English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51023746      Online Users : 897
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/115932
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115932


    Title: The Burden of Proof and Prima Facie About The Cause of Accident-Discussing Based on the Decision of Taiwan High Courton the 14. Sep. 2011
    意外原因之舉證、證明度減低及表見證明--從臺灣高等法院100年度保險上字第18號判決談起
    Authors: 葉啟洲
    Yeh, Chi-Chou
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 傷害保險;原因說;結果說;舉證責任;複保險
    Accident Insurance;Accident Means;Accident Result;Injury insurance;burden of proof;Double Insurance
    Date: 2013-06
    Issue Date: 2018-02-08 16:22:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 關於傷害保險「意外事故」之要件,向來有原因說與結果說的爭議。在比較法上,英、美、德諸國已改採結果說,以擴大傷害保險對於被保險人的保障功能,但我國司法實務仍以原因說為多數見解,並將本屬保險人舉證範圍之「自願性」轉化為意外事故的「原因」,從而變為原告的舉證責任,明顯加重被保險人及受益人的舉證負擔。本文認為,在意外事故的要件上,應採結果說之理論,以還原「故意行為」應由保險人舉證的基本原則。
    With regard to the definition of "accident" in personal injury insurance, there are disputes among "Accident Means" and "Accident Result". In comparative law, England, America and Germany have adopted the "Accident Result", thus to expand the scope of protection to the insured. However, most of our domestic courts have summited the "Accident Means", by modifying the "voluntary act" into the" cause of the accident " which is supposed to be considered as the insurers`burden of proof. Consequently, this modification alters the burden of proof into insured`s accountability, augmenting the insured and the beneficiary`s liability. In conclusion, in order to amend "the intentional wrongdoing" as the burden for the insurer."Accident Result" should be adopted as a fundamental element within "injury insurance" for future reference.
    Relation: 保險專刊, Vol.29, No.1, pp.45-62
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2797View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback