English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51713486      Online Users : 688
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123064


    Title: 民族、民族研究、民族主義：兼論作為意識形態的社會科學研究
    Belonging to the State: Politics of Epistemology in the Studies of Nation and Nationism
    Authors: 石之瑜
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 國家民族;民族主義;認識論;台灣;少數民族;現實主義;理想主義
    state、nation;nationalism;epistemology;Taiwan;minority;realism;idealism
    Date: 2001-07
    Issue Date: 2019-04-18 14:00:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文指出，當代民族主義存在的前提，在於人們已經先接受民族是客觀存在的才有可能，而民族被認為是客觀存在的源頭，在於民族成為國家改造或防範的對象。作為改造對象的民族稱為國內的少數民族；作為防範對象的民族則屬於國際無政府狀態的元素。社會科學對民族的研究，加強了民族的客觀性。社會科學對國際無政府狀態的研究，加強了國家的客觀性。在社會科學研究裡，隱藏了民族應該歸由國家管轄，國家應由民族組成的兩個立場。中國作為客觀存在的國家與客觀存在的民族，是絕大多數社會科學家研究中國的前提，也是中國民族主義發生的論述基礎。但是，台灣問題揭穿了國家與民族的不可定義性，台灣國家性質的流動，使得作為國家與作為民族的中國失去客觀性。不過，由於社會科學家繼續將台灣當成客觀存在的國家來研究，使得中國大陸的民族與國家客觀存在的前提，免於受到挑戰。在國家與民族客觀存在論述動搖之前，台灣問題是無解的，而社會科學正是其中重要的阻礙。
    In realism, political scientists treat state and nation as concepts that refer to objective realities. Even idealists collude in the sense that they consider their duty merely to be improving human conditions under the realist constraints. This paper challenges the objectivity of both state and nation as analytical concepts. It exposes the implicit assertion in political science that nations belong to states. Accordingly, problems identified by political scientists are often discursively predetermined in realism. The question of Taiwan`s statehood is tackled in the last part of the paper. The argument is that the Taiwan question is a product of realism which, when also used to try to provide a resolution, exacerbates the mood critical to the resolution of the question. In the end, the paper also disputes the mainstream epistemology of contemporary social science, which fixates nations in states and pretends objectification of nations and states.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 40(4), 97-110
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    338.pdf1056KbAdobe PDF2269View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback