Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118795
|
| Title: | 探索中巴關係 : 發展驅動合作？
Exploring Sino-Brazilian Relations: development driven cooperation? |
| Authors: | 林民泰
Gugel, Arthur Lin |
| Contributors: | 袁易
Yuan, I
林民泰
Gugel, Arthur Lin |
| Keywords: | 巴西
中國
Brazil
China
Bilateral relations
Development
International cooperation |
| Date: | 2018 |
| Issue Date: | 2018-07-20 18:42:52 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 中國日益增長的國際影響力在世界各地引起了極大的關注。透過對中國與巴西雙邊關係的分析，我們可以洞察中國雙邊關係的一個案例，從發展驅動的嘗試開始，協調並發展為全球戰略夥伴關係，並成為巴西在商業流程方面的最大貿易夥伴。
本研究試圖透過多重領域分析來探討中巴關係，包括經濟、國家利益、身份認同，外交政策，國際法和發展等主題。 實證分析基於兩國關係的分水嶺：首先為巴西歷史上，以建立身份認同為重心的時期；第二個時期為1974年中華人民共和國的國際認可，早期關係與「中巴地球資源衛星計畫」(CBERS)；第三個時期為提升到策略夥伴關係、新的參與者、「中國、巴西高層協調與合作委員會」 (COSBAN) 以及聯合行動計畫；第四個時期為貿易流量、可能的緊張局勢和金磚國家開發銀行。
本研究結論歸納出，中巴關係隨著時間的推移呈現多樣化的表現，而在經濟方面，則從原本的發展驅動合作關係，逐漸產生變化。針對官方文件和條約的分析顯示，試圖根據國際法制定共同準則的趨勢日益增加，但從政治角度來看，由於會議記錄資料和外交政策皆缺乏更多細節的闡述，因此研究結果未有定論。針對於進一步相關的研究，本文提出兩條途徑：中國在其他雙邊關係案例中的國際法視角以及在中國外交政策中，持續發展的重要性。
China’s increasing international presence has sparked much attention in all parts of the world. The analysis of its relations with Brazil offers insight into one of the cases of China’s bilateral relations, beginning as a development-driven attempt for coordination and evolving to a strategic global partnership and Brazil’s biggest trading partner in amount of commercial flows.
This study attempts to make sense of Sino-Brazilian relations by employing a multi-disciplinary analysis of the various factors in order to explore the subject involving economy, national interest, identity, foreign policy, international law and development. The empirical analysis is based on watershed moments in bilateral relations: first, the history of Brazil’s foreign policy with a focus on identity building, second, the recognition of the People’s Republic in 1974, early days of relations and the CBERS, third, the elevation of relations to a strategic partnership, new actors, the COSBAN and the joint action plans, fourth, trade flows, potential sources of tension and the BRICS’ NDB.
The conclusion finds that Sino-Brazilian relations have diversified over time and the economic aspect indicates a shift away from the development-driven origins. The analysis of official documents and treaties reveals an increasing trend in the attempt to generate shared norms under international law, but under a political perspective results are inconclusive due to the lack of more details in meetings and elaboration of foreign policy. Two avenues are presented as relevant further studies: the Chinese perspective of international law in other cases of bilateral relations and the growing importance of sustainable development in China’s foreign policy. |
| Reference: | References
• Associação Brasileira de Energia Eólica. 2017. Boletim anual de geração eólica 2017 (Annual bulletin of wind generation 2017). http://abeeolica.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Boletim-Anual-de-Geracao-2017.pdf
• Barbosa, Rui C. 2013. “Brazil’s CBERS-3 spacecraft destroyed following Chinese failure”. NASAspaceflight. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/12/chinese-long-march-4b-cbers-3/
• Bird, Graham. 1999. “Special Drawing Rights: how fashions change”. World Economics 11 no.1.
• Brazilian Space Agency. 2018. “Com Sucesso, Satélite CBERS-4 Completa Três Anos em Órbita”. (Sucessfully, satellite CBERS-4 completes three years in orbit”). http://www.aeb.gov.br/com-sucesso-satelite-cbers-4-completa-tres-anos-em-orbita/
• Brito, Lana Bauab. “O Futuro Nebuloso da Cooperação Sino-Brasileira na Área de Satélites” (The nebulous future of sino-brazilian cooperation in the area of satellites). Meridiano 47, 14 no.136. 10-17
• Cardoso, Daniel. 2016. “China-Brazil: A Strategic Partnership in an Evolving World Order”. East Asia 30. 35-51.
• Cardoso, Daniel. 2016. “Network Governance and the Making of Brazil’s Foreign Policy towards China in the 21st century”. Contexto Internacional 38 no.1. 295.
• Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Faletto, Enzo. 1970. Dependência e desenvolvimento na América Latina: ensaio de interpretação sociológica (Dependency and development in Latin America: essay of sociological interpretation). Rio de Janeiro: LTC.
• Cassiolato, José and Lastres, Helena. 2009. “Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in the BRICS Countries: an introduction”. In: BRICS and Development Alternatives: Innovation Systems and Policies. London: Anthem Press. 1-34.
• Cervo, Amado Luíz and Bueno, Clodoaldo. 2002. História da Política Externa Brasileira (History of Brazilian Foreign Policy). Brasília: Editora UNB.
• Cervo, Amado Luiz. 2003. “Política exterior e relações internacionais no Brasil: enfoque paradigmático” (Foreign policy and international relations in Brazil: paradigmatic framework). Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 46 no.2. 5-25.
• Cervo, Amado Luiz. 2012. “Brazil in the Current World Order”. Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations 2. 35-57.
• Chen, Yanping. “China’s space policy- a historical review”. Space Policy 37. 171-178.
• Colistete, Renato. 2001. “O Desenvolvimento Cepalino: problemas teóricos e influências no Brasil” (The Cepaline Development: theoretical issues and influences in Brazil). Estudos Avançados 15 no.41. 21-34.
• Dantas, San Tiago. 1964. “Discurso de posse do chanceler San Tiago Dantas” (Opening speech of chancellor San Tiago Dantas). Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 27. 440-445
• Dong, Zhangyu et al. 2013. “SPOT5 Multi-spectral (MS) and Panchromatic (PAN) image fusion using an improved wavelet method based on local algorithm”. Computers & Geosciences 60. 134-141
• Dreyer, June. 2015. China’s Political System: Modernization and Tradition. New York: Pearson education.
• Estado de São Paulo. 2014. “Conselho Empresarial Brasil-China será oficializado nesta sexta” (Brazil-China Business Council will be officialized this Friday). https://economia.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,conselho-empresarial-brasil-china-sera-oficializado-nesta-sexta,20040423p19428
• Feng, Zhongping and Huang, Jing. 2014. “China’s Strategic Partnership Diplomacy”. ESPO Working Paper no.8.
• Filho, José Monserrat. 1997. “Brazilian-Chinese Space Cooperation: an analysis”. Space Policy 13 no.2. 153-170.
• Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change”. International Organization 52 no.4: 887-917.
• Furtado, André Tosi and Filho, Edmilson Jesus Costa. 2003. “Assessing the Economic Impacts of China-Brazil Resources Satellite Program”. Science and Public Policy 30 no.1. 25-39.
• Furtado, Celso. 1974. O Mito do Desenvolvimento Econômico (The myth of economic development). São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
• Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton University Press.
• Hermann, Jennifer. 2011. “Auge e Declínio do Modelo de Crescimento com Endividamento: o segundo PND e a crise da dívida externa” (Peak and decline of the model of growth by debt: the second PND and the crisis of foreign debt). In: Economia Brasileira Contemporânea: 1945-2010. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
• Hoffman, Stanley. 1977. “An American Social Science: International Relations”. Daedalus 106 no.3. 41-60.
• Hurrel, Andrew James. 2014; The Quest for Autonomy: the Evolution of Brazil’s Role in the International System 1964-1985, Brasília: FUNAG.
• Ikenberry, John. 2008. “The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive?”. Foreign Affairs 87 no.1.
• Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. 2018. “Lançamento CBERS-1” (CBERS-1 Launch) http://www.cbers.inpe.br/lancamentos/cbers1.php.
• Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. 2018. “Usos e aplicações” http://www.cbers.inpe.br/sobre/usos_aplicacoes.php.
• International Monetary Fund. 2002. Guidelines on Conditionality.
• International Monetary Fund. 2008. Reform of Quota and Voice in the International Monetary Fund – Report of the Executive Board to the Board of Governors. http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2016/12/31/Reform-of-Quota-and-Voice-in-the-International-Monetary-Fund-Draft-Report-of-the-Executive-PP4235
• International Monetary Fund. 2017. IMF Quotas. http://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2016/07/14/12/21/IMF-Quotas.
• Itamaraty. 2014. Sixth BRICS Summit: Fortaleza Declaration. http://brics.itamaraty.gov.br/media2/press-releases/214-sixth-brics-summit-fortaleza-declaration.
• Itamaraty. 2015. “Ata final da quarta sessão plenária da comissão sino-brasileira de alto nível de concertação e cooperação” (Final minute of the fourth plenary session of the COSBAN). http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/pt-BR/notas-a-imprensa/10340-ata-da-quarta-reuniao-da-comissao-sino-brasileira-de-alto-nivel-de-concertacao-e-cooperacao-cosban#cn.
• Keohane, Robert and Nye, Joseph. 2012. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in transition. Boston: Longman.
• Klaveren, Alberto van. 1992. “Entendiendo las Políticas Exteriores Latinoamericanas: modelo para armar” (Understanding the Latin-American foreign policies: model kit). Estudios Internacionales 25 no.98. 169-216.
• Krasner, Stephen D. 2002. “Realist Views of International Law”. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting American Society of International Law 96. 265-268.
• Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge University Press.
• Lafer, Celso Lafer. 2000. “Brazilian International Identity and Foreign Policy: past, future and present”. In Brazil: Burden of the Past, Promise of the Future (2000).
• Lardy, Nicholas R. 2012. “China’s Response to the Global Crisis”. In: Sustaining China’s Economic Growth. Washington D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics. 5-41.
• Li, Linyue, Willett, Thomas and Zhang, Nan. 2012. “The Effects of the Global Financial Crisis on China’s Financial Market and Macroeconomy”. Economics Research International 2012.
• Libânio, Gilberto. “Quem tem medo da China? Análise e implicações para os principais estados Brasileiros” (Who is afraid of China? Analysis and implications for the most important Brazilian states). Revista Econômica Contemporânea 16 no.2. 259-286.
• Melo, Maria Cristina Pereira and Filho, Jair do Amaral. 2015. “The Political Economy of Brazil-China Trade Relations, 2000-2010”. Latin American Perspectives 42 no.6. 64-87.
• New Development Bank. 2017. NDB’s General Strategy: 2017-2021. https://www.ndb.int/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/NDB-Strategy.pdf
• Oliveira, Henrique Altemani. 2004. “Brasil-China: trinta anos de uma parceria estratégica” (Brazil-china: thirty years of a strategic partnership), Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 47 no.1. 12-13.
• Parry, John T. 2014. “What is the Grotian Tradition in Internatonal Law?”. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 35 vol.2.
• Pinheiro, Leticia. Lima, Maria Regina Soares and Hirst, Monica. 2010. “A Política Externa Brasileira em Tempos de Novos Horizontes e Desafios” (Brazilian foreign policy in times of new horizons and challenges). Nueva Sociedad Dec.
• Prebisch, Raúl. 1950. “The Economic Development of Latin America and its principal problems”. CEPAL. http://archivo.cepal.org/pdfs/cdPrebisch/002.pdf
• Qin, Yaqing. 2010. “International society as a process: institutions, identities and China’s peaceful rise”. Chinese Journal of International Politics. 3 no.2.
• Qin, Yaqing. 2011. “Development of international relations theory in China: progress through debates”. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 11 no.2.
• Quadros, Jânio. 1961. “Brazil’s New Foreign Policy”. Foreign Affairs 40 no.1. 19-27.
• Ramos, Danielly Silva. 2006. O Brasil e a República Popular da China: Política Externa Comparada e Relações Bilaterais 1974-2004 (Brazil and the People’s Republic of China: Compared Foreign Policy and Bilateral Relations). 143-144.
• Rostow, Walt Whitman. 1960. Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. England: Cambridge University Press.
• Sato, Eiri. 2007. “Relações Internacionais como área do conhecimento e sua consolidação nas instituições de ensino e pesquisa”.
• Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom (New York: Anchor Books).
• Shih, Chih-Yu and Huang, Chiung-Chiu. “Preaching Self-Responsibility: the Chinese style of self-governance”. Journal of Contemporary China 22 no.80. 351-365.
• Sil, Rudra and Katzenstein, Peter. 2010. “Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions”. Perspectives on Politics 8 no.2. 411-431.
• Singer, Hans. 1950. “The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries”. The American Economic Review 40 no.2. 473-485.
• Skidmore, Thomas. 2007. “Politics in Brazil, 1930 – 1964”. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332698.001.0001.
• Souza, Túllio and Veríssimo, Michele. 2013. “O Papel das Commodities Para o Desempenho Exportador Brasileiro” (The role of commodities for the performance of Brazilian exportation). Índice Econômico 40 no.2. 79-94.
• Spektor, Matias. 2004. “Origens e Direção do Pragmatismo Ecumênico e Responsável (1974-1979)” (Origins and direction of the ecumenic and responsible pragmatismo). Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 47 no.2. 191-222.
• Stiglitz, Joseph. 2004. “Capital-Market Liberalization, Globalization and the IMF”. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20 no.1.
• United Nations Library. “United Nations General Assembly Eighteenth Session: official records”. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/PV.1208 (1963). 1-8.
• United Nations Library. 1969. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201155/volume-1155-I-18232-English.pdf
• United States Department of the Treasury. 2016. Implementation of certain legislative provisions relating to the International Monetary Fund.
• Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. The Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
• Wang, Tieya. 1990. International Law in China: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Leiden: Hague Academy of International Law. 253-256.
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
• Yan, Xuetong. 2011. “International leadership and norm evolution.”. Chinese Journal of International Politics 4 no.3.
• Yan, Xuetong. 2014. “From Keeping a Low Profile to Striving For Achievement”. Chinese Journal of International Politics 7 no.2.
• Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy”. Foreign Policy 76 no. 6.
• Zhang, Yongjin and Buzan, Barry. “The Tributary System as International Society in Theory and Practice”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 no.11. 3-36.
• Zhao, Suisheng. 2010. “The China Model: can it replace the Western model of modernization?”. Journal of Contemporary China 65 no.19.
• Zhao, Yun. 2005. “The 2002 Space Cooperation Protocol between China and Brazil: an excellent example of South-South cooperation”. Space Policy 21. 213-219. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
105862007 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105862007 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/THE.NCCU.IMPIS.012.2018.A06 |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際研究英語碩士學位學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 200701.pdf | 56485Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 371 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
