English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51577536      Online Users : 918
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123079


    Title: 論結構性嚇阻與決策性嚇阻
    One Structure Deterrence Theory And decision - Making Deterrence Theory
    Authors: 陳偉華
    Chen, Wei-Hwa
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 結構嚇阻;決策性嚇阻;立即嚇阻;延伸性嚇阻;理性決策
    Deterrence;Structureal Deterrence;Decision-Making Deterrence;Immediate Deterrence;Extended Deterrence;Rational Choice
    Date: 2002-03
    Issue Date: 2019-04-18 14:09:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 嚇阻理論之研究，係國際戰略與安全研究中重要的命題之一，亦為國際關係學者必備之理論基礎。嚇阻研究的範疇至為廣泛，由純軍事武力之相對嚇阻，擴展至非軍事武力之嚇阻。舉凡政治、經濟、軍事、外交、文化與社會互動，無不構影響對手決策的要素。結構性嚇阻與決策性嚇阻，是眾多嚇阻理論中，歸結出較為顯著的兩項。前者從較寬廣的國際體系與結構，探討嚇阻的功能與價值；後者則是由行為主體（actor）至決策者的角度，思考嚇阻的戰略決策與運用。本質上，兩者的精神均是著眼於現狀的維持。
    A study of deterrence, amongst the trends of international strategic and security studies in the early 1950s, became a notable one for its irresistible attractiveness. Because of its value in studying interstate conflict, the study of deterrence has become the key concept for the understanding of “war” and “peace,” which has long been regarded as major themes for international relations theory. From the perspective of deterrence theory, structural deterrence and decision-making deterrence offer both an empirical and logical explanation of the workings of bilateral conflict. Structural deterrence theory, taking a broad perpective, stats mainly from the understanding of functions and values of the international system. The decision-making deterrence theory, on the contrary, studies actor behavior and policy maker strategic choices. Fundamentally, both structural deterrence theory and decision-making deterrence theory base their goals on maintaining status quo.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 41(2), 23-42
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    353.pdf1128KbAdobe PDF2167View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback