English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50831174      Online Users : 777
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115053


    Title: 社會正義之理論與制度實踐—(子計畫七)身心障礙者平等參與社會之權利及公部門提供無障礙環境之積極作為義務
    The Rights of People with Disabilities to Equally Participate in the Society and the Positive Obligations of the Public Sectors to Create Barrier Free Environment
    Authors: 孫迺翊
    Contributors: 法律學系
    Keywords: 歧視;平等;身心障礙者;積極義務;無障礙;公法上請求權;合理調整;保護規範說;英國1995年身心障礙者反歧視法;英國2010年平等法;德國2002身心障礙者無障礙平等法;歐洲人權公約;身心障礙者權益保障法
    discrimination;equality;people with disabilities;positive obligation;barrier free;legal right;reasonable accommodation/ reasonable adjustment;theory of protective norms;UK Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA);UK Equal Act 2010;German Law on the Equalization of Disabled Persons 2002 (LEDP)/ Behindertengleichstellungsgesetz (BGG);European Convention on Human Rights;People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2017-12-08 14:33:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 依照我國憲法第7條之規定，身心障礙者與其他一般國民享有相同的基本權利保障，我國憲法增修條文第10條第7項進一步明文：「國家對於身心障礙者之保險與就業、無障礙環境之建構、教育訓練與就業輔導及生活維護與救助，應予保障，並扶助其自立與發展」。為落實上述憲法意旨，保障身心障礙者平等參與社會之權利，身心障礙者權益保障法規定許多國家積極作為，包括開發或提供輔具或便利設施，手語服務或視障者能夠使用之教具教材與圖書設備等等，但「經費缺乏」、「身心障礙者只是少數人，資源必須作有效配置」經常是公部門怠於執行的理由，其背後則隱含著整體法秩序對身障者的結構性歧視。 本計畫之研究目的在於探究英國、德國以及歐洲人權法有關平等原則積極促進內涵之實務與學說，並且依照我國憲法及身心障礙者權益保障法之規定，分析公部門應負擔何種內容之無障礙設施設置義務，身障者有無相對應的請求權，公部門若未提供適當輔具給予身心障礙應考人，是否即構成對身心障礙者之歧視等問題。本計畫希望透過學說的充實，提供身心障礙者主張權益更完整的論述，使憲法保障身障者享有平等參與社會、自立發展的意旨能夠真正落實。
    According to Art. 7 of the Constitution of the Republic of China (R.O.C.) the fundamental rights of people with disabilities shall be equally guarantied as the rights of others. In addition, Art. 10, Paragraph 7 of the Additional Articles of Constitution of R.O.C. proclaims that the State shall provide insurance, medical care, barrier-free environments, education and training, vocational guidance, and support and assistance in everyday life for physically and mentally handicapped persons, and shall also assist them to attain independence and to develop. In order to carry out the constitutional requirements mentioned above which are substantially stipulated by the “People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act” (PDRPA), the State are under obligation to create or provide public facilities, such like sing language, accessible reading materials for aurally or visually impaired people or other reasonable accommodations. Unfortunately the State always neglects their obligation by stating that “we are short of budget” or “public resources should be distributed efficiently of the majorities but not for the minorities like people with disabilities. This excuse unveils the structural discrimination against disabled people in the whole legal systems. The purpose of this research is to explore the theories and conventions that promote the principle of equality for human rights of people with disabilities practiced in England, Germany and European. Based on the comparative studies and the regulations of constitution of R.O.C. and PDRPA, this research will analyze the legal issues in Taiwan such as which extent of the barrier-free environments the public sectors are obligate to provide, whether the disabled people have the rights to appeal for such facilities, and whether the public sectors have committed discrimination against disabled if the state doesn’t provide recommendation and forced the people with disabilities to compete with general persons in case of recruitment initiated by the public sectors. This project aims at providing theoretical basis for the rights of people with disabilities in support of their equal participation in the society and their independent development in personality.
    Relation: 執行起迄：2013/01/01~2016/03/31
    102-2420-H-004-012-MY3
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML35View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback