Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122456
|
Title: | 動態競爭下的新創企業技術創新擴散-以Gogoro與光陽電池公版競爭案為例 Entrepreneurial Technology Innovation Diffusion under Dynamic Competition-A Case Study of Gogoro and Kymco |
Authors: | 彭郁庭 Peng, Yu-Ting |
Contributors: | 鄭至甫 Jeng, Jyh-Fu 彭郁庭 Peng, Yu-Ting |
Keywords: | 動態競爭 技術創新擴散 AMC分析法 新創企業 Gogoro Technology innovation AMC analysis |
Date: | 2018 |
Issue Date: | 2019-03-07 11:10:23 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 睿能創意(Gogoro Inc.)為台灣少數享譽國際、具潛能之綠色能源新創企業, 成立短短幾年便受到海、內外投資者所青睞,其成功關鍵原因深具企業作為觀摩 學習價值。本研究以睿能創意與燃油機車產業龍頭光陽工業競爭台灣電動機車產 業電池公版規格一案,透過陳明哲教授所提出動態競爭理論察覺-動機-能耐觀點 (AMC 分析法)探究企業競爭對新創企業技術創新擴散的影響。
過往學者探討技術創新擴散多從靜態、自身資源優化及資源拼湊的角度切入 分析,並未考量企業競爭對手、採納者及創新環境隨時間變化所造成之影響。故 本研究試圖從此缺口切入,採用動態競爭理論分析個案公司間競爭互動的過程探 究對技術創新擴散之影響。本研究最後提出本研究得出以下三點結論:(1)產業新 進者與業內既有廠商間競爭將刺激產業內部創新之動機,產品種類及性能的提升 進而降低創新採納者疑慮加速創新擴散。(2)信賴關係越緊密之創新網絡,能提升 網絡內部訊息之傳遞效率,降低潛在使用者採納創新疑慮加速創新之擴散。(3)創 新本身技術特性、創新採納者之意願及市場環境誘因三者環環相扣互相牽動:創 新優化將提升採納者採納之動機,採納者增加刺激市場環境誘因的提供,而完善 的市場環境誘因又將刺激創新不斷優化,進而加速創新擴散形成ㄧ動態正向循環。 E-scooter market in Taiwan has grown 2.1% within the last two years and the global e-scooter market has been predicted to grow at least 12.3% from 2017 to 2020. Development of green energy business has become an urgent issue worldwide and Taiwan is no exception. Gogoro Inc, a green energy entrepreneurial business in Taiwan, accounting for 85% of e-scooter market in Taiwan within only 6 years. How Gogoro become a potential corporation in the industry and how it competes with the leading company in the industry provide rich academic research value.
This research aims to understand the competition between Gogoro and Taiwan’s motorcycle leading company Kymco and how it influences entrepreneurial innovation diffusion from the aspect of dynamic competition. By using an integrated framework of competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry issued by Ming-Jer Chen, we propose three conclusions: (1) Competition between newcomer and industry leader increase the motivation of innovation, industry diversity than proceed the diffusion of technology innovation. (2) Network-based on the foundation of trust increase the efficiency of information flow within the organization, freeing customers from doubts. (3) Innovation optimization increase adopters, adopters than increase the provision of environmental stimuli such as government regulations and complementary products, which then increase the motivation of competition between innovation, accelerating diffusion of innovation and forming a positive cycle. |
Reference: | 中文文獻 尤浚達、林炳明(2012)。臺灣電動機車產業推動回顧。工業材料雜誌, 303期,頁 65-73。 毛良虎(2009)。國際創業論。天津大學管理學院博士學位論文,天津市。 王炘珏(2017)。把「GO粉」變成最強推銷員 13人團隊兩年打造超潮品牌。今周刊, 1068期,頁 74-75。 王珊珊、王宏起. (2012). 技術創新擴散的影響因素綜述. 情報雜誌期刊, 31(6), 197-201. 王美雅、吳思華(2011)。從複雜理論觀點探索創新擴散的動態過程:一個新概念擴散實驗。科技管理學刊, 16(2),頁 81-119。 石育賢、謝騄璘、蕭瑞聖、曾郁茜、沈怡如、嚴文聆(2017)。2017汽機車產業年鑑 。工研院產經中心,頁 3-1-69。 光陽新聞稿,KYMCO 車能網全球震撼發表公共能源交換站充、換電並行協助政府迅速實現全面綠能上路。上網日期2018年5月14日,檢自:https://www.inside.com.tw/2018/03/23/kymco-ionex 朱正庭,Gogoro宣告免收電池權利金盼共組台灣隊。上網日期2018年5月14日,檢自:https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20180131/1289293/ 吳仁麟,陳明哲談競爭/文化 台灣的核心。上網日期2018年4月24日,檢自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/articleLogin.action?id=5007321 吳元熙,反擊Gogoro光陽推出Ionex車能網;下半年開賣充、換電兩用電動機車。上網日期2018年5月17日,檢自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/48588/kymco-announced-new-electric-motorcycle-against-gogoro 李伊晴,談光陽發表電動車網傳Gogoro執行長發內部信回應。上網日期2018年5月18日,檢自:goo.gl/FxfgNP 李淑蓮,新創公司應如何進行專利佈局?Gogoro經驗分享。上網日期2018年5月15日,檢自:http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Industry_Economy/IPNC_161116_0702.htm 周書瑜(2012)。利用專利檢索與分析提供產品發展方向-以靈芝產業為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所,台北市。 易先勇(2014)。引發專利訴訟的影響因素-以動態競爭MC觀點分析ITC案件為例。未出版之碩士論文論文,國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所,台北市。 林子鈞,Gogoro 發布電池 110V 插頭充電方案 光陽的臉色怎麼這麼難看。上網日期2018年5月20日,檢自:https://buzzorange.com/techorange/2018/03/30/gogoro-2018/ 林孟汝,電動機車充換電站5年內拼3,310站。上網日期2018年5月14日,檢自:https://technews.tw/2018/01/03/tw-charge-station-will-set-3310-in-5-years/ 林彥呈,光陽專利申請數擠進十大。上網日期2018年5月14日,檢自:https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/3110059 林珮萱,老大哥光陽如何追趕小老弟Gogoro?。上網日期2018年5月20日,檢自:https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=43595 邱馨儀,Gogoro執行長專訪/Gogoro馳騁歐亞做大市場。上網日期2018年5月18日,檢自:https://money.udn.com/money/story/5649/2437077 邱馨儀,新充換電系統問世 有助電動機車產業發展。上網日期2018年5月17日,檢自:https://udn.com/news/story/7241/3046873 施金君,財團法人車輛研究測試中心 (ARTC)車輛產業調查與分析:台灣機車市場發展概況。上網日期2018年4月2日,檢自:goo.gl/mW2Mxp 唐筱恬、吳靜芳,公版電池規格戰開打!誰是贏家?。上網日期2018年5月14日,檢自:goo.gl/tS4fHM 孫秀慧、林炳明(2011)。電動車動力鋰電池技術專題-台灣電動機車的發展。工業材料雜誌, 291期,頁 70-76。 高詩琴,用Gogoro方案?電動機車換電標準喬不攏。上網日期2018年5月14日,檢自:https://udn.com/news/story/11316/2915827 張元銘(2009)。專利商標分析。台一顧問通訊期刊, 146期,頁 1-7。 張傑,Gogoro與Bosch合作 在巴黎推電動機車共享服務。上網日期2018年5月17日,檢自:https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=158&cat1=20&cat2=&id=0000502867_p3e9kgnp53urqx8p98rlt 張誠、林曉(2009)。技術創新擴散中的動態競爭:基於百度和谷歌(中國)的實證研究。中國軟科學期刊, 12,頁 122-132。 張語羚,防治空污 賴揆:2040年全台電動車化。上網日期2018年5月15日,檢自:http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20171222000251-260202 許牧彥(2016)。加己減異、加異減己-專利佈署的全方位競爭策略。中華民國科技管理研討會論文集, 臺北市:中華民國科技管理學會,頁 101。 連婉茜(2009)。跟隨者廠商競爭性回應特徵與績效之關係:台灣連鎖便利商店實證研究。未出版之碩士論文論文,私立逢甲大學科學管理研究所,台中市。 陳明哲(2009)。預測競爭對手的回應:AMC三環透視法。未出版原始資料。 陳明哲(2012)。“贏”在動態競爭中的”四部曲”。清華管理評論 Tsinghua Business Review, 2,頁 74-80。 陳信榮,Gogoro電池全球首件獲UL2271認證電動機車電池。上網日期2018年5月17日,檢自:http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20160630003910-260405 陳信榮,業者嗆聲 電動機車充電才是主流。上網日期2018年5月18日,檢自:http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20170517000031-260202 陳信榮,Gogoro 「OPEN計畫」打造電動機車界安卓系統。上網日期2018年5月20日,檢自:http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20180319000226-260204 陳彥邦、虞煥榮、胡鴻仁,陸學森從電動機車起跑 Gogoro創作台灣移動新能源故事。上網日期2018年5月17日,檢自:goo.gl/SYJRCS 陳修賢,哈佛商業評論:後波特時代的企業優勢。上網日期2018年4月24日,檢自:https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0000876.html 陳家聲, & 戴士嫻(2007)。創業家社會網絡行為之質性研究。Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 2(4),頁 1-24。 陳慜蔚,2015機車年銷衝破70萬台。上網日期2018年5月17日,檢自:goo.gl/V2BLmJ 曾郁茜,台灣綠色產業深度報告書:台灣電動機車產業現況及未來發展商機。上網日期2018年4月10日,檢自:https://www.greentrade.org.tw/zh-hant/publication/184 曾靉,來自台灣!智能電動機車 Smartscooter 初登場。上網日期2018年5月17日,檢自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/34927/BN-ARTICLE-34927 集邦科技,電動機車充換電站布建計畫 換電站將以 Gogoro 電池為基準。上網日期2018年5月18日,檢自:https://technews.tw/2018/01/05/gogoro-change-battery-station-is-standard/ 楊卓翰、王忻珏(2017)。Gogoro狂潮背後的犀牛精神。今周刊, 1068期,頁 62-72。 楊卓翰、吳靜芳(2017)。政府獨厚Gogoro?工業局採充換電雙軌制。今周刊, 1068期,頁 82-83。 楊明方,Gogoro電動機車 前進日本、西班牙。上網日期2018年5月17日,檢自:goo.gl/bjouxu 楊波、張衛國(2010)。新創企業持續競爭優勢研究。科技與經濟期刊, 23(133),頁 87-91。 經濟部工業局, & 工研院. (2015). 105年度電動機車產業發展推動計畫期末執行成果報告. 趙于萱,三陽工業將發重訊 31日暫停交易。上網日期2018年5月31日,檢自:https://money.udn.com/money/story/5599/3171109 劉光瑩,拔掉電池也能跑!光陽電動機車花3年練絕招。上網日期2018年5月18日,檢自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/articleLogin.action?id=5088845 劉光瑩,南霸天第三代V.S.西雅圖科技新貴-台灣電動機車開打。上網日期2018年5月20日,檢自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/articleLogin.action?id=5089028 劉光瑩、呂國禎,巴黎氣候峰會後,全球四大低碳趨勢。上網日期,檢自:http://topic.cw.com.tw/2015cop21/ 蔡孟修,Gogoro 2今交車1300輛創世界紀錄。上網日期2018年5月17日,檢自:https://tw.news.appledaily.com/life/realtime/20170708/1157004/EDITOR 蔡漢威,電池另外租、11,800 元騎回家 中華 e-moving 推出車電分離豪省方案。上網日期2018年5月17日,檢自:https://tnntoday.com/16603/china-motor-emoving-20170720 賴品中(2018)。企業併購的動態競爭分析-以台灣半導體封測廠商日月光與矽品合併為例 。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所 ,台北市。 顏孟賢, 司徒達賢, 于卓民, & 彭朱如(2017)。跨交易網絡間形成之學習網絡:以自行車業A-Team為例。管理學報, 34(3),頁 431-466。 蘇宇庭,富比士評IoT新創100強,台灣僅一家公司上榜。上網日期2018年5月17日,檢自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/37780/BN-2015-10-26-143407-102 蘇哲弘、黃立中、朱昭怡、林昱宏、林炳明(2013)。推動電動機車面臨的問題與未來展望。工業材料雜誌, 315期,頁 62-69。 蘋果日報採訪新聞稿,抗空污 2035年起 汽機車全電動。上網日期2018年5月18日,檢自:https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/daily/20171222/37881224
英文文獻 Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure, and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 567-574. Alkemade, F., & Castald, C. (2005). Strategies for the diffusion of innovations on social network. Computational Economics, 25, 3-23. Attewell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science, 3, 1-19. Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A., & G.Smith, K. (2000). The paradox of success: An achival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 837-853. Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2009). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366. Baldridge, J. V., & Burnham, R. A. (1975). Organizational innovation: Individual, organizational, and environmental impacts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(2), 165-176. Bantel, K. A. (1998). Technology-based “adolescent” firm configurations: Strategy identification, context, and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 205-230. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2006). Complementarity in R&D cooperation strategies. Review of Industrial Organization, 28, 401-426. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892-895. Branstetter, L. (2006). Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States. Journal of International Economics, 68, 325-344. Bulter, J. E., Brown, B., & Chamornmarn, W. (2003). Informational networks, entrepreneurial action and performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20, 151-174. Chen, M.-J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 100-134. Chen, M.-J., & MacMillan, I. C. (1992). Nonresponse and Delayed Response to Competitive Moves: The Roles of Competitor Dependence and Action Irreversibility. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 539-570. Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. (1994). Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: An expectancy-valence framework. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 85-102. Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive dynamics: themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. The Academy of Management Annals, 6, 1-76. Chen, M.-J., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. (1992). Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses. Management science, 38(3), 439-455. The innovator’s battle plan, Retrieved May 26 2018, from:https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/the-innovators-battle-plan Cool, K. O., Dierickx, I., & Szulanski, G. (1997). Diffusion of innovations within organizations: Electronic switching in the bell system, 1971-1982. Organization Science, 8(5), 543-559. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreurship Theory and Practice Journal, 16, 7-26. Cyert, R. M., & G.March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. (Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign`s, Champaig,USA. Day, G. S. (1981). Strategic market analysis and definition: An integrated approach . Strategic Management Journal, 2(3), 281-299. Delre, S. A., W.Jager, Bijmolt, T. H. A., & M.A.Janssen. (2007). Targeting and timing promotional activities: An agent-based model for the takeoff of new products. Journal of Business Research, 60(8), 826-835. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management science, 35(12), 1504-1511. Dimitratos, P., Buck, T., Fletcher, m., & Li, N. (2016). The motivation of international entrepreneurshop: The case of chinese transnational entrepreneurs. International Business Review, 25(5), 1103-1113. Fagyal, Z., Swarup, S., Escobar, A. M., Gasser, L., & Lakkaraju, K. (2010). Centers and peripheries: network roles in language change. Lingua, 120(8), 2061-2079. Fernhaber, S. A., McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. (2007). Exploring the role of industry structure in new venture internationalization. Entrepreurship Theory and Practice Journal, 4, 517-542. Granovetter, M. S. (2007). The strength of weak ties. The American Hournal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. Greenhalgh, C., & Rogers, M. (2010). Innovation, intellectual property, and economic growth. Princeton University Press. Greve, A. (1995). Networks and entrepreneurship - An analysis of social relations, occupational background, and use of contacts during the establishment process Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(1), 1-24. Competing for the future, Retrieved May 28 2018, from:https://hbr.org/1994/07/competing-for-the-future Hayton, J. C., & Kelley, D. J. (2006). A competenct-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 407-427. Hsu, M.-Y., & Chen, M.-J. (2006). Competitor analysis and inter-firm rivalry -by integrating market commonality and resource similarity. National Chen-Chi University, Taiwan. Lambiotte, R., & P.Panzarasa. (2009). Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion. journal of Informetrics, 3, 180-190. Lee, M., & Lee, S. (2017). Identifying new business opportunities from competitor intelligence: An integrated use of patent and trademark databases. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 119, 170-183. MacGarvie, M. (2005). The determinants of international knowledge diffusion as measured by patent citations. Economics letters, 87, 121-126. Mansfield, E. (1989). The difussion of industrial robots in Japan and the United States. Research Policy, 18, 183-192. Nord, W. R., & Tucker, S. (1987). Implementing routine and radical innovations: Lexington Books. Peterson, R. A., Kozmetsky, G., & Ridgway, N. M. (1983). Perceived causes of small business failure: A research note. Amrican Journal of Smal Business, 8(1), 15-19. Philip, & Mathew. (2011). Factors affecting business success of small & medium enterprises (SMEs). Amity Global Business Review, 6(1), 118-136. Presutti, M., Boari, C., & Fratocchi, L. (2007). Knowledge acquisition and the foreign development of high-tech start-ups: A social capital approach. International Business Review, 16, 23-46. Reitzig, M. (2004). Strategic management of intellectual property. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(3), 35-40. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations: The Free Press. Rumelt, R. P. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167-185. Sandnerc, P. G., & Block, J. (2011). The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks. Research Policy, 40, 969-985. Scherer, F. M., & Ross, D. (2009). Industrial market structure and economic performance. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Chicago. Shane, S. (2000). Technologucal opportunities and new firm creation. Institute foe Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 47(2), 205-220. Simpson, M., Tuck, N., & Bellamy, S. (2004). Small business success factors: the role of education and training. Education + Training, 46(8), 481-491. Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Gannon, M. J., & Chen, M.-J. (1991). Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 60-85. Suarez, F. F., & Utterback, J. M. (1995). Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 415-430. Sutton, J. (1996). Technology and market structure. European Economic Review, 40(3-5), 511-530. Wani, T. A., & Ali, S. W. (2015). Innovation diffusion theory review & scope in the study of adoption of smartphones in India. Journal of General Management Research, 3(2), 101-118. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 105364125 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105364125 |
Data Type: | thesis |
DOI: | 10.6814/THE.NCCU.TIIPM.003.2019.F08 |
Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
412501.pdf | 1478Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 2 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|