English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112704/143671 (78%)
Visitors : 49782309      Online Users : 336
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120873


    Title: 從契約法觀點論智慧合約的內涵與應用
    The interpretation and application of smart contracts – from the perspective of contract laws
    Authors: 吳俞慶
    Wu, Yu-Ching
    Contributors: 薛景文
    Hsueh, Ching-Wen
    吳俞慶
    Wu, Yu-Ching
    Keywords: 智慧合約
    區塊鏈
    分散式帳本
    國際貿易
    契約
    Smart contracts
    Blockchain
    Distributed ledger technology
    International trade
    Contract
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-11-09 15:44:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 於二十世紀初誕生的「智慧合約(Smart Contract)」,其原始意義應是指由一連串可透過電子化手段自動執行的承諾所組成,並且儲存於電腦上的協定。歸功於近代分散式帳本、區塊鏈技術的發展,結合了新興科技的智慧合約,不僅可用來作為締約的手段,亦可作為輔助契約履行之工具,甚至產生了更多有別於以往想像的應用可能性。於此,也衍生了有關其法律地位應如何定性的爭議。考量智慧合約一詞既帶有「合約(Contract)」二字,且其應用亦與契約法律關係具有緊密關聯,未來更可能主要應用在跨國交易場域中,故本文即從不同法系下之契約法以及國際上與契約相關之規範出發,嘗試探討智慧合約在現行法下的定位和法律效力。
    經過本文的分析後,發現智慧合約並無法與契約等同視之,且其自動執行的功能以及目前定位不明之狀態,亦可能造成其應用上衍生諸多法律爭議,但現行之契約規範亦並非完全無法適用在智慧合約,只不過部分規範仍有需要顧及區塊鏈技術之特殊性而加以調整。儘管如此,立法者仍須注意在智慧合約之發展未臻成熟之前,不應驟然針對智慧合約過早介入管制,以免制定出不符需求之規範,反倒弄巧成拙造成新科技的技術發展受限。而業界如欲研發智慧合約於商業活動之應用,亦應考量到其目前法律狀態既然尚屬不明,故在使用上仍以謹慎為宜。
    The original concept of smart contracts could be defined as an electronic agreement composed of a series of commitments that can be executed automatically and stored on computers. However, due to the development of distributed ledger technology (DLT) and blockchain, the idea of smart contracts combined with these emerging technologies becomes even broader than ever. In other words, it can not only be used as a means of contracting, a tool to assist the fulfillment of the contract, but can also be applied in different ways not necessary related to contractual frameworks. The question then arises as to whether smart contracts should be deemed as a legally enforceable contract. Considering the term smart "contracts" is closely related to the legal contract. Also, the implementation of smart contracts can be largely beyond jurisdictional boundaries due to the cross-border nature of blockchain. Therefore, this article tries to clarify the legal characterization and validity of smart contracts under modern contract law in different legal systems and international trade law.
    This article argues that although some smart contracts could meet the requirements of a legal contract, still not all smart contracts are identical to the traditional contract. Thus, the application of smart contracts may lead to unprecedented legal issues. Yet, the current contract laws are not completely inapplicable to smart contracts, as long as some rules need to be modified based on the characteristics of blockchain technology. Nonetheless, legislators have to notice the fact that they should not regulate smart contracts untimely, so as not to limit the development of DLT and its related applications. On the other hand, industry utilizing smart contracts as a method to facilitate commercial activities should also consider the uncertainty of the legal status of smart contracts, and treat smart contracts with caution.
    Reference: 中文部分
    王文宇,契約解釋與任意規定─比較法與案例研究,收於:2014兩岸四地法學發展,頁593-656(2018年)。
    郭慧姿,PKI的運作原理與應用發展趨勢,資安人,2001年7月17日,https://www.informationsecurity.com.tw/article/article_detail.aspx?aid=46 (最後瀏覽日:2018年7月31日)。
    高靖鈞、丁川偉、陳耀鑫、馬金溝、陳澤世,區塊鏈簡介與技術探討,電腦與通訊,169期,2017年5月9日,網址:https://ictjournal.itri.org.tw/Content/Messagess/contents.aspx?MSID=744257557510131250&MmmID=654304432061644411。
    陳恭,智能合約的發展與應用,財金資訊季刊,90期,33,33(2017)。
    許明恩,數位貨幣IOTA和全新的機器經濟,Medium,2017年11月1日,網址:https://medium.com/@astromnhsu/024-%E6%95%B8%E4%BD%8D%E8%B2%A8%E5%B9%A3-iota-%E5%92%8C%E5%85%A8%E6%96%B0%E7%9A%84%E6%A9%9F%E5%99%A8%E7%B6%93%E6%BF%9F-5238bb6a00da。
    游士弘、郭閔裕,外幣結算平台之架構設計即系統建置,財金資訊季刊,75期,頁7,7(2013年)。
    闕志克,從容錯的角度看區塊鏈技術,電腦與通訊,169期,2017年5月9日,網址:https://ictjournal.itri.org.tw/Content/Messagess/contents.aspx?MmmID=654304432061644411&MSID=744461230707511007。

    英文部分
    Akhbari, Ki, What is restitution?, LEGALMATCH (Apr. 11, 2018), https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/what-is-restitution.html。
    An introduction of IOTA, https://iotasupport.com/whatisiota.shtml (last visited July 29, 2018).
    ASSOCIATION FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ENGLISH COMMON LAW, http://www.a4id.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/A4ID-english-contract-law-at-a-glance.pdf.
    Balfour v. Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571.
    Buterin, Vitalik, On Public and Private Blockchains, ETHEREUM BLOG (Aug. 6, 2015), https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/08/07/on-public-and-private-blockchains/.
    CHAMBER OF DIGITAL COMMERCE, SMART CONTRACTS: 12 USE CASES FOR BUSINESS & BEYOND, Dec. 2016, 8.
    Clack, Christopher D., Vikram A. Bakshi & Lee Braine, Smart Contract Templates: foundation, design landscape and research directions, ARXIV.ORG, (Revised Mar. 15, 2017), https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.00771.pdf, 2.
    Cohn, Alan, Travis West & Chelsea Parker, Smart After All: Blockchain, Smart Contracts, Parametric, Insurance, and Smart Energy Grids, Georgetown Law Technology Review 1(2), 273, 277, 2017.
    Contracts Law: Offer and Acceptance, 4LAWSCHOOL, http://www.4lawschool.com/contracts101/offer.htm (last visited July 29, 2018).
    Contracts Law: Consideration, 4LAWSCHOOL, http://www.4lawschool.com/contracts101/consideration.htm (last visited July 29, 2018).
    Delfini, Francesco, Instances of Civil Law in North American Common Law Tradition: Cause and Consideration in Quebec and Louisiana Civil Codes, 2 THE ITALIAN LAW JOURNAL, 87, 103 (2016).
    Donaldson, Jim, Public vs. Private Blockchain In A Wide World of Unique Applications, MOJIX (Aug. 8, 2017), https://www.mojix.com/private-blockchain/.
    Ethereum, https://www.ethereum.org/.
    Explanatory Note by the UNCITRAL Secretariat on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods [hereinafter Explanatory Note of CISG], ¶ 4.
    Farrell, Scott, Heidi Machin & Roslyn Hinchliffe, Lost and found in smart contract translation – considerations in transitioning to automation in legal architecture (Congress Paper) (July 4-6, 2017), http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/congress/Papers_for_Programme/14-FARRELL_and_MACHIN_and_HINCHLIFFE-Smart_Contracts.pdf, 1.
    Giancaspro, Mark, Is a ‘smart contract’ really a smart idea? Insights from a legal perspective, 33 COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 825, 826, 2017.
    Hermida, Julian, Convergence Of Civil Law And Common Law In The Criminal Theory Realm, 13 U. Miami Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 163(2006), at 11.
    ISDA & LINKLATERS, SMART CONTRACTS AND DISTRIBUTED LEDGER – A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE, https://www.isda.org/a/6EKDE/smart-contracts-and-distributed-ledger-a-legal-perspective.pdf, 4-5.
    Kramer, Melanie, Smart Contracts are Seeping into U.S Law – Tennessee Passes Bill, BITCOINIST (Apr. 2, 2018), https://bitcoinist.com/smart-contracts-are-seeping-into-u-s-law-tennessee-passes-bill/.
    Lorenzen, Ernest G., Causa and Consideration in the Law of Contracts, 28(7) THE YALE LAW JOURNAL, 621 (1919).
    Magnus, Ulrich, The Vienna Sales Convention (CISG) between Civil and Common Law – Best of all worlds? 3, JOURNAL OF CIVIL LAW STUDIES, 68, 71 (2010).
    Meldrum, Christopher, Civil law contracts, ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL (July 1, 2012), http://www.acc.com/legalresources/quickcounsel/clc.cfm, 1.
    Model Law on Electronic Commerce with Guide to Enactment 1996, with additional article 5 bis as adopted in 1998 (New York: United Nations, 1999) [hereinafter MLEC], at 1.
    Model Law on Electronic Signatures with Guide to Enactment 2001(New York: United Nations, 2002) [hereinafter MLES], ¶ 88.
    Mukherjee, Aaheree, Smart Contracts – Another Feature in UNCITRAL’s Cap, CORNELL INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL ONLINE (Feb. 8, 2018), http://cornellilj.org/smart-contracts-another-feather-in-uncitrals-cap/.
    Nakamoto, Satoshi, Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
    Raskin, Max, The Law and Legality of Smart Contract, 1 GEORGETOWN LAW TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 304, 310-311, 2016.
    R3, Norton Rose Fulbright, Can Smart Contracts be Legally Binding Contrats? FROM 2011 ONWARDS 24-25, available at http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/files/r3-and-norton-rose-fulbright-white-paper-full-report-144581.pdf.
    Slobodnik, J, How Oracles Connect Smart Contracts to the Real World, MEDIUM (Feb. 3, 2018), https://medium.com/bethereum/how-oracles-connect-smart-contracts-to-the-real-world-a56d3ed6a507.
    Stark, Josh, Making Sense of Blockchain Smart Contracts, COINDESK (Jun. 4, 2016, 18:39), https://www.coindesk.com/making-sense-smart-contracts/.

    Szabo, Nick, Smart Contracts: Building Blocks for Digital Markets, http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart_contracts_2.html.
    Szabo, Nick, A Formal Language for Analyzing Contracts, http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/contractlanguage.html (last visited July 29, 2018).
    The Trust Machine, THE ECONOMIST, Oct. 31, 2015, https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21677198-technology-behind-bitcoin-could-transform-how-economy-works-trust-machine.
    United Nation Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Jan. 1, 1988 (New York: United Nations, 2010) [hereinafter CISG], preamble, available at https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/sales/cisg/V1056997-CISG-e-book.pdf.
    United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts, Nov. 23, 2005 (New York: United Nations, 2007) [hereinafter ECC], art. 1.1, available at https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/electcom/06-57452_Ebook.pdf.
    Vryonis, Panayotis, Explaining Public-Key Cryptography to non-geeks, MEDIUM (Aug. 28, 2013), https://medium.com/@vrypan/explaining-public-key-cryptography-to-non-geeks-f0994b3c2d5.
    Zetzsche, Dirk, Ross p. Buckley & Douglas W. Arner, The Distributed Liability of Distributed Ledgers: Legal Risks of Blockchain, FACULTY OF LAW, ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 11.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    105351048
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105351048
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.IB.039.2018.F06
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    104801.pdf1176KbAdobe PDF27View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback