政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/121838
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113961/144987 (79%)
造访人次 : 51986326      在线人数 : 768
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121838


    题名: 中國大陸金融監管困境的制度性分析
    The Institutional Analysis of the Regulatory Predicaments in China’s Financial Sector
    作者: 蔡中民
    Tsai, Chung-Min
    关键词: 中國大陸;金融產業;政府監管;一行三會
    China;Financial Industry;State Regulation;Yihang Sanhui (One Bank and Three Commissions)
    日期: 2018-12
    上传时间: 2019-01-10 15:02:11 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 中國大陸在經歷了多年的高速經濟增長後，許多問題也相應而生，例如鋼鐵產能過剩、煤電矛盾、太陽能板企業破產、股市狂跌、地方政府債務高築等，無一不對中央政府造成嚴重的挑戰。就金融產業而言，快速成長的同時也突顯了監管體系的脆弱。國有企業較私有企業享有更為容易的銀行融資以及政策優惠，甚至有能力對抗監管單位的約束。為何過往的一行三會監管架構無法有效治理？監管體制的設計有何缺陷？為何在威權主義國家中，竟然會產生監管俘虜的困境？本文旨在回答上述問題，並以新制度主義的研究途徑，從歷史制度論的角度切入檢視中國大陸金融產業監管體制的演進過程。本文認為監管體制的不足之根源在於制度設計的矛盾，亦即中國大陸在採用西方國家新自由主義式的監管體制時，配合國家特殊的政治體制而轉換為行政主導式的監管邏輯。以致監管單位無法規範市場行為，陷入監管失靈的困境。本文嘗試釐清中國大陸政府監管的政治經濟學，以提供威權體制下的國家與市場關係進一步的思考。
    After undergoing rapid economic development for many years, China is beginning to see many new problems emerging, such as overproduction, contradiction between the coal and electricity, bankruptcy of the solar panel industry, the crash of the stock market, a huge local debt, and others. In the financial industry, while there has been a rocketing growth and a rise in innovative production, the regulatory system still has failed to manage the market. The state-owned enterprises enjoy easier banking loan and preferential policies than their private counterparts and are even able to challenge the regulatory agencies. Why has the former regulatory structure of yihang sanhui (one bank and three commissions) been unable to govern the industry? What are the problems about the regulatory designs? Why did the regulatory capture happene in an authoritarian state? This article aims to answer these questions by adopting a new-institutionalist approach and exploring the evolvement of regulatory system in China’s financial industry. This article also argues that the insufficiency of regulatory capacity has its roots in the institutional contradiction. That is to say, while China was adopting the Western style neoliberal regulatory system, it also has converted the system into an administrative-oriented one in order to fit into China’s unique political regime. In the end, the regulatory agencies have been unable to regulate the market and suffered from regulatory failure. This article illustrates the political economy of China’s state regulation and sheds lights on the state-market relationship in the authoritarian state.
    關聯: 中國大陸研究, 61(4), 57-74
    数据类型: article
    DOI: 10.30389/MCS.201809_61(4).0003
    显示于类别:[中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    614-03.pdf936KbAdobe PDF2245检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈