政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/121267
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113393/144380 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51237304      線上人數 : 892
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121267


    題名: 憑據猜答或盲目猜答？以政治知識測量為例
    Informed Guessing or Blind Guessing? The Case of the Measurement of Political Knowledge
    作者: 潘心儀
    Pan, Sin-Yi
    蔡宗漢
    Tsai, Tsung-Han
    貢獻者: 政治系
    關鍵詞: political knowledge;multiple-choice item;experimental design;blind guessing;informed guessing
    政治知識;選擇題;實驗設計;盲目猜答;憑據猜答
    日期: 2018-09
    上傳時間: 2018-12-07 17:14:52 (UTC+8)
    摘要: This article examines respondents` guessing behavior in multiple-choice items for the measurement of political knowledge. Some researchers suspect that using multiple-choice items to measure political knowledge would overestimate observed knowledge because respondents could correctly answer some questions just by blind guessing. We argue, however, that informed guessing is more common than blind guessing. This is because successful guessing requires certain levels of knowledge, which implies that respondents` observed knowledge is not seriously higher than their actual knowledge. Analyzing survey experimental data, we show that, when the respondents answer political knowledge questions by guessing, they are more likely to select the correct answer. This result implies that respondents tend to guess the answer based on their partial knowledge rather than by chance.
    本文主要在探究受訪者回答選擇題型的政治知識題目時的猜答行為，以東吳大學學生為研究對象，其資料性質屬於調查實驗資料。由於選擇題題目提供選項讓受訪者選擇，所以一般會認為不知道答案的受訪者能夠藉由盲目猜答的方式選到正確答案，因而造成政治知識程度被高估的問題。然而，本文從理論上分析受訪者的政治知識程度與其在開放題和選擇題的回應模式，認為當受訪者不確定答案時，會根據其擁有的部份知識或錯誤知識進行憑據猜答。分析結果顯示受訪者在選擇題進行猜答時，有很高的機率會選擇正確答案，而非等機率的選擇選項，意謂受訪者是憑據猜答而不是盲目猜答。此結果另一個意涵為選擇題比開放題有較高的答對率，是來自於內在知識的反映而非隨機猜答。
    關聯: 東吳政治學報, 2018, Vol.36, No.2, pp.213-259
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    213-259.pdf785KbAdobe PDF2373檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋