政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/122775
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51265789      線上人數 : 914
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/122775


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122775


    題名: 影響大眾對藍領及白領犯罪懲罰態度的心理機制：知覺威脅感、知覺競爭感及懲罰階級的中介效果
    Psychological mechanisms influencing the public’s punitive attitudes toward blue-collar and white-collar crimes: the mediating effects of perceived threat, perceived competitiveness and class-based punishment.
    作者: 陳彥禎
    Chen, Yan-Jen
    貢獻者: 李怡青
    孫蒨如
    陳彥禎
    Chen, Yan-Jen
    關鍵詞: 雙歷程模型
    右翼威權主義
    社會支配性
    懲罰態度
    藍領犯罪
    白領犯罪
    Dual-process model
    RWA
    SDO
    Punitive attitudes
    Blue-collar crime
    White-collar crime
    日期: 2019
    上傳時間: 2019-04-01 14:48:28 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 過去關於懲罰態度的研究多以藍領犯罪為主，且多認為人們對藍領犯罪的懲罰態度高於白領犯罪，但尚不清楚形成此態度差異的原因及心理機制為何。本論文以右翼威權主義信念（RWA）及社會支配性（SDO）這兩種偏好重罰的意識形態信念及引發這兩種信念的心理機制切入，檢驗RWA及SDO程度越高的人，是否會因為認為犯罪人危害社會安全、與內群體競爭資源、或希望以犯罪人的社會階級特徵來給予懲罰，而對藍、白領犯罪人有較重或較輕的懲罰態度。首先，本論文發現影響人們對藍、白領犯罪人懲罰態度的主要因素為其犯罪行為，犯罪人的社會階級特徵未有明顯影響，且兩個研究中均發現台灣民眾對白領犯罪人的懲罰態度高於藍領犯罪人，與過往的研究論點不太一致。在心理機制因素的影響方面，研究一及研究二的結果顯示個體的RWA程度越高，越認為藍領犯罪人，以及造成他人身體傷害的白領犯罪人會危害到社會安全、並且越傾向因藍、白領犯罪人的社會階級身分來給予懲罰，對藍、白領犯罪人的懲罰態度越重。研究二則顯示高SDO者越傾向因為藍、白領犯罪人的社會階級身分，而對藍、白領犯罪人有較重的懲罰態度；而高SDO者對藍領犯罪人競爭感的評估則不穩定。除此之外，本論文發現只有在白領犯罪的情境下，個體越能夠想像犯罪情節，對白領犯罪人的態度越負面。因此推論過去普遍認為大眾對藍領犯罪的懲罰態度高於白領犯罪的原因，亦可能是因為較無法想像白領犯罪情節發生在現實生活中。本論文嘗試探索影響台灣民眾對不同類型犯罪人的懲罰態度以及心理機制，補足目前研究多關注對藍領犯罪人的懲罰態度，以及多以人口學變項來探討影響大眾對犯罪人懲罰態度的因素的研究現況。
    While most of the previous research concerning punitive attitudes of the public focused on blue-collar crimes and concluded that people are more punitive toward blue-collar offenders than white-collar offenders, the factors and psychological mechanisms contributing this attitude differences remain unclear. Based on two pro-punitive ideologies and the psychological mechanisms behind them, this thesis tested whether people with high right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) perceive blue-collar and white-collar offenders to be danger to society, competitive to ingroup`s resources, or hoping to punish them based on the offenders’ social status, thus tend to have higher or lower punitive attitudes toward them.

    First, we found that it is the "act", not the "social status", influences people`s punitive attitudes toward blue-collar and white-collar offenders. Furthermore, two studies both showed that people in Taiwan are more punitive toward white-collar offenders than blue-collar offenders, which is inconsistent to most of conclusions of previous researches. As the impact of psychological mechanisms, Study 1 and Study 2 showed that individuals with high RWA perceived blue-collar offenders and white-collar offenders who caused physical harms both to be dangerous to the society, and hoping to punish blue-collar and white-collar offenders based on their social status, thus have higher punitive attitudes toward them. While study 2 found that individuals with high SDO would hope to punish blue-collar and white-collar offenders based on their social status, thus have higher punitive attitudes toward them, the relationship between SDO and perceived competitiveness toward blue-collar offenders is unstable. Lastly, we also found that only in the white-collar crime situation, the more people believe the crime is possible to occur in reality, the more punitive they will be toward white-collar offenders. We inferred that the differences of punitive attitude toward white-collar and blue-collar offenders might be due to the imaginary degree of the offenders’ act.

    This thesis attended to understand the punitive attitude of Taiwan’s public as well as the psychological mechanisms of it. Also, it attempted to fulfill the other side of current academic spectrum that mostly focused on public’s punitive attitudes toward blue-collar offenders with demographic factors as approach to explore factors influencing public’s punitive attitudes.
    參考文獻: 吳明隆（2007）。結構方程模式－AMOS的操作與應用。台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    周愫嫻（2002）。白領犯罪的界定與爭議。犯罪學期刊，9，1–32。
    周愫嫻、Hebenton, B. (2010)。刑罰是知識結構與文化的鏡子：台灣與英國嚴刑重罰趨勢之比較研究。臺大法學論叢，39，433–472。
    孟維德（2016）。白領犯罪（修訂第二版）。台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    侯崇文、許福生（1997）。治亂世用重典社會意向之研究。犯罪學期刊，3，43–57。
    許春金（2010）。犯罪學（修訂六版）。台北市：三民書局。
    黃毅志（2005）。教育研究中的「職業調查封閉式問卷」之信效度分析。師大教育研究集刊，51，43-71。
    黃毅志（2008）。如何精確測量職業地位？“改良版台灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表”之建構。臺東大學教育學報，19，151-159。
    薛褘葶（2016）。民眾對治安滿意度、對犯罪報導量認知與重刑態度之關係（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。（系統編號104NTPU0102006）
    鍾麗環（2003）。民眾對白領犯罪與傳統犯罪嚴重性認知之比較研究─以高雄市為例（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。（系統編號091CCU00102035）
    Adriaenssen, A., & Aertsen, I. (2014). Punitive attitudes: Towards an operationalization to measure individual punitivity in a multidimensional way. European Journal of Criminology, 6, 459–480.
    Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba press.
    Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., & Fisher, B. S. (2002). Public views toward crime and correctional policies. Is there a gender gap? Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 89–100.
    Baumer, E. P., Messner, S. F., & Felson, R. B. (2000). The role of victim characteristics in the disposition of murder cases. Justice Quarterly, 17, 281–307.
    Benforado, A. (2016)。不平等的審判（堯嘉寧譯）。台北市：城邦文化事業股份有限公司。（原著出版於2015）
    Blair, I.V, Judd, C. M., & Chapleau, K. M. (2012). Facial influence of features in criminal sentencing. Psychological Science, 15, 674–679.
    Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Olson, J. M. (2012). Justice motive effects in ageism: The effects of a victim’s age on observer perceptions of injustice and punishment judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1343–1349.
    Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284–299.
    Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W. T., Lurigio, A. J., & Weaver, F. M. (1987). Sentencing Goals, Causal Attributions, Ideology, and Personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 107–118.
    Clinard, M. B., & Quinney, R. (1973). Criminal Behavior Systems: A Typology (Second edt). New York : Holt, Rinehart And Winston.
    Cohrs, J. C., & Asbrock, F. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 270–289.
    Coleman, J. W. (1987). Toward an Integrated Theory of White-Collar Crime. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 406–439.
    Colémont, A., VanHiel, A., & Cornelis, I. (2011). Five-Factor Model personality dimensions and right-wing attitudes: Psychological bases of punitive attitudes? Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 486–491.
    DeKeijser, J. W., Van DerLeeden, R., & Jackson, J. L. (2002). From moral theory to penal attitudes and back: A theoretically integrated modeling approach. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 317–335.
    Dodge, M., Bosick, S. J., & Antwerp, V.V. (2013). Do Men and Women Perceive White-Collar and Street Crime Differently? Exploring Gender Differences in the Perception of Seriousness, Motives, and Punishment. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29, 399–415.
    Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential Effects of Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Outgroup Attitudes and Their Mediation by Threat From and Competitiveness to Outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696.
    Duckitt, J. (2009). Punishment attitudes: their social and psychological bases. In M.Oswald, S.Bieneck, & J.Hupfeld (Eds.), Social Psychology of Punishment of Crime (pp. 75–92). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
    Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation and The Dimensions of Generalized Prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130.
    Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1894.
    Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., duPlessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93.
    Faccidomo, J. (2017). White Collar Crimes Versus Blue Collar Crimes. Retrieved from https://www.rflawgroup.com/white-collar-crimes-versus-blue-collar-crimes/
    Feather, N. T. (1996). Reactions to penalities for an offence in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived seriousness and deservigness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571–582.
    Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528–44.
    Feild, H. S. (1979). Rape Trials and Jurors ’ Decisions and Case Characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 261–284.
    Friedrichs, D. O. (2009). Trusted criminals: White collar crime in contemporary society. Cengage Learning.
    Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195–218.
    Gerber, M. M. (2012). A Dual-Process Motivational Model of Punitive Attitudes : The effects of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Public Punitiveness. Retrieved from http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/504/
    Gordon, R. A., Bindrim, T. A., McNicholas, M. L., & Walden, T. L. (1988). Perceptions of blue-collar and white-collar crime: The effect of defendant race on simulated juror decisions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 191–197.
    Hawkins, D. F. (1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 2, 207–230.
    Henry, P. J., Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (2005). Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the middle east and America. Political Psychology, 26, 569–583.
    Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., …Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028.
    Hodson, G., & Dhont, K. (2015). The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 1–42.
    Holtfreter, K., VanSlyke, S., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. (2008). Public perceptions of white-collar crime and punishment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 50–60.
    Huang, L. L., & Liu, J. H. (2005). Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 267–276.
    Johnson, B. D., VanWingerden, S., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2010). Sentencing Homicide Offenders In The Netherlands: Offender, Victim, And Situational Influences In Criminal Punishment. Criminology, 48, 981–1018.
    Johnson, D. (2008). Racial prejudice , perceived injustice , and the Black-White gap in punitive attitudes gap in punitive attitudes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 198–206.
    Kemmelmeier, M. (2005). The Effects of Race and Social Dominance Orientation in Simulated Juror Decision Making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1030–1045.
    Kim, S. U. (2002). Blue-Collar Crime. Retrieved from www.sociologyindex.com
    King, R. D., & Wheelock, D. (2007). Group Threat and Social Control: Race, Perceptions of Minorities and the Desire to Punish. Social Forces, 85, 1255–1280.
    Langworthy, R. H., & Whitehead, J. T. (1986). Liberalism and Fear As Explanations of Punitiveness. Criminology, 24, 575–591.
    Liu, J. H., Huang, L. L., & McFedries, C. (2008). Cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in social dominance orientation and right wing authoritarianism as a function of political power and societal change. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 116–126.
    Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgment of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1315–1344.
    McFarland, S. G. (2005). On the eve of war: authoritarianism, social dominance, and American students’ attitudes toward attacking Iraq. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 360–367.
    Michel, C. (2016). Violent Street Crime Versus Harmful White-Collar Crime: A Comparison of Perceived Seriousness and Punitiveness. Critical Criminology, 24, 127–143.
    Michel, C. (2017). Examining the Influence of Increased Knowledge About White-Collar Crime on Attitudes Toward It in the Undergraduate Classroom. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 28, 52–73.
    Michel, C., Heide, K. M., & Cochran, J. K. (2016). The Consequences of Knowledge about Elite Deviance. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 359–382.
    Mitchell, M., & Sidanius, J. (1995). Social Hierarchy and the Death Penalty: A Social Dominance Perspective. Political Psychology, 16, 591–619.
    Mustard, D. B. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. Journal of Law & Economics, 44, 285–314.
    Payne, B. K., Gainey, R. R., Triplett, R. A., & Danner, M. J. E. (2004). What drives punitive beliefs?: Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 195–206.
    Peterson, B. E., Doty, R. M., & Winter, D. G. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 174–184.
    Pratto, F., Liu, J. H., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H., & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social Dominance Orientation and the Legitimization of Inequality Across Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409.
    Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320.
    Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
    Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49–68.
    Radelet, M. L. (1981). Racial Characteristics And The Impositon Of The Death Penalty. American Sociological Review, 46, 918–927.
    Rodriguez, S. F., Curry, T. R., & Lee, G. (2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 318–339.
    Rossi, P. H., Waite, E., Bose, C. E., & Berk, R. E. (1974). The Seriousness of Crimes: Normative Structure and Individual Differences. American Sociological Review, 39, 224.
    Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., …Miles, A. (2013). A New Model of Social Class ? Findings from the BBC’ s Great British Class Survey Experiment. Sociology, 47, 219–250.
    Schoepfer, A., Carmichael, S., & Piquero, N. L. (2007). Do perceptions of punishment vary between white-collar and street crimes? Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 151–163.
    Sibley, C. G., Robertson, A., & Wilson, M. S. (2006). Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects. Political Psychology, 27, 755–768.
    Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw, J. S., & Pratto, F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation, Hierarchy Attenuators and Hierarchy Enhancers: Social Dominance Theory and the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338–366.
    Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., Zanna, M. P., & McBride, M.V. (2007). Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: High social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 67–81.
    Sprott, J. B. (1999). Are Members of the Public Tough on Crime? The Dimensions of Public “Punitiveness.” Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 467–474.
    Steffensmeier, D., & Allan, E. (1996). Gender and Crime: Toward a Gendered Theory of Female Offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459–487.
    Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2001). Ethnicity and judges’ sentencing decisions: Hispanic-black-white comparisons. Criminology, 39, 145–178.
    Sutherland, E. H. (1940). White-Collar Criminality. American Sociological Review, 5, 1–12.
    Williams, Y. (n.d.). Blue-Collar Crime: Definition, Statistics & Examples. Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/blue-collar-crime-definition-statistics-examples.html
    Wilson, J. P., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Facial Trustworthiness Predicts Extreme Criminal-Sentencing Outcomes. Psychological Science, 26, 1325–1331.
    Wood, J., & Viki, G. T. (2004). Public perceptions of crime and punishment. In J. R. Adler (Ed.), Forensic Psychology: Concepts, Debates and Practice (pp. 16–36). Willan Publishing.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    104752012
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104752012
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.001.2019.C01
    顯示於類別:[心理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋