政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/116332
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50926867      Online Users : 936
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116332


    Title: 「教育部」及「教育部體育署」權力分工之研究─以各該「行政規則」為例
    The power distributions between ";Ministry of Education";and ";Sports Administration, MOE";—taking the ";Administrative Rules";as examples
    Authors: 沈施俊
    陳敏男
    陳俊良
    潘達人
    Shen, Shih-Chun
    Chen, Min-Nan
    Chen, Jiun-Liang
    Pan, Darren
    Keywords: 教育部;體育署;行政院公報;行政規則;權力分工
    Administrative Rules;Executive Yuan Gazette;Ministry of Education;Power Distributions;Sports Administration;MOE
    Date: 2017-12
    Issue Date: 2018-03-16 15:42:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 各該體育運動法律中央主管機關或主管機關等自 102 年01 月01 日均改為「教育部」而非「體育署」,前「行政院體育委員會」(以下簡稱「體委會」) 則配合裁撤,惟「教育部」及「教育部體育署」(以下簡稱「體育署」),上下隸屬「機關」屬性不同而針對前開各該事項分權方式為何?自有疑義,本研究則以「行政院公報」及「體育署」網站上刊載各該「行政規則」為例,賡續研析「教育部」及「體育署」兩者權力分工。本研究係以「質性研究」之「文獻研究法」及「觀察法」等,作為研究方法,本研究認為各該體育運動法律主管機關等均為「教育部」而非「體育署」,此與「體委會」時期處理方式,明顯不同;各該行政規則發布權責,雖分屬「教育部」及「體育署」,渠等各該管轄事項,仍有所不同;而「教育部」及「體育署」兩者機關分工事項,除「運動發展基金」運作等事項有所明朗,其他目前仍待後續實務上之發展。
    The central competent authority or the competent authority of sports laws was changed to "Ministry of Education" (MOE, also), not "Sports Administration, MOE" (SAMOE, also) on January 01, 2013. The former Sports Affairs Council, Executive Yuan (SAC, also) was abolished at the same time. It`s so different between MOC and SAMOE, SAMOE is attached to MOE, what kinds of matter item are the difference between MOE and SAMOE? This study focused the "administrative rules "are published on the gazette website of the Executive Yuan and the website of SAMOE, and research the difference of the power distributions continuously. This study is based on the "qualitative research"-"literature research" and "observation method". The central competent authority or the competent authority of sports laws was changed to MOE, not SAMOE, this is clearly different from the missions of SAC. The powers and administrative rules are distributed between MOE and SAMOC, in addition to the operation of the Sports Development Fund and others; it`s still follow-up to the practical development.
    Relation: 政大體育研究, 第 24 期, 頁 13-26
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[NCCU Sports Series] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    S03_24-02.pdf432KbAdobe PDF2768View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback