English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50931938      Online Users : 998
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/121686


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121686


    Title: 中國證券市場虛假陳述的背景成因及其民事救濟制度考察
    Observation on the Background Reasons and the Civil Compensation System of the False Statements in Chinese Stock Market
    Authors: 王文杰
    Wang, Wen-Chieh
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 虛假陳述；民事賠償；行政管制；前置程序；集團訴訟
    虛假陳述；民事賠償；行政管制；前置程序；集團訴訟
    Date: 2010-10
    Issue Date: 2018-12-28 17:16:27 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The development of the Chinese stock market comes from the government`s reforming State-owned companies. The regulation emphasizes more on the administrative power. Governmental behaviors keep the operation of the stock market and therefore the governmentled model intervenes the free wills of the investors. This model is a huge distortion and conflicts with the modern system where listed companies should provide public information. It fosters the incentives and motivations of false statements. In addition, the legal system has been fallen behind the development of the Chinese stock market. The main shaft of Securities Law is administrative penalty and regulation. Over the years, the biggest group in the administrative penalty cases from securities torts is false statement, but the civil liability for compensation had been long ignored. The Supreme People`s Court provided some remedies in its 2003 judicial interpretation if, and only if, the administrative penalty or the criminal judgment of the said case was final. It is a high threshold for a party to get remedies on time and oftentimes causes the unsatisfaction of the tort compensation. The lacking of class action in current Chinese civil litigation also makes it difficult to have a real compensation for the false statement cases.
    虛假陳述；民事賠償；行政管制；前置程序；集團訴訟
    Relation: 東吳法律學報, Vol.22, No.2, pp.119-150.(TSSCI)
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    119-150.pdf3105KbAdobe PDF2213View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback