English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50939624      Online Users : 941
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/117390


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/117390


    Title: The Norm, Legal Nature of Leave for Union and Employers` Authority for Granting the Permission: Concurrently Discuss the Development of Judicial Decisions in Taiwan
    工會會務假之規範、法律性質與雇主准駁權限：兼論我國法院判決實務之發展
    Authors: 林良榮
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: Leave for Union Related Business;Unfair labor practice;Union activities;Basic labor rights
    會務假;不當勞動行為;工會活動;勞動基本權
    Date: 2014-03
    Issue Date: 2018-05-29 11:52:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: From a practical standpoint, the legal cases related to ＂Leave for Union Related Business＂ (LURB) are rarely seen; however, practicing such type of leaves can be a difficult challenge. When tension occurs between labors and employers, whether the union staffs can be granted with ＂LURB＂ by employers may significantly impact their future development of relationship. The issue and essence of the ＂LURB＂ focus on two themes: (1) the nature of this legislation; and (2) the conflict caused while employees take this leave at the expense of employers. From the perspective of preventing unfair labor practices, the following issues should be further examined and clarified. What are the rights for union staffs to take a leave while handling union business? What is the perimeter while union staffs exercise their right of ＂LURB＂? In the meantime, granting permission for ＂LURB＂ from employers may affect the unity of a union. This study will examine the ＂LURB＂ from the related international and domestic laws, as well as provide examples on the recent domestic civic court decisions and executive lawsuits. A protective mechanism of ＂LURB＂ based on the rights and legality of union activities will be concluded.
    我國司法實務上，因工會會務假所生之爭議案例雖不多見，但在工會實際運作的實務上卻屢生困擾；尤其當勞資雙方的關係出現較為緊張的時候，工會幹部能否向雇主請公假（會務假）辦理會務，更是牽動日後勞資關係的發展。會務假的問題核心乃在於：工會會務假的法律本質為何，以及該權利行使所造成與雇主經營權之間的衝突。如就不當勞動行為保護的政策面向來看，或者應論究以下問題之疑義，亦即：工會幹部因辦理會務而請公假的權利本質為何以及該權利行使的射程範圍，同時，對於該權利之保護是否該當於不當勞動行為制度的政策目的而使雇主對於會務假之准駁有生妨礙工會團結之可能。本文將從內國法與國際（外國）的法律規範說明「會務假」的保護，並從我國法院實務見解，尤其以民事與行政訴訟事件之會務假爭議為例說明判決的立場。最後將從工會活動（行動）權的法理建構對於工會會務假的保護。
    Relation: 思與言, Vol.52, No.1, pp.44-88
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2535View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback