English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51583053      Online Users : 977
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/121904


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121904


    Title: Larenz論法官與法律之關係─對Larenz的戰前與戰後法學方法論觀點發展之分析
    Authors: 周伯峰
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: Karl Larenz;Methodology of Jurisprudence;value Jurisprudence;Nazi;Legal Flaw;further build of law
    Karl Larenz;法學方法論;評價法學;納粹;法律漏洞;法續造
    Date: 2018-06
    Issue Date: 2019-01-16 12:54:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Karl Larenz is one of the most important law scholars in Germany of 20th century, and he has great contribution for the Interpretation of civil law and the Methodology of Jurisprudence. This Article would like to introduce his Methodology of Jurisprudence and focus on this issue, how he discusses the problem about the relationship between judge and law. Because he has published in 1938 and in 1960 very important literary work for Methodology of Jurisprudence, this article will discuss these two periods separately and compare their differences and similarities. First introduce this article Larenz’s Biography and literary works. Next discuss this article Larenz’s Methodology of Jurisprudence in 1938 and in 1960. As a conclusion will this article briefly evaluate his Methodology of Jurisprudence.
    Karl Larenz於20世紀的德國法學界中，在民法釋義學與法學方法論上都有重要貢獻，本文則是處理Larenz作為法學方法論者的那一面，關注其如何討論法官與法律之關係這個問題。因其在戰前（納粹時期）與戰後（聯邦德國時期）都有方法論相關的著作，本文將針對其戰前與戰後之法學方法論上的主要主張與命題究竟為何，做一基本入門之介紹，並且比較討論其異同與意義。本文首先將簡短的介紹Larenz的生平，接下來則討論Larenz戰前（納粹時期）的方法論主張，再來，本文將介紹Larenz在戰後（聯邦德國時期）的法學方法論主張。最後，本文將對於Larenz的法學方法論進行一些簡短的評價，來做為結論。
    Relation: 輔仁法學, No.55期, pp.93-143
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2400View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback