政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/116045
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造访人次 : 51185326      在线人数 : 916
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116045


    题名: 市值老二選股策略
    Second is better : a simple strategy for single stock selection
    作者: 張婉珍
    Chang, Wanchen
    贡献者: 周冠男
    Chou, Robin
    張婉珍
    Chang, Wanchen
    关键词: 大型股
    市值排名
    超額報酬
    動能策略
    定錨效應
    股價
    Large caps
    Market values ranking
    Outperformances
    Momentum strategy
    Anchoring bias
    Share prices
    日期: 2017
    上传时间: 2018-03-02 11:44:31 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 大型股過去一直被認為平均報酬率低於小型股,但如果從個股來看,不少大型股的績效並不會比指數差。考慮到一般非專業投資人在投資股票時,選擇大型股還是比小型股容易,本論文試圖建構一套在實務上較可行的大型個股選股策略—選擇市值第二大的股票,並定期調整個股。我們以美股標準普爾500指數中前兩大市值的股票,分為兩種投資組合做比較,結果發現,市值最大的股票不容易創造超額報酬,市值第二大的股票,反而締造極佳的超額報酬,此現象在過去3年、5年、10年,尤其較過去20年更為明顯。原因在於市值排名第二的股票,多半屬於排名仍在持續上升的成長股,這些個股基本面尚未到達頂點,故股價還會反應一段時間的基本面利多,採取類似動能策略(Momentum Strategy)的方法,報酬率容易超越指數;市值最大者則因為基本面普遍伴隨市值排名已經到頂,加上投資人對於排名第一的股票,多半易產生定錨效應(Anchoring Effect),即認為股價可能已經反應其該有的價值,較難創造超額報酬,傾向賣出。故同樣投資大型股,選擇市值第二名的股票會優於第一名。
    According to The Size Effect Theory, small cap securities generally generate greater returns than those of large cap companies. However, this trend has involved into the difficulties of stock picking due to the large number of small caps. In this paper I propose a strategy against the size effect theory, “Second is Better”, to pick the second largest market value security as the single stock investment. I examine the performances of the No.1 and the No.2 largest market cap stocks in the S&P500 and apply a 6-month rebalance to construct two different portfolios, which is similar to the concept of Momentum Strategy that buy the past winners and sell the past losers. I find the No.2 stock outperforms than No.1 stock and generate amazing excess returns in the near mid-to-long-term periods. Because No.1 stocks are more likely to experience Momentum Crash than No.2 stocks due to investor’s anchoring bias as they believe the No.1 stock might have been peaked. No.2 stocks are usually in the growing stages that many investors believe the 2nd largest caps still yet to peak during market value expansion.
    參考文獻: Banz, Rolf W. (1981). “The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks,” Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 3-18.
    Byun, Suk Joon and Jeon , Byoung Hyun (2015). “Momentum crashes and an investor’s anchoring bias”. Working paper.
    Cohen, Randolph, Christopher Polk, and Bernhard Silli. (May 2010). “Best Ideas.” Working paper, London School of Economics.
    Daniel, Kent D., and Tobias J. Moskowitz. (2014). “Momentum crashes”, Working paper
    Dijk , Mathijs A. van. (2006) “Is size dead? A review of the size effect in equity returns”. Journal of Banking & Finance, 5-6.
    Dowen, Richard J., and Bauman, W. Scott. (Spring 1986) “The relative importance of size, P/E, and neglect”. Journal of Portfolio Management.
    Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French. (March 1995 ) “Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns”. Journal of Finance.
    Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French. (June 1992) “The cross-section of expected stock returns”. Journal of Financial Economics.
    Gompers, P.A., Metrick, A. (2001) “Institutional investors and equity prices”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 229–259.
    Grey, Wesley R. (2014). “Does Size Effect Exist? Probably”. Blog.alphaarchitect. com.
    Jegadeesh, Narasimhan, and Sheridan Titman. (1993), “Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency”, Journal of Finance 48, 65-91.
    Lustig, Ivan L. and Philip A. Leinbach. (May–June 1983) “The Small Firm Effect.”Financial Analysts Journal 39, 46–49.
    Siegel, Jeremy (1994). “Stocks for the Long Run”, Chapter 6, page 95-96
    Sonders , Liz Ann. (2017) “Big Machine: Why Large Caps Are Likely to Outperform”, Advisor Perspectives, page 1-3, March 14, 2017
    Yeung, Danny, Paolo Pellizzari, Ron Bird, and Sazali Abidin. (2012) “Diversification versus Concentration …and the Winner is?” Working paper series, University of Technology Sydney.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    104932138
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104932138
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    213801.pdf689KbAdobe PDF285检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈