English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50921018      Online Users : 938
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115263


    Title: 建立國際連結的機會與挑戰：印度對於中國「一帶一路」計畫的觀點
    Opportunities and Challenges of Building International Connectivity: The Indian Perspective on China’s ＂One Belt and One Road＂ Initiative
    Authors: 方天賜
    Fang, Tien-Sze
    Keywords: 一帶一路;國際連結;中巴經濟走郎;孟中印緬經濟走廊
    One Belt One Road;International Connectivity;China-Pakistan Economic Corridor;Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor
    Date: 2017-06
    Issue Date: 2017-12-19 16:41:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 印度是中國規劃「絲綢之路經濟帶」和「21世紀海上絲綢之路」（「一帶一路」）的沿線國家之一。但新德里迄今尚未決定是否加入此計畫。事實上，印度內部對於加入與否有不同意見。為提供對此議題的不同分析角度，本文將採用國際連結的觀點，來檢視印度對於「一帶一路」的政策及回應。對印度而言，「一帶一路」雖提供經濟利益，卻也帶來地緣政治的隱憂。印度在參與國際連結時，則傾向成為網絡的中心。綜合考量相關因素之下，本文認為，印度可能有條件性地回應「一帶一路」計畫：即參加孟中印緬經濟走廊建設，但反對中巴經濟走廊。
    India is among the countries invited to join China’s initiative to build the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road（the OBOR）. New Delhi has not yet decided whether to join. In fact, there is a diversity of opinion within India. This paper proposes an alternative perspective for examining India’s policy and responses to the OBOR from the perspective of international connectivity. For India, the OBOR presents both economic benefits and geopolitical concerns. Particularly, India prefers to be the hub of the network of international connectivity. To bracket the concerns together, this paper suggests that India may offer conditional support to the OBOR, join the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor (BCIM-EC), but oppose the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor （CPEC）.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究,60:2,87-108
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    60(2)(87-108).pdf376KbAdobe PDF257View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback