政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/116010

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/116010

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 50966497 在线人数 : 949

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 國際經營與貿易學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/116010

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116010

题名:	等量風險貢獻度投資組合在台灣股票市場之應用－以元大台灣卓越50ETF為例 Application of equal risk contribution portfolio in Taiwan stock market- Yuanta /P-shares Taiwan Top 50 ETF
作者:	郭宇珍 Guo, Yu Jhen
贡献者:	郭維裕郭宇珍 Guo,Yu Jhen
关键词:	等量風險貢獻度滾動視窗集中度 Equal risk contribution Rolling window Equity concentration
日期:	2017
上传时间:	2018-03-02 11:39:23 (UTC+8)
摘要:	近年來金融市場情勢瞬息萬變且波動劇烈而令投資人難以捉摸，導致被動式投資重獲投資人的青睞。市值加權法是最普遍被使用的指數編製方法，傳統市值加權指數的缺點，主要有投資組合主要集中於特定成份股與暴露於不會吸引風險溢價的各類風險因子中，這些缺點促成Smart Beta策略的發展，未來將有許多具備不同風險與報酬水準的指數供投資人參考。本研究選用近幾年提出不需仰賴預期報酬假說的等量風險貢獻度投資組合(ERC)建構方式，以台灣50為基準，利用其成份股建構投資組合，探討權重與風險分散特性，並且檢視其績效表現與報酬風險輪廓。為了有比較上的基礎，除了與台灣50做比較外，也另外選用以風險分散角度所配置的投資組合建構方法：等權重投資組合(EW)作對照。　　研究結果發現全樣本時期，等量風險貢獻度投資組合在事後相較於台灣50擁有較低的波動度。當市場趨勢向下時，除了能維持其低波動的特性，還能提供某種程度上的抗跌能力。然而，以報酬率和Sharpe Ratio指標來看，表現皆不如台灣50，但優於等權重投資組合。同時，依不同經濟狀況與時間區間檢視投資組合績效表現，等量風險貢獻度投資組合能將波動度控制在較低水準，但績效表現上較不穩定。　　本文透過HHI指數及吉尼係數衡量持股集中度與風險集中度。以持股權重分配的特性來說，台灣50極端集中於少數股票上，等量風險貢獻度投資組合和等權重投資組合則相對較平均。以風險權重分配的特性來說，台灣50風險權重過於集中，風險權重較平均分散的組合則為等量風險貢獻度投資組合。　　Traditional capitalization-weighted approaches are the most common ways to construct indexes. However, during market up turns, the capitalization-weighted indexes may be influenced by a small number of large-cap stocks. Smart beta indexes have recently prompted great interest among academic researchers and market practitioners. Risk-based indexes are an important category of smart beta. In this article, we explore equal risk contribution portfolio (ERC), which is risk-parity based smart beta. The portfolio implies to determine the weights so as to obtain the same risk contribution for each asset. The aim is to minimize the concentration in terms of risk contributions. In this paper, we examine whether or not ERC portfolio can outperform a buy and hold, capitalization-weighted and equally-weighted allocation in different economic environments. We also compute the parity in portfolio “risk allocation” and parity in “asset class allocation” using HHI index and Gini coefficient. 　　We consider here real-life applications with stock universe: the Yuanta /P-shares Taiwan Top 50 ETF. We compute smart beta portfolios by using the one-year empirical covariance matrix of stock returns. Empirical applications show that ERC portfolios generally are inferior in terms of return performance and Sharpe ratios. It does have some characteristics such as balanced risk allocation and less volatile performance characteristics. It also exposes to lower maximum drawdown. ERC portfolio provides the best ex ante and ex post “parity “in asset class risk contribution. On the other hand, the capitalization-weighted portfolio is concentrated in terms of weights and risk contributions. The statistics suggest to us that the capitalization-weighted portfolio’s superior Sharpe ratio is largely due to its higher returns.
參考文獻:	賀蘭芝，民國 104年10 月，「Risk Parity 投資組合配置分析」，JP Morgan 資產管理公司「2015 計量模型投資訓練課程」公務出國報告賀蘭芝，民國105年8月，「Factor-based 投資組合配置」，渣打銀行「亞洲央行外匯管理研討會」 Anderson, R.M.,S.W.Bianchi and L.R. Goldberg(2012),”Will My Risk Parity Strategy Outperform?”, Financial Analysts Journal, vol.68, no.6, pp.75-93. Asness, C.S.,Frazzini, A. and Pedersen, L.H.(2012), “Leverage Aversion and Risk Parity.”, Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 68, no.1, pp.47-59. A.R.Pagan and K.A.Sossounou, (2003) “A Simple Framework for Analyzing Bull and Bear Markets.”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol.18, no.1, pp.23-46. Arnott, R., Hsu J. and Moore P (2005),”Fundamental Indexation” Financial Analysts Journal, vol.61, no.2, pp.83-99. Barry Schachter and S. Ramu Thiagarjan (2011),”Risk Parity-Rewards, Risks and Research Opportunities”, The Journal of Investing, vol.20, no.1, pp.79-89. Benartzi S. and Thaler R.H. (2001), “Naïve Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Saving Plans“, American Economic Review, vol.91, no.1, pp.79-98. Blyth, S.,Szigety,M.C. and Xia,J.(2016).”Flexible Intermediate Factor-based Asset Allocation.”, The Journal of Portfolio Management, vol. 42, no.5, pp.79-93. Booth D. and Fama E. (1992),”Diversification and Asset Contributions.”, Financial Analyst Journal, vol.48, no.3, pp.26-32. Chaves D.,J.Hsu,F.li, and O.Shakernia(2011), “Risk Parity Portfolios vs. Other Asset Allocation Heuristic Portfolios.”, The Journal of Investing, vol.20, no.1, pp.108-118. Chaves, Denis, Jason Hsu, Feifei Li and Omid Shakernia (2012), “Efficient Algorithms for Computing Risk Parity Portfolio Weights.” Journal of Investing, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 150-163. Fabozzi,F.J. and J.C. Francis.(1979),”Mutual Fund Systematic Risk for Bull and Bear Markets: An Empirical Examination.” , Journal of Finance, vol.34, no.1,pp.1243-1250. Fernholtz R., Garry R. and Hannon J.(1998),”Diversity-weighted Indexing.”, Journal of Portfolio Management, vol.24, no.2, pp.74-82. Ledoit, O. and W. Michael (2004), “Honey, I Shrunk the Sample Covariance Matrix.” Journal of. Portfolio Management, vol.30, pp.110-119. Ledoit O, Wolf M. (2003),”Improved Estimation of the Covariance Matrix of Stock Returns with an Application to Portfolio Selection.” Journal of. Empirical Finance, vol.10, pp.603-621. Maillard,S.,Roncalli, T., and Teiletche, J.(2009),”On the Properties of Equally-weighted Risk Contributions Portfolios”, Journal of Portfolio Management. Maillard,S., Roncalli, T., and Teiletche, J.(2010),”The Properties of Equally Weighted Risk Contribution Portfolios.”, Journal of Portfolio Management, vol. 36, no. 4, pp.66-70. Millet, F. (2015). ”Smart Beta Broader than You Think.” Qian,E. (2005),” Risk Parity Portfolios: Efficient Portfolios through True Diversification ”, Panagora Asset Management. Qian,E. (2006), “On the Financial Interpretation of Risk Contribution: Risk Budgets Do Add Up.”, Journal of Investment Management, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 41-51. Qian,E.(2009), “Risk Parity Portfolios: The Next Generation”, Panagora Asset Management. Qian, E (Fall 2013). “Are Risk-Parity Managers at Risk Parity?” The Journal of Portfolio Management, vol.40, no.1, pp.20-26. Roger Clarke, Harindra de silva, and Steven Thorley. (Spring 2013),”Risk Parity, Maximum Diversification, and Minimum Variance: An Analytic Perspective.”, The Journal of Portfolio Management, vol.39, Iss.3:39-53, 11-12. Roncalli, T. (2014). “Introduction to risk parity and budgeting.” CRC Press. Windcliff H. and Boyle P. (2004), “The 1/n Pension Plan Puzzle.” North American Actuarial Journal, vol.8, pp.32-45.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學國際經營與貿易學系 104351019
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1043510192
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	大小	格式	浏览次数
019201.pdf	1800Kb	Adobe PDF2	32	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈