政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/119259
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造访人次 : 51215793      在线人数 : 956
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119259


    题名: 美麗的制約：星野旅館集團如何以服務創新化劣勢為優勢
    Beautiful constraints: how Hoshino Group transforms adversities into advantages through service innovation
    作者: 湯桂禎
    Tang, Kuei-Chen
    贡献者: 蕭瑞麟
    Hsiao, Ruey-Lin
    湯桂禎
    Tang, Kuei-Chen
    关键词: 服務創新
    隨創
    劣資源
    使用者導向創新
    旅館管理
    Service innovation
    Bricolage
    Inferior resource
    User-centric innovation
    Hotel management
    日期: 2018
    上传时间: 2018-08-07 17:21:44 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 服務已成為現代企業之主導邏輯，是競爭市場中的求生之道。過去文獻強調由流程與使用者兩個方向去思考服務創新。然而，此論述皆是建立在資源充裕的前提下去進行創新。若資源不足，又面臨制約，企業如何進行服務創新呢？雖然隨創理論提出就地取材、將就著用、資源重組三個原則，卻仍未深入探究，就地只有劣資源時，如何擴大取用在地周圍的資源；將就著用時如何考慮到使用者而思考另類資源用法；資源重組時又如何能轉換資源性質，巧妙拼湊出解決方案。因此，現階段「服務隨創」的重點議題是，如何由這三個實務去形成新服務。本文以星野集團旗下四間旅館為案例，分析如何就地取材手邊的劣資源，在制約中找到創新機會，使旅館重生。觀念上，本文拓展隨創的三項原則，並點出新作法的可能。實務上，本研究建議，企業面臨制約時如何運用服務隨創的方式，以有限資源建構全新的顧客體驗。制約其實是美麗的，是隱藏的祝福，是服務創新的最佳助力。
    Service has become a dominant logic for modern enterprises, which guides firms’ survival in competitive markets. Prior literature stresses service innovation from process and user orientation. However, both arguments are based on the premise that firms innovate services by means of sufficient resources. If resources are insufficient while encountering constraints, how might firms engage in service innovation? The theory of bricolage highlights three core principles: employing resources at hand, making-do with resources, and resource recombination. Nonetheless, it has not yet explored such constrained conditions: when firms only have inferior resources at hand, how they could expand the scope of exploration; in making-do, how firms would identify alternative use of resources from target users’ perspectives; and in recombining, how firms might convert the quality of less useful resource and leverage these resources for creative solutions. Therefore, the key issue for ‘service bricolage’ at present stage is to innovate services by means of these three practices. This thesis examines four hotels from Hoshino Group and analyzes how these hotels are rejuvenated through deploying inferior resources at hand while recognizing opportunities from constraints. Conceptually, this thesis extends the three principles of bricolage and highlights new possibilities. Practically, it suggests how firms may employ service bricolage to construct customer experience with limited resources. Constraints are in fact beautiful; they are blessing in disguised; and they are the best enablement for service innovation.
    參考文獻: 中文文獻
    木下齊（張佩瑩譯），2017，《地方創生：小城鎮、商店街、返鄉青年的創業十個鐵則》，新北市：遠足文化。
    李沿儒、楊瑜馨，2014，「連結消費者新生活型態：王品集團商業生態系統個案研究」，《產業管理評論》，第一期，第7 卷，17-37 頁。
    林俊昇、林政佑、周恩頤，2011，「服務體驗管理：亞洲文獻回顧與未來研究方向」，《臺大管理論叢》，第2 期，第26 卷，303-352 頁。
    陳意文、吳思華、項維欣，2010，「資源基礎觀點下之資源拼湊與價值創造: 以台灣翅帆開發創新產品為例」，《科技管理學刊》，第2 期，第15 卷，1-20 頁。
    陳蕙芬，2015，「柔韌設計：化機構阻力為創新助力」，《中山管理評論》，第1 期，第23 卷，13-55 頁。
    彭康麟、洪碧怡、林明珠，2011，「逆境生存、創新思維─以節慶活動行銷幼教產業」，《產業管理評論》，第1 期，第5 卷，35-47 頁。
    湯玲郎、吳美智，2012，「發展觀光醫療之服務創新模式─以四家個案醫院為例」. 《產業管理評論》，第2 期，第5 卷，9-23 頁。
    蕭瑞麟，2016，《思考的脈絡：創新可能不擴散》，台北：天下文化學術叢書。
    蕭瑞麟，2017，《不用數字的研究：質性研究的思辨脈絡》，台北：五南學術原創系列。
    蕭瑞麟、侯勝宗、歐素華，2011，「演化科技意會—衛星派遣科技的人性軌跡」，《資訊管理學報》，第4 期，第18 卷，1-28 頁。
    蕭瑞麟、廖啟旭、陳蕙芬，2011，「越淮為枳：從實務觀點分析跨情境資訊科技移轉」，《資訊管理學報》，第2 期，第18 卷，131-160 頁。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、吳彥寬，2017，「逆勢拼湊：化資源制約為創新來源」，《中山管理評論》，第1 期，第25 卷，219-268 頁。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳蕙芬，2014，「劣勢創新：梵谷策展中的隨創行為」，《中山管理評論》，第2 期，第22 卷，323-367 頁。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、蘇筠，2017，「逆強論：隨創式的資源建構過程」，《台大管理論叢》，第4 期，第27 卷，43-74 頁。

    英文文獻
    Antorini, Y. M., Muniz, J. A. M., & Askildsen, T. 2012. Collaborating with customer communities: Lessons from the Lego Group. Sloan Management Review, 53(3): 73-79.
    Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. 2003. Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2):255-276.
    Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 329-366.
    Berry, L. L., Shankar, V., Parish, J. T., Cadwallader, S., & Dotzel, T. 2006. Creating new markets through service innovation. Sloan Management Review, 47(2): 56-63.
    Bettencourt, L. A., Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. 2014. A service lens on value creation: Marketing role in achieving strategic advantage. California Management Review, 57(1):
    44-66.
    Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L., & Morgan, F. N. 2008. Service blueprinting: A practical technique for service innovation. California Management Review, 50(3): 66-94.
    Brown, T. 2009. Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Collins.
    Chakravorti, B. 2010. Finding competitive advantage in adversity. Harvard Business Review, 88(11): 102-108.
    Chesbrough, H. W. 2011. Bringing open innovation to services. Sloan Management Review, 52(2): 85-90.
    Drucker, P. 1998. The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 76(6): 149-157.
    Edelman, D. C., & Singer, M. 2015. Competing on customer journeys. Harvard Business Review, 93(11): 88-87.
    Fichter, D., & Wisniewski, J. 2017. Tackling the omnichannel experience with customer journey mapping. Computers in Libraries, 37(8): 4-7.
    Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2): 277–300.
    Gibbert, M., Hoegl, M., & Välikangas, L. 2007. In praise of resource constraints. Sloan Management Review, 48(3): 15-17.
    Hienerth, C., Keinz, P., & Lettl, C. 2011. Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models. Long Range Planning, 44(5–6): 344-374.
    Kastalli, I. V., Van Looy, B., & Neely, A. 2013. Steering manufacturing firms towards service business model innovation. California Management Review, 56: 100-123.
    Langley, A. 2007. Process thinking in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3): 271-282.
    Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. 2016. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6): 69-96.
    Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. 2015. Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1): 155-176.
    Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’Brien, M. 2007. Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1): 5-18.
    Maklan, S., Antonetti, P., & Whitty, S. 2017. A better way to manage customer experience: Lessons from the Royal Bank of Scotland. California Management Review, 59(2): 92-115.
    Möller, K., Rajala, R., & Westerlund, M. 2008. Service innovation myopia? A new recipe for client-provider value creation. California Management Review, 50(3): 31-48.
    Morgan, A., & Barden, M. 2015. A beautiful constraint: How to transform your limitations into advantages, and why it’s everyone’s business. London: Wiley.
    Powell, E. E., & Baker, T. 2014. It`s what you make of it: Founder identity and enacting strategic responses to adversity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5): 1406-1433.
    Quinn, J. B., Paquette, P. C., & Baruch, J. J. 1988. Exploiting the manufacturing-services interface. Sloan Management Review, 29(4): 45-56.
    Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. 2013. Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms.
    Journal of Business Research, 66(8): 1085-1097.
    SchÄFer, A., & Klammer, J. 2016. Service dominant logic in practice: Applying online customer communities and personas for the creation of service innovations. Management, 11(3): 255-264.
    Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. 2004. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1): 1-17.
    von Hippel, E. 2001. Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software. Sloan Management Review, 42(4): 82-86.
    Voorhees, C. M., Walkowiak, T., Fombelle, P. W., Gregoire, Y., Bone, S., Gustafsson, A., & Sousa, R. 2017. Service encounters, experiences and the customer journey: Defining the field and a call to expand our lens. Journal of Business Research, 79: 269-280.
    Witell, L., Gebauer, H., Jaakkola, E., Hammedi, W., Patricio, L., & Perks, H. 2017. A bricolage perspective on service innovation. Journal of Business Research, 79:
    290-298.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    105932425
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105932425
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.EMBA.042.2018.F08
    显示于类别:[經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈