 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51047416
Online Users : 918
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122009
|
| Title: | Has Homo economicus Evolved into Homo sapiens from 1992 to 2014: What Does Corpus Linguistics Say? |
| Authors: | 陳樹衡
Zou, Yawen
Chen, Shu-Heng |
| Contributors: | 經濟系 |
| Keywords: | Homo economicus;Homo sapiens;Richard Thaler;Corpus linguistics;Digital humanities;Econometrics;Co-word network analysis |
| Date: | 2018-10 |
| Issue Date: | 2019-01-19 15:58:45 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | Thaler (Journal of Economic Perspectives 14:133–141, 2000) predicted that the paradigm of Homo economicus, which basically formulates the rationality of economic behavior in an ideal mathematical optimization framework and had dominated orthodox economics for a substantial period of the entire twentieth century, would “evolve” into the paradigm of Homo sapiens, which emphasizes the consideration of the psychological, cultural, and social factors that constrain a human’s rationality. We applied a corpus linguistic approach to examine whether this prediction is true. To this end, we built a corpus using the abstracts of 51,285 economics research articles published from 1992 to 2014 in 42 mainstream economics journals. By analyzing the upward-trending and downward-trending words in this corpus, we found the Homo sapiens paradigm to have expanded significantly, while there was no clear evidence of the concession of the Homo economicus paradigm. From the analysis of increasingly used words related to Homo sapiens we can further attribute the expansion of the Homo sapiens paradigm to the research attention increasingly drawn to the interdisciplinary integration of the social sciences, human heterogeneity and (cognitive) constraints, and the complexity of economic behaviors. Likewise, from the analysis of words related to Homo economicus that are less and less used, we found that the research attention directed to the concept of equilibrium was gradually drawn away. Our main finding based on the corpus linguistic analysis was further supported and consolidated by the co-word network analysis. |
| Relation: | Big Data in Computational Social Science and Humanities, Springer International Publishing, pp.117-137 Chapter 7 |
| Data Type: | book/chapter |
| DOI 連結: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95465-3 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-319-95465-3 |
| Appears in Collections: | [經濟學系] 專書/專書篇章
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 10.1007_978-3-319-95465-3_5.pdf | | 872Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 514 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
