政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/122302
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51089318      在线人数 : 872
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122302


    题名: 桃園航空城土地交易價格之變化分析
    The Change of Land Transaction Price in Taoyuan Aerotropolis
    作者: 葛家瑜
    Ge, Jia-Yu
    贡献者: 陳奉瑤
    葛家瑜
    Ge, Jia-Yu
    关键词: 區段徵收
    桃園航空城
    定錨效果
    公告土地現值
    地價坡度
    Land expropriation
    Taoyuan Aerotropolis
    Anchoring effect
    The Current Land Value
    Price gradient
    日期: 2018
    上传时间: 2019-02-12 15:51:53 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 一個重大政策的實施，會影響投資者的購地決策。桃園航空城計畫係我國最大的區段徵收政策，因投資者進場，導致徵收範圍內的農地價格上漲率相對一般的農地價格高。但投資者會只要是「農地」就購買，還是參考其他資訊分析後，再進行投資。本研究將利用地價坡度地圖觀察整個航空城範圍內土地價格時空變化，觀察政策改變對空間地價之影響，並進行交易價格影響因素分析，歸納政策實施範圍內土地投資者購地偏好，了解投資者是否會參考內外在資訊，進行不一樣的投資決策。
    根據實證分析，政策的變革確實會對實施範圍內的空間地價產生影響。此外，投資者最終決策行為會受到外在資訊影響，即公告土地現值與未來產業發展分區；亦會受內在心理影響，即厭惡損失心理。在兩者定錨效果交互影響下，航空城區域範圍內土地價格不斷上漲，將導致未來航空城發展計畫窒礙難行。
    A policy will affect the investor’s decision to purchase land. The Taoyuan Aerotropolis is the largest land expropriation plan at Taiwan. Because of the investors’ behavior, the farmland prices within the area of collection is soaring. But will the investors buy the land as long as they are "agricultural lands"? Or the investors will make the decision by analyzing other information? This study draws a price gradient picture and uses regression analysis to test the effect of anchoring, explore the behavior of investors within the area, and understand whether investors will be affected by "the current land value "or " the previous market price " or " the future development "to make different investments.
    According to the results, investors are actually affected by "the current land value "and " the previous market price " and " the future development " to make different investments. And also the price gradient will change, because of the policy’s reforming.
    參考文獻: 一、中文參考文獻
    何宇明，1995，「土地增值稅與房地產價格關係之研究」，『財稅研究』，27(4)：64-71。
    杜宇璇、宋豐荃、曾禹瑄、葛仲寧、陳奉瑤，2013，「台灣特徵價格模型之回顧分析」，『土地問題研究季刊』，12(2)：44-57。
    林全，1989，「土地增值稅與房地產價格變動之關係」，『經濟論文叢刊』，17(3)：303-326。
    林元興、陳國智，1996，「公告現值指數的編製及其應用－以臺北市為例」，『臺北銀行月刊』，313：55-62。
    林祖嘉、林素菁，1993，「台灣地區環境品與公共設施對房價與房租影響之分析」，『住宅學報』，1：21-45。
    林祖嘉、馬毓駿，2007，「特徵方程式大量估價法在台灣不動產市場之應用」，『住宅學報』，16(2)：1-22。
    胡志平，2010，「台灣高鐵通車營運對住宅價格之衝擊影響分析-以新竹車站為例」，『建築與規劃學報』，11(2)：77-88。
    殷章甫，2004，『土地經濟學』，五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    陳奉瑤，1986，「地價坡度之研究」，『地政論壇』，11：89-100。
    梁仁旭、陳奉瑤，2014，『不動產估價』，中國地政研究所。
    梁宏富、陳奉瑤，2016，「不動產跨區購買之溢價分析」，『土地經濟年刊』，27：82-116。
    彭建文、張金鶚，2000，「預期景氣與宣告效果對房地產景氣影響之研究」，『管理學報』，17(2)：343-368。
    廖仲仁、張金鶚，2004，「搜尋成本與定錨行爲對於購屋者價格貼水之影響」，『住宅學報』，13(2)：47-62。
    謝文盛，2001，「再論土地增值稅與住宅價格之關係」，『住宅學報』，10(2)：91-105。

    二、外文參考文獻
    Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use, Harvard University Press.
    Anenberg, E. (2011). Loss aversion, equity constraints and seller behavior in the real estate market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(1), 67-76.
    Arbel, Y., Ben-Shahar, D., & Gabriel, S. (2014). Anchoring and housing choice: Results of a natural policy experiment. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 49, 68-83.
    Atack, J., & Margo, R. A. (1998). “Location, location, location!” The price gradient for vacant urban land: New York, 1835 to 1900. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16(2), 151-172.
    Black, R. T., & Diaz III, J. (1996). The use of information versus asking price in the real property negotiation process. Journal of Property Research, 13(4), 287-297.
    Black, R. T. (1997). Expert property negotiators and pricing information, revisited. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 15(3), 274-281.
    Bowen, W. M., Mikelbank, B. A., & Prestegaard, D. M. (2001). Theoretical and empirical considerations regarding space in hedonic housing price model applications. Growth and change, 32(4), 466-490.
    Bucchianeri, G. W., & Minson, J. A. (2013). A homeowner`s dilemma: Anchoring in residential real estate transactions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 89, 76-92.
    Burnell, J. D. (1985). Industrial land use, externalities, and residential location. Urban Studies, 22(5), 399-408.
    Capozza, D. R., & Seguin, P. J. (1996). Expectations, efficiency, and euphoria in the housing market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(3-4), 369-386.
    Case, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (1988). The behavior of home buyers in boom and post-boom markets.
    Chen, M. C., & Patel, K. (1998). House price dynamics and Granger causality: an analysis of Taipei new dwelling market. Journal of the Asian Real Estate Society, 1(1), 101-126.
    Cheshire, P., & Sheppard, S. (1995). On the price of land and the value of amenities. Economica, 247-267.
    Colwell, P. F., & Munneke, H. J. (2003). Estimating a price surface for vacant land in an urban area. Land Economics, 79(1), 15-28.
    Coulson, N. E. (1991). Really useful tests of the monocentric model. Land Economics, 67(3), 299-307.
    Cypher, M., & Hansz, J. A. (2003). Does assessed value influence market value judgments?. Journal of Property Research, 20(4), 305-318.
    Diekmann, K. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., Shah, P. P., Schroth, H. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). The descriptive and prescriptive use of previous purchase price in negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(2), 179-191.
    Dunford, R. W., Marti, C. E., & Mittelhammer, R. C. (1985). A case study of rural land prices at the urban fringe including subjective buyer expectations. Land Economics, 61(1), 10-16.
    Dubin, R. A., & Sung, C. H. (1987). Spatial variation in the price of housing: rent gradients in non-monocentric cities. Urban Studies, 24(3), 193-204.
    Dunse, N., & Jones, C. (1998). A hedonic price model of office rents. Journal of property valuation and investment, 16(3), 297-312.
    Genesove, D., & Mayer, C. (2001). Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1233-1260.
    Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2002). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. MIT press, 45-56.
    Glaeser, E. L., Gyourko, J., & Saks, R. (2005). Why is Manhattan so expensive? Regulation and the rise in housing prices. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 331-369.
    Grimes, A., & Young, C. (2013). Spatial effects of urban rail upgrades. Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 1-6.
    Heikkila, E., Gordon, P., Kim, J. I., Peiser, R. B., Richardson, H. W., & Dale-Johnson, D. (1989). What happened to the CBD-distance gradient?: land values in a policentric city. Environment and planning A, 21(2), 221-232.
    Ihlanfeldt, K., & Mayock, T. (2012). Information, search, and house prices: Revisited. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 44(1-2), 90-115.
    Kasarda, J. D. (2008). The evolution of airport cities and the aerotropolis. Airport cities: The evolution.
    Kavetsos, G. (2012). The impact of the London Olympics announcement on property prices. Urban Studies, 49(7), 1453-1470.
    Kettel, B. (2001). Financial economics: making sense of market information. Financial Times Prentice Hall, London.
    Kiel, K. A., & McClain, K. T. (1995). House prices during siting decision stages: the case of an incinerator from rumor through operation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(2), 241-255.
    Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133-1165.
    Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of political economy, 74(2), 132-157.
    Leung, T. C., & Tsang, K. P. (2013). Anchoring and loss aversion in the housing market: implications on price dynamics. China Economic Review, 24, 42-54.
    Levy, D., Dong, Z., & Young, J. (2016). Unintended consequences: the use of property tax valuations as guide prices in Wellington, New Zealand. Housing Studies, 31(5), 578-597.
    List, J. A. (2003). Does market experience eliminate market anomalies?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 41-71.
    Liu, Y., Gallimore, P., & Wiley, J. A. (2015). Nonlocal office investors: anchored by their markets and impaired by their distance. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 50(1), 129-149.
    Lum, S. K. (2002). Market fundamentals, public policy and private gain: house price dynamics in Singapore. Journal of Property Research, 19(2), 121-143.
    Majumdar, A., Munneke, H. J., Gelfand, A. E., Banerjee, S., & Sirmans, C. F. (2006). Gradients in spatial response surfaces with application to urban land values. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 24(1), 77-90.
    Mayer, C. J., & Somerville, C. T. (2000). Land use regulation and new construction. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(6), 639-662.
    Mense, A., & Kholodilin, K. A. (2014). Noise expectations and house prices: the reaction of property prices to an airport expansion. The Annals of Regional Science, 52(3), 763-797.
    McDonald, J. F., & McMillen, D. P. (1990). Employment subcenters and land values in a polycentric urban area: the case of Chicago. Environment and Planning A, 22(12), 1561-1574.
    Mills, E. S. (1979). Urbanization and urban problems (No. 88). Harvard University Press.
    Mok, H. M., Chan, P. P., & Cho, Y. S. (1995). A hedonic price model for private properties in Hong Kong. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 10(1), 37-48.
    Neo, P. H., Ong, S. E., & Tu, Y. (2008). Buyer exuberance and price premium. Urban Studies, 45(2), 331-345.
    Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 39(1), 84-97.
    Ohls, J. C., Weisberg, R. C., & White, M. J. (1974). The effect of zoning on land value. Journal of Urban Economics, 1(4), 428-444.
    Paraschiv, C., & Chenavaz, R. (2011). Sellers` and buyers` reference point dynamics in the housing market. Housing Studies, 26(03), 329-352.
    Pollakowski, H. O., & Wachter, S. M. (1990). The effects of land-use constraints on housing prices. Land economics, 66(3), 315-324.
    Poterba, J. M. (1984). Tax subsidies to owner-occupied housing: an asset-market approach. The quarterly journal of economics, 99(4), 729-752.
    Poterba, J. M. (1992). Taxation and housing: Old questions, new answers (No. w3963). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Richardson, H. W. (1978). Regional and urban economics, Penguin Books, Limited.
    Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of political economy, 82(1), 34-55.
    Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason (Vol. 3). MIT press.
    Simonsohn, U., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). Mistake# 37: The effect of previously encountered prices on current housing demand. The Economic Journal, 116(508), 175-199.
    Sirmans, S., Macpherson, D., & Zietz, E. (2005). The composition of hedonic pricing models. Journal of real estate literature, 13(1), 1-44.
    Stevenson, S., Young, J., & Gurdgiev, C. (2010). A comparison of the appraisal process for auction and private treaty residential sales. Journal of Housing Economics, 19(2), 145-154.
    Söderberg, B., & Janssen, C. (2001). Estimating distance gradients for apartment properties. Urban Studies, 38(1), 61-79.
    Söderberg, B. (2002). A note on the hedonic model specification for income properties. In Real Estate Valuation Theory (pp. 157-180). Springer, Boston, MA.
    Stephanie, V., Yoko, M., & Anne, S. (2005). A hedonic price comparison of manufactured and site-built homes in the non-MSA US. Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(1), 83-104.
    Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39-60.
    Tse, C. Y., & Chan, A. W. (2003). Estimating the commuting cost and commuting time property price gradients. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33(6), 745-767.
    Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
    Yiu, C., & Tam, C. (2004). A review of recent empirical studies on property price gradients. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 12(3), 305-322.
    Zhou, X., Gibler, K., & Zahirovic-Herbert, V. (2015). Asymmetric buyer information influence on price in a homogeneous housing market. Urban Studies, 52(5), 891-905.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    105257018
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105257018
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.LE.002.2019.A05
    显示于类别:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    701801.pdf2695KbAdobe PDF21检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈