政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/118239
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造访人次 : 51150625      在线人数 : 855
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/118239


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118239


    题名: 外匯市場因子與流動性風險之關係
    Research of the Relationship between Factors and Liquidity Risks in the Foreign Exchange Market
    作者: 操孟儒
    TSAO, MENG-RU
    贡献者: 林建秀
    Lin, Chien-Hsiu
    操孟儒
    TSAO, MENG-RU
    关键词: 外匯交易
    利差交易策略
    動能交易策略
    價值交易策略
    流動性風險因子
    Fama-Macbeth兩步驟回歸
    FX trading
    Carry trade
    Momentum strategy
    Value strategy
    Liquidity risk factor
    Fama-Macbeth two-step regression
    日期: 2018
    上传时间: 2018-07-03 17:26:30 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文是研究外匯市場中利差交易、動能交易以及價值交易因子間的關係以及其與流動性風險之關係,故先檢視在樣本期間內(1985/02至2017/08),用高減低法將37國貨幣以各因子指標大小分為4個投組並計算出投組報酬,結果發現各因子都有顯著的超額報酬。另外,發現了動能交易與價值交易為負向關且顯著。
    接著探討5種流動性風險因子是否能解釋利差交易、動能交易以及價值交易之超額報酬,以及上述的因子是否能解釋動能交易與價值交易之間顯著的負向關係,因此使用了簡單迴歸法來檢驗5種流動性風險因子與各因子之4個投組以及各投組報酬之間的關係,結果發現融資流動性風險指標較市場流動性風險指標來的顯著且當融資流動性風險上升時利差及動能交易的報酬會下降而價值交易的報酬會上升,本研究認為動能交易與價值交易之間的負相關可能是來自兩者與融資流動性風險指標之相反關係。最後使用Fama-Macbeth兩步驟回歸法評估其定價能力,結果發現不管是使用利差交易、動能交易或價值交易的投組去跑Fama-Macbeth兩步驟迴歸,融資流動性風險指標之定價能力都比市場流動性風險指標好。
    This paper is research the relationship between factors and liquidity risks in the foreign exchange market. First, we use 37 currencies and factor indexes to build up four portfolios by High minus Low method in the sample period from 1985/02 to 2017/08.Then we find out each factor has significant excess return and the relationship between Momentum and Value factors is obviously negative.
    Second, we explore if five liquidity risks can explain the excess returns in Carry trade, Momentum strategy and Value strategy factor. Otherwise, if the factors above can explain the negative relationship between Momentum factor and Value factor. So, we use the simple regression to testify those relations and find out that funding liquidity risk factors are more significant than market liquidity risk factors in the regression. When the funding liquidity risk falls, excess returns of Carry and Momentum factors will rise and excess return of Value factor will rise. In this study opinion, the negative relationship between Momentum and Value factors may be caused by their opposite relationship with funding liquidity risk.
    In the end, we use Fama-Macbeth two-step regression to testify the asset pricing ability. We find out that the asset pricing ability of funding liquidity risk factor is better than market liquidity risk factor regardless in every Fama-Macbeth two-step regression.
    參考文獻: 黃祺真(2016)。匯率報酬的三因子。國立政治大學金融研究所碩士論文,台北市。
    黃品翔(2017)。外匯報酬三因子模型之利差、動能交易策略成因分析。國立政治大學金融研究所碩士論文,台北市。
    Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of financial markets, 5(1), 31-56.
    Acharya, V. V., & Pedersen, L. H. (2005). Asset pricing with liquidity risk. Journal of financial Economics, 77(2), 375-410.
    Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H., & Pedersen, L. H. (2006). Liquidity and asset prices. Foundations and Trends® in Finance, 1(4), 269-364.
    Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2006). The cross‐section of volatility and expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259-299.
    Asness, C. S., Moskowitz, T. J., & Pedersen, L. H. (2013). Value and momentum everywhere. The Journal of Finance, 68(3), 929-985.
    Brunnermeier, M. K., & Pedersen, L. H. (2008). Market liquidity and funding liquidity. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2201-2238.
    Burnside, C., Eichenbaum, M., & Rebelo, S. (2008). Carry trade: The gains of diversification. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2‐3), 581-588.
    Boyson, N. M., Stahel, C. W., & Stulz, R. M. (2010). Hedge fund contagion and liquidity shocks. The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1789-1816.
    Burnside, C., Eichenbaum, M., & Rebelo, S. (2011). Carry trade and momentum in currency markets.
    Banti, C., Phylaktis, K., & Sarno, L. (2012). Global liquidity risk in the foreign exchange market. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(2), 267-291.
    Bakshi, G., Gao, X., & Rossi, A. G. (2017). Understanding the Sources of Risk Underlying the Cross Section of Commodity Returns. Management Science.
    Chordia, T., & Shivakumar, L. (2002). Momentum, business cycle, and time‐varying expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 57(2), 985-1019.
    Clarida, R., Davis, J., & Pedersen, N. (2009). Currency carry trade regimes: Beyond the Fama regression. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(8), 1375-1389.
    Corcoran, A. (2009). The determinants of carry trade risk premia. Institute for international integration studies, 287, 1-33.
    Dobrynskaya, V. (2014). Downside market risk of carry trades. Review of Finance, 18(5), 1885-1913.
    Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
    Fama, E. F. (1984). Forward and spot exchange rates. Journal of monetary economics, 14(3), 319-338.
    Engel, C. (1996). The forward discount anomaly and the risk premium: A survey of recent evidence. Journal of empirical finance, 3(2), 123-192.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1998). Value versus growth: The international evidence. The journal of finance, 53(6), 1975-1999.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2012). Size, value, and momentum in international stock returns. Journal of financial economics, 105(3), 457-472.
    Filippou, I., & Taylor, M. (2014). Common Macro Factors and Currency Premia.Galati, G., & Melvin, M. (2004). Why has FX trading surged? Explaining the 2004 triennial survey.
    Grinblatt, M., & Han, B. (2005). Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. Journal of financial economics, 78(2), 311-339.
    Gyntelberg, J., & Remolona, E. (2007). Risk in carry trades: a look at target currencies in Asia and the Pacific.
    Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (2001). Profitability of momentum strategies: An evaluation of alternative explanations. The Journal of finance, 56(2), 699-720.
    Lesmond, D. A. (2005). Liquidity of emerging markets. Journal of financial Economics, 77(2), 411-452.
    Ludvigson, S. C., & Ng, S. (2009). Macro factors in bond risk premia. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(12), 5027-5067.
    Lustig, H., Roussanov, N., & Verdelhan, A. (2011). Common risk factors in currency markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(11), 3731-3777.
    Lustig, H., Roussanov, N., & Verdelhan, A. (2014). Countercyclical currency risk premia. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(3), 527-553.
    Moosa, I. A. (2010). The Profitability of Carry Trade-La redditività del carry trade. Economia Internazionale/International Economics, 63(3), 361-380.
    Menkhoff, L., Sarno, L., Schmeling, M., & Schrimpf, A. (2012). Carry trades and global foreign exchange volatility. The Journal of Finance, 67(2), 681-718.
    Menkhoff, L., Sarno, L., Schmeling, M., & Schrimpf, A. (2012). Currency momentum strategies. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(3), 660-684.
    Menkhoff, L., Sarno, L., Schmeling, M., & Schrimpf, A. (2016). Currency value. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(2), 416-441.
    Okunev, J., & White, D. (2003). Do momentum-based strategies still work in foreign currency markets?. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(2), 425-447.
    Pástor, Ľ., & Stambaugh, R. F. (2003). Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. Journal of Political economy, 111(3), 642-685.
    Plantin, G., & Shin, H. (2011). Carry trades, monetary policy and speculative dynamics.
    Rouwenhorst, K. G. (1998). International momentum strategies. The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 267-284.
    Raza, A. (2015). Are Value Strategies Profitable in the Foreign Exchange Market?.
    Mancini, L., Ranaldo, A., & Wrampelmeyer, J. (2013). Liquidity in the foreign exchange market: Measurement, commonality, and risk premiums. The Journal of Finance, 68(5), 1805-1841.
    Stattman, D. (1980). Book values and stock returns. The Chicago MBA: A journal of selected papers, 4(1), 25-45.
    Sadka, R. (2011). Hedge-fund performance and liquidity risk.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融學系
    105352024
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105352024
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.MB.009.2018.F06
    显示于类别:[金融學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    202401.pdf7393KbAdobe PDF2422检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈