政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/117636
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51174358      Online Users : 897
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/117636


    Title: 關鍵查核事項與會計師事務所特性
    The Relationship between Key Audit Matters and Audit Firm Characteristics
    Authors: 陳品芊
    Contributors: 金成隆
    陳品芊
    Keywords: 關鍵查核事項
    產業專家會計師
    會計師任期
    詞頻-逆向文件頻率
    Key audit matters
    Industry specialist auditors
    Auditor tenure
    TF-IDF
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-06-12 17:12:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本文旨在探討關鍵查核事項與會計師事務所特性之關聯性。其中,會計師事務所特性係指其獨立性與專業能力,並分別以任期與產業專家衡量之。
      本文實證研究結果如下:其一,主查會計師之任期對關鍵查核事項幾無影響。其二,產業專家會計師事務所與關鍵查核事項之數量及品質僅有部分試驗呈正相關。其三,產業專家主查會計師其對關鍵查核事項之數量及品質均有正面影響。
      在增額測試的部分,結果如下:其一,對產業專家主查會計師而言,任期對關鍵查核事項有正面效果。其二,會計師事務所與主查會計師俱為產業專家的會計師對關鍵查核事項之正面影響力大於僅有會計師事務所為產業專家的會計師。最後,會計師的專業能力使其更有能力以簡明扼要的文字呈現關鍵查核事項。
    The objective of this thesis is to investigate the relationship between key audit matters (KAMs) and audit firm characteristics. In this study, audit firm characteristics are focused on their independence and ability, and are measured by tenure and industry expertise, respectively.
    The empirical results can be summarized as follows. Firstly, lead partners tenure has little effect on KAMs. Secondly, partial evidence is found on the association between firm-level industry specialist auditors and KAMs. Thirdly, partner-level industry specialist auditors have positive effects on both the quantity and quality of KAMs.
    In further examinations, the results are as follows. Firstly, tenure has positive effects on KAMs when the auditors are partner-level industry specialist. Secondly, industry experts at both firm- and partner-levels have stronger positive effects on KAMs then industry experts at firm-level alone. Lastly, auditors’ capacity allows them to present KAMs more concisely.
    Reference: 一、中文參考文獻
    金融監督管理委員會證券期貨局 2017. 上市(櫃)公司 105 年財務報告採用新式查核報告情形. Available at: http://www.fsc.gov.tw/fckdowndoc?file=/上市(櫃)公司105年財務報告採用新式查核報告情形20170512.pdf&flag=doc. Access Date: 2017.10.27.
    徐永堅,2016,審計準則公報第五十八號「查核報告中關鍵查核事項之溝通」之內容、影響與建議,證券暨期貨月刊,第34卷(9月):30-41。
    陳宜惠、呂瑞麟與黃政傑,2013,斷詞系統對於Queried keywords的影響,臺灣網際網路研討會論文集,TANET2013:482-486。

    二、英文參考文獻
    Ahmed, K. and Courtis, J. K. 1999. Associations between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels in annual reports: A meta-analysis. The British Accounting Review 31 (1): 35-61.
    Association of International Accountants (AIA). 2013. Consultations: IAASB exposure draft-reporting on audited financial statements. Available at: https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/IAASBReportingonAuditedFinancialStatements.pdf. Access Date: February 21, 2018.
    Backof, A. , Bowlin, K. and Goodson, B. 2017. The impact of proposed changes to the content of the audit report on jurors’ assessments of auditor negligence. Working paper, University of Virginia, University of Mississippi and University of Cincinnati.
    Balsam, S. , Krishnan, J. and Yang, J. S. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (2): 71-97.
    Bamber, E. M. and Iyer, V. M. 2007. Auditors’ identification with their clients and its effect on auditors’ objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26 (2): 1-24.
    Bedard, J. C. and Biggs, S. F. 1991. The effect of domain-specific experience on evaluation of management representations in analytical procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10 (Supplement): 77-90.
    Bédard, J. , Gonthier-Besacier, N. and Schatt, A. 2014. Costs and benefits of reporting key audit matters in the audit report: The french experience. Working paper, Laval University, University of Grenoble and HEC Lausanne.
    Bonner, S. E. 1990. Experience effects in auditing: The role of task-specific knowledge. The Accounting Review 65 (1): 72-92.
    Boolaky, P. K. and Quick, R. 2016. Bank directors’ perceptions of expanded auditor’s reports. International Journal of Auditing 20 (2): 158-174.
    Brasel, K. , Doxey, M. M. , Grenier, J. H. and Reffett, A. 2016. Risk disclosure preceding negative outcomes: The effects of reporting critical audit matters on judgments of auditor liability. Current Issues in Auditing 10 (2): 1-10.
    Carcello, J. V. and Nagy, A. L. 2004. Client size, auditor specialization and fraudulent financial reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal 19 (5): 651-668.
    Carey, P. and Simnett, R. 2006. Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review 81 (3): 653-676.
    Carver, B. T. and Trinkle, B. S. 2017. Nonprofessional investors’ reactions to the pcaob’s proposed changes to the standard audit report. Working paper, Clemson University and Mississippi State University.
    Chen, C. Y. , Lin, C. J. and Lin, Y. C. 2008. Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality? Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (2): 293-638.
    Chen, L. , Jones, K. L. , Lisic, L. L. , Michas, P. , Pawlewicz, R. and Pevzner, M. B. 2013. Comments by the auditing standards committee of the auditing section of the american accounting association on the IAASB proposal: Improving the auditor’s report. Current Issues in Auditing 7 (1): C11-C20.
    Chi, W. , Huang, H. , Liao, Y. and Xie, H. 2009. Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit quality, and market perception: Evidence from Taiwan. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (2): 311-626.
    Chin, C. L. and Chi, H. Y. 2009. Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (3): 729-765.
    Christensen, B. E. , Glover, S. M. and Wolfe, C. J. 2014. Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors’ decision to invest? Working paper, University of Illinois and University of Texas at Austin.
    Compagnie Nationale des Commissaires aux Comptes (CNCC). 2013. Re: IAASB exposure draft(ED) `reporting in audited financial statements: proposed new and revised international standards on auditing(ISAs)`. Available at: https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/CNCCCSOEC_0.pdf. Access Date: February 18, 2018.
    Czerney, K. , Schmidt, J. J. and Thompson, A. 2017. Do investors respond to explanatory language included in unqualified audit reports? Working paper, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, University of Texas at Austin and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
    Daniels, B. W. and Booker, Q. 2009. Loan officers’ reactions to audit rotation. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business 1: 1-13.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183-199.
    Deis, D. R. and Giroux, G. A. 1992. Determinants of audit quality in the public sector. The Accounting Review 67 (3): 462-479.
    Dobija, D. , Cieślak, I. and Iwuć, K. 2013. Extended audit reporting - an insight from the auditing profession in Poland. Working paper, Kozminski University and BDO Numerica Poland.
    Dumais, S. T. 1991. Improving the retrieval of information from external sources. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 23 (2): 229–236.
    Dunn, K. A. and Mayhew, B. W. 2018. Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality. Review of Accounting Studies 9 (1): 35–58.
    Fakhfakh, M. 2015. The readability of international illustration of auditor’s report: An advanced reflection on the compromise between normative principles and linguistic requirements. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science 20 (38): 21-29.
    Garcia-Blandon, J. and MaArgiles, J. 2015. Audit firm tenure and independence: A comprehensive investigation of audit qualifications in spain. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 24 (2015): 82-93.
    Geiger, M. A. and Raghunandan, K. 2002. Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 21 (1): 67-78.
    Ghosh, A. and Moon, D. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review 80 (2): 585-612.
    Gold, A. , Gronewold, U. and Pott, C. 2012. The isa 700 auditor’s report and the audit expectation gap – do explanations matter? International Journal of Auditing 16 (3): 286–307.
    Gray, G. L. , Turner, J. L. , Coram, P. J. and Mock, T. J. 2011. Perceptions and misperceptions regarding the unqualified auditor’s report by financial statement preparers, users, and auditors. Accounting Horizons 25 (4): 659-684.
    Gul, F. A., Jaggi, B. and Krishnan, G. V. 2007.Auditor independence : Evidence on the joint effects of auditor tenure and non-audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 26 (2): 117-142
    Gutierrez, E. , Minutti-Meza, M. , Tatum, K. W. and Vulcheva, M. 2018. Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom. Working paper, Universidad de Chile, University of Miami, and Florida International University.
    Havasi, R. and Darabi, R. 2016. The effect of auditor’s industry specialization on the quality of financial reporting of the listed companies in Tehran stock exchange. Asian Social Science 12 (8): 92-103.
    Hogan, C. E. and Jeter, D. C. 1999. Industry specialization by auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18 (1): 1-17.
    Huang, C. L. and Kung, F. H. 2010. Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3): 435-451.
    Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). 2007. Audit quality forum reports: fundamentals- Auditor reporting. Available at: https://www.icaew.com/-/media/corporate/files/technical/audit-and-assurance/audit-quality/audit-quality-forum/january-2007-auditor-reporting.ashx. Access Date: February 18, 2018.
    International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2009. Agenda item 4-A: Auditor’s report- IAASB working group report. Available at: https://www.ifac.org/system/files/meetings/files/5108.pdf. Access Date: February 17, 2018.
    International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2011. Consultation paper: Enhancing the value of auditor reporting: exploring options for change. Available at: http://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/CP_Auditor_Reporting-Final.pdf. Access Date: February 20, 2018.
    Jamal, K. and Sunder, S. 2013. To change or not? CA magazine 146 (5): 37-40.
    Johnson, P. E. , Jamal, K. and Berryman, R. G. 1991. Effects of framing on auditor decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1): 75-105.
    Jones, K. S. 1972. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation 28 (1): 11-21.
    Kachelmeier, S. J. , Schmidt, J. J. and Valentine, K. 2017. The disclaimer effect of disclosing critical audit matters in the auditor’s report. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin.
    Khan, M. and L. Watts, R. 2009. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48 (2-3): 132-150.
    Kim, J. B. and Zhang, L. 2016. Accounting conservatism and stock price crash risk: Firm‐level evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 33 (1): 412-441.
    Knechel, R. and Vanstraelen, A. 2007. The relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality implied by going concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26 (1): 113-131.
    Köhler, A. , Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V. S. and Theis, J. 2016. The effects of key audit matters on the auditor’s report’s communicative value: Experimental evidence from investment professionals and non-professional investors. Working paper, University of Duisburg-Essen and University of Hamburg.
    Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Does big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? Accounting Horizons 17 (Supplement): 1-16.
    Kutner, M. , Nachtsheim, C. J. and Neter, J. 2004. Applied linear regression model. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
    Lennox, C. S. , Schmidt, J. J. and Thompson, A. 2017. Is the expanded model of audit reporting informative to investors? Evidence from the UK. Working paper, University of Southern California, University of Texas at Austin, and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
    Low, K. Y. 2004. The effects of industry specialization on audit risk assessments and audit-planning decisions. The Accounting Review 79 (1): 201-219.
    Lu, L. Y. , Wu, H. and Yu, Y. 2017. Investment-related pressure and audit risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 36 (3): 137-157.
    Luhn, H. P. 1957. A statistical approach to mechanized encoding and searching of literary information. IBM Journal of Research and Development 1 (4): 309-317.
    Mautz, R. K. , and H. A. Sharaf. 1961. The Philosophy of Auditing. American Accounting Association Monograph N0. 6. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association: 204-231.
    Mayhew, B. W. and Wilkins, M. S. 2003. Audit firm industry specialization as a differentiation strategy: Evidence from fees charged to firms going public. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (2): 33-52.
    Mock, T. J. , Bédard, J. , Coram, P. J. , Davis, S. M. , Espahbodi, R. and Warne, R. C. 2013. The auditor’s reporting model: Current research synthesis and implications. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32 (Supplement 1): 323-351.
    Moroney, R. and Simnett, R. 2009. Differences in industry specialist knowledge and business risk identification and evaluation. Behavioral Research in Accounting 21 (2): 73-89.
    Myers, J. N. , Myers, L. A. and Omer, T. C. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review 78 (3): 779-799.
    New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants (NYSSCPA). 2012. Comments on IAASB invitation to comment: improving the auditor’s report. Available at: https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/exposure-drafts/comments/NYSSCPA%20Comments%20to%20IAASB%20-%20Improving%20the%20Auditors%20Report%20Invitation%20to%20Comment%20final%2012.10.02.pdf. Access Date: Feb 20, 2018.
    Owhoso, V. E. , Messier, W. F. and Lynch, J. G. 2002. Error detection by industry-specialized teams during sequential audit review. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (3): 883-900.
    Pakaluk, M. 2017. The illusion of insight in an extended auditor’s report. Working paper, Busch School of Business and Economics.
    Porter, B. , hÓgartaigh, C. Ó. and Baskerville, R. 2009. Report on research conducted in the United Kingdom and New Zealand in 2008 investigating the audit expectation-performance gap and users’ understanding of, and desired improvements to, the auditor’s report. Working paper, Exeter University, University College Dublin and Victoria University.
    Potts, A. , Bednarek, M. and Caple, H. 2015. How can computer-based methods help researchers to investigate news values in large datasets? A corpus linguistic study of the construction of newsworthiness in the reporting on hurricane Katrina. Discourse & Communication 9 (2): 149-172.
    Pound, G. D. 1981. A note on audit report readability. Accounting & Finance 21 (1): 45-55.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2013. Proposed Auditing Standards—The Auditor’s Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion; the Auditor’s Responsibilities Regarding Other Information in Certain Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements and the Related Auditor’s Report; and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards. Available at: https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket034/Release_2013-005_ARM.pdf. Access Date: February 18, 2018.
    Reid, L. C. , Carcello, J. V. , Li, C. and Neal, T. L. 2016. Impact of auditor and audit committee report changes on audit quality and costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Working paper, University of Pittsburgh and University of Tennessee.
    Salton, G. and Buckley, C. 1988. Term weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management 24 (5): 513-523.
    Salton, G. and Yang, C. S. 1973. On the specification of term values in automatic indexing. Journal of Documentation 29 (4): 351-372.
    Salton, G. , Wong, A. and Yang, C. S. 1975. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM 18 (11): 613-620.
    Sarwoko, I. and Agoes, S. 2014. An empirical analysis of auditor’s industry specialization, auditor`s independence and audit procedures on audit quality: Evidence from Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 164 (2014): 271-281.
    Shettar, R. and Bhuptani, R. 2008. A vertical search engine – based on domain classifier. International Journal of Computer Science and Security 2 (4): 18-27.
    Shockley, R. A. 1981. Perceptions of auditors` independence: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review 56 (4): 785-800.
    Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 161-190.
    Sirois, L. P. , Bédard, J. and Bera, P. 2018. The informational value of key audit matters in the auditor’s report: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Accounting Horizons, Forthcoming:
    Skaife, H. A. , Collins, D. W. and Kinney, W. R. 2007. The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to sox-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 166-192.
    Smith, K. W. 2017. Tell me more: A content analysis of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom. Working paper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
    Taylor, M. H. 2000. The effects of industry specialization on auditor’s inherent risk assessments and confidence judgments. Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (4): 693-712.
    The Financial Reporting Council (FRC). 2015. Extended auditor’s reports: A review of experience in the first year. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/document-library/audit-and-assurance/2015/extended-auditor-s-reports-a-review-of-experience. Access Date: October 30, 2017.
    Tobi, B. A. , Osasrere, A. O. and Emmanuel, U. 2016. Auditor`s independence and audit quality: A study of selected deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Finance and Accounting 5 (1): 13-21.
    Tsai. , C. H. 2000. MMSEG: A word identification system for Mandarin Chinese text based on two variants of the maximum matching algorithm. Available at: http://technology.chtsai.org/mmseg/. Access Date: November 1, 2017.
    Vanstraelen, A. , Schelleman, C. , Meuwissen, R. and Hofmann, I. 2012. The audit reporting debate: Seemingly intractable problems and feasible solutions. European Accounting Review 21 (2): 193-215.
    Vinson, J. , Robertson, J. C. and Cockrell, C. 2018. The effects of critical audit matter removal and duration on jurors’ assessments of auditor negligence. Working paper, Clemson University, University of North Texas and Xavier University.
    Wang, K. J. and Tuttle, B. M. 2009. The impact of auditor rotation on auditor–client negotiation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34: 222-243.
    Whisenant, S. , Sankaraguruswamy, S. and Raghunandan, K. 2003. Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non-audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (4): 721-744.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    105353013
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1053530131
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    013101.pdf2664KbAdobe PDF2249View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback