal of Practice & Theory (23) : 13 -33
    Beneish, M. D. 1997. Detecting GAAP violation: Implications for assessing earnings management among firms with extreme financial performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16 (3): 271-309.
    Burt, R. S. 1983. Corporate profits and cooptation: Networks of market constraints and directorate ties in the American economy. Academic Press.
    Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71 (4): 443- 465.
    Collier, P. 1996. The rise of the audit committee in UK quoted companies: A curious phenomenon? Accounting, Business and Financial History 6 (2): 121-140.
    Changanti, R. S., V. Mahajan and S. Sharma. 1985. Corporate board size, composition, and corporate failures in the retailing industry. Journal of Management Studies (22): 400-417.
    Chen, Y. S., S. Zhu, and Y.T. Wang. 2011. Corporate fraud and bank loans: Evidence from china. China Journal of Accounting Research 4 (3): 155-165.
    Chen, J. P., and B. Jaggi. 2000. Association between independent non-executive directors, family control and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 19(4-5): 285-310.
    Chiu, P. C., S. H. Teoh, and F. Tian. 2013. Board interlocks and earnings management contagion. The Accounting Review 88 (3): 915-944.
    Cottrell, D.M., and W. S. Albrecht. 1994. Recognizing the symptoms of employee fraud. Health Care Financial Management (5): 19-25
    Depken, C. A., and B. Ouyang. 2006. The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Early evidence from earnings management. Applied Financial Economics Letters 16 (2): 347-351.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (1): 1- 36.
    Doidge, C., G. Karolyi, and R. Stulz. 2009. Has New York become less competitive in global markets? Evaluating foreign listing choices over time. Journal of Financial Economics 91 (3): 253-277.
    Freeman, L. C. 1987. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks (1): 215-239.
    Gargiulo, M. and B. Mario. 2000. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science 11 (2): 183-196
    Keister, L. A. 1998. Engineering growth: Business group structure and firm performance in China`s transition economy. American Journal of Sociology 104 (2): 404-440.
    Karpoff, J. M., and J. R. Lott. 1993. The reputational penalty firms bear from committing criminal fraud. Journal of Law and Economics (36): 757-802.
    Lipton, M., and J. Lorsch. 1992. A model of proposal for improving corporate governance. Business Lawyer 48 (1): 59- 77.
    Lisic, L. L., T. L. Neal, X. y. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. 2015. CEO Power, internal control quality, and audit committee effectiveness in substance versus in Form. Contemporary Accounting Research 33 (3): 1199-1237.
    Larcker, D. F., E. C. So, and C. C. Y. Wang. 2010. Boardroom centrality and stock returns. Working Paper, Stanford University.
    Mitchell, J. D., C. W. L. Chia, and A. S. Loh. 1995. Voluntary disclosure of segment information. Accounting and Finance (35): 1-16.
    Mizruchi, M. S. 1996. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates, Annual Review of Sociology (22): 271-298.
    Menon, K., and J. D. Williams. 1994. The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 13(2): 121-139.
    McMullen, D. A., K. Raghunandan, and D. V. Rama. 1996. Internal control reports and financial reporting problems. Accounting Horizons 10 (4): 67-75.
    Nelson, I. T., and R. L. Ratliff. 1996. Control triggers: A control concept come of age. Managerial Auditing Journal 11 (4): 32-38.
    Peasnell, K. V., P. F. Pope and S. Young. 2005. Board monitoring and earning management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 32 (7-8): 1311-1346.
    Pope P. F., and S. Young. 2002. Outside directors, board effectiveness, and earnings management. www.ssrn.com.
    Peng, M. W., k. Au, and D. Wang. 2001. Interlocking directorates as corporate governance in third world multinationals: Theory and evidence from Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Management (16): 161-181.
    Persons, O. 1995. Using financial statement data to identify factors associated with fraudulent financing reporting. Journal of Applied Business Research (11): 38 -46.
    Renneboog, L., and Y. Zhao. 2011. US knows us in the UK: On director networks and CEO compensation. Journal of Corporate Finance 17 (4): 1132-1157.
    Song, J., and B. Windram. 2004. Benchmarking audit committee effectiveness in financial reporting. International Journal of auditing 8 (3): 195-205.
    Sharma, V. D., and E. R. Iselin. 2012. The association between audit committee multiple-directorships, tenure, and financial misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31 (3): 149-175.
    Summers, S. L., and J. T. Sweeney. 1998. Fraudulently misstated financial statements and insider trading: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review 73 (1): 131-146.
    Timoth, B. B., and V.C. Joseph. 2000. A decision aid for assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. A Journal of Practice &Theory (19): 169-184.
    Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge Univesity Press.
    Wang Z., M. H. Chen, C. L. Chin, and Q. Zheng. 2017. Managerial ability, political connections, and fraudulent financial reporting in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 36 (2): 141–162.
    Wild, J. J. 1996. The audit committee and earnings quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 11(2): 247-276.
    Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management 15(2): 291-334.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    106353048
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106353048
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.ACCT.010.2019.F07
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    304801.pdf948KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback