政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/118744
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113371/144356 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51192044      線上人數 : 873
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118744


    題名: 勞工貴族的反抗：澳門博彩業工運的研究
    Resistance of Labor Aristocracy: A Study of the Casino Labor Movement in Macao
    作者: 廖志輝
    Lio, Chi-Fai
    貢獻者: 苗延威
    Miao, Yen-Wei
    廖志輝
    Lio, Chi-Fai
    關鍵詞: 博彩工運
    構框
    集體認同
    政治機會結構
    澳門
    Casino labor movement
    Framing
    Collective identity
    Political opportunity structure
    Macao
    日期: 2018
    上傳時間: 2018-07-18 11:13:27 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 自主權回歸與博彩經營權開放後，澳門經歷了顯著的經濟與社會發展，然而社會抗爭卻也從不缺席，勞工抗爭則是當中的主力。2014年，來自主要產業、被視為「勞工貴族」的博彩業勞工發動持續半年的抗爭行動，成為澳門回歸後參與規模最大的勞工抗爭。本文的目的則是釐清這波「博彩工運」的興起和衰落原因與過程。

    本文的資料來源包括：官方檔案與統計數據、新聞報導、社交媒體內容、訪談、田野筆記和既有研究等。透過社會運動研究的理論視角對以上資料進行解釋，本文認為工運的過程牽涉以：(1)運動組織者以「反外勞」為主框架形成的集體認同；(2)行動者在運動中對機會與威脅的認知；(3)兩場發生在本地和香港的社會運動對工運的深遠影響。

    首先，得益於植根社會的反外勞情緒，工運組織者在靈活運用新媒體作為動員渠道的情況下，將員工的日常勞動不滿與大眾情緒結合並提昇為集體認同。其次，澳門「反離補運動」造成的政治機會既阻礙了政權對工運的打壓，也促進了工運的動員力。然而，既有的主框架卻間接限制了參與者形成更堅實的團結，香港「雨傘運動」的爆發更意外地奪走了重要的動員資源，其溢出效果更進一步導致工運內部意識形態的分裂。

    另一方面，透過分析回歸至今(2000年-2016年)的抗爭事件，本文發現澳門勞工抗爭長期呈現低動員力、溫和與議題導向的特徵，原因在於官方能利用正式與非正式手段，有效管理勞工組織，這些手段亦同時被使用於博彩工運，並限制了工運的發展。
    This research aims to examine Macao’s casino labor movement in the mid-2010s. After being returned to China and opening up the casino market in 1999, Macao has witnessed a rapid socio-economic growth, and at the same time, labor protests against the capitalists and the state powerholders have mushroomed. In 2014, thousands of casino employees, or the so-called “labor aristocracy”, have been mobilized in a series of protests that Macao people have never experienced during the “Reunification” era. Focusing on this protest and putting it into a broad labor movement context in Macao, we adopt a theoretical perspective of social movements to get a more meaningful analysis. Our data sources include official documents and statistics, newspaper reports, social media such as Facebook, interviews with movement participants and relevant informers, field notes, and related literature. We find that three elements are particularly significant in the contentious process of Macao’s casino labor movement: (1) the master frame of anti-imported labor that movement organizers used to shape their collective identity; (2) contentious activists’ perceptions toward threats and opportunities for the movement, and (3) the influences of other-issue-oriented protests occurred both in Macao and Hong Kong during the same period. This research also finds that labor protests in Macao, including the casino labor movement, can be characterized as “low mobilized, moderate, and issue-oriented”, in the sense that the authority was capable of influencing the labor unions by various means. Thus the unions need to empower themselves in the future.
    參考文獻: Amenta, E., and Young, M. P. 1999. “Democratic states and social movements: Theoretical arguments and hypotheses.” Social Problems 46(2): 153-168.
    Benford, R. D., and Snow, D. A. 2000. “Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment.” Annual review of sociology 26: 611-639.
    Biggs, M. 2013. “How Repertoires Evolve: The Diffusion of Suicide Protest in the Twentieth Century.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 18(4): 407-428.
    Blee, K. M., and Taylor, V. 2002. “Semi-structured interviewing in social movement research.” In Methods of social movement research. eds., B. Klandermans & S. Staggenborg. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
    Burawoy, M. 1985. The politics of production: Factory regimes under capitalism and socialism. London: Verso Books.
    Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor. 2016. China (Includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau) 2016 Human Rights Report. United States Department of State.
    Cai, Y. 2016. The occupy movement in Hong Kong: Sustaining decentralized protest. London: Taylor & Francis.
    Cavatorta, F. 2013. Civil society activism under authoritarian rule: a comparative perspective. London, NY: Routledge.
    Chesters, G., and Welsh, I. 2011. Social movements : the key concepts. London, New York: Routledge.
    Choi, A. H. 2008. “Labour Rights and the Political Economy of Growth: Migrant Workers and Labour Informalization in Macau.” In Rights for Two-Thirds of Asia: Asian Labour Law Review 2008, ed. A. L. Doris Lee, Rene Ofreneo, Anoop Sukumaran, Hong Kong: Asia Monitor Resource Centre.
    Choi, A. H., and Hung, E. 2011. “Labour Regulation in the Liberalised Casino Economy: The Case of the Croupiers.” In Gaming, Governance and Public Policy in Macau, ed. N. L. a. I. Scott, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    Chong, E. K.-m. 2016. “Clientelism and Political Participation: Case Study of the Chinese tongxianghui in Macao SAR Elections.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 21(3): 1-22.
    Chou, B. K. 2005. “Interest group politics in Macau after handover.” Journal of Contemporary China 14(43): 191-206.
    Clark, J. A. 2013. “Relations between Professional Associations and the State in Jordan.” In Civil society activism under authoritarian rule: a comparative perspective, eds. F. Cavatorta, NY: Routledge.
    Cohen, J. L., and Arato, A. 1994. Civil society and political theory. Gambridge, Mass: Mit Press.
    Davies, J. C. 1962. “Toward a theory of revolution.” American sociological review 5-19.
    Della Porta, D., and Diani, M，2002，《社會運動概論》，苗延威譯，台北：巨流。(Della Porta, D., and Diani, M. 1997. Social movements: An introduction. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.)
    Deng, Y., and O`Brien, K. J. 2013. “Relational repression in China: using social ties to demobilize protesters.” The China Quarterly 215: 533-552.
    Eisinger, P. K. 1973. “The conditions of protest behavior in American cities.” American Political Science Review 67(01): 11-28.
    Fernandes, M. S，1998，〈1949-1966年間葡中關係概況〉，《行政》，11(2): 521-541。
    Foley, M. W., and Edwards, B. 1996. “The paradox of civil society.” Journal of Democracy 7(3): 38-52.
    Gamson, W. A., and Meyer, D. S. 1996. “Framing political opportunity.” In Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings, eds. D. McAdam, McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Garrison, W. A. 1992. “The social psychology of collective action.” In Frontiers in social movement theory, ed. C. M. M. Aldon D. Morris. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
    Giugni, M. G. 1998. “Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements.” Annual review of sociology 24: 371-393.
    Goffman, Erving，1992，《日常生活中的自我表演》，徐江敏、李姚軍譯，台北：桂冠。(Goffman, Erving. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. UK: Scotland: University Of Edinburgh.)
    Goffman, Erving. 1961. Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Marrill.
    Gould, R. V. 1995. Insurgent identities: Class, community, and protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Gunn, G. C，2009，《澳門史(1557-1999)》，秦傳安譯，北京：中央編譯出版社。(Gunn, G. C. 1996. Encountering Macau: A Portuguese city-state on the periphery of China, 1557-1999. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.)
    Gurney, J. N., and Tierney, K. J. 1982. “Relative deprivation and social movements: A critical look at twenty years of theory and research.” The Sociological Quarterly　 23(1): 33-47.
    Gusfield, J. [1994]2007. “The reflexivity of social movements: Collective behavior and mass society theory revisited.” In Social Movments, eds. J. a. J. M. J. Goodwin. NY: Roultdge.
    Hadden, J., and Tarrow, S. 2007. “Spillover or spillout? The global justice movement in the United States after 9/11.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 12(4): 359-376.
    Hancock, L., and Hao, Z. 2016. “Gambling regulatory regimes and the framing of “responsible gambling” by transnational casino corporations: Asia-Pacific regimes in comparative perspective.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 38(3): 139-153.
    Hirsch, E. L. 1990. “Sacrifice for the cause: Group processes, recruitment, and commitment in a student social movement.” American sociological review 55(2): 243-254.
    Ho, C. B. 2011. “Political culture, social movements, and governability in Macao.” Asian Affairs: An American Review 38(2): 59-87.
    Ho, Ming-sho. 2015. “Occupy Congress in Taiwan: Political Opportunity, Threat, and the Sunflower Movement.” Journal of East Asian Studies 15(1): 69-97.
    Hochschild, A. R. 1979. “Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure.” American Journal of Sociology 85(3): 551-575.
    Hyman, R，2004，《比較工會運動》，許繼峰、吳育仁譯，台北：韋伯文化國際。(Hyman, R. 2001. Understanding European trade unionism: between market, class and society: Sage.)
    Ieong, M. U. 2017. “Macao and Hong Kong, Convergence or Divergence? The 2014 Retirement Package Bill Protest and Macao`s Goverance Crisis.” Asian Survey 57(3): 504-527.
    Johnson, R. A. 1999. “Mobilizing the disabled.” In Waves of protest: Social movements since the sixties,ed. F. Jo & V. Johnson. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
    King, G., Pan, J., and Roberts, M. E. 2013. “How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression.” American Political Science Review 107(2): 326-343.
    Kitschelt, H. P. 1986. “Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies.” British journal of political science 16(01): 57-85.
    Koopmans, R., and Rucht, D. 2002. “Protest event analysis.” Methods of social movement research 16: 231-259.
    Koopmans, R., and Statham, P. 1999. “Political claims analysis: integrating protest event and political discourse approaches.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 4(2): 203-221.
    Kornhauser, W. [1959]2007. “The Politics of Mass Society.” In Social Movments, eds.　J. a. J. M. J. Goodwin. NY: Routledge.
    Kriesi, H. 2004. “Political context and opportunity.” In The Blackwell companion to social movements,eds. D. A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds. Malden, Ma: Blackwell Pub.
    Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W., and Giugni, M. G. 1992. “New social movements and political opportunities in Western Europe.” European journal of political research 22(2): 219-244.
    Kurlantzick, J. 2005. “Viva Macao?” Current history: A journal of contemporary world affairs(683): 284-288.
    Kurzman, C. 1996. “Structural opportunity and perceived opportunity in social-movement theory: the Iranian revolution of 1979.” American sociological review 61(1): 153-170.
    Kwong, B. K.-K. 2007. “Patron–client politics in Hong Kong: A case study of the 2002 and 2005 chief executive elections.” Journal of Contemporary China 16(52): 389-415.
    Kwong, B. K.-k. 2014. “Patron-Clientelism and Elections in Macao: The 2009 Chief Exective Election.” In China`s Macao Transformed: Challenge and Development in the 21st Century,ed, E. W. Y. Y. M. K. CHAN. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
    Kwong, Y. H. 2014. “Protests against the welfare package for chief executives and principal officials: Macao`s political awakening.” China Perspectives(4): 61-65.
    Kwong, Y.-h., and Wong, M. Y. 2017. “State size and democratization in hybrid regimes: the Chinese island cities of Macau and Hong Kong.” Island Studies Journal 12(2): 113-126.
    Lam, A. I.-f. forthcoming2018. “The Post-1999 Macau Media: Bigger Diversification but Weaker Dominance.” In Macao: Breakthrough and Change in China’s Special Administrative Region,ed. M. Chan & J. Leong. Canada: University of Toronto Press.
    Lam, Carlos Siu. 2011. “Frontline employees` informal learning and customer relationship skills in macao casinos: An empirical study.” UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal 15(2): 35-58.
    Lam, W.-M., and Tong, I. L. 2006. “Political Change and the Women`s Movement in Hong Kong and Macau.” Asian Journal of Women`s Studies 12(1): 7-35.
    Lee, F. L., and Chan, J. M. 2011. Media, social mobilisation and mass protests in post-colonial Hong Kong: The power of a critical event. NY: Routledge.
    Lee, S.-p. 2006. Social stability and public policy: the role of special interest groups in Macao. Master diss. University of Hong Kong.
    Lo, S.-H. 1990. “Political culture and participation in Macau.” Asian Affairs: An American Review 17(3): 147-155.
    Lo, S.-H., and Chong, E. K.-M. 2016. “Casino interests, Fujian Tongxianghui and electoral politics in Macao.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 46(2): 286-303.
    Lo, S.-H.. 1995. Political development in Macau. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
    Lo, S.-H.. 2005. “Casino politics, organized crime and the post-colonial state in Macau.” Journal of Contemporary China 14(43): 207-224.
    Lo, S.-H.. 2009. “Casino capitalism and its legitimacy impact on the politico-administrative state in Macau.” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 38(1): 19-47.
    McAdam, D. [1982]1999. Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970 (Second ed.). Chicago: Univresity of Chicago Press.
    McAdam, D., and Tarrow, S. 2011. “Introduction: Dynamics of contention ten years on.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 16(1): 1-10.
    McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N. 1996. Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C. 2001. Dynamics of Contention: Cambridge University Press.
    McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N. 1977. “Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 1212-1241.
    Meyer, D. S., and Minkoff, D. C. 2004. “Conceptualizing political opportunity.” Social Forces 82(4): 1457-1492.
    Meyer, D. S., and Tarrow, S. G. 1998. The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Meyer, D. S., and Whittier, N. 1994. “Social movement spillover.” Social Problems 41(2): 277-298.
    Michels, R. [1915]1962. Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: Collier Books.
    Minns, J., and Tierney, R. 2003. “The labour movement in Taiwan.” Labour History 85: 103-128.
    Myers, D. J. 2000. “The Diffusion of Collective Violence: Infectiousness, Susceptibility, and Mass Media Networks.” American Journal of Sociology 106(1): 173-208.
    Myers, D. J., and Caniglia, B. S. 2004. “All the rioting that`s fit to print: Selection effects in national newspaper coverage of civil disorders, 1968-1969.” American sociological review 69(4): 519-543.
    Ng, S. H., and Ip, O. 2009. “Hong Kong`s Trade Unions as an Evolving Social Organisation and Their Prospects for the Future.” In Social Movements in China and Hong Kong: the expansion of protest space, eds. K. E. Kuah-Pearce & G. Guiheux. Netherlands, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    Oliver, P. E., and Myers, D. J. 1999. “How Events Enter the Public Sphere: Conflict, Location, and Sponsorship in Local Newspaper Coverage of Public Events.” American Journal of Sociology 105(1): 38-87.
    Ost, D. 1991. Solidarity and the Politics of Anti-politics: Opposition and Reform in Poland since 1968. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    Polletta, F., and Jasper, J. M. 2001. “Collective identity and social movements.” Annual review of sociology 27(1): 283-305.
    Putnam, R. D. 1995. “Bowling alone: America`s declining social capital.” Journal of Democracy 6(1): 65-78.
    Sallaz, J. 2009. The labor of luck: Casino capitalism in the United States and South Africa. California: University of California Press.
    Schmitter, P. C. 1974. “Still the century of corporatism?” The Review of politics 36(01): 85-131.
    Scott, J. C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Sewell, W. H. 1996. “Historical events as transformations of structures: Inventing revolution at the Bastille.” Theory and society 25(6): 841-881.
    Siu, R. C. 2006. “Evolution of Macao`s casino industry from monopoly to oligopoly: Social and economic reconsideration.” Journal of Economic Issues 40(4): 967-990.
    Skocpol, T，2007，《國家與社會革命：對法國、俄國和中國的比較分析》，何俊志、王學東譯，上海: 上海人民出版社。(Skocpol, T. 1979. States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)
    Snow, D. A., and Benford, R. D. 1992. “Master frames and cycles of protest.” In Frontiers in social movement theory, ed. C. M. M. Aldon D. Morris. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
    Snyder, D., and Tilly, C. 1972. “Hardship and collective violence in France, 1830 to 1960.” American sociological review 520-532.
    Strang, S. 1986. Casino capitalism. NY: Blackwell.
    Tarrow, S. 1998. Power in movement: Collective action, social movements and politics. NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Taylor, M. C. 2002. “Fraternal deprivation, collective threat, and racial resentment.” In Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration,ed. I. Walker & H. J. Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Tilly, C. 2004. Social movements, 1768-2004. Bouler,Colo: Paradigm Publishers.
    Touraine, A. 1997. Critique of Modernity. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
    Treré, E. 2015. “Reclaiming, proclaiming, and maintaining collective identity in the# YoSoy132 movement in Mexico: an examination of digital frontstage and backstage activism through social media and instant messaging platforms.” Information, Communication & Society 18(8): 901-915.
    Useem, B. 1980. “Solidarity model, breakdown model, and the Boston anti-busing movement.” American sociological review 357-369.
    Voss, K., and Sherman, R. 2000. “Breaking the iron law of oligarchy: Union revitalization in the american labor movement.” American Journal of Sociology 106(2): 303-349.
    Wen, D. M. 2013. Media representation of foreign domestic workers in Macau and Hong Kong : a longitudinal analysis of reports in Macau Daily and Apple Daily in 2003-2012. Master. diss. University of Macau, Macau.
    White, G. 1994. “Civil society, democratization and development (I): Clearing the analytical ground.” Democratization 1(2): 375-390.
    Wong, H. H. A. 2017. “The Summer 2014 protests in Macau: their contexts and continuities.” Asian Education and Development Studies 6(1): 57-71.
    Woo, S. 2015，〈中國的大傳媒牆：爭取自由〉，https://www.docdroid.net/m5HERKT/123.pdf#page=2，查閱時間：2017/12/29。
    Yee, H. S. 2005. “The 2001 Legislative Assembly elections and political development in Macau.” Journal of Contemporary China 14(43): 225-245.
    Yu, E. W.-y. 2007. “Formal and informal politics in Macao special administrative region elections 2004–2005.” Journal of Contemporary China 16(52): 417-441.
    Yu, E. W.-y. 2013. “Macao`s "One County, Two Systems": High Autonomy or Intervention?.” In Negotiating Autonomy in Greater China: Hong Kong and its Sovereign Before and After 1997,ed. R. Yep. Copenhagen, Denmark: NIAS Press.
    Yu, E. W.-y., and Chin, K. m. 2012. “The Political Opposition and Democracy in Macao: Revolutionaries or Loyalists?.” Government and opposition 47(1): 97-116.
    Yuen, S., and Cheng, E. W. 2017. “Neither Repression Nor Concession? A Regime’s Attrition against Mass Protests.” Political Studies: 1-20.
    工黨，2011，〈政策總綱〉，http://labour.org.hk/policy-zh/foreword-zh/，查閱時間：2016/11/30。
    孔寶華，2009，〈社會資本〉，王家英等篇，《澳門社會新貌：成就與挑戰》，香港：香港中文大學亞太研究所.
    王韻，2015，〈國內維權，國際賦權，與跨國倡權：基督新教的跨國倡議運動與兩岸三地的宗教人權〉，《政治學報》，(59): 55-80。
    史唯、 劉世鼎，2010，〈新自由主義的主體：澳門賭場荷官調查〉，《臺灣社會研究季刊》，80：321-366。
    石之瑜，2003，《社會科學方法新論》，台北：五南.
    何明修，2004，〈政治機會結構與社會運動研究〉，《國立政治大學社會學報》， 37: 33-80。
    何明修，2005，《社會運動概論》，台北：三民。
    何明修，2006，《綠色民主：台灣環境運動的研究》，台北：群學。
    何明修，2007，〈公民社會的限制—台灣環境政治中的結社藝術〉，《台灣民主季刊》，4(2): 33-65。
    何明修，2008a，〈沒有階級認同的勞工運動：台灣的自主工會與兄弟義氣的極限〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，72：49-91。
    何明修，2008b，〈體制化及其不滿─二十年來的台灣勞工運動〉，王宏仁、李廣均、龔宜君主編，《跨戒：流動與堅持的台灣社會》，台北：群學。
    何明修，2011，〈導論：探索台灣的運動社會〉，何明修、林秀幸主編，《社會運動的年代：晚近二十年來的台灣行動主義》，台北：群學。
    何明修，2016，《支離破碎的團結：戰後台灣煉油廠與糖廠的勞工》，新北市： 左岸文化。
    何明修，2017，〈第三勢力與傘兵：比較台港站領運動後的選舉參與〉，《中國大陸研究》， 60(1): 58-86。
    余振、婁勝華、陳卓華，2011，《澳門華人政治文化縱向研究》，香港：三聯書店。
    吳介民，2012，《第三種中國想像》台灣：左岸文化。
    吳志良，1998，《生存之道─論澳門政治制度與政治發展》，澳門：澳門成人教育學會。
    吳志良、陳欣欣，2000，《澳門政治社會研究》，澳門：澳門成人教育學會。
    吳志良、湯開建、金國平，2009，《澳門編年史．第五卷 民國史期(1912-1949)》，廣東：廣東人民出版社.
    吳國昌，2003，〈從二十世紀到二十一世紀：澳門政治的發展〉，余振、鄭煒明、崔寶峯主編，《澳門歷史、文化與社會》，澳門：澳門晨輝出版社。
    李孝智，2001，〈澳門“一二‧三事件”的口述歷史與葡萄牙的殖民統治〉，碩士論文，香港浸會大學。
    李國強，2015，《博彩工運始末─澳門賭業的黑暗》，澳門：李國強。
    林玉鳳，2011，〈媒體、身份認同與公民社會〉，第8屆「媒介與環境」國際學術研討會，台灣天主教輔仁大學傳播學院。
    邱毓斌，2010，〈當工運的制度惰性遭遇全球化〉，吳介民、范雲、顧爾德主編，《秩序繽紛的年代：走向下一輪民主盛世》，台北：左岸文化出版社。
    邱毓斌，2011，〈台灣自主工運組織策略的歷史侷限：對工會領導階層的分析〉，何明修、林秀幸主編，《社會運動的年代：晚近二十年的台灣行動主義》，台北：群學。
    邵朝陽，2003，〈澳門博彩語研究〉，北京：北京語言大學語言學及應用語言學博士論文。
    金耀基，1997，《中國政治與文化》，香港：牛津大學出版社。
    哈力，2005，〈澳門娛樂場服務質素的神秘顧客調查〉，《澳門博彩》，2：55-63.
    姜姍姍，2013，〈鄰避抗議如何影響政府政策——以澳門為例〉，《當代港澳研究》，40(3): 132-139。
    柳智毅，2013，〈二零一二年澳門各業職工工作現狀問卷調查分析報告〉，澳門：澳門工會聯合總會。
    秋鬥：左翼連結，2014，〈秋鬥史〉， http://www.leftlinks.tw/about/%E7%A7%8B%E9%AC%A5%E5%8F%B2/，查閱時間：2016/11/30。
    孫家雄，2001，〈二零零零年澳門特別行政區勞工政策的回顧〉，《行政》， 14(53): 991-1002.
    容潔晶，2014，〈澳門博彩業的生產政治：從莊荷小費到禁輸外勞〉，澳門：澳門大學公共行政碩士論文。
    郝雨凡、吳志良、林廣志，2012，《澳門學引論：首屆澳門學國際學術研討會論文集》，北京：社會科學文獻。
    婁勝華，2004，《轉型時期澳門社團研究─多元社會中法團主義體制解析》，廣東：廣東人民出版社。
    婁勝華，2004，《轉型時期澳門社團研究─多元社會中法團主義體制解析》，廣東：廣東人民出版社。
    婁勝華、姜姍姍，2012，〈“鄰避運動”在澳門的興起及其治理－以美沙酮服務站選址爭議為個案〉，《中國行政管理》，4: 114-117。
    常凱等，2013，〈澳門和諧勞動關係研究〉，澳門：澳門工會聯合總會。
    張妙清等，2014，《構建澳門未來》，香港：香港中文大學香港亞太研究所。
    張虎，1999，《澳門「九九」：問題與研究》，臺北：桂冠。
    莫榮添，2010，〈從社會行動看港澳兩地的政治發展〉，余振、林媛主編， 《澳門人文社會科學研究文選．政治卷》，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。
    陳永昆，2015，〈澳門工會組織現況與未來發展分析〉，台北：國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
    陳震宇，2011，《現代澳門社會治理模式研究》，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。
    陳韻如、沈幼蓀、陳雅蓁，2011，〈街頭抗爭的暴力邏輯〉，《臺灣社會學刊》， 46: 167-205。
    麥瑞權等，2013，《澳門社團參政問題研究》，澳門：澳門理工學院一國兩制研究中心。
    麥潔玲，1999，《說吧，澳門》，香港：牛津大學。
    華僑志編纂委員會，1964，《澳門華僑志》，台北：華僑志編纂委員會。
    馮邦彥、李勝會，2009，〈香港與澳門產業結構比較研究〉，余振、鄺錦鈞、余永逸主編，《雙報記III：港澳政治、經濟及社會發展的回顧與前膽》，澳門：澳門社會科學學會。
    馮家超等，2009，〈澳門博彩從業員生活調查〉，澳門：澳門大學博彩研究所。
    馮家超等，2011，〈博彩從業員參與文娛康體活動調查〉，澳門：澳門大學博彩研究所。
    黃長玲，2003，〈重新管制的政治：全球化與民主化下的台灣勞工運動〉，張茂桂、鄭永年主編，兩岸社會運動分析，台北：新自然主義。
    黃啟臣、鄭煒明，1994，《澳門經濟四百年》，澳門：澳門基金會。
    新生代，2007，〈新的工種，新的故事〉，32。
    楊允中，2009，《何厚鏵：行政長官施政報告匯編（2000-2009）》，澳門：澳門理工學院一國兩制研究中心。
    葉國豪，2004，〈政治機會結構與社會運動：香港解殖後的轉變〉，台灣：國立清華大學社會學研所碩士論文。
    廖志輝，即將出版（2018），〈借助外力的動員：澳門社會運動中的外部動員機制〉，《中國大陸研究》。
    趙利峰、胡根，2008，〈晚清澳門博彩業的興起與發展〉，吳志良、金國平、湯開建主編，《澳門史新編（第三冊）》，澳門：澳門基金會。
    趙鼎新，2007a，《國家、社會關係與八九北京學運》，香港：香港中文大學出版社。
    趙鼎新，2007b，《社會運動與革命：理論更新和中國經驗》，台北：巨流。
    齊鵬飛，2008，《統一與整合：新時期解決港澳台問題的理論與實踐》，北京：中國傳媒大學出版社。
    劉世鼎，2007，〈澳門的新殖民主義：透視 2007 年五一大遊行〉，《思想》，7: 55-82。
    劉昭瑞、霍志釗，2017a，《蝶變：澳門博彩業田野敘事（上）》，北京：商務印書館。
    劉昭瑞、霍志釗，2017b，《蝶變：澳門博彩業田野敘事（上）》，北京：商務印書館。
    潘文瀚等，2012，《團結不折彎 : 香港獨立工運尋索40年》，香港：進一步。
    蔡永君，2014，〈從2009-2013年的社會運動看回歸後澳門公民社會的發展〉， 《行政》，27(103): 29-44。
    蔡幸強，2004，〈澳門的外地勞工：全球化和勞動力〉，《香港社會科學學報》， 27：103-130。
    澳門大學博彩研究所，2016，〈「澳門幸運博彩經營權開放中期檢討：經濟、社會、民生影響及承批公司營運狀況」研究報告〉，澳門：澳門大學博彩研究所。
    澳門互聯網研究學會、易研網絡研究實驗室，2017，〈第十七次澳門居民互聯網使用年度調查報告〉， http://www.macaointernetproject.net/uploads/default/files/macaonetusereport2017_20170301_mair.pdf，查閱時間：2017/12/29。
    澳門旅遊博彩技術培訓中心，2004，《廿一點"及"百家樂"教程》，澳門：澳門理工學院。
    澳博通訊，2005，〈膳食服務分析報告公佈〉，4。
    澳博通訊，2009，〈澳博福諮會「聆聽之旅」正式啟動〉，57。
    澳博通訊，2013，〈聆聽之旅成功啟航〉，111。
    龍俊業，2016，〈國家、市場與人才之重構 : 以澳門旅遊博彩業的發展轉型為例〉，台灣：國立政治大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
    鄺錦鈞，2010，〈博彩業與澳門政治的關係〉，梁潔芬、盧兆興編，《中國澳門特區博彩業與社會發展》，香港：香港城市大學。
    譚志強，1994，《澳門主權問題始末(1553-1993)》，台北：永業。
    關鋒、麥敬英，2009，〈港澳十年經濟發展比較〉，余振、鄺錦鈞、余永逸主編，《雙報記III：港澳政治、經濟及社會發展的回顧與前膽》，澳門：澳門社會科學學會。
    蘇嘉豪，2015，《撤！還記得嗎？》，蘇嘉豪主編，香港：嘉濤宮。
    顧向恩等，2012，〈澳門博彩業的神秘顧客調查〉，《澳門博彩》，9：14-22。
    顧良智，2011，〈澳門博彩從業員生活狀況調查研究分析報告〉，澳門：澳門博彩研究學會。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    東亞研究所 
    102260021
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1022600211
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.EAS.001.2018.A06
    顯示於類別:[東亞研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    021101.pdf2594KbAdobe PDF2749檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋