| Reference: | 翁堃嵐、林宛儀與郭虹瑩(2014)，《混合寡占市場下利潤稅的中立性與最適釋股比例》，應用經濟論叢，96，105-126。
邱俊榮與黃鴻(2006)，《公營廠商民營化的最適釋股比例分析》，經濟論文叢刊，34，246-259。
翁永和、羅鈺珊與劉碧珍(2003)，《市場結構與最適民營化政策》，經濟論文叢刊，31，149-169。
Abdelmutti, Nazek, and Laurie Hoffman-Goetz (2009), “Risk Messages about HPV, Cervical Cancer, and the HPV Vaccine Gardasil: A Content Analysis of Canadian and U.S. National Newspaper Articles,” Women & Health, 49, 422-440.
Anderson, S. P., A. Palma, and J. F. Thisse (1997), “Privatization and Efficiency in a Differentiated Industry,” European Economic Review, 41, 1635-1654.
Barros, F. (1995), “Incentive Schemes as Strategic Variables: An Application to a Mixed Duopoly,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 373-86.
Bárcena-Ruiz, J. C. (2007), “Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Duopoly: Price Competition,” Journal of Economics, 91, 263-272.
Brandão, A. and S. Castro (2007), “State-Owned Enterprises as Indirect Instruments of
Entry Regulation,” J Econ, 92, 263-274.
Bárcena-Ruiz, J. C. and M. B. Garzon (2010), “Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Duopoly with Capacity Choice,” The Manchester School, 78, 93-109.
Boardman, A. and A. R. Vining (1989), “Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises,” Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 1-33.
Chang, W.W.(2005), “Optimal Trade and Privatization Policies in an International Duopoly with Cost Asymmetry,” Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 14, 19–42.
Chao, C. C. and E. S. H. Yu (2006), “Partial Privatization, Foreign Competition, and Optimum Tariff,” Review of International Economics, 14, 87-92.
Chen, T. L. (2017), “Privatization and Efficiency: A Mixed Oligopoly Approach ,” Journal of Economics,120(3), 251-268.
Cremer, H., M. Marchand, and J. F. Thisse (1989), “The Public Firm as an Instrument for Regulating an Oligopolistic Market,” Oxford Economic Papers, 41, 283-301.
Dadpay, A. and J. S. Heywood(2006), “Mixed Oligopoly in a Single International Market,” Australian Economic Papers, 45, 269-280.
Dewenter, K. and P. H. Malatesta (2000), “State-Owned and Privately-Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labour Intensity,” American Economic Review, 91(1), 320-334.
De Fraja, G. and F. Delbono (1989), “Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly,” Oxford Economic Papers, 41, 302-311.
De Fraja, G. and F. Delbono (1990), “Game-Theoretic Models of Mixed Oligopoly,” J Econ Surv, 4, 1–17.
Drucker, P. (1969), “The Age of Discontinuity,” Fuente: Butterworth-Heinemann, 380 pp.
Estrin, S. and V. Perotin (1991), “Does Ownership Always Matter?” InternationalJournal of Industrial Organization, 9, 55572.
Fjell, K. and D. Pal (1996), “A Mixed Oligopoly in the Presence of Foreign Private Firms,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 29, 737-743.
Fjell, K. and J. Heywood (2004), “Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of
Firm’s Moves: The Relevance of Privatization,” Econ Lett, 83, 411-416.
George, K. and M. La Manna (1996), “Mixed Duopoly, Inefficiency, and Public Ownership,” Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 853-860.
Gupta, N. (2005), “Partial Privatization and Firm Performance,” J Finance, 60, 987-1015.
Heywood, J. S. and G. Ye (2009), “Partial Privatization in a Mixed Duopoly with an R&D Rivalry,” Bulletin of Economic Research, 61, 165-178.
Ishida, J. and N. Matsushima (2009), “Should Civil Servants Be Restricted in Wage
Bargaining? A Mixed-Duopoly Approach,” J Public Econ, 93, 634-646.
Kay, J. A., C. Mayer, and D. J. Thompson (1986), “Privatization and Regulation: The U.K. Experience,” Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kay, J. A. and D. J. Thompson (1986), “Privatization: A Policy in Search of a Rationale,” Economic Journal, 96, 18-32.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez‐de‐Silanes, and A. Shleifer (2002), “Government Ownership of Banks,” The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 265-301.
Long, N. V. and F. Stähler (2009), “Trade Policy and Mixed Enterprises,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 42, 590–614.
Matsumura, T. (1998), “Partial Privatization in Mixed Duopoly,” Journal of Public Economics, 70, 473-483.
Mujumdar, S. and D. Pal (1998), “Effects of Indirect Taxation in a Mixed Oligopoly,” Economic Letters, 58, 199-204.
Matsumura, T. and N. Matsushima (2004), “Endogenous Cost Differentials Between
Public and Private Enterprises: A Mixed Duopoly Approach,” Economica, 71, 671-688.
Matsumura, T. and O. Kanda (2005), “Mixed Oligopoly at Free Entry Markets,” Journal of Economics, 84, 27-48.
Pal, D. and M. D. White (1998), “Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization, and Strategic Trade Policy,” Southern Economics Journal, 65, 264-281.
Parker, D. (1997), “The Regulation of Privatised Utilities: Reflections of the UK Experiences,” Policy Studies, 3(3), 3-37.
Pestieau, P. and H. Tulkens (1993), “Assessing and Explaining the Performance of Public Enterprises,” Finanz Archiv, 50, 293-323.
Poyago-Theotoky, J. (1998), “R&D Competition in a Mixed Duopoly under Uncertainty and Easy Imitation,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 26, 415-428.
Sappington, D. E. and J. E. Stiglitz (1987), “Privatization, Information and Incentives,”
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,6(4), 567-585.
Savas, E. S. (1987), “Privatization: The key to better government,” Chatham House.
Tian, G. L. (2000), “State Shareholding and Corporate Performance: A Study of a Unique
Chinese Data Set,” working paper, London Business School.
Wang, L. F. S. and T. L. Chen (2011), “Mixed Oligopoly, Optimal Privatization, and
Foreign Penetration,” Econ Model, 28, 1465-1470.
Wang, C. C. and J. R. Chiou (2015), “An Analysis of Policy Harmonization on
Privatization and Trade Liberalization,” International Review of Economics & Finance, 38, 279–290.
White, M. D. (1996), “Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization and Subsidization,” Econ Lett, 53,
189-195.
White, M. D. (2001), “Managerial Incentives and the Decision to Hire Managers in
Markets with Public and Private Firms,” European Journal of Political Economy, 17, 877-896.
Willner, J. (2001), “Ownership, Efficiency, and Political Interference,” Eur J Polit Econ,
17, 723-748.
Yarrow, G. (1985), “Privatisation in Theory and Practice,” Economic Policy, 5, 324-377. |
