政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/117662

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/117662

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51295217 線上人數 : 870

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 行政管理碩士學程(MEPA) > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/117662

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/117662

題名:	政府採購政策變遷之研究– 以臺北市政府聯合採購發包中心設置為例 A Study on the Policy Change of Government Procurement – Case Study of Contract Centers Mechanism of Taipei City Government
作者:	呂蕙蕙 Lu, Hui Hui
貢獻者:	黃慶堂 Huang, Chin Tony 呂蕙蕙 Lu, Hui Hui
關鍵詞:	臺北市政府聯合採購發包中心政策變遷政策倡議聯盟架構決策者信念政策中間人 Taipei City Government Joint Purchasing Contracting Center Policy changes Policy advocacy coalition framework Decision makers` beliefs Policy middleman
日期:	2018
上傳時間:	2018-06-12 18:09:13 (UTC+8)
摘要:	有關政府採購研究，現行大部分關注在法律層面、制度層面。本研究擬從政策變遷與宏觀角度切入，就發包中心設置過程因果關係，發現決策者信念、政策中間人、聯盟運作等對政策影響。本文擬透過Sabatier & Jenkins-Smith 所建構政策倡議聯盟架構（Policy Advocacy Coalition Framework，[PACF ]），從不同面相研究觀察，以宏觀之政策面，研究分析市府發包中心重新設置之動態過程。本研究採文獻分析法、深入訪談及焦點團體訪談法，分析探討1995至2015年臺北市政府聯合採購發包中心設置之政策變遷過程。藉由分析架構內外在系統的影響因素，探討執政輪替與決策者的信念是否為影響政策變遷主要因素。經研究發現：第一，市府倡議聯盟間（發包中心與洽辦單位、集中採購與分散採購）透過政策導向的學習，跨越聯盟達成共識。第二，避免陳水扁時代採購案件延宕，改以折衷版集中採購。第三，柯文哲市長主張集中採購，設置發包中心政策是其競選政策白皮書。第四，市府發包中心設置政策變遷主因，決策者信念與執政輪替。 With regard to government procurement research, most of them focus on the legal and institutional aspects. This study intends to proceed from the perspective of policy changes and macroeconomics. It will investigate the cause-and-effect relationship of the setup process of the contract issuing center, and discover the impact of decision makers` beliefs, policy middlemen, and alliance operations on the policy. Using the policy advocacy coalition framework (PACF) constructed by Sabatier & Jenkins-Smith , we observe and analyze the dynamic process of the resetting of the city`s outsourcing centers. This study used document analysis, in-depth interviews, and focus group interviews to analyze and explore the process of policy changes at the Joint Purchasing and Contracting Center of the Taipei City Government from 1995 to 2015. By analyzing the influencing factors of the internal and external systems of the architecture, it is discussed whether the alternation of governance rotation and decision makers` beliefs are the main factors affecting policy changes. The study found that: First, the city’s initiative among the alliances (contracting centers and contact agencies, centralized procurement and decentralized procurement) through policy-oriented learning, reached consensus across the alliance. Second, to avoid delays in Chen Shui-bian’s era of procurement cases , it used eclectic centralized procurement. Thirdly, Mayor Ko Wen-je advocated centralized procurement and set up a contract center policy as a white paper on his election policy. Fourth, the main reasons for the policy changes in the city`s outsourcing centers are decision makers` beliefs and governance rotation.
參考文獻:	中文部分一、專書丘昌泰(（2014）。公共政策-基礎篇(第五版)。巨流圖書公司。朱柔若（譯）（2000）。W. Lawrence Neuman著。社會研究方法－質化與量性取向。揚智文化出版社。吳定（2013）。公共政策辭典。五南圖書出版公司。余致力（2008）。公共政策。智勝文化公司。李允傑、丘昌泰（2009）。政策執行與評估。元照出版公司。周志忍（2011）政策變遷與學習－一種倡議聯盟途徑。北京大學出版社（簡體書）。林佳瑩、陳雅琪、吳永明、方欹葳（譯）（2015）。Daniels F. Chambliss and Russell K. Schutt著。社會科學研究方法－理解人類社會的工具書。雙葉書廊有限公司。陳敦源（2012）民主治理：公共行政與民主政治的制度性調和。五南圖書出版公司。陳潭（2016）。尋找公共政策的制度邏輯。中國政法大學出版社(簡體書)。黃東益（2013）。從價值差異到夥伴關係：政務官事務官的互動管理。臺北：五南。魯炳炎（2014）。誰說了算？從蘇花高到蘇花改政策變遷的倡議聯盟分析（1990-2014）。五南圖書出版公司。二、期刊余致力（2015）。民主與行政：政黨輪替對文官體系的衝擊與影響黨意識形態決定政策。文官制度季刊，8（3），1-20。林水波、王崇斌（1998）。政策論述與政策變遷的關聯性－批判取向的分析。臺灣政治學刊，3，245-269。林水波（2006）。政策變遷的三面向分析。政策研究學報，6，1-18。柯于璋（2012）。政策移植與移植政策評估指標之建立—結合政策過程與知識應用之雙元演化觀點。公共行政學報，43，63-90。陳志瑋（2016）。問題導向的政策學習法。國家文官學院-飛訊，218，1-18。陳恆鈞（2000）。二十一世紀的新課題：政策學習。法政學報，10，91-115。陳恆鈞（2009）。我國高速公路電子收費系統政策變遷之分析：整合型分析模式。政治科學論叢，39，1-53。陳恆鈞、劉邵祥（2007）。由政策選擇觀點談政策變遷。國家文官學院-飛訊，56，1- 18。黃東益（2004）。全球治理下政府知識管理的新面向：府際政策學習。國家政策季刊， 3（1），135-154。魯炳炎、張永明（2006）ּ政策倡導聯盟架構之研究：以國道五號蘇花段高速公路為例。政治科學論叢，30，131-164。三、論文王金昌（2001）。地方政府設置統一發包中心功能評估之研究－以新竹縣政府為例。國立交通大學工學院營建技術與管理學程碩士專班。李芯燕（2017）臺北市政府聯合採購制度服務品質與顧客滿意之研究。臺北市立大學教育行政與評鑑研究所教育行政碩士班碩士學位論文。李建中（2009）。政府採購制度問題探討與對策。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究案。吳權原（2008）。政府採購貪瀆犯罪防制之研究〞。逢甲大學交通工程與管理學系在職專班碩士論文。林俊雄（2003）鄉鎮市長貪瀆犯罪之研究--兼論採購等制度之興革。國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。林育民（2003）。政府採購統一發包機制之研究。臺灣科技大學碩士論文。莊文忠（2003）。政策體系與政策變遷之研究－停建核四政策個案分析。國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。張玉琴（2015）。臺北市政府設置發包中心機制之回應性評估－以臺北市區公所為例。臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士班論文。陳宗祈（2010）。我國集中採購制度之研究-以臺灣銀行辦理之共同供應契約為例。東海大學公共事務碩士在職專班。四、網路行政院公共工程委員會－政府採購法。106年7月28日，取自： https://www.pcc.gov.tw/pccap2/BIZSfront/MenuContent.do?site=002&bid=BIZS_C0 0004027。行政院公共工程委員會－91年推動成立「統一發包及集中採購中心」計畫方案。106 年7月28日，取自：http://www.pcc.gov.tw/pccap2/BIZSfront/MenuContent.do?site=002&bid= BIZS_C00000634。行政院公共工程委員會－臺紐經濟合作協定政府採購章（中文版）107年1月31 日，取自：https://www.pcc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=EF914433795F003E。行政院公共工程委員會－（106）政府採購法部分條文修正草案107年4月20日，取自：https://www.ey.gov.tw/DL.ashx?s...u...caa7-432c-227.。.. 新北市政府採購處組織簡介107年2月22日，取自： http://www.cop.ntpc.gov.tw/content/?parent_id=10052。英文部分 Baumgartner,Frank R,and Bryan D Jones (1991). Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems,Journal of politics,53:1044-1074. Bennet ,Colin J. and Michael Howlett. (1992). The Lesson of Learning Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change, Policy Science,25:275-294. Bennett, W. Lance. (2007). News: The Politics of Illusion, New York: Pearson Longman, 7th ed. Easton, David (1965). A System Analysis of political Life. New York: John Wiley. Education in Canada and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms(1986).﹝Special issue﹞Canadian Journal of Education 11, no.3 (Summer). Freeman, John Leiper ,and Judith Parris Stevens .(1987). A Theoretical and Conceptual Reexamination of Subsystem Politics , Public Policy and Administration,2(1):9-24. Gunther, Richard (1996). The impact of Regime Change on Public Policy: The Case of Spain, Journal of Public Policy,16.2:157-201. Hall. Peter A.(1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain, Comparative Politics,25(3):275-297. Hamm, Keith (1983). Patterns of influence Among Committees, Agencies and interest Groups , Legislative Studies Quarterly 8(August):379-426. Hogwood, W. Brian and B. Guy Peters. (1983). Policy Dynamics. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Howlett, Michael (1997). Issue-Attention and punctuated Equilibria Models Reconsidered :An Empirical Examination of the Dynamics of Agenda-Settingin Canada , Canadian Journal of Political Science.30(1):3-29. Howlett, Michael, M, Ramesh, and Anthony Perl (2009). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems,3rd edition, Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press. Jenkins-Smith ,Hank (1982). Professional Roles for Policy Analysts :A Critical Analysis , Journal of policy Analysis and Management 2 (Fall)：88-100. Jenkins-Smith ,Hank and Weimer. David (1985). Analysis as Retrograde Action , Public Administration Review 45 (July)：485-494. Jenkins-Smith Hank C., and Paul A Sabatier,(1993a). The Study of Public Policy Processes , in Sabatier ,P.A., and H.C. Jenkins-Smith (eds.), Policy Change And Learning :An Advocacy Coalition Approach,pp.19,Boulder,CO: Westview press. (1993b). The Dynamics of Policy-Oriented Learning, in Sabatier ,P.A., and H.C. Jenkins-Smith (eds.), Policy Change And Learning :An Advocacy Coalition Approach,pp.41-58,Boulder,CO:Westview press. Jones, Charles (1970). An Introduction to the Study of public policy. (1975). Clean Air Pittsburgh：Univ. of Pittsburgh Press. (1977). An Introduction to the study of Public Policy,3d ed Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Kingdon, John (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies .Boston :Litter, Brown. Kingdon, John (1995). Agendas , Alternatives ,and Policies,2nd ed ,New York：HarperCollins. Krueger, Richard A. and Mary Anne Casey (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research ,3rd ed. Thousand Oaks ,CA :Sage. Lester,James P. and Joseph Stewart ,Jr (2000). Public Policy. 2nd ed.,Belmont ,Calif: Thomson Learning. Majone, Giandomenico, (1980). Policies as Theories ,Omega,8:151-162. Mazmanian, Daniel A., and Paul A. Sabatier (1989). Implementation and Public Policy, Lanham, MD: University Press of American. Mossberger .K. and H. Wolman (2003). Policy Transfer as a Form of Prospective Policy Evaluation: Challenges and Recommendations, Public Administration Review, July/August, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp.428-440. Patton, Michael Quinn (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Newbury Park, CA：Sage Publication . Pressman, Jeffrey L. and Aaron Wildavsky (1973). Implementation :How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Roberts, Nancy C and Paula J King.(1996). Transforming Public Policy：Dynamics of policy entrepreneurship .San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Sabatier , Paul. A (1984).Faculty Interest in Policy-Oriented Advising and Research, Knowledgw 5（June）：469-502. Sabatier , Paul. A (1986).Top-Down and Bottom-up Models of Policy implementation ;A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis, Journal of Policy 6 (January):21-48. Sabatier , Paul. A. and Jenkins-Smith, Hank (1988). Symposium Volume, Policy Change and policy-Oriented Learning ,Policy science 21 (Summer and Fall) :123-277. Sabatier, Paul. A. and Hank C Jenkins-Smith (1993). Policy Change and Learning :A Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder ,CO :Westview Press. Sabatier , Paul. A (1990). Coastal Land Use Planning in Britain and France ;Lessons from implementation Research, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association , Newport Beach, CA. Sabatier, Paul. A.(1991). Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process, ps :political Science & Politics 24 （June）:147-156. (1998). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe , Journal of European public policy,5:98-130. (1999). Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, Co: Westview Press. Sabatier, Paul. A. and Pelkey, Neal (1990).Land Development at lake Tahoe ;The Effects of Environmental Controls and Economic Conditions on Housing Construction. Davis , CA: Institute of Ecology. Weible,Christopher M.,(2008). Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems:A Review and Synthesis ,Policy Studies Journal,36(4):615-635. Weiblel,Christopher M.,Andrew Pattison,and Paul A, Sabatier (2010). Harnessing Expert-Based Information for Learning and the Sustainable Management of Complex Socio-Ecological Systems , Environmental Science and Policy,13:522-534. Weiss, Carol (1977). Using Social Research in public policy making.:Lexington D.C.Heath. Wilson. James Q (1973). Political Organization ,New York: Basic Book. Yin, Robert K.(1988). Case Study Research：Design and Methods, Revised edition, London Sage Publications.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程 105921079
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105921079
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
107901.pdf	2756Kb	Adobe PDF2	6	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋