English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113313/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50948233      Online Users : 923
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118979


    Title: Airbnb與周邊住宅價格及觀光型旅館收益關係之探討
    The Relationship of Airbnb and House Prices and Revenues of Tourist Hotels
    Authors: 曾懷萱
    Tseng, Huai-Hsuan
    Contributors: 林左裕
    Lin, Tso-Yu
    曾懷萱
    Tseng, Huai-Hsuan
    Keywords: 房價
    觀光型旅館收益
    Airbnb
    特徵價格模型
    分量迴歸模型
    Housing prices
    Revenues of tourist hotels
    Airbnb
    Hedonic price model
    Quantile regression model
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-07-27 12:36:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著共享經濟(sharing economy)的浪潮,Airbnb此種新創公司成為共享經濟體系下的產物,透過利用閒置、效率低落的資本商品,擺脫傳統產業經營模式以生成經濟價值,得到公眾的關注。Airbnb的立意良善,作為消費者和供應者之間的媒合中介,Airbnb減少了提供住房作為短期租賃的風險和成本,從而使房屋擁有者能夠靈活地參與住宅商品化的市場。
    儘管Airbnb提供了創新體驗與房東額外收入,或促進地方經濟等相關利益,然而,在其高度發展下,全球各地仍不免關心其衍生負面問題,例如對於住宅市場所會產生的經濟和福利面的隱憂或排擠當地旅館行業的生存。故本研究以地理資訊系統軟體ArcGIS對住宅交易點位周圍1000公尺進行範圍計算Airbnb數量,並以特徵價格模型衡量台北市之Airbnb與住宅價格之關係,此外亦對觀光型旅館收益進行實證,並以分量迴歸模型量測Airbnb與高、低收益旅館關係程度的不同。研究結果為Airbnb與房價存在正向顯著關係;與觀光型旅館收益則有負向顯著關係,且收益越低負向顯著程度越大。表示Airbnb短期租賃行為加劇對於住宅市場的負擔能力,並對低收益觀光型旅館行業產生競爭。依據分析結果給予未來政策思考的方向,以利共享經濟的浪潮下政府對於Airbnb有更完善的配套措施因應。
    With the prevalence of Sharing Economy, Airbnb, a start-up company, has become an evidence of Sharing Economy by using idle and inefficient capital goods to generate economic value. The intention of Airbnb is good. As a mediator between consumers and suppliers, Airbnb has reduced the costs of providing housing as a short-term leasing, so that homeowners can flexibly participate in the residential commercialized markets.
    Although the innovative experiences provided by Airbnb, under its high level of development, the world is still concerning about its negative issues, such as the economic and welfare problems in the residential markets or the survival of the local hotel industries. Therefore, this study uses ArcGIS to calculate the number of Airbnb in the distance of 1000 meters around the location of the houses, and measures the relationship between Airbnb and residential prices in Taipei City by Hedonic Price Model. On the other hand, the study also demonstrates the relationship between Airbnb and revenues of tourist hotels by Multiple Regression Model. In addition, the study investigates how much different influences on the relationship between Airbnb and low or high revenues of tourist hotels by Quantile Regression Model. The results point out that Airbnb has a positive and significant relationship with house prices; meanwhile, there is a negative and significant relationship between Airbnb and revenues of tourist hotels. Furthermore, the lower the revenues are , the greater negative and significant relationship between Airbnb and revenues of tourist hotels. This indicates that the short-term leasing practices of Airbnb have leveled up the affordability of the residential markets and competed seriously with lower class of tourist hotels. According to the results, the direction of future policy will be given in order to facilitate better solutions under Sharing Economy.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    1. 余昌翰,2015,「共享經濟平台下的信任機制之個案分析-以Airbnb為例」,中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文: 桃園。吳健宇,2014,「購屋者對住宅不動產成交價格之影響分析-搜尋、預期及其屬性探討」,政治大學地政系碩士論文: 台北。
    2. 宋豐荃,2014,「鄰近公園有助提升房價嗎?大小公園對高低房價影響程度之研究」,政治大學地政研究所碩士論文:台北。
    3. 李欣,2015,「共享經濟的困境與限制-以Airbnb為例」,政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所碩士論文:台北。
    4. 李泓見、張金鶚、花敬群,2006,「台北都會區不同住宅類型價差之研究」,台灣土地研究,9(1): 63-87 。
    5. 林人和,1991,「台中市住宅地價影響因素之研究: 以西區、北區為例」,政治大學地政研究所碩士論文: 台北。
    6. 林秋瑾、楊宗憲、張金鶚,1996,「住宅價格指數之研究-以台北市為例」,『住宅學報』,4:1-30。
    7. 林祖嘉、林素菁,1993,「台灣地區環境品質與公共設施對房價與房租影響之分析」,『住宅學報』,1:21-45。
    8. 林祖嘉、洪得洋,1999,「台北市捷運系統與道路寬度對房屋價格影響之研究」,『住宅學報』8: 47-67。
    9. 林祖嘉、馬毓駿,2007,「特徵方程式大量估價法在台灣不動產市場之應用」,『住宅學報』,16(2): 3-5。
    10. 林素菁,2002,「台灣地區特徵性房價函數估計係數不一致性問題之探討」,2002年中華民國住宅學會第十一屆年會論文集。
    11. 林豐政、陳偉毓、許淳雅,2015,「旅館營運與地區因素對創造收入影響之研究」,『觀光休閒學報』21(2):131-156。
    12. 邱昰芳,2014,「共享經濟顛覆傳統打造創新服務模式」,『臺灣經濟研究月刊』,37(8): 18-24。
    13. 凃雅珍,2007,「風水對不同住宅價格影響之研究:分量迴歸之應用」,政治大學經濟學系碩士論文:台北。
    14. 洪郁真,2014,「不賣反而賣更多 共享經濟42大模式。」,台北: 動腦。
    15. 張怡文、江穎慧、張金鶚,2009,「分量迴歸在大量估價模型之應用-非典型住宅估價之改進」,『都市與計劃』,36(3):281-304。
    16. 張金鶚、范垂爐,1993,「房地產真實交易價格之研究」,『住宅學報』,1: 75-97。
    17. 陳奉瑤、楊依蓁,2007,「個別估價與大量估價之準確性分析」,『住宅學報』,16(2):67-84 。
    18. 陳怡如,2013,「全球變現平台 好能力,好生意!」,台北: 數位時代。-結合階層線性模式與分量迴歸」,觀光休閒學報,21(2):131-156。
    19. 虛擬世界法規調適線上諮詢會議Part8-Airbnb,2015,
    https://www.vtaiwan.org.tw/model.aspx?no=250
    20. 黃佳鈴、張金鶚,2005,「從房地價格分離探討地價指數之建立」,『台灣土地研究』, 8(2): 73-106。
    21. 楊菡茹,2015,「分享經濟與其平台商業模式之個案研究」,臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文: 台北。
    22. 葉家瑜、陳江明, 2012,「探討不確定住房需求對旅館成本結構之影響:台灣國際觀光旅館之實證研究」,『應用經濟論叢』,92 。
    23. 廖仲仁、張金鶚,2006,「不對稱的仲介服務價格效果 : 分量迴歸法之檢驗」,『都市與計劃』,33(1):1-16。
    24. 劉韋成,2017,「民眾對Airbnb外部性認知之研究」,逢甲大學土地管理學系碩士論文: 台中。
    25. 蔡仲苓,2008,「台北市內湖區住宅屬性價格之探討」,臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文: 台北。
    26. 顧遠,2014,「分享經濟:我的,就是你的。」
    http://www.seinsights.asia/story/1434/795/1882
    27. 吳健宇,2014,「購屋者對住宅不動產成交價格之影響分析-搜尋、預期及其屬性之探討」,政治大學地政研究所碩士論文:台北。

    二、英文參考文獻
    1. Airbnb.(2017). Retireved Novemver 27, 2017, from
    https://www.airbnb.com.tw/
    2. Alex Stephany, 2015, “The Business of Sharing: Making it in the New Sharing Economy”, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Apostolos Filippas & Horton J. J., 2017, “The Tragedy of your Upstairs Neighbors: Is the Negative Externality of Airbnb Internalized? ” Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, Massachusetts, USA ,June 26 -June 30
    4. Böckmann M., 2013, “The Shared Economy: It is time to start caring about sharing; value creating factors in the shared economy. ”Faculty of Management and Governance, University of Twente.
    5. Boitnott John, 2014, “The Free Economy: The Future Of Success Is Free.” Retireved Novemver 27, 2017, from
    http://www.digitalistmag.com/sales-marketing/the-free-economy-the-future-of-success-is-free-01915408
    6. Boroyan Nate, 2014, “Uber Isn’t Delivering Christmas Trees This Year. “Retrieved Novemver 30, 2017, from
    https://www.americaninno.com/boston/uber-isnt-delivering-christmas-trees-this-year/
    7. Botsman Rachel. & Rogers Roo., 2010, “What mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. ” New York: HarperCollins.
    8. Cohen Boyd. & Kietzmann Jan., 2014, “Ride on! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy. ” ,Organization & Environment, 27(3): 279-296.
    9. Colwell Peter F. & Munneke Henry J., 1997, "The Structure of Urban Land Price", Journal of Urban Economics, 41:321-336.
    10. Court, A.T., 1939, “Hedonic price indexes with automotive examples, in: The dynamics of automobile demand”, New York: The General Motors Corporation: 99-117.
    11. European Commission, 2013, “The Sharing Economy. Accessibility Based Business Models for Peer-to-Peer Markets. ” Retrieved November 27, 2017, from
    http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/13413/attachments/2/translations/en/renditions/native
    12. Felson & Spaeth, 1978, “Community structure and collaborative consumption. A routinactiveity Approach. “, The American Behavioral Dcientist,21(4):614-624.
    13. Follain J.R.& Malpezzi S., 1980, "Dissecting Housing Value and Rent. ", Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
    14. Georgios Zervas, Davide Proserpio & John W. Byers, 2015, “The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Estimating the Impact of Airbnb on the Hotel Industry.”, Boston University School of Management Research Paper Series No.2013‐16.
    15. John J. Horton & Richard J. Zeckhauser, 2016, “Owning, Using and Renting: Some Simple Economics of the "Sharing Economy" ”, NBER Working Paper No. w22029, IO,PR
    16. Kaplan, R. A. & Nadler, M. L., 2016, “Airbnb: Case Study in Occupancy Regulation and Taxation. ”, University of Chicago Law Review Dialogue, 82:103-115.
    17. Kaplan, R. A., & Nadler, M. L., 2015, “Airbnb: A case study in occupancy regulation and taxation.”, U. Chi. L. Rev. Dialogue, 82: 103.
    18. Kelly Kevin, 2009 , “Better than Own. “Retireved Novemver 27, 2017, from
    http://kk.org/thetechnium/better-than-own/
    19. Kim, J. H., Leung, T. C., & Wagman, L., 2016, “Can Restricting Property Use Be Value Enhancing? Evidence from Short-Term Rental Regulation. ” Retireved Novemver 27, 2017, from SSRN
    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2755035
    20. Koenker, R. & Bassett, G. W., 1978,"Regression quantiles",Econometrica", 46(1): 211-244.
    21. Kuan, C. M., 2007, "An Introduction to Quantile Regression", Institue of Economics Academia Sinica.
    22. Lancaster, K.J. 1966 "A New Approach to Consumer Theory", Journal of Political Economy, 74: 132-157.
    23. Lazarow, A., 2015, “Airbnb in New York City: Law and Policy Challenges.”, International Journal of Knowledge and Innovation in Business ,2(3):24-52.
    24. Lisa Gansky, 2010, “The Mesh: Why the Future of Business is Sharing. ” New York: Penguin Group.
    25. Mc., Ardle & Megan, 2014, “Airbnb Is a Risky Neighbor. ” Retireved Novemver 27, 2017, from
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/airbnb-mulls-employee-stock-sale-at-13-billion-valuation-1414100930
    26. Owyang, Sameul & Greville, 2014, “Sharing is the new buying. How to win in the collaborative consumption. “Retireved Novemver 27, 2017, from
    https://www.slideshare.net/jeremiah_owyang/sharingnewbuying
    27. Ridker, Ronald G. & John A. Henning, 1976, "The Determinants of Residential Property Values with Special Reference to Air Pollution", Review of Economics and Statistics ,49: 246-57.
    28. Rosen, S.,1974,"Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in pure Competition", Journal of Political Economy, 82: 35-55.
    29. Russell Belk, 2014, “ You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online”, Journal of Business Research, 67(8): 1595-1600.
    30. Schneiderman T. Eric, 2014, “Airbnb in the city. ”, Retrieved November 27,2017, from
    http://www.ag.ny.gov/pdfs/Airbnb%20report.pdf
    31. Song, H., Lin, S., Witt, S. F., & Zhang, X. , 2011, "Impact of financial/economic crisis on demand for hotel rooms in Hong Kong", Tourism Management, 32(1): 172-186.
    32. Sukel, M. M., Marx, M. J., & ILPS, I., 2016, “AirBnB in Amsterdam. ” Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
    33. Udell, A., 2016, “ Do Airbnb Properties Affect House Prices? ” , Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors, Williams College, Williamstown, MA
    34. Vincent van der Bijl, 2016, “The effect of Airbnb on house prices in Amsterdam A study of the side effects of a disruptive start-up in the new sharing economy.”, MSc Business Economics: Real Estate Finance & Corporate Finance, University of Amsterdam.
    35. Waugh, F.V., 1929, “Quality as a determinant of vegetable prices: A statistical study of quality factors influencing vegetable prices in the Boston wholesale market”, Columbia University Press, New York.
    36. Zietz, J., E. N. Zietz, G. S. Sirmans, 2007, "Determinants of House Prices: A Quantile Regression Approach.", The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economic Working Paper Series.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    1052570191
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1052570191
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.LE.007.2018.A05
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    019101.pdf1332KbAdobe PDF2536View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback