English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51728725      Online Users : 420
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122404


    Title: 證券型代幣(STO)之監管研究
    A Study on Regulatory Framework of Security Token Offering
    Authors: 謝依紋
    Hsieh, Yi-Wen
    Contributors: 林國全
    Lin, Kuo-Chuan
    謝依紋
    Hsieh, Yi-Wen
    Keywords: 首次代幣發行
    區塊鏈
    虛擬貨幣
    首次公開發行股票
    證券型代幣
    眾籌平台
    智慧合約
    智慧監理
    Iniital coin offering
    Blockchain
    Virtual currency
    Initial public offerings
    Securities token offering
    Crowdfunding platform
    Smart contract
    Smart supervision
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-03-04 22:27:10 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來區塊鏈的興起,造就了金融科技的浪潮,金融市場因區塊鏈技術的應用,不斷推陳出新金融商品,又隨著虛擬貨幣的不斷水漲船高,運用區塊鏈與虛擬貨幣開啟籌資大門的首次代幣發行(Initial Coin Offering,簡稱ICO)成為新創事業募集資金的新寵兒。ICO之所以受到新創事業之青睞在於各國監理機關在ICO問市時對於其性質及定性仍未有準繩,而成為金融監管的模糊地帶,新創業者遂一擁而上的透過ICO向大眾募集資金。隨著市場充斥著詐騙及虛擬貨幣炒作之投機風氣,主管機關意識到必須有所作為,而開始向投資者提醒ICO之風險。惟單純的警告似乎不足以扼止投資者投資之意願,ICO市場依舊十分火熱。
    ICO類似於首次公開發行股票 ( Initial Public Offerings,簡稱 IPO )在於其皆係向不特定之投資大眾募集資金,惟取得的係發行公司發行的代幣而非股票,然而其卻未受到主管機關監管,造成監理漏洞,部分監理機關開始表態,屬於證券性質之ICO應受該國證券法規之監管,此種應受證券法規管制下發行的代幣即稱為證券型代幣(Securities Token Offering,簡稱 STO)。惟ICO商品的特性與IPO不同,且其複雜不易瞭解,實難與傳統證券相比擬,傳統證券法規恐無法一體適用在STO上。是以,如何量身訂作此種特殊型態的金融工具正考驗著主管機關的智慧。
    ICO缺乏透明度、評價困難且價格波動性高及市場操控風險高等特性,其監理強度仍應高於傳統IPO商品,惟ICO背後的基礎設施-區塊鏈因具有不可修改、交易同步及分布式信任架構,用以作為金融領域之用,可降低成本,結合科技發展提供創新產品,仍不應過度禁止,以避免抑止金融市場發展,是以,採差異化管理,允許發行公司可利用區塊鏈技術發行證券型代幣,而新創業者,因其公司尚值草創階段,風險屬性較高,於現行眾籌平台募集資金,對投資人屬性作適度之限制,以保護投資人權益及維持金融市場穩定,另外眾籌平台同步採用區塊鏈技術,以降低市場參與者法遵成本及主管機關監理成本。
    鑑於證券型代幣與傳統IPO商品仍有不同,在資訊揭露方面,除了在現行法規框架要求下,仍應考量證券型代幣之特殊性,在技術層面如智慧合約及基礎技術部分充分說明,並就代幣價格之決定、可接受之代幣類型、相關風險及其有關之會計處理及評價作揭露,如果是上市櫃公司應另揭露代幣發行對發行人財務可能的影響及對現存之公司股東的影響。至於對證券型代幣之報告要求,原則上與現行IPO類似,定期須揭露年報、季報及遇有特殊情形發生時之臨時報告事項,另外就智慧合約及應用於STO相關程序提出審計報告。
    最後,基於區塊鏈的技術運用,可減化證券之交易及結算流程,主管機關應積極思考如何利用區塊鏈的技術重新塑造市場參與者角色,並利用區塊鏈的技術達成智慧監理的目標,區塊鏈雖帶給監理機關一個挑戰,但也是一個機會,主管機關應樂觀面對,為打造我國成一個數位科技的金融市場帶來新契機。
    In recent years, the rise of the blockchain has created a wave of financial technology. With the blockchain technology, new financial products have continuously introduced to the financial market. As the price of virtual currency increase, initial Coin Offering (ICO) has become the new fundraising method. The reason why ICO is favored by new ventures is that the supervisory had no guidelines ICO when it came to the market. New entrepreneurs are rushing to raise funds through the ICO to the public. As the market is full of frauds and speculation, the authorities started to aware that they need to do more. The authorities alerted investors the risks of ICO. However, the warning seemed to be insufficient to stop investors` willingness to invest. The ICO market is still very hot.
    ICO is similar to Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) in raising funds from public. The different is that investors get tokens instead of stocks in ICO. However, ICO is not regulated that cause supervision loopholes. Some supervision announced that ICO has securities nature should be regulated under the country`s securities regulations. Such token issued under the securities laws is called Securities Token Offering (STO). However, the characteristics of ICO are different from IPO, and ICO is complexity and difficult to understand. Traditional securities regulations may not be suitable for STO. Therefore, how to regulate this type of financial instrument is testing the wisdom of the authority.
    ICO lack transparency, evaluation difficulty, high price volatility and easily manipulation. Its supervision intensity should be higher than traditional IPO. The infrastructure of ICO is blockchain, which is unmodifiable, transactional synchronization and distributed trust. Blockchain used as a financial field, can reduce costs and provide innovative products. It should not be excessively banned to use it. Therefore, suggesting differentiated management allows the issuing company to use the blockchain. Technology issues securities-type tokens, while new entrepreneurs, because of their company`s value-added stage, have higher risk attributes, raise funds on the current crowdfunding platform, and impose appropriate restrictions on investor attributes to protect investor rights and maintain finance.
    In terms of information disclosure, additional requirements, including smart contract, basic technology, token price, acceptable token type, risks, accounting treatments and evaluations are necessary. If the listed company issuing the STO, it should disclose the possible impact on the token issue and influence on the company`s shareholders. As for the reporting requirements on STO, are similar to the current IPO, annual reports, quarterly reports and interim reports in the event of special circumstances are needed. Moreover, audit reports on smart contracts and applications related to STO are suggested.
    Finally, using of blockchain technology can simplize the transaction and settlement process of securities. The authorities should actively consider how to use the technology of blockchain to reshape the role of market participants and achieve smart supervision. The blockchain brings a challenge to the supervision, but it also provides an opportunity. Authorities should be optimistic to build a digital financial market in the future.
    Reference: 一、英文文獻:
    (一)期刊論文:
    1. Steven C. Bradford, The New Federal Crowdfunding Exemption: Promise Unfulfilled, 40 Securities Regulation Law Journal (May. 2012).
    2. The Market in Initial Coin Offerings Risks Becoming a Bubble, The Economist; Dearing, Rule of Thumb for ICO Investor: Explore Risks Involved (June. 9 ,2017).

    (二)研究報告
    1. European Securities and Markets Authority, The Distributed Ledge Technology Applied to Securities Markets, Discuss Paper (Jun. 2016).
    2. Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group, Own Initiative Report on Initial Coin Offerings and Crypto-Assets (Oct. 19, 2018).
    3. World Economic Forum, The Future of Financial Infrastructure- An Ambitious Look at How Blockchain Can Reshape Financial Services (Aug. 2016).
    4. Wulf A. Kaal & Marco Dell’Erba, Initial Coin Offerings: Emerging Practices, Risk Factors, and Red Flags, U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper (Nov. 14, 2017).
    (三)網路資料
    1. Aaron Stanley, ICO Ban? Canada’s Regulators Are Giving One Token Sale a Big Break (Sep. 6, 2017), available at: https://www.coindesk.com/ico-ban-canadas-regulators-giving-one-token-sale-big-break.
    2. Alex Sunnarborg, ICO Investments Pass VC Funding in Blockchain Market First (update: Jun. 11, 2017), available at: https://www.coindesk.com/ico-investments-pass-vc-funding-in-blockchain-market-first.
    3. Amelia Tomasicchio, Europe, ICO regulation to arrive in 2019(Oct. 9, 2018), available at: https://cryptonomist.ch/en/2018/10/09/europe-ico-regulation/.
    4. Australian Securities & Investments Commission, 18-122MR ASIC takes action on misleading or deceptive conduct in ICOs (May. 1, 2018), https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/find-a-media-release/2018-releases/18-122mr-asic-takes-action-on-misleading-or-deceptive-conduct-in-icos/.
    5. Australian Securities & Investments Commission, Initial coin offerings (Oct. 11, 2017), available at: https://www.iosco.org/library/ico-statements/Australia%20-%20ASIC%20-%20Initial%20coin%20offerings.pdf.
    6. Autorité des Marches Financiers, French ICOS - A New Method OF Finance?( Nov. 14,2018), available at: https://www.amf-france.org/en_US/Publications/Lettres-et-cahiers/Risques-et-tendances/Archives?docId=workspace%3A%2F%2FSpacesStore%2F27604d2f-6f2b-4877-98d4-6b1cf0a1914b.
    7. Blockgeeks, What are Security Tokens?, available at: https://blockgeeks.com/guides/security-tokens/.
    8. Canadian Securities Administration, The Canadian Securities Administrators Launches a Regulatory Sandbox Initiative (Feb. 23, 2017), available at: https://www.securities-administrators.ca/aboutcsa.aspx?id=1555.
    9. Canadian Securities Administrators, CSA Staff Notice 46-307- Cryptocurrency Offerings (Aug. 24, 2017), available at: http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/SecuritiesLaw_csa_20170824_cryptocurrency-offerings.htm.
    10. Canadian Securities Administrators, CSA Staff Notice 46-307- Securities Law Implications for Offerings of Tokens (June. 11, 2018), available at: http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/SecuritiesLaw_csa_20180611_46-308_securities-law-implications-for-offerings-of-tokens.htm.
    11. Charles Bovaird, Why Bitcoin Prices Have Risen More Than 400% This Year (Sep. 1, 2017), available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/cbovaird/2017/09/01/why-bitcoin-prices-have-risen-more-than-400-this-year/#5b2be5a66f68.
    12. Coin desk, available at: https://www.coindesk.com/price/bitcoin.
    13. Commission, A.S.I. Initial coin offerings and crypto-currency, available at: https://asic.gov.au/regulatory-resources/digital-transformation/initial-coin-offerings-and-crypto-currency/#when.
    14. Daniel Heller, Initial Coin Offerings: Crowdfunding in a regulatory vacuum, Peterson Institute for international Economics (Aug. 25, 2017), available at: https://piie.com/blogs/realtime-economic-issues-watch/initial-coin-offerings-crowdfunding-regulatory-vacuum.
    15. Daniel Roberts, The SEC brings its ICO crackdown out into the open (Nov. 20, 2018), available at: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sec-brings-ico-crackdown-open-132238303.html.
    16. Energy Premier, ICO vs. crowdfunding — what’s different? (Mar. 9, 2018), available at: https://cryptocurrencyhub.io/ico-vs-crowdfunding-whats-different-bc54f13ede79.
    17. European Parliament, Draft Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Crowdfunding Service Providers for Business (Oct. 8, 2018), available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FNONSGML%2BCOMPARL%2BPE-626.662%2B02%2BDOC%2BPDF%2BV0%2F%2FEN.
    18. Fabian Schuh, Daniel Larimer, BITSHARES 2.0: FINANCIAL SMART CONTRACT PLATFORM(Nov.12, 2015), available at: https://www.weusecoins.com/assets/pdf/library/Bitshares%20Financial%20Platform.pdf.
    19. Financier Worldwide, The ‘Wild West’ of financing: are ICOs the end of venture capital fundraising? (May, 2018), available at: https://www.financierworldwide.com/the-wild-west-of-financing-are-icos-the-end-of-venture-capital-fundraising/#.XAiFN2gzbb0.
    20. Fintechnews Singapore, What SGX Expects of Listed Companies Conducting an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) (Nov. 21,2018), available at: http://fintechnews.sg/26417/blockchain/sgx-ico-public-listed/.
    21. Guest Writer, What is a Security Token Offering (STO) and Why You Need an Advisor (Oct. 8, 2018), available at: https://www.ccn.com/opinion-what-is-a-security-token-offering-sto-and-why-you-need-an-advisor/.
    22. Jeff John Robers, Canada Pours Cold Water on `Initial Coin Offerings`(Aug. 28, 2017), available at: http://fortune.com/2017/08/28/canada-ico/.
    23. Jerry Yu, Differences Between a White Paper, Yellow Paper, and Beige Paper, available at: https://medium.com/@hello_38248/differences-between-a-white-paper-yellow-paper-and-beige-paper-ad173f982237.
    24. Josiah Wilmoth, Indiegogo’s First Security Token ICO Listing Raised $18 Million (Oct. 9,2018), available at: https://www.ccn.com/indiegogos-first-security-token-ico-raised-18-million/.
    25. KPMG, Could blockchain be the foundation of a viable KYC utility (Mar 2018), available at: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/jm/pdf/kpmg-blockchain-kyc-utility.pdf.
    26. Laura Noonan, Singapore keen on initial coin offerings, Financial Times (Nov. 15, 2017), available at: https://www.ft.com/content/17173c92-c9e6-11e7-ab18-7a9fb7d6163e.
    27. Lawrence Lundy, Jamie Burke, Aron van Ammers, All you Need to know About Initial Coin Offerings, Outlier Ventures Research, available at: http://www.the-blockchain.com/docs/Initial_Coin_Offerings_Outlier_Ventures_Research.pdf.
    28. Lea, Venture Capital 3.0: The Initial Coin Offering Explained, Financial Review (May. 2,2017), available at: http://www.afr.com/technology/venture-capital-30-theinitial-coin-offering-explained-20170502-gvxhos.
    29. Monetary Authority of Singapore, A Guide to Digital Token Offerings (Nov. 14,2017), available at: http://www.mas.gov.sg/News-and-Publications/Monographs-and-Information-Papers/2017/Guidance-on-Digital-Token-Offerings.aspx.
    30. Monetary Authority of Singapore, MAS warns Digital Token Exchanges and ICO Issuer (May. 24,2018), available at: http://www.mas.gov.sg/News-and-Publications/Media-Releases/2018/MAS-warns-Digital-Token-Exchanges-and-ICO-Issuer.aspx.
    31. Nikhilesh De, EU Lawmaker Wants to Include ICOs in New Crowdfunding Rules (Aug. 13,2018), available at: https://www.coindesk.com/european-parliament-proposes-ico-regulations-for-crowdfunding-efforts/.
    32. Nikhilesh De, The SEC Just Launched a Fake ICO Website to Educate Investors (May. 16, 2018), available at: https://www.coindesk.com/the-sec-just-launched-a-fake-ico-website-to-educate-investors.
    33. Peter Reeves, Georgina Willcock & Marcus Wong, ASIC releases updated guidance on initial coin offerings and cryptocurrency (May. 2, 2018), available at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=55c053b6-0a3e-4a05-8f81-920ffcc702e8.
    34. Richard Kastelein, What Initial Coin Offerings Are, and Why VC Firms Care (Mar. 24, 2017), available at: https://hbr.org/2017/03/what-initial-coin-offerings-are-and-why-vc-firms-care.
    35. Satisgroup, Cryptoasset market coverage initiation: network creation (Jul. 11, 2018), available at: https://research.bloomberg.com/pub/res/d28giW28tf6G7T_Wr77aU0gDgFQ.
    36. Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008), https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
    37. Securities and Exchange Commission, Regulation Crowdfunding, available at: https://www.sec.gov/smallbusiness/exemptofferings/regcrowdfunding.
    38. Securities and Exchange Commission, Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:The DAO (July.25, 2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/investreport/34-81207.pdf.
    39. Securities and Exchange Commission, Rules On Initial Coin Offerings (Aug. 21, 2018), available at: http://www.sec.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/MC-Rules-for-ICOs.pdf.
    40. Securities and Exchange Commission, Statement on Cryptocurrencies and Initial Coin Offerings (Dec. 11, 2017), available at: https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/statement-clayton-2017-12-11.
    41. Securities and Exchange Commission, Two ICO Issuers Settle SEC Registration Charges, Agree to Register Tokens as Securities (Nov. 16, 2018), available at: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-264.
    42. Selva Ozelli, Why Switzerland is Becoming a “Crypto Nation” with a Flourishing ICO Market: Expert Take (Feb. 18, 2018), available at: https://cointelegraph.com/news/why-switzerland-is-becoming-a-crypto-nation-with-a-flourishing-ico-market-expert-take.
    43. Shane Shifflett, Coulter Jones, Buyer Beware: Hundreds of Bitcoin Wannabes Show Hallmarks of Fraud (May. 17,2018),available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/buyer-beware-hundreds-of-bitcoin-wannabes-show-hallmarks-of-fraud-1526573115.
    44. Stan Higgins, Australia`s Securities Watchdog Has Halted 5 ICOs Since April (Sep. 24, 2018), https://www.coindesk.com/australias-securities-watchdog-has-halted-5-icos-since-april/.
    45. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority, FINMA publishes ICO guidelines, Press Release (Feb. 16,2018), available at: https://www.finma.ch/en/news/2018/02/20180216-mm-ico-wegleitung/.
    46. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority, Guidelines-for enquiries regarding the regulatory framework for initial coin offerings (Feb.16, 2018), available at: https://www.finma.ch/en/news/2018/02/20180216-mm-ico-wegleitung/.
    47. The Directorate General for Economic Development, Research, and Innovation of the State of Geneva, Guide: Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) in the Canton of Geneva (Oct. 17, 2018), available at: https://www.ge.ch/document/guide-initial-coin-offerings-icos-canton-geneva/telecharger.
    48. The Financial Conduct Authority, The FCA’s regulatory approach to crowdfunding and similar activities, at 10(Oct. 24, 2013), available at: https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/consultation/cp13-13.pdf.
    49. The Securities and Exchange Commission, Thailand, Decree on the Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561(2018), available at: https://www.sec.or.th/EN/SECInfo/LawsRegulation/Documents/actandroyal/digitalasset_decree_2561_EN.pdf.
    二、中文文獻
    (一)中文專書
    1. 王志誠,現代金融法,新學林,2017年10月。
    2. 王志誠、邵慶平、洪秀芬、陳俊仁,實用證券交易法,新學林,五版,2018年2月。
    3. 王聖雯,ICO市場的法律問題與監管研究,初版,2018年9月。
    4. 余雪明,證券交易法-比較證交法,2016年9月。
    5. 谷湘儀、臧正運,金融科技發展與法律,五南圖書出版股份有限公司,2017年05月。
    6. 曾宛如,證券交易法原理,元照,六版,2012年8月。
    7. 曾宛如,證券交易法原理,元照出版社,2005年3月,頁265。。
    8. 楊東,練金有法-區塊鍵商業實踐與法律指南,北京航空航天大學出版社,2017年6月1日。
    9. 劉連煜,新證券交易法實例研習,元照,十四版,2016年9月。
    10. 賴英照,股市遊戲規則-最新證券交易法解析,2017年9月。
    (二)期刊論文
    1. 王志誠,股權群眾募資之新里程-兼論證券商經營股權性質群眾募資平臺業務之法制發展及課題,華岡法粹,第61期, 2016年12月。
    2. 何寯銘,ICO商業模式的法律性質分析及監管模式優化--基於九國ICO監管現狀,上海金融,2018年第2期。
    3. 徐坊寧,淺析首次公開募幣ICO的發展與監管,科技經濟導刊,第17期,2018年 6月。
    4. 高啟仁,我國推動「創櫃板」與「群眾募資」之情形,證券暨期貨月刊,第32卷第4期, 2014年4月16日。
    5. 許宗力,論法律明確性之審查:從司法院大法官相關解釋談起,國立臺灣大學法學論叢,第41卷第4期,2012年12月。
    6. 郭戎晉、李震華、吳李祺,接軌國際-從監理與法制環境談我國區 塊鏈生態體系的建構,財金資訊季刊,第 90 期,2017年10月。
    7. 陳恭,智能合約的發展與應用,財金資訊90期,2017年10月。
    8. 楊英伸,區塊鏈發展趨勢,證期月刊,第34卷第10期,2016年10月。
    9. 臧正運、曾宛如、方嘉麟,從區塊鏈融資論眾募規範趨勢,月旦法學雜誌,第273期,2018年2月。
    10. 劉連煜,論票券是否可能成為證券法上所規範之證券-美國聯邦最高法院Reves v. Ernst & Young乙案之檢討,公司法理論與判決研究(一),自版,1995年1月。
    11. 蔡昌憲,我國股權性質群眾募資之管制發展:從創櫃版到民間募資平台,臺大法學論叢,第45卷第1期,2016年3月。
    12. 戴銘昇,論證券交易法上之「有價證券」,華岡法粹,第38期,2007年7月。
    (三)研究報告
    1. 金融研究發展基金管理委員會,金融區塊鏈國際發展趨勢與監理,107年10月。
    2. 臺灣證券交易所,從數位科技環境看證券商經營策略的發展,105 年 12 月 15 日。
    3. 林瑛珪,淺談群眾募資及台灣群眾募資發展現況,2016年1月。
    (四)網路資料
    1. Ennio Y. Lu,澳洲證交所應用分散式帳本技術將節省「230億美元」營運成本,2018年8月17日,網頁:https://www.blocktempo.com/asx-blockchain-application-reduce-cost/。
    2. 中國網信網,國家互聯網資訊辦公室關於《區塊鏈資訊服務管理規定(徵求意見稿)》公開徵求意見的通知,2018年10月19日,網址:http://www.cac.gov.cn/2018-10/19/c_1123585598.htm。
    3. 立法院第9屆第6會期財政委員會第 6 次全體委員會議,「虛擬通貨發展現況及主要國家監 管措施」暨「如何避免泛公股行庫藉 著防制洗錢所需,針對香港澳門大陸地區金流進行嚴審現象」專題報告。
    4. 吳筱涵,區塊鏈與虛擬貨幣法律專題(十一) 針對虛擬貨幣交易所兼營虛擬代幣ICO一條龍服務之法律觀察,網頁: http://zhongyinlawyer.com.tw/%E5%8D%80%E5%A1%8A%E9%8F%88%E8%88%87%E8%99%9B%E6%93%AC%E8%B2%A8%E5%B9%A3%E6%B3%95%E5%BE%8B%E5%B0%88%E9%A1%8C%E5%8D%81%E4%B8%80-%E9%87%9D%E5%B0%8D%E8%99%9B%E6%93%AC%E8%B2%A8%E5%B9%A3%E4%BA%A4/。
    5. 金管會新聞稿,依證券交易法第十五條第三款規定,核准證券經紀商得建置網路平台經營股權性質群眾募資業務,https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=128&parentpath=0,3&mcustomize=lawnew_view.jsp&dataserno=201505010002&toolsflag=Y&dtable=NewsLaw。
    6. 金管會新聞稿,金管會對「開放股權性質群眾募資業務」之說明,2015年04月23日,https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=201504230002&toolsflag=Y&dtable=News。
    7. 金融監督管理委員會,金管會再次提醒社會大眾投資比特幣等虛擬商品的風險,2018年06月22日,https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=201712190002&aplistdn=ou=news,ou=multisite,ou=chinese,ou=ap_root,o=fsc,c=tw&dtable=News。
    8. 金融監督管理委員會,金管會提醒社會大眾有關ICO的風險,2018年06月22日,https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=201806220002&aplistdn=ou=news,ou=multisite,ou=chinese,ou=ap_root,o=fsc,c=tw&dtable=News。
    9. 胡雅筑(天遠律師事務所),美國證管會SEC出手嚴打ICO,2018年11月12日,網址: https://www.ecounsel.net/zh/2018/11/12/sec-ico/。
    10. 區塊客,新加坡證交所、金管局攜手將利用區塊鏈加速證券交割結算,2018年8月25日,網址: https://blockcast.it/2018/08/25/singapore-stock-exchange-taps-blockchain-for-faster-settlement/。
    11. 黃有容,中時電子報,虛擬貨幣交易平台處境難 僅1家交易帳戶在台灣,2018年5月29日,網址: https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20180529004460-260410。
    12. 經濟日報,涉有價證券的ICO 金管會要管了,2018年10月22日,https://money.udn.com/money/story/5648/3435380?from=popinpc2。
    13. 關春修、張純怡,工商時報,安侯建業專欄-迎接代幣經濟新時代泰國頒布數位資產法案,2018年06月27日,網址: https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20180627000350-260205。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法學院碩士在職專班
    105961037
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105961037
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.LLME.003.2019.F10
    Appears in Collections:[法學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    103701.pdf2698KbAdobe PDF26View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback