English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51576928      Online Users : 943
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123000


    Title: 論「差別國籍」與原台籍日本軍人及軍屬之補償問題
    Native Taiwanese Soldiers & Civilian Employees in World WarⅡ Japan: Discriminatory Compensation for Time Served?
    Authors: 陳光輝
    Chen, Kuang-Hui
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 原軍人及軍屬；差別國籍；戰後補償；戰後賠償
    Compensation of Ex-soldiers ； Discrimination of Nationality concerning Compensations ； Discrimination of Nationality & Ex-soldiers ； Exsoldiers & Poltwar Settlement
    Date: 1998-08
    Issue Date: 2019-04-15 10:02:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 一九七二年中日斷交後，為取得日本政府合麗的補償，洪坤?等原台籍日本軍人及軍屬直接向日本法院提出訴求，但日本法院以原告等非屬「特殊犧牲」而否定適用日本憲法地二十九條三項之規定，並且以非日本國籍而拒絕適傭其援護法及恩給法。其後，日本當局對原台籍日本軍人及軍屬僅支付二百萬日圓之慰問金〈弔慰金〉，而未依據其本國所實施之「恩給法及援護法」來支付，以致於在支付金額上有十倍以上之差距。本文以世界各先進國在第二次世界大戰後之戰後處理上，對原軍人與軍屬的年金給付方式，探討日本以國籍之不同而在待遇上有所差別的作法，是否違反公民權及政治權國際公約中所禁止之「差別國籍之原則」，並舉出「塞內爾加爾人對法國」的案例。此案經公民全及政治權國際公約委員會判斷認為，法國在年金支付上，將塞那加爾人與法國人加以區別，違反了第二十六條之規定。而做為該公約之締約國的日本，當然有遵守該公約之義務。
    This article seeks to uncover whether or not the Japanese government violated the Accord of International Convenants on Civil and Political Rights when it chose to legislate compensation to native Taiwanese who had served as soldiers or civilian employees during World WarⅡ. By applying such legislation, the Japanese government would only be required to pay out less than one-tenth of the compensation it would pay under Japan’s won existing pension system. Although the Japanese courts have rejected earlier appeals regarding compensation, this author argues that Japan has an obligation to observe its own domestic regulations in treating even foreign employees. This argument is made based on such historical evidence as a similar case that occurred between the Senegalese and the French governments, where France was judged by a UN committee to have violated the afore-mentioned International Covenant.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 37(8), 73-84
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    273.pdf950KbAdobe PDF2180View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback