政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/119152

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/119152

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51114026 線上人數 : 884

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/119152

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119152

題名:	現金減資短期市場反應與長期營運績效之分析 Analysis of short-term market reaction and long-run operating performance on capital reduction
作者:	張大羿 Chang, Ta-Yi
貢獻者:	陳宇紳張大羿 Chang, Ta-Yi
關鍵詞:	現金減資異常報酬長期營運績效 Capital reduction Abnormal return Long-run operating performance
日期:	2018
上傳時間:	2018-08-02 16:14:36 (UTC+8)
摘要:	現金減資在近年來成為台灣企業十分熱門的議題，實行的家數屢創新高，且相繼有規模龐大的龍頭產業宣告現金減資。現金減資藉由降低股本可以提升股東權益報酬率以及每股盈餘等獲利指標，同時退還之現金也不需繳納稅負，對投資人具有立即上的好處。然而，究竟現金減資長期來說對企業是否仍為正面影響亦是市場投資人所關心的焦點，本文藉由探討現金減資後的長期營運績效企圖釐清上述問題。本文以訊號發射理論以及自由現金流量理論的觀點出發，探討投資人對企業現金減資的反應，以及現金減資與企業後續營運績效的關聯性。本文有三個主要發現：第一，市場對現金減資的反應為正面，顯示投資人視現金減資為一好消息；第二，現金減資後續的營運績效隨公司特徵不同有所差異。實證結果顯示，高投資機會、非家族企業以及外資持股比例較高的企業在現金減資後營運績效較配對樣本企業有顯著提升，支持訊號發射理論的論述。第三，投資人無法完全地將現金減資對公司未來營運績效的意涵反應在股價上。從實證結果來看，在以不同公司特徵分組的情況下，市場對現金減資的反應皆為正向，然而，公司後續的營運績效會隨公司特質有明顯的差異，意味著投資人無法辨明宣告減資背後的動機，進而給予公司現金減資正確的評價。 In recent years, capital reduction has become a popular means for firms to return profits to shareholders in Taiwan. Through capital reductions, firms can reduce the number of shares outstanding, making profitability measures such as return on equity or earnings per share look nicer and attractive to investors. In addition, shareholders generally welcome capital reduction because cash distributed to shareholders through capital reduction exercise is tax exempted. Despite these immediate benefits, whether capital reduction really benefits shareholders in the long run is an unanswered question. To answer this question, I build on signaling theory and free cash flow theory to examine the market reaction to the announcement of capital reduction news and the association between capital reduction and long-run firm performance. There are three main findings in this study. First, market reaction surrounding the announcement of capital reduction news is significantly positive, indicating that investors generally view capital deduction as good news. Second, firms’ long-run operating performance subsequent to the event of capital reduction varies with firm characteristics. Specifically, high growth firms, nonfamily firms, and firms with greater foreign institutional ownership tend to outperform matching firms in long-run operating performance, consistent with the prediction of signaling theory. Lastly, market reaction in response to news release of capital reduction is positive irrespective of firm characteristics (i.e., growth prospect, family ownership and foreign institutional ownership). This finding suggests that investors do not fully gauge the implication of capital reduction for future firm operating performance and fail to impound such information in stock prices.
參考文獻:	王瑪如、蕭君宇，2013，彌補虧損減資、現金減資與庫藏股減資之市場宣告效果，會計評論, (57),page 105-135 杜文禮、張純明、廖敏齡，2008，台灣上市櫃公司買回庫藏股與股價、經營績效關條之研究，全球管理與經濟, 4(1), page 31-48 林有志、陳筱平，2011，現金減資之宣告效果，當代會計, 12(1),page 31-56 林鴻光、許永聲、沈家瑜，2009，企業進行現金減資之宣告效果及對其營運績效之影響，台灣管理學刊, 9(2), 2009,page 185-203 粘瑜芬，2011，現金減資的後續長期績效之探討，中興大學會計研究所碩士論文陳振遠、張眾卓、王朝仕、莊博勝，2009，庫藏股購回宣告後長期績效與影響因素之研究，輔仁管理評論第16 卷第3 期，23-58 陳曉蓉、王詠惠，2006，機構投資人持股對股價反映未來盈餘資訊程度之影響─以台灣集團公司與非集團公司為例，會計與公司治理第三卷第二期69-100頁黃劭彥、林琦珍、黃怡倫，2012，我國實施減資之上市櫃公司其公司治理對公司績效之影響，台灣管理學刊, 12(2),page 227-250 楊芳瑜，2007，公司減資返還股款之研究，台灣大學碩士論文廖秀梅、李建然、吳祥華，2006，董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究－兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響，東吳經濟商學學報第五十四期,page 117-160 蔡柳卿、郭法雲，2004，我國庫藏股制度之實證研究：資訊效果與資訊傳遞動機，會計評論，第38期，2004年1月第81-112頁鄭桂蕙、林宛瑩、許崇源，2006，董監事持股高低對庫藏股買回誘因之影響，東吳經濟商學學報第五十四期,page 1-26 Agrawal Anup and Gershon N. Mandelker. 1990. Large Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers: The Case of Antitakeover Charter Amendments. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Vol. 25, No. 2 pp. 143-161 Anderson Ronald C. and David M. 2003. Reeb Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance Volume58, Issue3 June Pages 1301-1328 Barber Brad M, John D.Lyon. 1997. Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics Volume 43, Issue 3, March, Pages 341-372 Bhagat Sanjai , Brian Bolton. 2008. Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance Volume 14, Issue 3, June, Pages 257-273 Dittmar Amy K. 2000. Why Do Firms Repurchase Stock. The Journal of Business, Vol. 73, No. 3 July pp. 331-355 Fama Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French. 2001. Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics Volume 60, Issue 1, April, Pages 3-43 Fama, E. F., and Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics26: 301-325. Gilson Stuart C. 1990. Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders: Evidence on changes in corporate ownership and control when firms default. Journal of Financial Economics vol. 27, issue 2, 355-387 Gong Guojin, Henock Louis, Amy X. Sun. 2008. Earnings management and firm performance following open-market repurchases. The Journal of Finance Volume63, Issue2 April Grullon Gustavo, Roni Michaely, Bhaskaran Swaminathan. 2002. Are Dividend Changes a Sign of Firm Maturity? Journal of Business, , vol. 75, no. 3 Grullon Gustavo, Roni Michaely. 2002. Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis. The Journal of Finance Volume57, Issue4 August, Pages 1649-1684 Grullon, G.,Michaely,R. 2004. The Information Content of Share Repurchase Programs. Journal of Finance Volume59, Issue2 April Pages 651-680 Ho Li-Chin Jennifer, Chao-Shin Liu and Ramachandran Ramanan. 1997. Open-Market Stock Repurchase Announcements and Revaluation of Prior Accounting Information. The Accounting Review, Vol. 72, No. 3 Jul, pp. 475-487 Ikenberry David, Josef Lakonishok, Theo Vermaelen. 1995. Market underreaction to open market share repurchases. Journal of Financial Economics Volume 39, Issues 2–3, October–November, Pages 181-208 Jagannathan Murali, Clifford Stephens. 2003. Motives for Multiple Open-Market Repurchase Programs. Financial Management vol. 32, issue 2 Jensen Michael C. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow,Corporate Finance and Takeovers, American Economic Review, May, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 323-329 Jensen Michael C. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. The Journal of Finance Volume48, Issue3 July Pages 831-880 Lakonishok Josef and Theo Vermalen 1990. ,Anomalous Price Behavior Around Repurchase Tender Offers, The Journal of Finance . Volume45, Issue2 June Pages 455-477 Lie Erik, John J. McConnell. 1998. Earnings signals in fixed-price and Dutch auction self-tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics Volume 49, Issue 2, 1 August, Pages 161-186 Lie Erik. 2005. Operating performance following open market share repurchase announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics Volume 39, Issue 3, September Pages 411-436 Lnag Larry H.P, Robert H. Litzenberge. 1989. Dividend announcements: Cash flow signalling vs. free cash flow hypothesis? Journal of Financial Economics Volume 24, Issue 1, September, Pages 181-191 Nohel Tom, Vefa Tarhan. 1998. Share repurchases and firm performance: new evidence on the agency costs of free cash flow. Journal of Financial Economics Volume 49, Issue 2, 1 August, Pages 187-222 Perfect Steven B., David R. Peterson, Pamela P. Peterson. 1995. Self-tender offers: The effects of free cash flow, cash flow signaling and the measurement of Tobin’s q. Journal of Banking & Finance Volume 19, Issue 6, September, Pages 1005-1023 Pound John. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics Volume 20, January–March Pages 237-265 Shleifer Andrei and Robert W. Vishny. 1986. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control . Journal of Political Economy Vol. 94, No. 3, Part 1 Jun. pp. 461-488 Shleifer Andrei and Robert W. Vishny. 1997. The Limits of Arbitrage. The Journal of Finance Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 35-55. Steiner, T. L. 1996. A reexamination of the relationships between ownership structure, firm diversification, and Tobin’s Q. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 35(4):39-48. Vermalen Theo. 1981. Common stock repurchases and market signalling: An empirical study Journal of Financial Economics Volume 9, Issue 2, June, Pages 139-183.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學會計學系 105353032
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105353032
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/THE.NCCU.ACCT.036.2018.F07
顯示於類別:	[會計學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
303201.pdf	925Kb	Adobe PDF2	6	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋