政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/119144
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51186924      線上人數 : 868
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119144


    題名: 稅制變革與逃漏稅：臺灣遺贈稅的分析
    Tax Reform and Tax Evasion: Evidence from Estate and Gift Taxes of Taiwan
    作者: 陳宜津
    Chen, I-Chin
    貢獻者: 洪福聲
    Hung, Fu-Sheng
    陳宜津
    Chen, I-Chin
    關鍵詞: 稅率
    逃漏稅
    遺產稅
    贈與稅
    Tax rate
    Tax evasion
    Estate tax
    Gift tax
    日期: 2018
    上傳時間: 2018-08-01 16:45:32 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 政府為營造輕稅簡政之賦稅環境、吸引留滯海外資金回流，於2009年1月21日修法公布「遺產及贈與稅法」，將「遺產稅」及「贈與稅」50%最高邊際稅率之累進稅率制度，修正為「10%的單一稅率制度」及提高免稅額。本研究於「遺產稅」及「贈與稅」稅率調降政策施行9年後，租稅誘因的經濟實質效益較為明顯時，透過對「遺產稅」及「贈與稅」理論與實證的探討，檢視「遺產稅」及「贈與稅」稅率調降後，是否能降低民眾租稅規避誘因，提高「遺產稅」及「贈與稅」申報意願，進而使「遺產稅」及「贈與稅」違章漏稅「裁罰案件」占「核定案件」比例減少。
    　　本研究以「遺產稅」及「贈與稅」稅制改革前後對「遺產稅」及「贈與稅」之違章漏稅「裁罰案件」占「核定件數」比例的變化，並以2004年至2016年為研究期間，使用「主計總處」、財政部所屬五區國稅局的統計數據。透過「EViews」計量經濟軟體建立縱橫多元迴歸模型，進行「實證分析」與「相關統計檢定」。研究結果顯示「遺產稅」稅率調降，對「遺產稅」之違章漏稅「裁罰案件」占「核定件數」比例的變動是顯著的；但「贈與稅」稅率的調降，對贈與稅之違章漏稅「裁罰案件」占「核定件數」比例的影響則不顯著的。
    The government of Taiwan implemented estate and gift tax reform to create a tax-free environment for light taxation and attracting citizens to redirect their overseas investment back to Taiwan. This law amendment was promulgated on January 21, 2009, in which the maximum tax rate in “The Law of Estate and Gift Tax" is reduced from 50% down to 10% and the amount of tax exemption is increased. After 9 years of implementing, the purpose of this thesis is to study whether or not the tax reform has reduced the tax evasion of the corresponding taxes.
    We collected data of 5-district National Tax Bureaus of Taiwan from year 2004 to 2016. Using panel regressions, we find that, in term of estate taxes, the reform successfully reduces tax evasion. However, in terms of gift taxes, the tax reform has no significant effect on tax evasion. We discuss some possible reasonings behind our findings.
    參考文獻: Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323-338.
    Clotfelter, C. T. (1983). Tax Evasion and Tax Rates: An Analysis of Individual Returns. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 363-373.
    Crane, S. E., & Nourzad, F. (1986). Inflation and Tax Evasion: An Empirical Analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(5), 217-223.
    Crane, S. E., & Nourzad, F. (1990). Tax rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from California Amnesty Data. National Tax Journal, 43(2), 189-199.
    Dubin, J. A., & Wilde, L. L. (1988). An Empirical Analysis of Federal Income Tax Auditing and Compliance. National Tax Journal, 41(1), 61-74.
    Friedland, N., Maital, S., & Rutenberg, A. (1978). A Simulation Study of Income Tax Evasion. Journal of public economics, 10(1), 107-116.
    Geeroms, H. J., & Wilmots, H. (1985). An Empirical Model of Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance. Public Finance/ Finances Publiques, 40(2), 190-209.
    Gordon, J. P. (1989). Individual Morality and Reputation Costs as Deterrents to Tax Evasion. European Economic Review, 33(4), 797-805.
    Graetz, M. J., & Wilde, L. L. (1985). The Economics of Tax Compliance: Fact and Fantasy. National Tax Journal, 38(3), 355-363.
    Graetz, M. J., Reinganum, J. F., & Wilde, L. L. (1986). The Tax Compliance Game: Toward an Interactive Theory of Law Enforcement. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 2(1), 1-32.
    Klepper, S., & Nagin, D. (1989). The Anatomy of Tax Evasion. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 5(1), 1-24.
    Lin, W. Z., & Yang, C. C. (2001). A Dynamic Portfolio Choice Model of Tax Evasion: Comparative Statics of Tax Rates and its Implication for Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25(11), 1827-1840.
    Pommerehne, W. W., & Weck-Hannemann, H. (1996). Tax Rates, Tax Administration and Income Tax Evasion in Switzerland. Public Choice, 88(1-2), 161-170.
    Reinganum, J. F., & Wilde, L. L. (1986). Equilibrium Verification and Reporting Policies in a Model of Tax Compliance. International Economic Review, 27(3), 739-760.
    Reinganum, J. F., & Wilde, L. L. (1988). A Note on Enforcement Uncertainty and Taxpayer Compliance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(4), 793-798.
    Sandmo, A. (1981). Income Tax Evasion, Labour Supply, and the Equity-Efficiency Tradeoff. Journal of Public Economics, 16(3), 265-288.
    Slemrod, J. (1985). An Empirical Test for Tax Evasion. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(2), 232-238.
    Spicer, M. W., & Becker, L. A. (1980). Fiscal Inequity and Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach. National tax journal, 33(2), 171-175.
    Spicer, M. W., & Hero, R. E. (1985). Tax Evasion and Heuristics: A Research Note. Journal of Public Economics, 26(2), 263-267.
    Spicer, M. W., & Lundstedt, S. B. (1976). Understanding Tax evasion. Public Finance, 31(2), 295-305.
    Tanzi, V. (1983). The Underground Economy in the United States: Annual Estimates, 1930-80. Staff Papers, 30(2), 283-305.
    Witte, A. D., & Woodbury, D. F. (1985). The Effect of Tax Laws and Tax Administration on Tax Compliance: The Case of the US Individual Income Tax. National Tax Journal, 38(1), 1-13.
    Yitzhaki, S. (1987). On the Excess Burden of Tax Evasion. Public Finance Quarterly, 15(2), 123-137.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    105921009
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105921009
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.MEPA.016.2018.F09
    顯示於類別:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋