政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/115752
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51137944      線上人數 : 870
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115752


    題名: 臺北市商業不動產財產稅稅基探討 -以觀光旅館與辦公大樓為例
    Exploring the property tax base of commercial properties--case studies of hotels and offices in Taipei City
    作者: 黃詩霓
    Huang, Shih-Ni
    貢獻者: 林子欽
    Lin, Tzu-Chin
    黃詩霓
    Huang, Shih-Ni
    關鍵詞: 商業不動產
    財產稅
    房屋稅
    成本價值
    租金價值
    Commercial property
    Property tax
    House tax
    Cost value
    Rental value
    日期: 2017
    上傳時間: 2018-02-02 11:29:22 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 財產稅素來為政府重要財政收入，有關財產稅稅基計算為政府與民眾關心之重要議題。國際上財產稅稅基評估方式，依收益來源之不同，可分為由「租金收入」所得之年租金價值，或由「交易」所得之市場價值。我國財產稅稅基為土地申報地價與房屋評定現值，屬於以成本法評估之市場價值。
    本研究經由稅基理論之文獻回顧，並針對臺北市觀光旅館與辦公大樓進行模擬分析與迴歸分析，研究結果發現，國際上財產稅稅基評估方式為市場價值或租金價值，應用於臺灣其實屬於「成本價值」與「收益價值」之爭。本研究認為，基於商業不動產經營獲利特性、交易型態與行政便利，並且符合量能課稅原則，商業不動產宜採用收益面之租金價值作為財產稅稅基；然而，現行制度僅反映不動產成本面，未反映不動產收益面。另外，若以租金價值作為稅基，需扣除無形資產之價值。
    最後，若財產稅稅制轉變為以租金價值作為稅基，就旅館而言，於政策上可以鼓勵廠商興建大規模觀光旅館，並對經營初期業者有利，對於旅館產業發展有助益。就辦公大樓而言，於政策上可以鼓勵廠商興建大規模辦公大樓，可以促進開發者整合較大面積土地進行開發。
    Property tax is one of the important tax revenues of the government. People care about how to calculate property tax base. There are two values-based approaches that depends on different revenue sources one is “Annual Rental Value” which is based on rents, the other is “Market Value” which is based on sales. The Taiwanese property tax is based on market value and on cost approach.
    The study explores the tax base theories and use differential tax incidence and regression model to test the property tax bases of hotels and offices. According to the literature, there are two main ways to assess the property tax bases: Market Value Basis and Annual Rental Value Basis. However, it turns out to be the difference of Cost Value and Income Value in Taiwan. Due to the revenue-generating feature and transaction style of commercial properties, administrative convenience and the ability-to-pay principle, the study suggests that we should use annual rental value as the property tax base of commercial properties. Nevertheless, the Taiwanese property tax base only reflects the cost of properties, not the revenue-generating capacities of properties. On the other hand, the rent value includes the intangible assets such as famous brand names, the additional value which is not from the property should be excluded from the tax base.
    Nevertheless, if the rental value is substituted for the cost value as a tax base, there will be some possible situations as a reference for policy makers. For hotels, it will encourage firms to construct big scale hotels, and it will be beneficial for the initial operation of hotels. For offices, it will encourage firms to construct big scale offices and it will promote the developers to create more land area as well.

    Keywords: commercial property, property tax, house tax, cost value, rental value
    參考文獻: 一、中文參考文獻
    1. 交通部觀光局，2016，『中華民國103年臺灣地區國際觀光旅館營運分析報告』，交通部觀光局
    2. 徐偉初、歐俊男、謝文盛，2012，『財政學』三版，臺北：華泰文化
    3. 黃曉薇，2015，「以量能課稅原則檢驗自用住宅房屋稅」。頁57-84，收錄於謝哲勝編，『房屋稅法律與政策』，台北：元照出版公司。

    二、英文參考文獻
    1. Almy, R. (2001). A survey of property tax systems in europe. Report prepared for Department of Taxes and Customs, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Slovenia. Retrieved December, 22, 2002.
    2. Bahl, R. W., & Linn, J. F. (1992). Urban public finance in developing countries. The World Bank.
    3. Ballentine, J. G., & Eris, I. (1975). On the general equilibrium analysis of tax incidence. Journal of Political Economy, 83(3), 633-644.
    4. Bates, T. D. (2006). Property Tax Assessment: Valuation Methods Combined for Leased Property. . & Loc. L. News, 30, 6.
    5. Bird, R. M., & Slack, E. (2004). Land and property taxation in 25 countries: a comparative review. International Handbook of Land and Property Taxation, 19.
    6. Bond, S., Denny, K., Hall, J., & McCluskey, W. (1996). Who pays business rates?. Fiscal Studies, 17(1), 19-35.
    7. Bowman, J. H. (1995). Taxation of business property: overview. in Taxation of business property: is uniformity still a valid norm?. Greenwood Publishing Group.
    8. Bowman, J. H., & Bell, M. E. (2008). Distributional consequences of converting the property tax to a land value tax: Replication and extension of England and Zhao. National Tax Journal, 593-607.
    9. Bowman, J. H., & Bell, M. E. (2008). Distributional consequences of converting the property tax to a land value tax: Replication and extension of England and Zhao. National Tax Journal, 593-607.
    10. Brown, H. G. (1928). Taxing rental versus taxing salable value of land. The Journal of Political Economy, 164-168.
    11. Brown, P. K., & Hepworth, M. A. (2000). A study of european land tax systems. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
    12. Chen, C. F., & Rothschild, R. (2010). An application of hedonic pricing analysis to the case of hotel rooms in Taipei. Tourism Economics, 16(3), 685-694.
    13. Cornia, G. C., & Slade, B. A. (2006). Horizontal inequity in the property taxation of apartment, industrial, office, and retail properties. National Tax Journal, 33-55.
    14. Cornia,(1995). Perspective on the Business Property Base. in Taxation of business property: is uniformity still a valid norm?. Greenwood Publishing Group.
    15. Dunse, N., & Jones, C. (1998). A hedonic price model of office rents, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 16(3), 297-312.
    16. England, R. W., & Zhao, M. Q. (2005). Assessing the Distributive Impact of a Revenue—Neutral Shift from a Uniform Property Tax to a Two-Rate Property Tax with a Uniform Credit. National Tax Journal, 247-260.
    17. England, R. W., & Zhao, M. Q. (2005). Assessing the Distributive Impact of a Revenue—Neutral Shift from a Uniform Property Tax to a Two-Rate Property Tax with a Uniform Credit. National Tax Journal, 247-260.
    18. Fischel, W. A. (1992). Property taxation and the Tiebout model: Evidence for the benefit view from zoning and voting.
    19. Franzsen, R., & McCluskey, W. J. (2013). Value‐based approaches to property taxation. A Primer on Property Tax: Administration and Policy, 41-68.
    20. Goldberg, L., & Kersten, D. (2004). California commercial property tax study. California Tax Reform Association.
    21. Hennessey, S. (1993). Myths About Hotel Business and Personality Values. The Appraisal Journal, 608-611.
    22. Johnson, J. H. (2013). Variation In Commercial Property Tax Appraisal Accuracy In Texas.
    23. Kefela, M. S. (2014). Determinants of hotel room rates in Stockholm: A hedonic pricing approach. Södertörn University, Institution of Social Sciences.
    24. Lesser, D. H., & Rubin, K. E. (1993). Understanding the unique aspects of hotel property tax valuation. Appraisal Journal, 61(1), p9.
    25. Mak, J. (2015). Research note: Are hotel property taxes fully passed on to hotel guests? Implications from recent research on property tax incidence. Tourism Economics, 21(4), 899-905.
    26. Man, J. Y. (1995). The incidence of differential commercial property taxes: Empirical evidence. National Tax Journal, 479-496.
    27. Matonis, S. J., & DeRango, D. R. (1993). The determination of hotel value components for ad valorem tax assessment. Appraisal Journal, 61, 342-342.
    28. McCluskey, W. J., & Bell, M. E. (2008). Rental value versus capital Value: alternative bases for the property tax (No. paper0818). International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    29. McGuire, T. J. (1999). Proposition 13 and its offspring: For good or for evil?. National Tax Journal, 129-138.
    30. Mieszkowski, P. (1969). Tax incidence theory: The effects of taxes on the distribution of income. Journal of Economic Literature, 7(4), 1103-1124.
    31. Monty, B., & Skidmore, M. (2003). Hedonic pricing and willingness to pay for bed and breakfast amenities in Southeast Wisconsin. Journal of Travel Research, 42(2), 195-199.
    32. Muthitacharoen, A., & Zodrow, G. R. (2012). Revisiting the excise tax effects of the property tax. Public Finance Review, 40(5), 555-583.
    33. Orr, L. L. (1968). The incidence of differential property taxes on urban housing. National Tax Journal, 21(3), 253-262.
    34. Owens, R. W. (2000). Valuation and the property tax. Appraisal Journal, 68(3), 340-350.
    35. Phillips, A., Sallee, C., Sufranski, D.,& Larimore, E. (2015). Total state and local business taxes. Council on State Taxation.
    36. Plummer, E. (2010). Evidence on the distributional effects of a land value tax on residential households. National Tax Journal, 63(1), 63-92.
    37. Plummer, E. (2010). Evidence on the distributional effects of a land value tax on residential households. National Tax Journal, 63(1), 63-92.
    38. Reason, T. (2004). Poor move? Property tax is not just one of the biggest tax expenses that companies face it`s also one of the worst managed. CFO, 20(2), 35-39.
    39. Rogers, T. and Blake,N. (2013). The role of commercial property in the UK economy. IPF Research Programme 2011–2015.
    40. Taussig, F.W. and Litt, D. (1921). Principles of Economics: Volume II, Third Edition Revised, The Macmillian Co., New York.
    41. The appraisal of real estate (2008). The appraisal of real estate. Appraisal Institute, US., Chicago, Ill. 13th ed
    42. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The journal of political economy, 416-424.
    43. Williams, D. (2011). What do business rates measure?. Local Economy, 26(3), 145-156.
    44. Youngman(1995). Special Problems in the Valuation of Business Property. in Taxation of business property: is uniformity still a valid norm?. Greenwood Publishing Group.


    三、網頁參考文獻
    1. 蔡惠芳、王榮章，2016年6月8日，「房屋稅新制大暴走！ 劉文治：投資台灣前要三思」，中時電子報，2016年12月10日
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    104257003
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104257003
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    700301.pdf1857KbAdobe PDF2295檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋