政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/119321
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50955053      Online Users : 963
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119321


    Title: 利用資訊通訊技術與主觀幸福指標評估臺灣非政府組織與非營利組織的表現與影響
    Assessing NGO´s/NPO´s Performance and Impacts Applying Information and Communication Technologies and Subjective Well-Being Indicators in Taiwan
    Authors: 雷賀
    Zamora, Jose Heliodoro
    Contributors: 李栢浡
    Lee, Pai-Po
    雷賀
    Zamora, Jose Heliodoro
    Keywords: 評估
    資通訊科技
    非政府組織/非營利組織
    社會影響力評估
    主觀福祉
    Assessment
    Information and communication technologies
    NGO/NPO
    Social impact assessment
    Subjective well-being
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-08-10 11:08:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 多數非營利組織與其受益人有著緊密的連結，然而，不論他們之間的關係有多緊密，受益人仍難以全然瞭解非營利組織的行動與計畫所帶來的影響。本研究論文之目的在透過利用資通訊科技，例如社交媒體或論壇互動，從當地或最終的利害關係人的主觀福祉之中，獲取對於組織的執行面至關重要的資訊。傳統的指標以及直接受影響的大眾之主觀見解，可增進機構對於工作領域的觀點，而擁有良好的觀點可提升決策過程，並提供一個有效率的工具以評估機構的表現與影響。選擇主觀福祉以及資通訊科技使用為研究主題，對於試圖建立一個可行的方法有所助益。本文將臺灣的非營利組織代表所做的問卷，作為評估其觀點與意願的依據，結果顯示機構認可其重要性與必須性，但是這樣的過程並不能成為機構執行之工具。
    Many nonprofit organizations work in tight relationships with their beneficiaries, but regardless of the closeness, they cannot wholly comprehend the full impacts of their actions, projects, and programs. The objectives of this thesis is to utilize the Information and Communication Technologies, such as social media or forum interaction is possible to acquire information from the subjective well-being of the local or final stakeholders that can be vital for the decision-making process of the organizations. Traditional indicators used in combination with the subjective perception of the directly affected population, adequately gathered, can increase the institutional perspective of their field of work. Having a better perspective consequently enhances the decision-making process and ultimately providing a cost-effective tool to assess organizational performance and impact. Taking subjective well-being and the rise of the use of Information and Communication Technologies in an attempt to establish a possible method take the best of the available opportunities. This thesis incorporates the results of questionnaires answered by nonprofit organizations representatives in Taiwan to evaluate the point of view and willingness to incorporate process like the discussed in their activities. The results of the analysis suggest that organizations acknowledge the importance and the necessity, but do not have such a process implemented as an institutional tool.
    Reference: 1. A.Becker, H. (2001). Social impact assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 128( Issue 2), 311-321.
    2. About the IAIA. (2018, May 20). Retrieved from http://www.iaia.org: http://www.iaia.org/about.php
    3. Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16: , 227–247.
    4. Aejin Song, U. L.-i. (2015). Every Little Help: Understanding Donor Behavior in Crowdfunding platforms for Non-Profit. CHI`15 Extended Abstracts, 1103-1108.
    5. Albrecht, S. L. (1988). The place of attitudes and perceptions in social impact assessment. Society and Natural Resources, 1, 69–80.
    6. Arce-Gomez, A. D. ( 2015). Social impact assessments: developing a consolidated conceptual framework. Environmental Impact Assessesment Rev. 50 , 85–94.
    7. Assessment, I. A. (2012). fastips Ethics. Retrieved from International Association of Impact Assessment.
    8. Becker, D. H. (2003 ). A participatory approach to social impact assessment: the interactive community forum . Environmental Impact Assessesment Rev. 23 , 367–382.
    9. Becker, D. H. (2004). A comparison of a technical and a participatory application of social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 22, 177–189.
    10. Bhutan, G. C. (n.d.). The 9 Domains of GNH. Retrieved 1 02, 2018, from GNH Center Bhutan: http://www.gnhcentrebhutan.org/what-is-gnh/the-9-domains-of-gnh/
    11. Biography of Adam Smith. (n.d.). (A. T. Networks, Producer) Retrieved January 4, 2018, from The Biography.com website: https://www.biography.com/people/adam-smith-9486480
    12. Braun, A. A. (2009, September 24). Gross National Happiness in Bhutan: A Living Example of an Alternative Approach to Progress. Pennsilvania: Wharton International Research Experience.
    13. Briggs, S. H. (2013). Determination of significance in ecological impact assessment: past change, current practice. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 38, 16-25.
    14. Broadbent, R. a. (2013). Bridging the Digital Divide—an Australian Story. Behaviour & Information Technology 32, no. 1, 4-13.
    15. Broeder, H. K. (2015, November). Effective Stakeholder Engagement. Fastips. International Association for Impact Assessment.
    16. Broeder, H. K. (2015). fastips Eff ective Stakeholder Engagement. Retrieved from International Association of Impact Assessment.
    17. Bruns, A. (2008). Life beyond the public sphere: Towards a networked model for political deliberation. . Information Polity, 13,, 65−79.
    18. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
    19. CEPAL, D. d. (2012). Indicadores Básicos de Guatemala . Portal Mayores.
    20. Cerna, A. R. (2008). Historia de la cultura y de la educación. Ciudad de Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica.
    21. Cohen, N. (2009). Twitter on the barricades: Six lessons learned. New York Times, Week in Review, 4.
    22. content, U. g. (n.d.). Sector Privado de la Economia. Retrieved from Wikipedia: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sector_privado
    23. Corning, P. (2011). The fair society and the pursuit of social justice. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
    24. Danner, D. D. (2001). Positive emotions in early life and longevity: Findings from the nun study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 804–813.
    25. Dennis R. Becker, C. C. (2003). A participatory approach to social impact assessment: the interactive community forum. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23 , 367–382.
    26. DEPORTES, M. D. (2012). Manual De Organización Y Funciones. Guatemala City: Goverment.
    27. Diener, E. K. (2009). Income`s Differential Influence on Judgments of Life Versus Affective Well-Being. Assessing Well-being. Oxford, UK: Springer.
    28. Dorji, T. (2012, June 15). The story of a king, a poor country and a rich idea. Retrieved from Earth Journalism: http://earthjournalism.net/stories/6468
    29. Dredge, S. (2014, June 30). How does Facebook decide what to show in my news feed? Retrieved from The Guardian : https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/30/facebook-news-feed-filters-emotion-study
    30. Drucker, P. F. (1973). Management: Tasks, Responsabilities, Practices. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
    31. Duflo, A. V. (2008). What Is Middle Class about the Middle Classes around the World? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 22, No. 2 , 3-28.
    32. Easterly, W. (2001). The Middle Class Consensus and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth, 6(4), 317-35.
    33. Easterly, W. (2007). Was developing assistance a mistake. The American Economic Review vol. 97 no. 2,, 328-332.
    34. Esteves, A. F. (2012). Social impact assessment: the state of the art. mpact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34–42.
    35. Esteves, A. V. (2009 ). Social development needs analysis as a tool for SIA to guide corporate-community investment: applications in the minerals industry . Environmental Impact Assessesment Rev. 29, 137–145.
    36. Fowler, A. (1995). Assesing NGO Performance: Difficulties, Dilemmas and Way Ahead.
    37. Frank Vanclay for IAIA. (2003). IAIA Social Impact Assessment, International Principles. Retrieved from IAIA: www.iaia.org
    38. French, H. W. (2012, May 21). The Next Asia Is Africa: Inside the Continent`s Rapid Economic Growth. Retrieved from The Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/05/the-next-asia-is-africa-inside-the-continents-rapid-economic-growth/257441/
    39. Freudenburg, W. R. (1985). Applying sociology to policy: social science and the environmental impact statement. Rural Sociology, 50, 578–605.
    40. Funiber. (n.d.). Distrubucion de etnias en honduras. http://alpha.funiber.org/nuestras-sedes/honduras.
    41. Gingrich, L. G. (2015). The Empirical Measurement of a Theoretical Concept: Tracing Social Exclusion Among Racial Minority and Migrant Groups in Canada. Social Inclusion 3 No.4, 98.
    42. Greenberg, M. D. (2013). Crowdfunding Support Tools: Predicting Success & Failure, In CHI Extended Abstracts,. CHI EA `13 CHI `13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1815-1820 .
    43. Guildford, J. V. (2000). Making the Case for Social and Economic Inclusion. Canada. Population and Public Health Branch.
    44. Hansmann, R. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale law journal.
    45. Heerkens, G. R. (2014). Project Management. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.: CWL Publishing Enterprises, Inc.
    46. Helliwell, J. L. (2017). World Happiness Report 2017. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
    47. Herkenrath, M. a. (2011). Protest Events in International Press Coverage: An Empirical Critique of Cross-National Conflict Databases. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 52 (3), 163-180.
    48. Hofacker, T. H.-T. (2013). Marketing the Pinball Way: Understanding How Social Media Change the. Journal of Interactive Marketing.
    49. Horowitz, J. (2018). Chinese company won`t take over MoneyGram after failing to get U.S. approval. Retrieved from CNN MONEY: http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/02/investing/moneygram-ant-financial-merger-terminated/index.html
    50. Howard, P., Duffy, A., Freelon, D., Hussain, M. M., Mari, W., & Maziad, M. (2011). Opening Closed Regimes: What was the Role of Social Media during the Arab Spring?
    51. Hulm, M. E. (1995). NGO performance and Accountability: Introduction and Overview. Earthscan Publications LTD, London.
    52. Hussain, M. M. (2012, , april). Democracy’s Fourth Wave? Information Technologies and the Fuzzy Causes of the Arab Spring . Paper presented at the International Studies Association.
    53. Ich, M. H. (2013). Composicion Etnica de Guatemala. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20140826140827/http://es.scribd.com/doc/141332731/Composicion-Etnica-de-Guatemala
    54. Jacobs, C. (2003). Organization responsiveness through dialog. Imagination Lab Foundation. Lausanne, Switzerland.
    55. Jaeger, P. T. (2009). One law with two outcomes: Comparing the implementation of the Children`s Internet Protection Act in public libraries and public schools. Information Technology and Libraries, 28, 8−16.
    56. Jennings, R. (2017, March). These Are The Fastest Growing Economies In East Asia In 2017. Retrieved from Forbes.com: https://www.google.com.tw/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2017/03/23/east-asias-5-fastest-growing-countries-in-2017/amp/)
    57. John C. Bertot, P. T. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, april.
    58. Julia Terrapon-Pfaffa, T. F. (2017). Determining significance in social impact assessments (SIA) by applying both technical and participatory approaches: Methodology development and application in a case study of the concentrated solar power plant NOORO Iin Morocco. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 138–150.
    59. Jyoti Choudrie, P. T. (2017). Social Inclusion and Usability of ICTenabled Services. Leicester: Bepress.
    60. Kierkegaard, S. (2009). Open access to public documents—More secrecy, less transparency! . Computer Law &Security Review, 25, 3−27.
    61. Klotz, R. J. (2004). The politics of Internet communication. Lanham, U.S.A:: Rowman & Littlefield.
    62. Kourdy, J. (2015). Business Strategy. London: Profile Books Ltd.
    63. Krishna, S. (2017, november 13). Swapna Krishna. Retrieved from engadget.com: https://www.engadget.com/2017/11/13/fact-checkers-say-facebook-is-losing-war-on-fake-news/
    64. Lawrence, D. (2007). Impact significance determination – designing an approach. Environmental Impact Assessesment Rev. 27 , 730–754.
    65. Lee, P.-P. (2017). Management of Nonprofit Organization. National Chengchi University.
    66. LEIRedirect. (2009, August 12). Understanding How Gallup Uses the Cantril Scale. Retrieved from Gallup News: http://news.gallup.com/poll/122453/understanding-gallup-uses-cantril-scale.aspx
    67. Lincoln, E. G. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.
    68. Merriam-Webster. (2017). Dictionary Merriam-Webster.
    69. Merriam-Webster. (2018, may 19). merriam-webster.com. Retrieved from merriam-webster.com: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/assessment
    70. Meuleman, L. (2013, march). Governance. Fastips. International Association for Impact Assessment . Retrieved from Assessment, International Association of Impact.
    71. Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming more components into integrated circuits. Electronics, volumen 38, n.º 8.
    72. Nakamura, D. (2017, april 13). Obama said there was never a better time to be alive. Trump thinks a ‘nasty’ world offers nothing but problems. Retrieved from The Washingtonpost.com: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-said-there-was-never-a-better-time-to-be-alive-trump-thinks-a-nasty-world-offers-nothing-but-problems/2017/04/13/59c9c65e-2090-11e7-be2a-3a1fb24d4671_story.html?utm_term=.00988c5bb5f0
    73. Norris, P. (2012, April). The Impact of Social Media on the Arab Uprisings: The Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube Revolutions? Antwerp,, Belgium.
    74. Oberhaus, D. (2015). Seven Ways to Donate Your Computer`s Unused Processing Power. Retrieved from motherboard.vice.com: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/bmj9jv/7-ways-to-donate-your-computers-unused-processing-power
    75. OECD. (1994). Development Assistance Committee Report 1993 . Paris.
    76. OECD. (2016). STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS OF THE SECRETARY GENERAL. Paris, France.
    77. Owen, L. H. (2017). Avoiding articles from “the creep”: People trust news based on who shared it, not on who published it. Retrieved from Niemanlab: http://www.niemanlab.org/2017/03/avoiding-articles-from-the-creep-people-trust-news-based-on-who-shared-it-not-on-who-published-it/
    78. Partidário, M. (2012, april). Impact Assessment. Fastips. International Association for Impact Assessment . Retrieved from International Association of Impact Assessment.
    79. Pezzni, M. (2012). An emerging middle class. Retrieved from OECD Observer : http://m.oecdobserver.org/news/fullstory.php/aid/3681/An_emerging_middle_class.html)
    80. Pool, I. D. (1983). Technologies of Freedom . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    81. Quick Facts About Nonprofits. (2013). Retrieved from National Center of Charitable Statistics: http://nccs.urban.org/data-statistics/quick-facts-about-nonprofits
    82. R.L.W., D. &. (2017). The Big Mac Index. Retrieved from The Economist: http://www.economist.com/content/big-mac-index
    83. Rifkin, J. (1996). El fin del trabajo: nuevas tecnologías contra puestos de trabajo : el nacimiento de una nueva era. Grupo Planeta (GBS). Retrieved from Wikipedia.
    84. Rowan, M. (2009). Refining the attribution of significance in social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 27 , 185–191.
    85. Schindler, J. G. (2016 ). Participatory impact assessment: bridging the gap between scientists` theory and farmers` practice . Agric. Syst. 148 , 38–43.
    86. Sen, A. (1987). The Standard of Living. Cambridge. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
    87. Shearer, J. G. (2016). News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016. Retrieved from Journalism.org: http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/
    88. Smillie, I. a. (1993). Non-Governmental Organisations and Governments:. Paris.
    89. Smith, D. H., Stebbins, R. A., & Dover, M. A. (2006 ). A Dictionary of Nonprofit Terms and Concepts real. Indiana: Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    90. Smith, D. H., Stebbins, R. A., & Dover, M. A. (2006). A Dictionary of Nonprofit Terms and Concepts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    91. Sourbati, M. (2012). Disabling communications? Media Culture and Society, 571-587.
    92. Staff. (2018). Mision y vision. Retrieved from Ministerio de Cultura y Deportes: http://mcd.gob.gt/mision-y-vision/
    93. Staff, H. (2009). Morse Code and the Telegraph. Retrieved from History.com Staff: http://www.history.com/topics/inventions/telegraph
    94. Staff, I. (2017, february). How do I raise funds for a nonprofit? Retrieved from indiegogo: https://support.indiegogo.com/hc/en-us/articles/115002403448-How-do-I-raise-funds-for-a-nonprofit-
    95. Stolp, A. G. (2002). Citizen values assessment: incorporating citizens` value judgements in environmental impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 20 , 11–23.
    96. Summers, R. M. (1994). Doing Well While Doing Good: Dilemmas of performance measurement in non profit organizations and the need of multiple constituency approach. In D. M. Lawton, Public Sector Management: Theory, Critique and Practice (pp. 220-236).
    97. Suopajärvi, L. (2013). Social impact assessment in mining projects in northern Finland: comparing practice to theory. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 42 (2013), 25–30. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.04.003. Environmental Impact Assessment Rev. 42, 25–30.
    98. The World Bank Data. (2017). Retrieved October-November 2017, from The World Bank: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
    99. Thompson, M. (1990). Determining impact significance in EIA: a review of 24 methodologies. . Journal Environmental Managagement 30 , 235–250.
    100. Uncensored, C. (2017). WeChat; The app that´s always watching you. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/DMHwVU-8BHM
    101. Uncensored, C. (2018). China Is Getting Rid of Cash. Retrieved from Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWY7A221hwA
    102. Universität Siegen, F. W. (2010). Study on the Social Impact of ICT. Siegen.
    103. Vanclay, F. (2003). International Principles For Social Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal volume 21, number 1, , 5–11.
    104. Vanclay, F. (2003, march). International Principles For Social Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, volume 21, number 1, 5–11.
    105. Verd, J. M. (2011). The Rewards of a Qualitative Approach to Life-Course Research: The Example of the Effects of Social Protection Policies on Career Paths. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12, no. 3.
    106. Wiebe E. Bi.Jker, T. P. (1993). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    107. Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous Technology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    108. Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social Media and the Arab Spring: Politics Comes First. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 115 –137.
    109. Wuppertal Institute, G. .. (2015). Energy and Development: Exploring the Local Livelihood Dimension of the NOORO I CSP Project in Southern Morocco. Germanwatch, Bonn: Final Report to the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Developmen.
    110. Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to Public Judgment: making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.
    111. Zephoria Inc. (2017). The Top 20 Valuable Facebook Statistics – Updated November 2017. Retrieved from Zephora Digital Marketing: https://zephoria.com/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics/
    112. Zephoria Inc., 2. Z. (2017). Top Ten Twitter Statistics. Retrieved from Zephoria Marketing: https://zephoria.com/twitter-statistics-top-ten/
    113. Zhao, Y. (2008). Neoliberal strategies, socialist legacies: Communication and state transformation in China. Global communications: Toward a transcultural political economy, 51-75.
    114. Zheng, Y. (2009). Different Spaces for e-Development: What Can We Learn from the Capability Approach? Information Technology for Development 15, no. 2, 66–82.
    115. Zittrain, J., & Palfrey , J. (2008). Internet filtering: The politics and mechanisms ofcontrol. Access denied: The practice and policy of global Internet filtering, 29−56.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
    105862015
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105862015
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.IMPIS.014.2018.A06
    Appears in Collections:[International Master`s Program in International Studies] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    201501.pdf2136KbAdobe PDF275View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback