政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/123691

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/123691

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50976673 線上人數 : 925

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程） > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/123691

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123691

題名:	台商於中東歐之供應商管理政策探討：權力比與態度之影響 A case study of supplier management policy of Taiwanese company in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE): The impact of power ratio and attitude
作者:	李玫嬛 Lee, Mei-Hsuan
貢獻者:	羅明琇 Lo, Ming-Shiow 李玫嬛 Lee, Mei-Hsuan
關鍵詞:	供應商管理管理權力管理態度第三方供應商管理單位中東歐市場 Supplier management Buy-supplier power Management attitude Third-party institution Central and Eastern Europe
日期:	2018
上傳時間:	2019-06-03 13:07:26 (UTC+8)
摘要:	隨著國際化的腳步，為了更快速回應西歐市場的需求以及善用中東歐勞工與投資利益，台商紛紛採用跨國化經營的方式進入中東歐，有些企業透過併購當地公司，有些則以直接設廠的方式進行在地化經營，然而，新的市場中擁有新的供應商，不能完全沿用原本在台灣的供應商管理政策，而需透過調整原有管理辦法以及順應當地外部環境的方式，在新市場進行有效率的供應商管理。因此，本研究欲探討台商進入中東歐市場時，因應不同的環境與條件前提，所採取不同的供應商管理政策。本研究採行個案研究法，訪談一家製造業之個案公司，對於該企業進行深度了解，並進一步探討該個案在台灣以及中東歐地區的供應商管理異同。本研究發現，台灣與中東歐地區對於供應商的權力比都有較大與較小的情況，因為該產業中都擁有長期經營的大型品牌公司，在整體供應鏈中處於主導地位，擁有較高的議價能力，使得其上下游的供應鏈夥伴對其資源依賴性高，亦擁有規模較小型的供應商，缺乏關鍵性資源並沒有足夠的資源與能力，因此在供應鏈中擁有的權力較小，此外，本研究也發現中東歐市場通常仰賴第三方供應商管理單位的認證與評估，且台灣母公司對於中東歐市場的不熟悉，以及對於該地區負責管理者的下轄權力有限，因此於中東歐對於供應商管理的態度呈現較消極被動，台灣則擁有特定的單位進行定期的稽核與評估，並會派遣人員協助與支援供應商改善與提升其產能品質與表現，管理態度呈現較積極主動。本研究對學術上的貢獻是更進一步了解台灣地區較不熟悉的第三方供應商管理單位所適用的情況與地理範圍，並整理與分析出第三方單位對於企業進行供應商管理態度之影響，進而影響企業選擇不同的供應商管理政策，提供未來欲進入中東歐市場的台商，或欲採用第三方供應商管理單位的企業一個參考的依據。 As an effect of globalization, to rapidly respond to the needs of Western Europe, and to wisely take advantage of investment incentives in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), Taiwanese corporations entered the market of CEE. Some of them adopted a localization strategy through mergers and/or acquisitions, and others directly established new factories in CEE. However, since there are different suppliers in new markets, Taiwanese corporations are not able to completely follow the supplier management policy of Taiwan when they enter the new market. Therefore, adjusting management regulations in response to local environments and enhancing the efficiency of supplier management are vital tasks for Taiwanese corporations entering CEE. This research is based on a case study of a company in the electronics industry. By analyzing this interviewed company, the research evaluates the difference between supplier management policies in Taiwan and CEE countries. The research found that the power ratios of buyers and suppliers in both Taiwan and the CEE area are not always smaller than one or bigger than one. When it comes to sizable international companies, they are dominant in supplier chain management, so they have higher bargaining power. Other smaller companies lack the crucial resources and the capabilities to do the same; they have to rely on bigger supplier partners and have lower bargaining power. Still, the result also indicates that because Taiwanese corporations are not familiar with CEE markets and tend to depend on third parties to evaluate and audit suppliers, and also adopt centralized management systems, supplier management attitudes toward CEE countries are passive. Since Taiwan is used to choosing and auditing suppliers of its own and is willing to assist and support suppliers to help them enhance performance and quality, supplier management attitudes toward Taiwan area are positive. The academic contribution of this research is to further understand the application of supplier management via third parties. This research analyzes the impact of third parties on supplier management attitudes, and offers a reference for Taiwanese corporations that are eager to enter the CEE market in the future or that want to adopt third parties for their supplier management responsibilities.
參考文獻:	英文部分 Ashnai, B., Henneberg, S. C., Naudé, P., & Francescucci, A. (2016). Inter-personal and inter-organizational trust in business relationships: An attitude-behavior-outcome model. Industrial Marketing Management, 52, 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.020 Barrell, R., & Holland, D. (2000). Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe Contents. Direct, 8(2), 477–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02928116 Bednarz, J. (2017). Th e determinants and development of crowdfunding in the Cen tr al and Eastern Europe coun tr ies, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2017.019.Th Bookbinder, J. H., Gumus, M., & Jewkes, E. M. (2010). Calculating the benefits of vendor managed inventory in a manufacturer-retailer system. International Journal of Production Research, 48(19), 5549–5571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903095434 Borade, A. B., Kannan, G., & Bansod, S. V. (2013). Analytical hierarchy process-based framework for VMI adoption. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 963–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.650795 Burnes, B., & New, S. (1997). Collaboration In Customer-Supplier Relationships: Strategy, Operations and the Function of Rhetoric. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 33(4), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1997.tb00032.x Chakraborty, G., Srivastava, P., & Marshall, F. (2007). Are drivers of customer satisfaction different for buyers/users from different functional areas? Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 22(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620710722798 Corbin, A. S. and J. (2008). Basic of Qualitative Research (3rd ed): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Inc. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/2/strauss.html Cox, A. (2004). Business relationship alignment: on the commensurability of value capture and mutuality in buyer and supplier exchange. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(5), 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410560793 Cui, L., Deng, J., Liu, F., Zhang, Y., & Xu, M. (2017). Investigation of RFID investment in a single retailer two-supplier supply chain with random demand to decrease inventory inaccuracy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2028–2044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.081 Day, M., Fawcett, S. E., Fawcett, A. M., & Magnan, G. M. (2013). Trust and relational embeddedness: Exploring a paradox of trust pattern development in key supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.12.004 Doz. (1996). The Evolution of Cooperation in Strategic Alliances : Initial Conditions or Learning Processes ? Author ( s ): Yves L . Doz Source : Strategic Management Journal , Vol . 17 , Special Issue : Evolutionary Perspectives on Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/s, 17, 55–83. Dries, L., Gorton, M., Urutyan, V., & White, J. (2014a). Supply chain relationships, supplier support programmes and stimulating investment: evidence from the Armenian dairy sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2012-0380 Dyer, J. H. (1998). EFFECTIVE INTERFIRM COLLABORATION : HOW FIRMS MINIMIZE TRANSACTION COSTS AND Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner . Further reproduction prohibited without permission . Strategic Management Journal. Ekici, A. (2013). Temporal dynamics of trust in ongoing inter-organizational relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(6), 932–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.03.008 Eshghi, G., & Ph, D. (2016). Corporate income tax as a determinant of foreign direct investment in central and eastern europe, 4(11), 111–123. F.M., H. R. G. and J. . M. S. (2001). Private Enforcement Capital and Contract Enforcement in Transition Economies, 90(2), 686–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01112.x Ferguson, R. J., Paulin, M., & Bergeron, J. (2005). Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Governance , and the Performance of Interfirm Service Exchanges : The Influence of Boundary- Spanner Closeness, (Williamson 1985). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304270729 Frooman, J., & Murrell, A. J. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: The roles of structural and demographic determinants. Business and Society, 44(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650304273434 Gaffeo, E., & Garalova, P. (2014). On the finance-growth nexus : additional evidence from Central and Eastern Europe countries, 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-013-9143-x Ghadge, A., Dani, S., Ojha, R., & Caldwell, N. (2017). Using risk sharing contracts for supply chain risk mitigation: A buyer-supplier power and dependence perspective. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 103, 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.11.034 Gilliland, D. I., & Bello, D. C. (2002). Two sides to attitudinal commitment: The effect of calculative and loyalty commitment on enforcement mechanisms in distribution channels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/03079450094306 Giraud, K. de C. M. (2017). Economic Complexity and Product Space of Visegrad Contires: A New Perspective on Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, 1–68. Glock, C. H. (2016). Training suppliers by delegating workers: A decision support model. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 93, 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.01.005 Glock, C. H., Grosse, E. H., & Ries, J. M. (2017). Decision support models for supplier development: Systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 193(August), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.025 Godichaud, M., & Amodeo, L. (2018). Economic order quantity for multistage disassembly systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 199(May 2017), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.008 Habib, F., Bastl, M., & Pilbeam, C. (2015). Strategic responses to power dominance in buyer-supplier relationships. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(1/2), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0138 Hausman, A., & Johnston, W. J. (2010). The impact of coercive and non-coercive forms of influence on trust, commitment, and compliance in supply chains. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(3), 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.05.007 Hecht, V., & Moritz, M. (2014). Regional Determinants of German. Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1990). Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172548 Heide, J. B., Wathne, K. H., & Rokkan, A. I. (2007). Interfirm Monitoring, Social Contracts, and Relationship Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.425 Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Arcas-Lario, N. (2003). The effects of authoritative mechanisms of coordination on market orientation in asymmetrical channel partnerships. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(03)00015-6 Hsieh, C. (2006). Strengths and Weaknesses of Qualitative Case Study Research. University of Leicester Journal, 1(12), 81–116. https://doi.org/10.7014/TCYCFFYYY.200404.0087 Ivanica, M. (2003). An Overview of the Treaty of Accession of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia to the European Union, (June), 90. Retrieved from http://www.eipa.eu/files/repository/product/20070816125607_2003w03.pdf Johnston, W. J., Khalil, S., Jain, M., & Cheng, J. M.-S. (2012). Determinants of Joint Action in International Channels of Distribution: The Moderating Role of Psychic Distance. Journal of International Marketing, 20(3), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.11.0178 Jones, S. L., Fawcett, S. E., Fawcett, A. M., & Wallin, C. (2010). Benchmarking trust signals in supply chain alliances: moving toward a robust measure of trust. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(5), 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771011076452 Jørgensen, M. S. (2004). Organising Environmental Supply Chain Management : Experience from a ... Kannan, V. R., & Tan, K. C. (2004). Supplier alliances: Differences in attitudes to supplier and quality management of adopters and non-adopters. Supply Chain Management, 9(4), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410550028 Kehoe, D. F., Dani, S., Sharifi, H., Burns, N. D., & Backhouse, C. J. (2007). Demand network alignment: Aligning the physical, informational and relationship issues in supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 45(5), 1141–1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600635219 Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 528–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.007 Laaksonen, T., Jarimo, T., & Kulmala, H. I. (2009). Cooperative strategies in customer-supplier relationships: The role of interfirm trust. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.029 Laaksonen, T., Pajunen, K., & Kulmala, H. I. (2008). Co-evolution of trust and dependence in customer-supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(8), 910–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.06.007 Lee, Y. H., & Wang, K. J. (2012). Performance impact of new product development processes for distinct scenarios under different supplier-manufacturer relationships. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 82(11), 2096–2108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2012.04.008 Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2010). Control mechanisms across a buyer-supplier relationship quality matrix. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.005 Lo, S. M. (2015). Impact of greening attitude and buyer power on supplier environmental management strategy. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12(10), 3145–3160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0742-5 Marinova, S. T. (2018). Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Mayer, K. J., & Teece, D. J. (2008). Unpacking strategic alliances: The structure and purpose of alliance versus supplier relationships. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 66(1), 106–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.06.007 McCutcheon, D., & Stuart, F. I. (2000). Issues in the choice of supplier alliance partners. Journal of Operations Management, 18(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00026-1 Mendoza, A., & Ventura, J. A. (2013). Modeling actual transportation costs in supplier selection and order quantity allocation decisions. Operational Research, 13(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-011-0109-3 Minichiello, V., & Aroni, R. (2008). IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING (3rd ed.). PEARSON Education Australia. Mukherji, A., & Francis, J. D. (2008). Mutual adaptation in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.008 Nyaga, G. N., Whipple, J. M., & Lynch, D. F. (2011). Relationship Quality and Performance Outcomes : Achieving a Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Supply Chain Management, 32(4), 345–360. OECD List of Developing Countries or Territories. (1997). Water International, 22(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508069708686671 Osička, J., Lehotský, L., Zapletalová, V., Černoch, F., & Dančák, B. (2018). Natural gas market integration in the Visegrad 4 region: An example to follow or to avoid? Energy Policy, 112(July), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.018 Pfeiffer, M., Mackenzie, R., & Com, S. (2017). Trends in On-Site Supplier Audits, 49(0). Pipaç, M. D. (2015). Interdependence between management, attitude and organizational behavior. Quality - Access to Success, 16(May), 99–104. Plank, R. E., Newell, S. J., & Reid, D. A. (2006). Organizational buyers and conflict: The impact of conflict on ongoing and new purchasing situations. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2006.02.004 President, V., Operations, D., President, V., & Operations, D. (2016). Coriant ; Coriant Awarded Gold Rating in EcoVadis Sustainability Survey, 2016–2018. Record, C. (2014). Supplier Support Services, (May), 2004. Rinehart, L. M., Eckert, J. A., Handheld, R. B., Page, T. J., & Atkin, T. (2004). JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS. Vol. 25. No. 1,2004 25, 25(1). S. Tamer Cavusgil, Seyda Deligonul, C. Z. (2004). Opportunism : An Examination of Trust , Contracts , and the Legal Environment in, 12(2), 7–27. Salancik, J. P. & G. R. (2017). Review Reviewed Work ( s ): The External Control of Organizations : A Resource Dependence Perspective by Jeffrey Pfeffer and Gerald R . Salancik Review by : H . Joseph Reitz Source : The Academy of Management Review , Vol . 4 , No . 2 ( Apr ., 1979 ), pp, 4(2), 309–310. Shenas, D. G., & Derakhshan, S. (1994). Organizational Approaches to the Implementation of Simultaneous Engineering. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(10), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579410067234 Srivastava, P., & Frankwick, G. L. (2011). Environment, management attitude, and organizational learning in alliances. Management Decision, 49(1), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111094491 Tseng, M. L., Chiang, J. H., & Lan, L. W. (2009). Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and choquet integral. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 57(1), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.12.001 van der Valk, W., Wynstra, F., & Axelsson, B. (2009). Effective buyer‐supplier interaction patterns in ongoing service exchange. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(8), 807–833. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910977706 Wagner, S. M. (2000). A strategic approach to professional supplier management, 21–29. Wagner, S. M. (2006). Supplier development practices: an exploratory study. European Journal of Marketing, 40(5/6), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610657831 Wang, X., & Disney, S. M. (2016). The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(3), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.022 Week, S. I., & Vol, C. (2009). Can GPOs Help Ease the Pain ?, 258(Jul), 24–25. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Book). New York Free Press (Vol. 20). London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. Retrieved from http://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp?T=P&P=AN&K=6127643&S=R&D=bth&EbscoContent=dGJyMMTo50SeprA4wtvhOLCmr0meqK5Ssa64SbaWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGuslGvqrdKuePfgeyx44Dt6fIA Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269–296. Xiaoyan, W., & Yanyan, W. (2010). Research on Supplier Selection in Supply Chain Management-From the Perspective of Reducing the Bullwhip Effect. Logistics and Supply Chain Research in China, 11, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.5503/J.CL.2013.11.012 Yeung, K., Lee, P. K. C., Yeung, A. C. L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2013). Supplier partnership and cost performance: The moderating roles of specific investments and environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.008 Zhang, L., Grešš, M., & Brocková, K. (2017). Current and Potential Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in the Slovak Republic. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 7(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0006 Zhou, K. Z., Poppo, L., & Yang, Z. (2008). Relational ties or customized contracts? An examination of alternative governance choices in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3), 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400363 Zoogah, D. B., Vora, D., Richard, O., & Peng, M. W. (2011). Strategic alliance team diversity, coordination, and effectiveness. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(3), 510–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.543629 卓瑞瑩. (2014). 台資企業投資趨勢之區域優勢分析以捷克共和國為例The Investment Trends of Taiwanese Enterprises in Czech Republic, 1–92. 外銷東歐專刊. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.cens.com/cens/html/zh/publication/pub_13.html 孫益民、婁臻亮. (2011). 汽車產品開發同步工程應用管理機制研究, 68–69. 我國對歐盟(28國)出進口統計. (2018). 根據經濟部國際貿易局經貿資訊網, 2016. Retrieved from file:///Users/maxine/Downloads/77186cc9-00c1-4b8d-a15a-6c9c55a5fe6d.pdf 林淑馨. (2010). 質性研究：理論與實務. 巨流圖書公司. Retrieved from http://www.books.com.tw/products/0010590752 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花. (2005). 質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.30072/JDR.200506.0005 毛樹仁、鄭伊真. (2005). 歐盟東擴對我國貿易與投資的影響. 歐洲國際評論, 31–64.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) 105363019
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105363019
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/THE.NCCU.MBA.024.2019.F08
顯示於類別:	[企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程）] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
301901.pdf	1526Kb	Adobe PDF2	166	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋