政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/119320
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50800132      Online Users : 854
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119320


    Title: 平台企業收購硬體廠商的策略分析-以Google收購HTC手機團隊為例
    Strategy Analysis of Platform Business Acquiring Hardware Companies-A Case Study of Google Acquiring HTC Smartphone Team
    Authors: 田佳展
    Tien, Chia-Chan
    Contributors: 許牧彥
    Hsu, Mu-Yen
    田佳展
    Tien, Chia-Chan
    Keywords: 平台企業
    智慧型手機
    創新型態
    獲利方式
    併購考量
    Platform business
    Smartphone
    Innovation types
    Profiting methods
    Mergers and acquisitions consideration
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-08-10 11:06:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 　　近幾年經營平台的企業開始有了走向硬體的情形，像是Amazon推出結合語音助理的喇叭Echo以及Facebook收購Oculus推出VR裝置，這些企業投入未來可能引領新潮流的產品是可以理解的。然而本研究則更聚焦於經營平台的企業選擇投入成長已經趨緩或是衰退的市場，當硬體廠商都難以獲利的情況下，這些企業又該如何從中獲利？
    　　智慧型手機製造商每年不斷推出新的功能以及更好的硬體設備來吸引消費者，市場也因為逐漸飽和而導致製造商之間的競爭越來越激烈，許多智慧型手機製造商都面臨虧損的窘境。然而即使是在這樣子的市場下，不只Microsoft收購Nokia手機部門，Google也繼收購Motorola後又收購了HTC團隊。
    　　本研究以Google作為個案研究對象，探討這些平台企業收購硬體廠商的策略意圖以及在後續推出產品和獲利上的思維為何。本研究發現：一、平台企業會透過建立硬體的標準來幫助將自己的服務推送出去；二、平台企業更傾向於採用協助者創新；三、平台企業會考慮技術生命週期來選擇技術的獲取方式；四、比起在生產過程中獲利，平台企業更傾向於在消費過程中獲利。
    　　In recent years, business that have been operating platforms have begun to move toward hardware. For example, Amazon launched the Echo with voice assistants and Facebook also launched VR devices through the acquisition of Oculus. It`s understandable that these business invest in the products that may lead the new trend in the future. However, this study is more focused on the platform business choosing to invest in growth has slowed down or declined in the market. When hardware manufacturers are difficult to profit, how should these platform business profit from it?
    　　Smartphone manufacturers continue to introduce new features and better hardware devices to attract consumers every year. The market is also becoming more competitive due to the gradual saturation of the market. Many smartphone manufacturers are facing losses. However, even in such a market, not only Microsoft acquired the Nokia mobile phone division, but Google also acquired the HTC team after acquiring Motorola.
    　　This study uses case study method and chooses Google as the object to explore the strategic intent of these platform business to acquire hardware companies and the thinking on subsequent product launches and profitability. This study finds out that: First, platform business will help to push their own services through the establishment of complementary standards; Second, platform business are more inclined to adopt helper innovation; Third, platform business will consider technology life cycle to select way of acquiring technology; Fourth, compared to the profit in the production process, platform business are more inclined to profit in the consumption process.
    Reference: 英文文獻
    Aaker, D. A. (1992). Developing business strategies (Vol. 26): Wiley.
    Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
    Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Chesbrough, H., & Garman, A. R. (2009). How open innovation can help you cope in lean times. Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 68-76, 128.
    Choudary, S. P., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 54-62.
    Christensen, C. M., Alton, R., Rising, C., & Waldeck, A. (2011). The big idea: The new M&A playbook. Harvard Business Review, 89(3), 48-57.
    Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. economica, 4(16), 386-405.
    Cuadrado, F., & Dueñas, J. C. (2012). Mobile application stores: success factors, existing approaches, and future developments. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(11), 160-167.
    Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Opening platforms: how, when and why? Platforms, markets and innovation, 131-162.
    Farquhar, P. (1990). Managing brand equity. Journal of Advertising Research, 30.
    Gemünden, H. G., Ritter, T., & Heydebreck, P. (1996). Network configuration and innovation success: An empirical analysis in German high-tech industries. International journal of research in marketing, 13(5), 449-462.
    Haspeslagh, P. C., & Jemison, D. B. (1991). Managing acquisitions: Creating value through corporate renewal (Vol. 416): Free Press New York.
    Heitkoetter, H., Hildebrand, K., & Usener, C. (2012). Mobile platforms as two-sided markets.
    Hong, A., Bhattacharyya, D., & Geis, G. T. (2012). The role of M&A in market convergence: Amazon, Apple, Google and Microsoft. Paper presented at the International Business Research Conference.
    Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Walker, G. (2003). Guest editors` introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource‐based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 889-902.
    Hsu, M.-Y., & Kuo, G.-N. (2018). Beyond Producer and User Innovations-Product Innovations Initiated by Helper. Graduate Institute of Technology, Innovation and Intellectual Property Management,National Cheng-Chi University Working Paper.
    Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984). User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Management science, 30(5), 586-603.
    Kenney, M., & Pon, B. (2011). Structuring the smartphone industry: is the mobile internet OS platform the key? Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 11(3), 239-261.
    Klanac, N. G. (2013). An integrated approach to customer value: A comprehensive-practical approach. Journal of Business Market Management, 6(1), 22-37.
    Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.
    Lin, F., & Ye, W. (2009). Operating system battle in the ecosystem of smartphone industry. Paper presented at the Information Engineering and Electronic Commerce, 2009. IEEC`09. International Symposium on.
    Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economyand How to Make Them Work for You: WW Norton & Company.
    Pitts, R. A., & Hopkins, H. D. (1982). Firm diversity: Conceptualization and measurement. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 620-629.
    Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competition. New York, 300, 28.
    Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. 1985: New York: Free Press.
    Priem, R. L. (2007). A consumer perspective on value creation. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 219-235.
    Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two‐sided markets. Journal of the european economic association, 1(4), 990-1029.
    Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2004). Two-sided markets: an overview. IDEI working paper.
    Schmidt, E., & Rosenberg, J. (2014). How google works: Hachette UK.
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle: Transaction Books.
    Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization: MIT press.
    Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management science, 32(7), 791-805.
    Von Hippel, E. (1998). Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information. Management science, 44(5), 629-644.
    Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: MIT press.
    Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
    Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York, 2630.
    Yalcin, T., Ofek, E., Koenigsberg, O., & Biyalogorsky, E. (2013). Complementary goods: creating, capturing, and competing for value. Marketing Science, 32(4), 554-569.
    Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and Methods, Applied social research methods series, 5. Biography, Sage Publications, London.
    Zenger, T. (2015). Why Google Became Alphabet. Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business Review, August, 15, 1-4.
    Arthur, C. (2014). Digital wars: Apple, Google, Microsoft and the battle for the Internet: Kogan Page Publishers.
    LexInnova (2015) Virtual Reality：Patent Landscape Analysis.

    中文文獻
    王俊雄 (2011)。後 iphone 時代智慧型手機產業環境因素對宏達電競爭策略影響之研究。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程 (EMBA) 學位論文。
    司徒達賢 (2005)。策略管理新論: 觀念架構與分析方法。智勝文化事業有限公司。
    伍忠賢 (2000)。企業併購─理論與實務。台北市: 新陸書局。
    何易剛 (2011)。行動應用軟體獲利模式之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所學位論文。
    吳思華 (2002)。策略九說: 策略思考的本質: 復旦大學出版社。
    林淑馨 (2010)。質性研究: 理論與實務: 巨流圖書股份有限公司。
    邱筱婷 (2010)。行動通訊產業軟硬體整合策略分析。國立政治大學商管專業學院碩士學位學程(AMBA)學位論文。
    陈珧 (2016)。技术获取型海外并购整合与目标方自主性研究。
    胡原誌 (2016)。B2B 公司以消費過程為基礎的獲利策略之研究: 以英特爾為例。國立政治大學科技管理研究所學位論文。
    許牧彥 (2007)。以消費過程為基礎的獲利策略。管理評論，19，29-36.
    郭于瑄 (2016)。跨國集團品牌併購動機與併後整合行動之研究。
    陳則銘 (2003)。企業併購之相關智慧財產管理策略與法律規劃研究-以併購美國高科技公司時之專利查核評估探微。國立政治大學智慧財產研究所學位論文。
    陳威如、余卓軒 (2013)。平台革命: 席捲全球社交, 購物, 遊戲, 媒體的商業模式創新。商周出版。
    陳達仁、黃慕萱 (2009)。專利資訊檢索, 分析與策略。臺北市: 華泰。
    黃陽明 (2012)。產業專利分類、專利轉讓資訊、知識重覆與廠商併購意圖之研究：以無線資料傳輸機制技術為例。
    黃愛倫 (2009)。跨國企業併購建立品牌之研究。國立政治大學智慧財產研究所學位論文。
    劉永信 (2014)。平台生態商業模式之探討: Google Android 的競爭策略。國立台灣大學資訊管理組碩士學位論文
    薛明玲、廖烈龍、林宜賢 (2006)。企業併購策略與最佳實務: 資誠教育基金會。
    劉常勇 (2004)。精簡研發管理效率大晉級(上)。取自: http://www.nsysu.edu.tw/files/14-1000-53909,r1235-1.php?Lang=zh-tw
    羅松濤 (2007)。全球第一搜尋引擎：Google。
    張榮裕 (2013)。從iOS和Android成功模式探討TIZEN發展策略。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)學位論文。
    陳信成 (2008)。軟體開放式創新之研究-以Google公司為例。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)學位論文。
     
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    105364120
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105364120
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.TIIPM.012.2018.F08
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of TIPM] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    412001.pdf2445KbAdobe PDF213View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback