政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/116103
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51094576      Online Users : 848
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116103


    Title: 大臺北都會區共同工作空間使用者需求特性之研究
    A study on the user demand for coworking space in Taipei metropolitan area
    Authors: 曾冠凱
    Tseng, Kuan-kai
    Contributors: 白仁德
    Pai, Jen Te
    曾冠凱
    Tseng, Kuan-kai
    Keywords: 眾創空間
    共同工作空間
    創新與創業
    使用者需求
    個體選擇模型
    Mass innovation space
    Co-working space
    Innovation and entrepreneurship
    User demand
    Individual selection model
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-03-02 11:53:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 共同工作(co-working)是一種嶄新的工作型態，一群來自於不同領域、不同專業背景的自由工作者(freelancer)、微型創業者，透過資源共享、技術互補並進而產生交流與合作，激發出更多的創意火花，如此創意發想的基地即是所謂的共同工作空間(co-working space)。當前世界各主要國家積極推動民間創新與創業，國內政府單位亦提出「亞洲.矽谷推動方案」以優化國內的創業環境、驅動經濟再發展，因此對於創新資源、基礎創業環境(如：共同工作空間)的研究是非常必要的。
    有鑑於國內共同工作空間的發展剛起步，相關研究仍付之闕如，因此本研究試圖以使用者需求面向切入，藉由國內外文獻、案例與創新創業資源的整理，歸納成本考量、資源取得、社群取向、座落區位、管制與管理為影響共同工作空間使用行為的五大面向因素。其次，採用問卷調查與個體選擇模型掌握使用者之使用情形與需求特性，結果發現研究範圍內使用者多為40歲以下的網路應用產業工作者；個體選擇模型方面採用二元羅吉特模型探討影響使用者「每次使用時間長短」、「每月花費租金多寡」的主要因素，結果發現在社經背景因素方面為「年齡」、「職業別」、「就業型態」、「工作月收入」，在主觀因素方面為「環境管制」、「創業支援」、「區位環境」、「地理區位」，在客觀因素方面則為「協助創業輔導與講座」、「協助資金取得」。總體來說，共同工作空間的發展策略短期之內應該建立內部營運指南、外部設址評估指標，中期應與周邊產業、空間聯結形成產業鏈，長期則應借鏡美國「創新城區」經驗，將大臺北都會區打造為宜居宜業之城市。
    “Co-working” is a brand new type of working: a group of freelancers or micro-entrepreneurs from different fields or professional backgrounds, through resource sharing、skill complementation, and thus they communicate with each other and facilitate cooperation. Finally, somewhere spark more creative sparks, such a base of creative thinking is the so-called “co-working space”. In present, all the major countries actively promote non-governmental innovation and entrepreneurship, for example, the Taiwan government also proposed "Asia Silicon Valley Promotion Program" to optimize domestic business environment and drive economic re-development. Therefore, study on innovative resources and basic entrepreneurial environment (such as co-working space) is so necessary.
    Due to the development of the co-working space just started, related study is deficient. Therefore, this study attempts to address the demand of users. With domestic and foreign research, cases and innovation resources sorting, sum up “cost considerations”, “resource acquisition”, “community orientation”, “location”, “regulation and management” as the five factors that affect the user behavior of the co-working space. Secondly, using questionnaires and individual selection model to analyze the user`s usage and demand characteristics, the results showed that the majority of users within the scope of study are network application workers whose age are almost under 40. In terms of individual selection model, the Binary Logistic is used to explore the major influence factors of the user "per use of time", and "the monthly cost of rent". As a result, we found that "Age", "Occupation", "Employment Type" and "Working Income" are the main social background factors. "Environmental Control", "Entrepreneurship Support", "Locational Environment", "Geographical Location" are the main subjective factors. "Assist in entrepreneurship counseling and lectures", "Assistance in obtaining funds" are the main objective factors. In general, the development strategies of co-working space should set up internal operating guidelines, external site selection indicators in short-term. In the medium-term, co-working space should be linked with the surrounding industries to form the industry chains. Eventually, we would, via the U.S “Innovative City” experience build Taipei Metropolitan into a livable city.
    Reference: 一、專書
    中國眾創空間行業發展藍皮書(2016)：中國眾創空間的現在與未來。
    毛大慶（2016）中國眾創空間的現狀與未來。浙江：浙江人民出版社。
    吳明隆(2009)SPSS操作與應用-問卷統計分析實務。臺北：五南圖書出版，第二版。
    劉志迎、徐毅、洪進（2015）眾創空間。北京：機械工業出版社。

    二、期刊論文
    王晶、甄峰（2016）城市眾創空間的特徵機制及其空間規劃應對。規劃師學刊，9(12)：5-10。
    吳崇旗、鄭恆星、王偉琴，2016，「應用IPA探討自行車騎士對單車旅館之旅遊期望與滿意度」，『運動休閒餐旅研究』，11(1)：1-18。
    陳德金（2016）眾創空間發展模式比較與推進策略研究。創新創業研究，(5)：1-3。
    魏帥（2016）政府在推進眾創空間建設發展中的作用探析。管理觀察，(8)：13-16。

    三、博碩士論文
    白詩滎（2013）臺北公共自行車使用行為特性分析與友善環境建構之研究。國立政治大學地政系碩士論文。
    唐淑珍，2013，「文化創意產業微型企業之聚落支援平臺研究」，臺北教育大學人文藝術學院碩士論文。
    陳怡萱（2013）共同工作空間之經營模式探討。臺北教育大學 社會與區域發展學系專題報告。
    鄭吉村（2010）電傳勞動者之人際關係與社會網絡問題探究。中國文化大學勞動研究所碩士論文。

    四、其他
    國家發展委員會，2016，「亞洲.矽谷推動方案」，行政院第3514次會議，9月8日。
    臺中市政府經濟發展局（2015）社會創新培力計畫。臺中：臺中市政府。
    臺北市產業發展局（2015）青年創業與發展白皮書。臺北：臺北市政府。
    臺北市政府，2017，「Taipei DigiBlock」，臺北數位產業園區現勘記者會簡報資料，2月9日。

    五、英文參考文獻
    Ben-Akiva, and M., Richards, M., (1976), “Disaggregate Multimodal Model for Work Trips in the Netherlands”, Transport Research Record, 569.
    Bruce Katz and Julie Wagner, (2014), “The Rise of Innovation Districts”, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
    Bruno Moriset, (2013), “Building new places of the creative economy. The rise of coworking spaces”, 2nd Geography of Innovation International Conference 2014, Utrecht (The Netherlands), January 23 – January 25.
    CBRE (2013) The Work Shop: Global Report. London: CBRE
    Coleman, C. (1990) Social Network and Social Capital. NY: Sage.
    Christopher J. P. Hurry,2012,“The HUB Halifax: A Qualitative Study on Coworking”, A Major Research Project Submitted to St. Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Business Administration.
    Deskmag (2015) The 4th Global Coworking Survey. London: Deskmag Ink.
    Feng, Z. (2016) Co-working Space and Collaborative Innovation in Urban China. Paper Presented in 2016 Workshop of Green City and Better Life, Fuzhou University, 0319/2016.
    Gupta, A. (2009) The Co-Working Space Concept. CINE Term Prokect.
    George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Muhrbeck, A., R. Waller and M. Berglund (2011) Co-working: A Creative Workspace. JÖNKÖPING UNIVERSITY.
    Merkel, J. (2015). Coworking in the city. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 15(1), 121-139.
    Tammy Johns and Lynda Gratton., 2013, “Spotlight on The Future of Knowledge Work-The Third Wave Of Virtual Work”, Harvard Business Review, January–February 2013,2-9.
    六、網頁參考文獻
    中國生產力中心（2014）2013年生產力中心年度報告https://www.cpc.org.tw/ [access 2016.11.15]
    共同工作空間操作手冊https://www.facebook.com/coworkingspaceoperationsmanaul/ [access 2016.11.15]
    李永展（2013）創意城市新思維：共同工作空間（Coworking space），「全球臺商E焦點」，(229)。[access 2016.03.20]
    創立方
    http://www.iehnccu.com/ [access 2017.03.20]
    詹傑勝(2014)金融海嘯下的職場新鮮人：男女比一比。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續調查電子報第四期。[access 2016.03.20]
    臺灣共同工作空間交流協會（2015）臺灣共同工作空間交流協會概況。http://www.slideshare.net/CoworkingTaiwan/coworking-taiwan [access 2016.11.15]
    appWorks 之初創投
    http://appworks.tw/ [access 2017.03.20]
    Changee (2016）串串改變世界。
    http://changee.tw/ [access 2016.11.15].
    CBase (2015) CBase Homepage
    https://c-base.org/ [access 2016.11.15]
    Centre For Social Innovation (2009) Global Industrial Trend and Innovation. http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/the-future-of-manufacturing [access 2016.11.15]
    CLBC Flickr (2016) CLCB大艦Flickr
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/clbc/ [access 2016.11.15]
    Emergent Research (2016) Coworking Labs Merged With Small Business Labs. http://genylabs.typepad.com/coworking_labs/ [access 2016.11.15]
    FabLab USA (2016)US Fablab Network.
    http://usfln.org/ [access 2016.11.15]
    Future Ward 未來產房
    http://futureward.com/zh-hant/ [access 2017.03.20]
    IB Times (2015) RBS and RocketSpace to open co-working space in London for high-growth tech startups. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/rbs-rocketspace-open-co-working-space-london-high-growth-tech-startups-1559235 [access 2016.11.15]
    The Economist (2011) Setting the desk jockeys free. http://www.economist.com/node/21542190 [access 2016.11.15]
    Yi-Coworking (2016) 一起開工社區
    https://www.facebook.com/yigather/ [access 2016.11.15]
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系碩士在職專班
    103923007
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103923007
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Land Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    300701.pdf6093KbAdobe PDF242View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback