政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/117752
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50934527      Online Users : 968
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/117752


    Title: Re-thinking Dissenting Opinions in Constitutional Courts-Perspective from the German Experience
    憲法法院不同意見書制度之再思考─以德國經驗為中心
    Authors: 林佳和
    Lin, Jia-He
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 不同意見書;協同意見書;憲法法院;憲法訴訟;司法的民主正當性;法與社會現實
    Dissenting Opinions;Concurring Opinions;Constitutional Court;Constitutional Procedure;Democratic Legitimacy of Jurisdiction;Law and Social Reality
    Date: 2014-12
    Issue Date: 2018-06-14 13:26:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 憲法法院解釋常見不同意見書，如併入協同意見書的話，則於我國釋憲實務上，不贊同多數意見決定或理由者並不在少。從憲法規範性之找尋、特別是憲法與社會現實之角度出發，更嚴謹與深刻的看待不同意見制度之功能與意義，德國憲法訴訟制度數十年來的發展，包括1990年代以後德東各邦憲法法院法立法過程中之討論，重新展開相關問題的思考與辯論，可提供一定的參考。司法權的民主正當性，不在於法官選任的鎖鏈式民主內涵之引入，而在於法的拘束，就憲法訴訟而言，特別是透過憲法規範性的找尋，正面的回應社會現實與意識之變遷，適當的反映不同之社會力量與主張，展現多元的社會現實與相應之憲法開放性，有助於社會接下來的進一步發展，應是不同意見制度的關鍵所在。
    ＂Dissenting＂ are frequent in our Justice of The Constitutional Court opinions. Along with concurring, many disagree with majority`s opinions or rationales. Searching with eye to the characteristics of constitution as statute, and the perspective of social reality, including 1990s legislating process of constitutional court law in Germany eastern states, the function and purposes of ＂dissenting＂ could be understood in a different way. The legitimate of judicial power dose not originate from the agreement of the appointment of judges by legislative power, but from the biding power of law; as to constitutional litigation especially, it`s legitimate comes from the searching of constitution statute, responding the changing of society and reflecting different social group`s value and claims. The key goal of dissenting is to show the diversity of social facts and the possibility of constitution interpretation, and be helpful for social progress.
    Relation: 輔仁法學, No.48, pp.1-69
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    c169.pdf1463KbAdobe PDF2378View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback