Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121052
|
| Title: | 網絡在秘魯製造業的創新中所扮演的角色
The Role of Networks in the Innovation of Peruvian Manufacturing Companies |
| Authors: | 丹尼爾
Segura Ferry, Daniel Dario |
| Contributors: | 魏玫娟
Wei, Mei-Chuan
丹尼爾
Segura Ferry, Daniel Dario |
| Keywords: | 創新
國家創新系統
網絡
秘魯
亞太地區
Innovation
National innovation system
Networks
Peru
Asia pacific |
| Date: | 2018 |
| Issue Date: | 2018-11-23 16:01:24 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 關於網絡與創新的相關研究，儘管有不少文獻探討網絡在促進創新的 採用、推廣與使用上所具有的重要性，特別是透過「大學—產業—政 府」所構成的三螺旋模型分析知識網絡在產業創新上所扮演的角色之 相關研究，但是並沒有針對秘魯案例進行的研究。為對相關理論跟經 驗研究有所貢獻，本論文使用來自 1,452 家製造業公司的數據，檢視 以下這些網絡（知識網絡、生產網絡和消費者網絡）對這些公司進行 創新之可能性的影響。同時，本研究也透過模型分析發現，亞太地區 網絡在知識傳遞方面對這些秘魯製造業公司的影響及重要性。本研究 結果顯示，生產網絡和消費者網絡對於創新的趨勢有重大的影響；此 外，根據本論文分析，與亞太地區國家有關係的公司比與之並無任何 關係的公司有更高的創新概率。
Despite several studies around the world about the importance of networks in facilitating the adoption, diffusion and usage of innovation, especially, those studies related to the role of knowledge network reflected in the university–industry–government relations through the triple helix model, there is not a relevant study using this model for the Peruvian case. As a result, using data from 1,452 manufacture companies, this research examines the impact of these networks (knowledge network, production network and customer network) on the probability of innovation at these manufacturing firms. The same procedure is extended to consider a model that captures the effect of Asia Pacific Networks to understand the importance of the region in the transfer of knowledge to these companies. The results show a significant impact of the production network and customer network on the propensity to innovate. Additionally, it is found that companies that have a relation with an Asia Pacific country have a higher probability to innovate than companies without any relationship. |
| Reference: | Acosta, J., Bethencourt, C., Marrero, G. A., & Perera, F. (2011). Los Modelos de tasa de ahorro exógenas. El modelo de Solow. Universidad de La Laguna , 1-26.
Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120 (2), 701-728.
Ajinomoto. (2018, March 31). Ajinomoto in number. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from A Ajinomoto Web site: https://www.ajinomoto.com/en/numbers/
Ajinomoto. (2018, August 31). Open & Linked Innovation. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from A Ajinomoto Web site: https://www.ajinomoto.com/en/rd/open_linked_innovation/
Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2000). Looking at national systems of innovation from the south. Industry and Innovation, 7 (1), 55-75.
Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In C. o. Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (pp. 609-626). Princeton University Press.
Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34 (8), 1191-1202.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). ”Coopetition” in Business Networks—to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously. Industrial marketing management, 29 (5), 411-426.
Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (2001). Co-opetition. Crown Business.
Buckow, J. (2013). The transnational Dimension of Innovation in CHina. Germany: China Politik.
Chaminade, C., & Nielsen, H. (2011). Transnational Innovation System. Mexico City: United Nation Publications.
Chen, X., Ender, P., Mitchell, M., & Wells, C. (2013). Chapter 3 Logistic Regression Diagnostics. Logistic Regression with Stata.
CIES. (2017). Balance de Investigación en Políticas Públicas 2011-2016 y Agenda de Investigación 2017-2021. Lima: Consorcio de Investigación Económica y Social CIES.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128-152.
Cueva, J. (2017, October 06). Los platos peruanos están llenos de Umami. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from JC Magazine: http://www.jcmagazine.com/los-platos-peruanos-estan-llenos-de-umami/
Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management science, 42 (5), 693-716.
Dang, G., & Pheng, L. (2015). Theories of economic development. In G. Dang, & L. Pheng, Infrastructure Investments in Developing Economies (pp. 11-26). Singapur: Business Media Singapore .
D`Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research policy, 36 (9), 1295-1313.
Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., & Luc, S. (1988). Technical change and economic theory. Pisa: Sant`Anna School of Advanced Studies.
Drucker, P. F. (1985). The discipline of innovation. Harvard business review, 63 (3), 67-72.
Du Plessis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of knowledge management, 11 (4), 20-29.
Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation approaches–their emergence and characteristics. (C. Edquist, Ed.) London.
Edquist, C. (2001). The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An Account of the State of the Art.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. A. (1995). Universities and the global knowledge economy: a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. EASST Review, 14 (1), 14-19.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘‘Mode 2’’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29 (2), 109-123.
European Commision. (1995). El libro verde de la Innovacion.
Freeman, C. (1982). The economic of industrial innovation.
Gellynk, X., & Kuhne, B. (2010). Horizontal and vertical networks for innovation in the traditional food sector. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 1 (2), 123-132.
Giles, D. (2011). EViews Workfiles & Program Files for Specification Testing. Retrieved from http://web.uvic.ca/~dgiles/downloads/binary_choice/index.html.
Giulani, E., & Rabellotti, R. (2012). Universities in emerging economies: bridging local industry with international science—evidence from Chile and South Africa. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36 (1), 679-102.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B.-J. R. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40 (5), 650-663.
Godin, B. (2008). In the shadow of Schumpeter: W. Rupert Maclaurin and the study of technological innovation. Minerva, 46 (3), 343-360.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of management information systems, 18 (1), 185-214.
Greer, C. R., & Lei, D. (2012). Collaborative innovation with customers: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Mangament Review, 14 (1), 63-84.
Hanson, G. H., Mataloni, J. R., & Slaughter, M. J. (2005). Vertical production networks in multinational firms. Review of Economics and statistics, 87 (4), 664-678.
Harabi, N. (1998). Innovation through vertical relations between firms, suppliers and customers: a study of German firms. Industry and innovation,, 5 (2), 157-179.
Harbison, J. R., & Pekar, J. P. (1998). Smart alliances: A practical guide to repeatable success. Jossey-Bass .
Hartmann, D., & Arata, A. (2011). Measuring social capital and innovation in poor agricultural communities. The case of Chaparra - Peru. FZID discussion papers, 36 (1), 1-25.
Heijs, J., & Buesa, M. (2016). Manual de Economia de Innovacion.
Ideo. (2013). Transforming the Banking Experience. Retrieved 09 19, 2018, from A Ideo Web site: https://www.ideo.com/case-study/transforming-the-banking-experience
Innova School. (2018, August 27). El modelo de Innova Schools. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=JkRUKt0Dgvc
Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P.-a., & Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National innovation system in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand. Research policy, 31 (8-9), 1445-1457.
Interbank. (2017, June 06). Interbank Explora: 5 razones por las que debes visitarlo. Retrieved August 19, 2018, from A Interbank Web site: https://interbank.pe/blog/interbank-para-mi/interbank-explora-5-razones-por-las-que-debes-visitarlo
Karlson, K. B., Holm, A., & Breen, R. (2012). Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using logit and probit: A new method. Sociological Methodology, 42 (1), 286-313.
Kesiduo, E., & Romijn, H. (2008). Do local knowledge spillovers matter for development? An empirical study from Uruguays` software cluster. World Development , 2004-2028.
Kuntze, U., Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Walz, R. (1998). Innovation and Sustainable Development - Lessons for Innovation Policies? Introduction and Overview. In F. Meyer-Krahmer, Innovation and Sustainable Development Lessons for Innovation Policies (pp. 3-34). Heidelberg: Physica-Verl.
Le Roy, F., & Czakon, W. (2016). Managing coopetition: the missing link between strategy and performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 53 (1), 3-6.
Lundvall, B. A. (2007). National innovation systems—analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14 (1), 95-119.
Lundvall, B. A. (1985). Product innovation and user-producer interaction. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope, 19.
Monjon, S., & Waelbroeck, P. (2003). Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data. nternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 (9), 1255-1270.
Motohashi, K. (2015). University-industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System. Research Policy, 34, 583-594.
Mytelka, L. K. (2010). Local system of innovation in a globalized world economy. Industrial Innovation , 15-32.
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of technical change. Cambridge: Beknap Harvard.
Nomaan, M. (2004). Reaching Millennium Goals: How well does agricultural productivity growth reduce poverty?
Ortiz, O. (2006). Evolution of agricultural extension and information dissemination in Peru: An historical perspective focusing on potato-related pest control. Agriculture and Human Values , 477–489.
Paan, C. (2014, Mayo 08). Las cinco marcas peruanas que conquistan el mundo. El Comercio .
Parodi, C. (2018, April 6). Las tareas economicas del nuevo gobierno. Gestion , pp. 1-2.
Quattrocchi, C. (2014, August 13). What a Peruvian School Designed by IDEO Looks Like. EdSurge .
Robin, S., & Schubert, T. (2013). Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany. Research Policy, 42 (1), 149-166.
Rodriguez, I. (2014). Nuevas Configuraciones Económicas en el Asia-Pacífico y sus Consecuencias para América Latina: Desde el APEC a la Alianza del Pacífico. Revista de Ciências Sociais, 57 (2), 553-580.
Rosado, R. (2016, August 31). La Victoria Lab, conozca el laboratorio de innovación de Intercorp apoyado por Ideo. empreNDE .
Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
SNIP. (2012). Peru: Politica de inversion publica en ciencia, tecnologia e innovacion.
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70 (1), 65-94.
Sosa, M. (2017, 10 09). La innovación en Perú al 2017: mejoras y retrocesos. pp. 1-2.
Tosi, A., Gaya, M. I., & Barboza, L. A. (2010). The brazilian sugarcane innovation system. Energy Policy, 39 (1), 156-166.
Vertova, G. (2014). The State and National Systems of Innovation: A Sympathetic Critique. University of Bergamo.
Vives, X. (2008). Innovation and competitive pressure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 56 (3), 419-469.
Vorobeva, N. A., Beletskaya, S. A., & Kolesnikov, M. V. (2016). Innovation Development of Russia and Participation in the Integration Process of the Asia-Pacific Region. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6 (3), 1038-1048.
Zanfei, A. (2000). Transnational firms and the changing organisation of innovative activities. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24, 515–542.
Zmud, R. (1984). An examination of “push-pull” theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work. Management science, 30 (6), 727-738. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
1059260171 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1059260171 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/THE.NCCU.IMAS.014.2018.A07 |
| Appears in Collections: | [亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 017101.pdf | 2213Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 142 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
