政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/118536

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/118536

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51738402 Online Users : 316

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Money and Banking > Theses > Item 140.119/118536

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118536

Title:	美國量化寬鬆政策對亞洲各國股市、匯市、外匯準備影響探討及因素分析 The Impact and Factor Analysis of Quantitative Easing on Stock Market, Exchange Market and Foreign Reserve: Evidence from Asia Region
Authors:	林蓉萱 Lin, Jung-Hsuan
Contributors:	林建秀林蓉萱 Lin, Jung-Hsuan
Keywords:	美國量化寬鬆政策 Tail Event 分析法資金流向探討因素分析 Quantitative easing Tail Event study Analysis of capital flow Factor analysis
Date:	2018
Issue Date:	2018-07-10 15:34:34 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	自2008年金融海嘯後，聯準會在利率區間過低，無法透過降息手段刺激市場行情的情況下，推出非正常的寬鬆貨幣政策以搶救市場流動性危機，並衍伸出扭轉操作策略、縮減寬鬆政策及資金收回的縮表政策。此篇研究分為三個主軸做說明，第一部分主要探討寬鬆、縮減、縮表三大政策下，每年八次聯準會開會及重要日期宣告對於亞洲十個國家股市、匯市立即性影響分析，測試各項宣告日是否造成亞洲市場一天、五天、十天顯著的波動程度，發現匯率在QE1及QE3宣告、縮減宣告前後一天下各有四個和五個國家顯著，而股市部分則在QE1宣告、QE3縮減有五個和三個國家顯著。本文並進一步觀察寬鬆政策造成的資金釋出，資金是否自美國竄流至亞洲地區推升各國的匯率、外匯準備、股價指數，並在縮減、縮表後流回美國，使各國的匯率貶值、外匯準備下降、股價指數受到影響，並加入資本推升指標一、資本推升指標二，綜合考量寬鬆政策下資金流向的狀況，結果顯示以QE1推升各國股市、匯率升值、外匯準備增加幅度最大，資金流出部分則以QE3縮減對匯率貶值、外匯準備減少影響較大。最後本文針對各國不同的市場狀況，對各國的總體經濟指標、市場大小、資本流入多寡及資本的敏感程度做回歸因素分析，探究哪些因素會造成寬鬆的資金較偏愛流入這些國家，並在縮減、縮表之後，資金優先由這些國家撤出回流美國，同時，本文也納入貨幣基數加入考量，考慮在資金撤出之後，各國匯率貶值、外匯準備減少的情況下，如何保持股市穩定成長，是否有透過釋出本國貨幣以穩定市場機制，研究結果為在QE1時期，匯率受國家因素中的資金流入多寡、資金敏感程度影響，股市部分則受資金敏感程度影響，並得出在QE3後期貨幣基數變數顯著，顯見亞洲各國有透過放大貨幣基數達到穩定股價市場的目的。 Since the financial crisis in 2008, the Fed’s interest rate was too low that they couldn’t use traditional means to stimulate market, instead, they introduced abnormally Quantitative Easing policy to rescue market from liquidity traps. This study divides into three parts. The first part mainly discusses the impact of FOMC’s eight annual meetings and the important dates of announcement on the stock and exchange markets of ten Asian countries. According to the analysis, the exchange rate is significant in four and five countries after announcement of QE1, QE3 and QE3 tapering, while the stock market is significant in five and three countries after the announcement of QE1 and QE3 tapering. This article further observes whether the funds has flowed to or outflowed from Asia after announcement of QE and reduction on balance sheet. It considers not only on the exchange rate, foreign exchange reserve, stock index, but the Capital Push Index I and II to examine capital flows of QE. We find out that QE1 and QE3 tapering has the largest effect on both of exchange, reserve and stock market, causing funds inflow after QE1 and funds outflow after QE3 tapering. Finally, this paper analyzes the different market conditions such as overall economic, market size, quantity of capital inflows or outflows, capital sensitivity and monetary base. This research uses regression methods to test which factors will result in preference of funds between countries. The result shows that quantity of capital inflows or outflows and capital sensitivity are two reasons in exchange rate market during QE1, with capital sensitivity in stock market. Meanwhile, monetary base factor is notable after QE3 tapering, which means some countries maintain stable growth of stock market by releasing domestic currency while exchange rates and reserve keep dropping.
Reference:	[1] Aizenman, J., Binici, M., & Hutchison, M. M. (2014). The transmission of Federal Reserve tapering news to emerging financial markets (No. w19980). National Bureau of Economic Research. [2] Balli, F., Hajhoj, H. R., Basher, S. A., & Ghassan, H. B. (2015). An analysis of returns and volatility spillovers and their determinants in emerging Asian and Middle Eastern countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 39, 311-325. [3] Bauer, M. D., & Neely, C. J. (2014). International channels of the Fed`s unconventional monetary policy. Journal of International Money and Finance, 44, 24-46. [4] Bekaert, G., Hoerova, M., & Duca, M. L. (2013). Risk, uncertainty and monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 60(7), 771-788. [5] Bowman, D., Londono, J. M., & Sapriza, H. (2015). US unconventional monetary policy and transmission to emerging market economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 55, 27-59. [6] Eichengreen, B., & Gupta, P. (2015). Tapering talk: The impact of expectations of reduced Federal Reserve security purchases on emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 25, 1-15. [7] Farmer, R. E. (2012). The effect of conventional and unconventional monetary policy rules on inflation expectations: theory and evidence. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(4), 622-639. [8] Hausman, J., & Wongswan, J. (2011). Global asset prices and FOMC announcements. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30(3), 547-571. [9] Kontonikas, A., MacDonald, R., & Saggu, A. (2013). Stock market reaction to fed funds rate surprises: State dependence and the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(11), 4025-4037. [10] Miyakoshi, T., Shimada, J., & Li, K. W. (2017). The dynamic effects of quantitative easing on stock price: Evidence from Asian emerging markets, 2001–2016. International Review of Economics & Finance, 49, 548-567. [11] Ricci, O. (2015). The impact of monetary policy announcements on the stock price of large European banks during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 52, 245-255. [12] Tillmann, P. (2013). Capital inflows and asset prices: Evidence from emerging Asia. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(3), 717-729. [13] Tillmann, P. (2016). Unconventional monetary policy and the spillovers to emerging markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 66, 136-156. [14] Ueda, K. (2012a). Japan`s deflation and the Bank of Japan`s experience with nontraditional monetary policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44(s1), 175-190. [15] Ueda, K. (2012b). Deleveraging and Monetary Policy: Japan since the 1990s and the United States since 2007. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3), 177-202. [16] Ueda, K. (2012c). The Effectiveness Of Non‐Traditional Monetary Policy Measures: The Case Of The Bank Of Japan. The Japanese Economic Review, 63(1), 1-22. [17] Wright, J. H. (2012). What does monetary policy do to long‐term interest rates at the zero lower bound?. The Economic Journal, 122(564).
Description:	碩士國立政治大學金融學系 105352015
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105352015
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/THE.NCCU.MB.015.2018.F06
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Money and Banking] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
201501.pdf	5803Kb	Adobe PDF2	174	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback