政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/116770
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51736586      Online Users : 345
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116770


    Title: 財務限制下公司財務及非財務資源配置之於策略性企業社會責任
    Firms’ Financial and Non-financial Resources Allocation on Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility under Financial Constraints
    Authors: 林泰鈺
    Contributors: 江彌修
    林泰鈺
    Keywords: 企業社會責任
    資源基礎理論
    投資活動
    資本依賴度
    Corporate social responsibility
    Resource-based theory
    Investment activities
    Financial constraint
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-04-09 15:42:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 既有文獻指出企業從事社會責任活動能帶來諸多經濟效益，然而企業也必須承擔相關的成本來進行社會責任活動。本研究探討公司在成本考量上，如何配置財務及非財務資源來進行企業社會責任活動。我們進一步討論當企業面對財務限制時，策略性的資源配置如何對企業社會責任之績效產生影響。本研究使用公司層面的企業社會績效和財報資料，資料期間為1991至2015年。藉由迴歸分析並且控制產業及修正群聚效果下，實證結果發現：研發活動對於企業社會責任績效有顯著正向的關聯，而公司的併購支出顯著地負向影響企業之正面及負面企業社會績效，資本支出則對負面企業社會責任績效有顯著的負向關係。就內部流動性資源運用的結果我們發現：現金對企業社會責任之績效表現並無顯著的關聯，此結果隱含公司在資金運用上傾向於配置少部份現金資源以資助企業社會責任活動；然而淨營運資金與企業社會績效呈現顯著負向關聯，意味著公司會使用淨營運資金來資助企業社會責任活動。最後透過對公司個體財務限制的衡量，實證結果顯示當公司面對財務寬鬆時，投入研發活動成本有助於加強研發成本與企業社會績效表現之正向關係，結果更意味著當公司面臨財務寬鬆時，較容易將社會績效納入考量。
    While the existing is fully aware of the diverse economic benefits that are brought about when firms engage in corporate social responsible (CSR), it also warns about the associated costs of all kinds. Using panel data obtained from MSCI ESG and Compustat for 4,160 U.S. public-listed firms from 1991 to 2015, we investigate what impacts the firms’ allocation of financial and non-financial resources would have on the implementation of their CSR, when knowing that CSR can be costly. Our main empirical findings are threefold. First, we find that firms’ R&D intensity is positively related to their corporate social performance (CSP). Capital expenditure is significantly negatively related to CSP concerns; and firms’ involvement in acquisitions is negatively related to both their CSP strengths and concerns. Second, firms’ implementation of CSR activities is found to be seldom cash-intensive, in fact, we document firms’ moderate usage of cash and short-term investments on the implementation of CSR relative to other investments activities. However, the noncash networking capital show significantly negative effects with CSP, revealing that firms use noncash networking capital to implement CSR activities. Third, the positive relationship between R&D intensity and CSP is further enhanced when firms are free without financial constraints, and we argue that firms take more concern on social issue/performance when facing financial slack.
    Reference: Acharya, V. V., Almeida, H., & Campello, M. (2007). Is Cash Negative Debt? A Hedging Perspective on Corporate Financial Policies. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16(4), 515-554.
    Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An Analysis of Corporate Donations: United Kingdom Evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5), 641-654.
    Almeida, H., Campello, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2004). The Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash. Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1777-1804.
    Almeida, H., Campello, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2011). Corporate Financial and Investment Policies When Future Financing Is Not Frictionless. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(3), 675-693.
    Baker, M., Stein, J. C., & Wurgler, J. (2003). When Does the Market Matter? Stock Prices and the Investment of Equity-Dependent Firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 969-1005.
    Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
    Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1230-1241.
    Baron, D. P. (2001). Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1), 7-45.
    Bekier, M. M., Bogardus, A. J., & Oldham, T. (2001). Why Mergers Fail. The McKinsey Quarterly, 6-6.
    Brown, J. R., & Petersen, B. C. (2011). Cash Holdings and R&D Smoothing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(3), 694-709.
    Campello, M., Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2010). The Real Effects of Financial Constraints: Evidence from a Financial Crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 97(3), 470-487.
    Carlson, L., Grove, S. J., & Kangun, N. (1993). A Content Analysis of Environmental Advertising Claims: a Matrix Method Approach. Journal of Advertising, 22(3), 27-39.
    Carmeli, A. (2005). Perceived External Prestige, Affective Commitment, and Citizenship Behaviors. Organization Studies, 26(3), 443-464.
    Carpenter, R. E., Fazzari, S. M., & Petersen, B. C. (1998). Financing Constraints and Inventory Investment: A Comparative Study with High-Frequency Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 513-519.
    Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
    Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
    Cheng, B. T., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23.
    Choi, J., & Wang, H. L. (2009). Stakeholder Relations and the Persistence of Corporate Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 895-907.
    Clarkson, M. B. (1991). Defining, Evaluating, and Managing Corporate Social Performance: The Stakeholder Management Model. Research in corporate social performance and policy, 12(1), 331-358.
    Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
    Deng, X., Kang, J. K., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Value Maximization: Evidence from Mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), 87-109.
    Denis, D. J., & Sibilkov, V. (2010). Financial Constraints, Investment, and the Value of Cash Holdings. Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 247-269.
    Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1511.
    Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
    Engizek, N., & Yasin, B. (2017). How CSR and Overall Service Quality Lead to Affective Commitment: Mediating Role of Company Reputation. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(1), 111-125.
    Erhemjamts, O., Li, Q., & Venkateswaran, A. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Firms` Investment Policy, Organizational Structure, and Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 395-412.
    Farre-Mensa, J., & Ljungqvist, A. (2016). Do Measures of Financial Constraints Measure Financial Constraints? Review of Financial Studies, 29(2), 271-308.
    Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., & Petersen, B. C. (1988). Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity(1), 141-195.
    Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate-Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.
    Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach: Cambridge university press.
    Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and "the Corporate Objective Revisited". Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369.
    Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.
    Gatewood, E., & Carroll, A. B. (1981). The Proctor and Gamble Rely Case: A Social Response Pattern for the 1980s? Academy of Management Proceedings, 1981(1), 369-373.
    Gilchrist, S., & Himmelberg, C. P. (1995). Evidence on the Role of Cash Flow for Investment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36(3), 541-572.
    Gildea, R. L. (1994). Consumer Survey Confirms Corporate Social Action Affects Buying Decisions. Public Relations Quarterly, 39(4), 20.
    Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777-798.
    Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425-445.
    Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
    Hadlock, P., Hecker, D., & Gannon, J. (1991). High Technology Employment: Another View. Monthly Labor Review, 114(7), 26-30.
    Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The Financing of R&D and Innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 609-639): Elsevier.
    Hamid, Z., Azhar, S. M., & Basir, H. (2014). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Literature Review and Value Chain Activities Filter. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 8(10), 3364-3370.
    Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, Social Responsibility, and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479-485.
    Hart, S. L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
    Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What`s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
    Himmelberg, C. P., & Petersen, B. C. (1994). R&D and Internal Finance: a Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(1), 38-51.
    Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1996). The Market for Corporate Control and Firm Innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1084-1119.
    Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2012). Financial Constraints on Corporate Goodness. Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Hubbard, R. G. (1998). Capital Market Imperfections and Investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 193-225.
    Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm Performance: The Interactions of Corporate Social Performance with Innovation and Industry Differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781-789.
    Hunt, S. D., Wood, V. R., & Chonko, L. B. (1989). Corporate Ethical Values and Organizational Commitment in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 53(3), 79-90.
    Jamali, D. (2006). Insights into Triple Bottom Line Integration from a Learning Organization Perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 12(6), 809-821.
    Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443-459.
    Jawahar, I. M., & McLaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory: An Organizational Life Cycle Approach. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 397-414.
    Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256.
    Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: a Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
    Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: McMillan.
    Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51-84.
    Lantos, G. P. (2001). The Boundaries of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595-632.
    Link, A. N. (1982). An Analysis of the Composition of R&D Spending. Southern Economic Journal, 342-349.
    Luo, X. M., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The Debate over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 198-213.
    Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Investor Preferences and Corporate Strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817-835.
    Madden, K., Scaife, W., & Crissman, K. (2006). How and Why Small to Medium Size Enterprises (SMEs) Engage with Their Communities: An Australian Study. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(1), 49-60.
    Manescu, C. (2009). Is Corporate Social Responsibility Viewed as a Risk Factor?: Evidence from an Asset Pricing Analysis: Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg.
    Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does It Pay to Be Good... And Does It Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance.
    McElhaney, K. (2009). A Strategic Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility. Leader to Leader, 2009(52), 30-36.
    McElroy, K. M., & Siegfried, J. J. (1985). The Effect of Firm Size on Corporate Philanthropy. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 25(2), 18-26.
    McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.
    McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
    McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
    Moore, G. (2001). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the Uk Supermarket Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3-4), 299-315.
    Navarro, P. (1988). Why Do Corporations Give to Charity. Journal of Business, 61(1), 65-93.
    Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The Determinants and Implications of Corporate Cash Holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 3-46.
    Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
    Padgett, R. C., & Galan, J. I. (2010). The Effect of R&D Intensity on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 407-418.
    Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435-480.
    Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
    Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. How to Reinvent Capitalism—and Unleash a Wave of Innovation and Growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2).
    Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
    Quazi, A. M., & O`Brien, D. (2000). An Empirical Test of a Cross-National Model of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1), 33-51.
    Reinhardt, F. L., Stavins, R. N., & Vietor, R. H. K. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility through an Economic Lens. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 219-239.
    Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
    Rothenberg, S., & Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2007). Determinants of Environmental Innovation Adoption in the Printing Industry: The Importance of Task Environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(1), 39-49.
    Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
    Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243.
    Siegel, D. S., & Vitaliano, D. F. (2007). An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 773-792.
    Silva, F., & Carreira, C. (2010). Financial Constraints: Are There Differences between Manufacturing and Services? Retrieved from GEMF, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra.
    Silva, F., & Carreira, C. (2012). Measuring Firms Financial Constraints: A Rough Guide. Notas Económicas(36).
    Summers, L. H., Bosworth, P. B., Tobin, J., & White, P. M. (1981). Taxation and Corporate-Investment: a Q-Theory Approach. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity(1), 67-140.
    Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
    Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 167-175.
    Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758-769.
    Weigelt, K., & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and Corporate Strategy: a Review of Recent Theory and Applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 443-454.
    Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
    White, H. (1980). A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817-838.
    Whited, T. M., & Wu, G. J. (2006). Financial Constraints Risk. Review of Financial Studies, 19(2), 531-559.
    Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.
    Zaman, M., Yamin, S., & Wong, F. (1996). Environmental Consumerism and Buying Preference for Green Products. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the Australian Marketing Educators’ Conference, 613-626.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融學系
    104352015
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104352015
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Money and Banking] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    201501.pdf4366KbAdobe PDF212View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback