政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/123305
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113313/144292 (79%)
造访人次 : 50947070      在线人数 : 933
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123305


    题名: 智慧資本的法律定性與智慧財產證券化的可行性研究
    The Legal Status of Intellectual Capital and the Feasibility Study of Intellectual Property Securitization
    作者: 闕光威
    贡献者: 政大智慧財產評論　
    关键词: Assets securitization
    日期: 2004-04
    上传时间: 2019-05-10 10:30:20 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究由法律觀點出發,研析智慧資本的法律定性,並研析企業利用智慧資本取得融資的可能性。學說上對於智慧資本雖有不同定義,觀察構面亦不相同,但大略可分為關係資本、人力資本、流程資本與創新資本四類。過去以擔保貸款為核心的放款,亦需以「權利」的存在為前提。本文發現,智慧資本的成分中,除已轉換為智慧財產權的情況外,能化約為法律權利的構面並不多見。企業所享有的利益若能轉換為法律上的權利,可以受到整套法律規定的保障,在移轉上與權利界定上亦較為容易,反應在企業融資與交易上,可以有效降低企業的交易成本,使企業以較低的成本取得資金。而無法權利化的利益,有時係因過於抽象無法清楚界定,或僅賦予有限度的保障,取得融資較為困難。無法權利化的利益,仍然會反應在企業的股票價值,是否可能以股權作為智慧資本的融資基礎,即有探究價值。本研究從股權的法律性質出發,發現股權在財產權上最主要的意義在於剩餘財產分配請求權與盈餘分配請求權,但請求權標的係以企業整體營利狀況為基礎,即便一企業智慧資本極有價值,若其他資本利用狀況不佳,整體狀況仍會被牽連。相反地,如果利益已經權利化(如智慧財產權),即便企業其他部門經營不善,若該權利本身仍有價值,可以作為獨立的擔保標的。這種特質也成為以股權架構進行智慧資本融資的限制。除了傳統擔保融資的架構外,資產證券化成為最新的融資工具之一。資產證券化基本架構在於創始機構移轉標的資產給特殊目的機構,以隔離創始機構的破產風險,對無法權利化的智慧資本而言,能否脫離創始機構移轉給特殊目的機構就會發生困難。對智慧財產權而言,與其他資本間高度的互補性,成為另一問題。許多智慧財產的價值不來自於技術面,而在於持有者本身的通路或市場地位,一旦移轉給特殊目的機構達到資產分割的效果,將同時隔離標的資產與其他互補性資源間的牽連,甚至可能形成道德風險。即便實務上資產證券化的服務機構多為創始機構,但創始機構若與標的資產具有過大的利益相關,亦可能面對法律上對資產分割是否符合真實買賣的爭議。但對於價值來源主要是來自於技術因素的智慧財產,上述問題應可獲得控制。
    Intellectual capital has long been mentioned as important assets for enterprises. How to help those companies collect necessary funding by such capital has become a new challenge. While more and more researchers dedicated to the development of the valuation and the accounting principles of intellectual capital, the legal status of intellectual capital has seldom been carefully examined. If intellectual capital can be viewed as legal rights, the structure of secured loan can be facilitated. Besides if the elements of intellectual property can be viewed as legal rights, it will be easier to transfer and can receive much more profound protection from laws, which will substantially reduce the transaction cost. After the survey of this research, it is found that few elements of intellectual capital can be viewed as legal rights. Except intellectual property rights such as copyrights, patents, trademarks, etc., only a few constructs of intellectual capital can be symbolized as contractral relationship among relevant firms. Except secured loans, assets securitization has been a brand new financial vehicle for fund raising. This paper also tries to explore whether the intellectual capital can be put into the new framework. It is found t951
    關聯: 政大智慧財產評論, 2(1), 97-116
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[智慧財產評論] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2222检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈