政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/122311

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Master for Eminent Public Administrators > Theses > Item 140.119/122311

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122311

Title:	臺北市政府警察局組織改造之研究- 以大同分局為例 A Study on the Organizational Transformation of the Taipei Municipal Police Department- A Case of Datong Precinct
Authors:	黃忠道 Huang, Chung-Tao
Contributors:	陳敦源黃忠道 Huang, Chung-Tao
Keywords:	整併派出所組織再造績效評估平衡計分卡落後指標 Consolidation of police stations Organizational reengineering Performance evaluation Balanced scorecard Lagged indicator
Date:	2019
Issue Date:	2019-02-12 15:54:22 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	臺北市市長柯文哲，4年前提出整併派出所一案，希望考量經濟規模下，整合派出所讓轄區範圍適中，警力調度靈活，提升執勤效能及強化治安、交通維護工作。當時大同分局的雙連、大橋2間派出所進行整併，此舉立即引起當地里長的強烈反彈，連議員也多次質疑柯市長硬推整併政策的適當性，但警察局仍遵照市長指示，成立警察勤務改革推動小組來推動整併派出所試辦，自104年7月1日起至12月31日止試辦6個月。最後結果是大同分局轄下的建成派出所與雙連派出所整合、民族路派出所與大橋派出所整合。究竟地方為何會有這麼大的反對聲音？過去臺灣其他縣市也有整併派出所的相關實例，也同樣面臨員警與民眾的抗拒與阻礙等問題，因此，本研究係為瞭解臺北市試辦整併派出所的來龍去脈以及面臨的阻礙為何？解決問題的方式為何？爰用文獻分析法、次級資料分析法及深度訪談，針對個案關鍵當事者共13個人進行深度訪談，並利用平衡計分卡四大構面輔助本研究瞭解受訪者對整併派出所各項績效衡量指標認同的程度。在分析訪談資料後，統合相關問題及落後指標，提出研究發現，分別是「整併派出所成敗的關鍵在於主事者的魄力與決心」、「目前整併派出所推動問題主要有五項」、「民眾反對整併派出所不受整併正面效果的影響」以及「整併政策係自上而下制定，缺乏民意支持」；最後對整併派出所政策提出4項建議，分別是「溝通應讓雙方瞭解理由和澄清誤解，並加入籠絡手段」、「整併前應規劃周詳；整併時應循序漸進」、「見警率非強調派出所在哪裡，而是警察出現的頻率」以及「政策制定應由下而上，始能貼近民意」，提供未來政府續推動整併派出所之參考。 Taipei Mayor Ko wen-je, 4 years ago proposed to integrate police stations, hoping to consider the scale of the economy, the integration of police stations to allow a moderate scope of jurisdiction, flexible police dispatching, improve the effectiveness of operations and strengthen law and order, traffic maintenance work. At that time, Datong Precinct`s Shuanglian and Daqiao 2 police stations were carried out, which immediately caused a strong backlash from the local minister, and even members repeatedly questioned the appropriateness of Mayor Ko`s hard push and policy, but the police department still complied with the mayor`s instructions and A police service reform promotion team was set up to promote the trial of the integrate police station, which has been piloted for 6 months from July 1 to December 31. The final result is Datong Precinct`s Jiancheng police station and Shuanglian police station integration, Minzu Police station and Daqiao police station integration. Why is there such a big opposition in the place? In the past, other counties and cities in Taiwan also had relevant examples of integrate police stations, and also faced resistance and obstruction from the police and the public. Therefore, this study is to understand the context of the trial of the Taipei City Police station and the obstacles faced, what is the way to solve the problem? Invoking used literature analysis, secondary data analysis and in-depth interviews to conduct in-depth interviews with a total of 13 people from key parties in the case, and to use the four-way balanced scorecard to assist in this study to understand the extent to which respondents agreed on the performance measures of the integrate police station. After analyzing the interview data, the relevant problems and backward pointers are integrated, and the research finds that the key to the success or failure of the police station is "the courage and determination of the principal", "There are five main problems in the promotion of the police station at present", "the public opposes the impact of the integrate and the positive effect of the police station" and "lack of public support " Finally, 4 suggestions were made for the policy of the integrate police station, namely, "Communication should make the two sides understand the reasons and clarify misunderstandings, and join the means of the cage", "the integrate should be well planned, the integrate should be gradual and orderly","the alarm rate does not emphasize where the police station is, but the frequency of the appearance of the police" and "policy formulation should be down from the bottom, can be close to public opinion", to provide the future government to continue to promote the integration police station reference.
Reference:	壹、中文部分內政部警政署（2008）。「從警勤區制度探討都市地區警力配置最佳策略」期末審查報告書。臺北市：內政部警政署。王彥喬（2015）。柯P提20人以下派出所整併居民憂治安不保，2015年4月26日，取自：網址http://www.storm.mg/article/47350。王維邦（2009）。次級資料的分析與應用(Secondary Data: Analysis and Application)。取自：網址http://soc.thu.edu.tw/ courses/u97-2.files/1811.pdf。丘昌泰（2002）。邁向績效導向的地方政府管理。研考雙月刊，（26）3，頁47。行政院研究發展考核委員會（2004）。政府績效評估。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。江岷欽（1994）。組織精簡芻議（上）。人事月刊，19（3），頁37-41。江伯晟（2004）。我國警察分駐派出所整併之研究—以新竹縣警察局為例。中央警察大學行政警察研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園市。朱景鵬（2012）。政府組織改造回顧與展望。檔案季刊，11（1），頁4-17。吳秉恩（1991）。組織行為學，臺北市：華泰文化事業股份有限公司。吳定（1996）。組織發展理論與技術。臺北：天一圖書公司，頁55-62。吳定、鄭勝分、李盈盈（2005），組織發展應用技術。臺北市：智勝文化事業有限公司。吳安妮（2001）。公務機關實施平衡計分卡及績效評估及管理制度之探討：以主計處會計作業小組為對象。行政院主計處90年度委託研究計畫。吳安妮（2004）。平衡計分卡在公務機關實施之探討。政府績效評估（初版）。臺北：行政院研究發展考核委員會，頁115-135。吳嘉苓（2013）。訪談法。收錄於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞(主編)，社會及行為科學研究方法(二)：質性研究法。臺北市：臺灣東華書局股份有限公司。李湧清（2001）。警察勤務之研究。桃園市：中央警察大學。李允傑（1999）。公部門之績效評估。人事月刊，29（4），頁4-14。林建煌（2010）。管理學（第三版）。臺北市：新陸書局。林峯立（2007）。偏遠地區警察分駐派出所空間組織再構之研究－以臺東縣為例。國立臺東大學區域政策與發展研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺東縣。范熾文（2005），「學校組織變革的策略與作法：知識經濟觀點」，現代教育論壇，13：頁285-296。胡幼慧、姚美華（1996）。一些質性方法上的思考。收錄於胡幼慧(主編)，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。新北市：巨流圖書有限公司。莊馥瑄（2013）。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典，2013年10月，取自：網址http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1954787/。許甫（2015）。「行動派出所」政策轉彎　柯提裁併整合，2015年02月16日，取自：網址https://news.tvbs.com.tw/life/567605。許士軍（2000）。高翠霜譯，走向創新時代的組織績效評估，績效評估。臺北市：遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司，頁3-9。陳恩惠（2015）。大同區派出所整併柯文哲喊卡再評估，2015年6月19日，取自：網址http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1354014。陳清泉（2015）。裁撤派出所應從長計議，2015年12月8日，取自：網址http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20141208/520491。陳明傳（2000）。警察行政專題（二）。桃園市：中央警察大學。連宏華（2010）。公共組織改造理論與應用之研究-行政組織改造之分析。國立臺灣師範大學政治學研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。孫本初（2010）。公共管理。臺北市：智勝文化事業有限公司。張明輝（2004）。平衡計分卡制度在學校績效管理之應用。教育研究月刊，123，頁19-25。葉至誠（1997）。蛻變的社會。臺北市：洪葉文化事業有限公司。溫金豐（2009）。組織理論與管理。臺北市：華泰文化事業股份有限公司。臺北市政府警察局（2015）。「警察新勤務」7月1日起上路。臺北市政府警察局網頁新聞稿，2015年6月29日，取自：網址 http://police.gov.taipei/ct.asp?xItem=109038100&ctNode=45192&mp=108001。鍾從定（2004）。政府組織再造-組織生命週期與變革。收錄於詹中原（編），政府再造新藍圖（國政叢書）。臺北市：國家政策研究基金會，頁257-286。貳、外文部分 Band, D. C. and Tustin, C.M. (1995). Strategic downsizing. Management Decision, 33(8): 36-45. Bruce, H. K. and Scott, D. (2000). Forces driving organizational change: A business school perspective. Journal of Education for Business,75(3): 133-137. Burke W. Warner. (2008)(4th ed.), Organization change: A Comprehensive Reade, 737-761. San Francisco, CA. Cascio, W. F. (1993). Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned? Academy of Management Executive, 7(1): 95-106. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405. Corrigan, J. (1996). The balanced scorecard: the new approach to performance measurement. Australian Accountant 66 (7): 47-48. Dewitt, R. L. (1993). The structural consequences of downsizing. Organization Science, 4(1): 30-40. Hale, S. and Hyde, A. (1994). Reengineering in the public sector. Public Productivity and Management Review, 18(2): 127-131. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1994). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, New York, NY: Harperbusiness. Hellriegel, D. and Slocum, J. W. (1994)(6th ed.). Management , New York, NY: Addison-Wesley. Habermas, J., (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action (Volume 1): Reason and the Rationalization of Society. (translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston, MA: Bacon Press). Jones, Gareth R. (2004)(4th ed.), Organizational Theory, Design, and Change: Text and Cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. (1996a). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1): 75-85. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. (1996b). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review 39(1): 53-79. Lowenthal, J. (1994). Reengineering the organization: A step-to-step approach to corporate revitalization, Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press. Mechling, J. (1994). Reengineering government: Is there a “there” there? Public Productivity & Management Review, 18(2): 189-197. Mossard, G. R. (1991). A TQM technical skill framework. Journal of Management Science and Policy Analysis, 8(2): 223-246. Morgon, J. S. (1972),Managing Change. New York,NY: McGraw-Hill, Co. Narayanan, V. K. and Nath, Raghu (1993), Organization Theory: A Strategic Approach. Boston, MA: Irwin. Niven, P. R. (2003). Balanced Scorecard Step by Step for Government and Nonprofit Agencies. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Ross, J. E. (1999). Total Quality Management, New York, NY: St. Lucie Press. Robbins, Stephen P. and Mary Coulter (2005), Management (8th ed.) .Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Robbins, Stephen P. and DeCenzo, David A (2008)(6th ed.), Fundamentals of Management: Essential Concepts and Applications. Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc (Prentice-Hall). Williamson,O . E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, and Relational Contracting. New York, NY: Free Press. Wise, R. I. (1997). The balanced scorecard approach to strategic management. The Public Manager, 26(3): 47-50.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程 105921027
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105921027
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/THE.NCCU.MEPA.002.2019.F09
Appears in Collections:	[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

社群 sharing

Loading...