Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120875
|
| Title: | 保險法規調整採公私協力合作模式之探討- 以研發保險業親晤親簽科技替代方案為例
The adjustment of insurance regulations through the public-private partnership pattern: a case study on r&d smart-see-signature alternative in insurance |
| Authors: | 徐金聖
Hsu, Chin-Sheng |
| Contributors: | 王儷玲
彭金隆
Wang, Li-Ling
Peng, Jin-Lung
徐金聖
Hsu, Chin-Sheng |
| Keywords: | 公私協力
監理沙盒
金融科技
保險科技
親晤親簽
保險法
保險法規
保險業務員
身份辨識
生物辨識
Public-Private partnership
Financial technology
Insurance technology
Regulatory sandbox
Insurance act
Insurance salesman
Identification
Biometric |
| Date: | 2018 |
| Issue Date: | 2018-11-09 15:44:49 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 金融科技（FinTech）近年來在金融領域成為顯學，原因在於新興科技為傳統金融機構的服務帶來顛覆性的效果。在金融科技與保險科技的浪潮下，台灣金融業者紛紛著手發展創新金融服務。而金融創新背後需有主管機關的支持與法規的核可才能順利實施運行，但過去台灣監理法規在立法、修法效率遲緩，在因應保險科技即時、快速的步調上，傳統監理模式將在保險科技趨勢下面臨困難與挑戰。又主管機關與業者過往上下位之從屬關係對於由下向上發動創新的推動有一定阻礙。保險業面臨創新法規修正的困境該如何突破，是本文的研究重點。
研究發現，保險業的創新法規過去多仰賴保險同業公會作為業者與監理機構的運作樞紐，然而在金融科技趨勢下此合作模式會有所改變。本文認為公私協力的新溝通模式可視為現行法規調整困境的突破關鍵，業者可透過公私協力概念排除從屬關係，與金融監理機構平等溝通創新方案，以充分獲得監理機構的理解與支持。並定義公私協力之概念為，業者、監理機構與獨立專業機構三方以平等互惠、共同參與、責任劃分的形式面對金融科技創新。本文認為，公私協力的精神是監理沙盒運行的核心要素，亦是此親晤親簽科技替代方案溝通的成功要點，故倡議公私協力可為金融科技業者善加利用。
本文在個案研析中有三點發現：其一，保險業者除採以往常見由上而下的溝通模式外，亦可採逐級而上的溝通形式增加保險科技創新服務落地的可能。其二，本個案非以壽險公會作為保險業者與主管機關溝通樞紐，而是以學術機構金融科技研究中心作為溝通樞紐，視為傳統保險法規調整框架的突破。其三，公正第三方機構作為提案溝通樞紐，其與各相關單位無利益衝突，其效益等同於監理沙盒，可充分發揮公私協力的精神。
FinTech has become a prominent scholar in financial sector recently. Potential of new innovations have had a disruptive effect on traditional financial sectors. With the innovative trend of FinTech and InsurTech, Taiwanese financial industry leaders and innovators have begun to develop innovative financial services. New financial products and services are creating significant regulatory uncertainty. The financial innovators require the support from relevant authorities and the approval of the regulations to be able to operate legally. However, in the past, Taiwan’s supervision regulations were slow in legislation and law enforcement. Besides, the subordinate relationship between supervisory authorities and the industry impeded innovation from the bottom up. In response to the rapid pace of InsurTech, the traditional pattern on regulatory revision needs to change. Facing difficulties and challenges under the trend, this paper would focus on how to break through the dilemma between the slow adjustment of innovation regulations and rapid pace of FinTech and InsurTech.
This study found that regulations with innovation in insurance used to rely on the insurance industry association as the key bridge of the insurance companies and supervision institutions. However, this cooperation pattern is changing under the impact of financial technology. The new communication pattern, Public-Private Partnership, can be regarded as the solution to the current regulatory adjustment inconsistency. This paper believes that the Public-Private Partnership is the core element of Regulatory Sandbox and the case, R&D Smart-See-Signature alternative.
In this paper, there are three points in the case study: First, in addition to the common top-down communication model, the bottom-up communication form.
This paper takes the R&D Smart-See-Signature alternative in insurance as a case study. This case breaks through the traditional insurance regulatory adjustment framework with the idea of Public-Private Partnership. |
| Reference: | 一、 中文文獻
1. 王子宜，(2006)。我國銀行保險之現況與展望。淡江大學保險學系保險經營碩士班學位論文，新北市。
2. 王儷玲、彭金隆、臧正運、謝明華 （2018）。〈我國保險業金融科技（FinTech/InsurTech）發展趨勢之風險管理及監理機制研究〉，財團法人保險安定基金，https://tinyurl.com/y9c49e9z，2018/09/20。
3. 戶政司（2001）。電子化政府推動方案，行政院研究發展考核委員會成果報告。
4. 任中美（2016）。條條大路通羅馬-談美國 Fintech 產業監理從倡議 [負責任的創新] 到國會宣布 [監理沙盒] 付委立法。證券服務，(656)，46-56。
5. 林國良（2011）。我國卡片業務發展概況。財金資訊季刊，（65）。
6. 林建智、彭金隆、吳佳寧（2009）。我國銀行保險業務監理架構之探討。台灣金融財務季刊, 10(4), 135-158。
7. 邱荷雅，(2017)。保險業經營網路投保現況與發展之研究。淡江大學保險學系保險經營碩士班學位論文，新北市。
8. 金融監督管理委員會（2016），金融科技發展白皮書。臺北市：金融監督管理委員會。
9. 協合國際法律事務所（2017）。金融科技發展與法律。台灣：五南。
10. 高瑞霙(2008)。壽險業多元行銷通路經營策略與模式探討－以電話行銷為例。 淡江大學保險學系保險經營研究所，新北市。
11. 孫鈺婷，（2017）。馬來西亞金融科技監理沙盒之觀察。科技法律透析，29(8)，8-10。
12. 張長根（2015）。第一銀行指紋辨識。台北市：工商時報。
13. 張淑芬、張玉璇（2014）。保險業辦理網路投保業務應注意事項。理律法律雜誌，2014(12)：8-9。
14. 張慧雯（2000）。翻開台灣信用卡史20年坎坷。中國時報，10版。
15. 彭金隆、臧正運（2017）。我國金融科技創新實驗落地機制之檢視與建構。月旦法學雜誌，(266)， 35-51。
16. 葉啟洲（2012）。人壽保險適用消費者保護法契約審閱期間之問題研析。保險專刊，28(1) ，61-91。
17. 臧正運，(2017)。臧正運觀點金融科技創新監理芻議–監理沙盒在台灣。風傳媒，https://www.storm.mg/article/160609，2018/08/12。
18. 劉念祖，（2016），〈神盾以指紋辨識技術推廣FIDO線上身分認證標準與BYOI概念〉，DIGITIMES，https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=130&id=0000459685_bnl57stl93qb9q43mdqmw，2018/08/15。
二、 英文文獻
1. Bradford, C. (1983). Private sector initiatives and public sector accountability: A case study of contracting with city venture corporation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 49(3), 326-335.
2. Ensmenger, N. (2011). The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
3. IAIS, (2017). “FinTech Developments in the Insurance Industry. “ in https://www.iaisweb.org/file/65625/report-on-fintech-developments-in-the-insurance-industry. Latest update 21 September 2018.
4. Langton, S. (1983). Public‐private partnerships: Hope or hoax?. National Civic Review, 72(5), 256-261.
5. OCC, (2016). “Supporting Responsible Innovation in the Federal Banking System:An OCC Perspective.”in http://consumerbankers.com/sites/default/files/OCC%20whitepaper%20fin%20inno%282%29.pdf. Latest update 20 September 2018.
6. Pollari, I., and Raisbeck, M. (2018). “The pulse of fintech Q4 2017: Global analysis of investment in fintech. Amstelveen: KPMG.”in https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2018/02/pulse_of_fintech_q4_2017.pdf. Lastest update 20 September 2018.
7. Smith, D. (2018). Business Model Innovation–From Incremental to Disruptive. The InsurTech Book: The Insurance Technology Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and FinTech Visionaries, 190-194.
8. Soloshchuk, V., and Kartashov, Y. (2018). InsurTech Trends–Why Regionalization Matters. The InsurTech Book: The Insurance Technology Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and FinTech Visionaries, 108-110.
9. Thomson, N. (2018). InsurTechs–Magical Thinking and Other Secrets of Success. The InsurTech Book: The Insurance Technology Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and FinTech Visionaries, 40-42.
10. Tseng, D. C., Chen, L. J., & Liu, S. C. (2012). Examining the Organization and Objectives of Elementary and High School Textbooks Review and Approval Committees. Journal of Textbook Research, 5(1):1-26.
11. World Economic Forum, (2015). “The Future of Financial Services.” in http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_future__of_financial_services.pdf. Latest update 20 September 2018. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
風險管理與保險學系
105358003 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105358003 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/THE.NCCU.RMI.014.2018.F08 |
| Appears in Collections: | [風險管理與保險學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 800301.pdf | 915Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 597 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
