政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/123095
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51288363      Online Users : 44
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > Journals of NCCU > Issues & Studies > Articles >  Item 140.119/123095


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123095


    Title: 國際典則：理論與經驗的對話──以國際銀行監管中的巴塞爾協議及協定為例
    International Regimes: Theory, Practice, and the Basel Concordat and Accord
    Authors: 林文斌
    Lin, Wen-Pin
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 國際典則;新現實主義;新自由主義;建構主義;巴塞爾協定;國際銀行監管
    international regimes;neorealism;neoliberalism;constructivism;Basel Concordat;Basel Accord;international banking supervising
    Date: 2002-11
    Issue Date: 2019-04-18 14:17:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 國際典則一詞提出已逾四分之一個世紀，學者們在應用時也發展出不同理論和看法，本文前半部梳理新現實主義、新自由主義和社會學式途徑三種主要對國際典則的觀點，並區分學派內部對國際典則是否發揮獨立影響作用的細微區別。其差基本教義派的新現實主義認為國際典則是毫無作用的、修正新現實主義則承認其可算是中介變數；新自由主義不只承認其發生獨立作用，同時也存在於國際事務上的各個議題叢中；修正新自由主義則認為國際典則的存在是視議題而定。社會學途徑則以認知過程說明國際典則的存在及如何發生獨立作用，而可區分為國際社會途徑、弱認知主義和建構主義三派。本文後半部則以巴塞爾協議及協定的形成作歷史性的經驗敘述，與各典則論作一對話，並對各典則觀加以評估其解釋力。本文指出除了揉合各典則觀、提出全整性的模式外，還提出各典則觀可以「水平式」、「垂直式」解釋典則形成的結論。
    There are three schools of thought regarding international regimes since this concept was presented in 1975. The first is neorealism (based on power), the second is neoliberalism (based on interests), and the third is a sociological approach (based on cognition). This paper reviews the theories of international regimes and their debates. The author also provides a historical description of the formation of the Basel Concordat and Basel Accord, the most two important documents on international banking supervisions, as a base of dialogue between the theories. All of the schools have their strengths and weaknesses in explaining regimes. The author concludes that three schools can interpret the formation both ´horizontally ´ and ´vertically ´, yet the synthesis approach of the three schools is inconsistent in theoretical logic.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 41(6), 25-60
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Issues & Studies] Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    369.pdf1745KbAdobe PDF2257View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback